我发现创业者特别喜欢这样搞啊，先集资后跑路。最近宁波又爆了一个"10亿茅台期货"惊天大雷，十五年的白酒行业创业者失联： 宁波酒商搞茅台期货庞氏骗局，10亿茅台期货暴雷了，他高价收低价卖玩击鼓传花，结果茅台价格暴跌，10亿资金盘崩盘跑 路，投资者血本无归。爆雷前该负责人已办理港澳通行证，公司账户资金清零，公司办公场所人去楼空，仓库货物被转移。 2010年，X老板代理茅台镇酱酒起家 最初是贵州某烧坊酱酒品牌的浙江及江西省级总代理，经营模式也很传统就是一手交钱，一手交货，主要卖茅台镇酱酒(非茅台)。 2020年，X老板开始搞期货 做茅台官方代理门槛挺高的：(1)要交3000万保证金，而且第一次进货要100万以上(省级代理)(2)年流水要达到3500以上，(3) 有稳定的销售渠道，实体店等等， X老板大概率是做不了的。所以做了擦边，(4年后还被茅台起诉过)，而且这一年飞天茅台疯涨，散瓶价从2000涨至2800。你说这么赚钱 的事谁看了不眼红? 这个X老板啊，根本就不是茅台正规代理商，拿不到稳定的低价货源。但他脑子活，整了个"茅台期货"的套路——1600一瓶预售飞天茅 台(当时市场价要2200-2800)，说好3-6个 ...

以下文章来源于南风窗 ，作者朱秋雨 南风窗 . 冷静地思考，热情地生活。 | 企业名称 | 浙江永坤控股有限公司 | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 法定代表人 | 流 汪国海 【关联企业 14 | 登记状态 (2 | 存续 | 天眼评分 ⑦ | 89 % | | | | 成立日期 | 2014-03-13 | | | | 统一社会信用代码 2 | 91330102093318244G | 注册资本 1 | 10230万人民币 | 实增资本 | 4210万人民币 | | 工商注册号 | 330102000118923 | 纳税人识别号 ① | 91330102093318244G | 组织机构代码 ① | 09331824-4 | | 营业期限 | 2014-03-13 至 2034-03-12 | 纳税人资质 | 增值税一般纳税人 | 核准日期 | ம் | | 企业类型 | 有限责任公司(自然人独资) | 行业 | 商务服务业 | 人员规模 | 50-aa Y | | 参保人数 | 72 2023年报> ~ | 英文名称 | Zhejiang ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the emergence of a blockchain project named "Oladin Origin," which masquerades as a DeFi 3.0 initiative but is revealed to be a Ponzi scheme that has defrauded over 500,000 investors, accumulating more than 10 billion yuan in funds [1][3][21]. Group 1: Project Overview - "Oladin Origin" claims to create the world's first privacy-focused payment ecosystem and a comprehensive Web3 financial ecosystem [1]. - The project attracted over 500,000 members and raised more than 10 billion yuan within nine months, leveraging the reputation of the Olympus DAO core team [3]. - The project outlines a three-phase blueprint, including the use of the algorithmic non-stablecoin LGNS as a financial ecosystem's foundation [7]. Group 2: Mechanisms of Deception - The project employs a complex economic model with six contract systems designed to create an illusion of a closed-loop economy [7]. - It promotes a misleading "economic flywheel theory" that obscures its Ponzi structure [7]. - Users are promised high static returns through staking LGNS, with claims of a daily return of 1.2%, equating to an annualized return of 44% [10]. Group 3: Recruitment and Incentives - The project features a multi-level marketing structure, allowing users to earn commissions through a 15-level referral system [12]. - A strict membership tier system incentivizes users to recruit others, with potential earnings of up to 25% from team performance [13]. Group 4: Control and Manipulation - The project falsely claims that each LGNS token is backed by a stable asset, creating a false sense of security [17]. - The project manipulates token prices through automatic adjustments based on market conditions, allowing the operators to control the market signals [18]. - The design of liquidity and reserve bonds serves as a mechanism for the project to cash out while delaying token sell pressure [19]. Group 5: Warning Signs of Fraud - Promises of unreasonably high returns, such as a daily return exceeding 1%, are indicative of a Ponzi scheme [21]. - The reliance on a multi-level recruitment system is a hallmark of pyramid schemes [22]. - Lack of transparency in contracts and the anonymity of the team raise red flags about the project's legitimacy [23]. - The project employs deceptive marketing tactics, claiming to be an international initiative without substantial operational backing [24].

