"其（长虹集团投资有限公司）名字和我们公司太接近了，很容易误导大家。"一位长虹控股的内部人士 对证券时报·e公司记者表示。 记者通过网络搜索发现，上述打假声明中提到的Ox Cap交易所的公开信息很少。 根据一些网友零星发布的信息来看，这个平台于去年10月上线，打着"长虹集团"名义推出虚拟币跟投项 目，通过OXCAP软件下单，最低投资1500美元，每日收益不低于1%，根据直推人数和伞下人数获得分 红、晋级奖励。另设多种报销、推荐奖励，但均以拉新人数作为衡量标准。 但根据网友所称，上述所谓的会员交易从未真正进入任何金融市场，平台展示的"交易记录"、"盈利截 图"均为后台操控的虚假数据。交易本质是"拆东墙补西墙"的庞氏骗局，用新用户的本金支付老用户 的"收益"，最终目的是卷款跑路。 为了刺激老人拉新，这个平台还许诺报销餐费、路费、住宿费等。 7月31日晚间，四川长虹电子控股集团有限公司（下称"长虹控股"）微信公众号发布打假声明。 长虹控股在声明中表示，公司近日多次收到社会公众反映，称有人以"长虹集团投资有限公司""长虹集 团""长虹集团财富团队"等名义在线上线下开展吸引社会公众金融投资等活动。长虹控股公开郑重声 明 ...

Group 1 - The project Htxunion is misleadingly promoting itself as affiliated with major brands like Huobi and TRON, but there is no official recognition from these entities [2][4] - Htxunion claims to provide