以下文章来源于大胡子财研社 ，作者湾区区长 大胡子财研社 . 真人实地调研，专注楼市研究10余年！大胡子教买房为您带来一手消息，助您预判楼市风向，实现资产 稳步增长！ 最近黄金的价格相比关S谈判之后稍微往上涨了一点，最新的黄金价格已经反弹到了3345元/盎 司。 但是我要提醒一下大家，现在买黄金的话，要小心B雷。 最近关于黄金投资出了一档子事，那就是 浙江黄金综合服务商 - 永坤黄金的 庞氏骗局事件。 这件事是怎么回事呢？ 简单说，就是投资人发现在永坤黄金购买的黄金产品无法提现了，平台客服电话也不再有人接 听。 一查才发现，这家黄金综合服务商不仅线下的门店没有了，据说连老板都跑路了。 这老板为什么跑路？ 因为资金链断了，同时引发了大规模的挤兑。 而且最气人的是，这老板不是没钱，他是把钱都转出去买了比特币，把钱都洗白了。 等同于这人里面赚一道、外面又赚一道。 但是机构买的不是黄金，压根没有那么多现金流兑付，最后结果就只能是B雷。 那为什么这件事引起了很多人的反响？ 因为涉及到的资金量太大，据说 涉及到了100多亿的RMB，中招的主要都是浙江本地的老板。 这些老板为什么买这个机构的黄金， 他们其实贪的不是黄金能涨 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article questions whether Bitcoin is truly a decentralized investment or a significant financial trap, suggesting that the reality behind Bitcoin is not as favorable as perceived by many [3][5]. Group 1: Bitcoin Ownership and Market Manipulation - A significant portion of Bitcoin is held by certain American financial groups, which manipulate the market by creating false demand through internal transfers [3]. - The potential for Bitcoin's price to rise is heavily dependent on the involvement of Chinese capital, which could lead to further price increases if they start acquiring large amounts of Bitcoin [3]. Group 2: Decentralization and Control - The notion of Bitcoin being decentralized is challenged, as transactions can be tracked through centralized exchanges, undermining the idea of true decentralization [5]. - Despite Bitcoin's lack of a central authority on the blockchain, its price is influenced by wealthy holders, indicating a form of centralized control over the market [5]. Group 3: Regulatory Environment and Future Implications - The regulatory actions taken by the U.S. against individuals in the cryptocurrency space, such as Zhao Changpeng, highlight the risks associated with operating in a market controlled by American regulations [7]. - The future of Bitcoin may be influenced by the ongoing regulatory pressures from the U.S., which could impact its market performance and the dynamics of capital flow [7][9].

Core Viewpoint - The article reveals a significant financial fraud involving Yongkun Gold, where the owner absconded with billions, leaving hundreds of families devastated and highlighting the dangers of high-yield investment schemes in the gold market [2][12][24]. Company Overview - Yongkun Gold was established by Wang Guohai, who initially gained recognition as a gold trader and analyst in Shanghai. The company operated under a unique investment model that promised high returns, claiming to be a leader in the gold investment sector [16][18]. - The company had 23 physical stores before the owner fled, and its business model involved customers purchasing gold but not taking physical possession, instead agreeing to a buyback at a future date based on market conditions [18][20]. Financial Impact - Reports indicate that victims have lost between 20 to 40 billion yuan, with estimates suggesting total losses could approach 100 billion yuan [12][14]. - One victim reported investing over 5 million yuan, only to see it vanish when the company ceased operations [10]. Investment Model and Risks - Yongkun Gold's investment model was characterized by promises of guaranteed returns, with claims of annual yields reaching up to 9% [22]. However, this model has been likened to a Ponzi scheme, where new investments are used to pay returns to earlier investors [26]. - The company’s operations were marked by high leverage and unsustainable financial practices, ultimately leading to its insolvency [24][26]. Market Context - The article notes that the current international climate has made gold a favored investment, with predictions of significant price increases over the next decade [5][7]. However, this environment has also attracted fraudulent schemes like Yongkun Gold, which exploited investor greed [3][14].

Group 1 - The core idea of the article revolves around the fraudulent practices of Yongkun Gold, which attracted 4.1 billion yuan in investments through a deceptive marketing model promising low-risk, high-return gold investments [1][3][32] - Yongkun Gold's business model involved "gold custody," where investors would not physically hold their gold but would have it stored by the company, creating uncertainty regarding gold price fluctuations during the custody period [5][8][10] - The company promised investors that if gold prices fell during the custody period, they could receive a refund at the original contract price, which led to a surge in investments as it appeared to eliminate risk [10][12][16] Group 2 - Yongkun Gold expanded rapidly, opening over 2,000 stores nationwide and attracting a wide range of investors, including employees who invested their salaries [14][16] - The company provided "gold insurance policies" for each transaction, which misled investors into believing their investments were secure, while the fine print excluded coverage for company fraud [21][23] - Ultimately, the owner of Yongkun Gold absconded with approximately 4.1 billion yuan, leaving around 12,000 investors with significant losses, some reaching millions [32][36]

Core Viewpoint - The financial sector is facing a significant crisis as multiple gold investment firms, particularly Yongkun Group, have collapsed, leading to substantial financial losses for investors, some of whom have lost millions [1][20][30] Group 1: Company Overview - Yongkun Group operated a complex gold investment scheme that misled investors into believing they were purchasing gold with guaranteed returns, which turned out to be a Ponzi scheme [3][11] - The company promised annual returns as high as 9%, significantly above the bank deposit rate of 3.45%, which attracted many investors [5][6] - The investment model involved both online and offline channels, where customers signed contracts for gold storage and repurchase, creating a facade of security [8][9] Group 2: Investment Scheme Details - The contracts included clauses that promised to refund the original price if gold prices fell, which was a key selling point for attracting investors [6][11] - The scheme relied on continuous influx of new investors to sustain operations, ultimately leading to financial collapse when new investments dried up [11][24] - Prior to the collapse, the company was still actively promoting investment opportunities and running promotional campaigns, indicating a desperate attempt to gather more funds [15][16] Group 3: Investor Impact - Many investors, including families, invested significant amounts, with some losing over 12 million yuan, leading to extreme emotional distress and even suicidal thoughts among victims [22][30] - The network of victims expanded widely, with over 60% of investors being referred by friends, showcasing the extensive reach of the company's marketing tactics [24][26] - The collapse has left a large number of investors in financial ruin, with reports of individuals losing their life savings and facing severe financial consequences [20][22] Group 4: Management and Legal Issues - The company's founder, Wang Guohai, has been described as a key figure behind the scheme, with a history of operating multiple companies, many of which have been dissolved [26][28] - Following the collapse, it was revealed that the promised gold reserves, valued at 4.1 billion yuan, were nonexistent, leading to legal investigations [28][30] - The authorities have initiated investigations, but recovery of lost funds for investors remains uncertain, highlighting the risks associated with high-return investment schemes [30]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the dual issues in the gold market, focusing on the fraudulent practices in Shenzhen's Shui Bei area and the collapse of Yongkun Gold, which has significantly impacted investor trust and market integrity [1][3][36]. Group 1: Gold Market Overview - Gold has historically been a symbol of wealth and a safe haven in economic turmoil, with prices soaring to four-digit levels this year, making it less accessible for potential buyers [1]. - Shenzhen Shui Bei is recognized as a major hub for gold and jewelry, accounting for over 50% of the domestic gold transaction volume, but it has recently become a hotspot for fraudulent activities [5][9]. - The price advantage of gold in Shui Bei compared to branded stores attracts many consumers, especially during peak times like weekends [9][11]. Group 2: Fraudulent Practices - Investigations revealed serious fraud in Shui Bei, including the sale of gold-plated items disguised as real gold, which are difficult for average consumers to identify without professional testing [11][13]. - Common fraudulent methods include "gold-plated silver" and "aluminum gold," where merchants mislead consumers by marking fake items as genuine gold [13][15]. - The prevalence of such fraud has raised concerns about consumer protection and the integrity of the gold market [19]. Group 3: Yongkun Gold Collapse - Yongkun Gold, established in 2014, attracted many investors with seemingly attractive investment products promising high returns, but it turned out to be a well-structured scam [21][32]. - The company employed a Ponzi scheme model, using new investors' funds to pay returns to earlier investors, which became unsustainable as market conditions changed [34]. - Reports indicate that clients have entrusted Yongkun with 5,359 kilograms of gold, valued at approximately 4.1 billion yuan, highlighting the scale of the collapse [34]. Group 4: Market Implications - The fraudulent activities in Shui Bei and the collapse of Yongkun Gold serve as a cautionary tale for investors, emphasizing the need for vigilance and the importance of choosing reputable dealers in the gold market [36].

Core Viewpoint - Yongkun Gold has collapsed, affecting a significant number of middle-class individuals, small business owners, and wealthy families in the Yangtze River Delta, with the involved amount exceeding 2 billion [2] Group 1: Business Model and Operations - Yongkun Gold is not a traditional gold retailer but positions itself as a "comprehensive gold service provider," offering investment certificates instead of physical gold [4] - The company attracted investors with high-interest promises, initially offering annual returns as high as 9%, later stabilizing around 7%, significantly above market averages [4] - The business model relied on a Ponzi scheme structure, using new investor funds to pay returns to earlier investors rather than purchasing actual gold [6][8] Group 2: Investor Impact - Many investors, including families, invested substantial amounts, with some families investing up to 20 million [6] - As gold prices surged, investors rushed to withdraw their funds, leading to a liquidity crisis for Yongkun Gold, which could not fulfill withdrawal requests [7] - Employees of Yongkun Gold also suffered losses, with reports of them losing their life savings and facing financial distress [8] Group 3: Market Context and Warnings - The recent surge in gold prices attracted many investors seeking high returns, leading them to overlook the risks associated with high-yield investments [9][10] - The collapse of Yongkun Gold serves as a warning against high-yield investment promises, especially in a changing interest rate environment where traditional safe investments yield lower returns [12][19] - The situation reflects a broader issue of similar Ponzi schemes in China, indicating a systemic risk in the investment landscape [12]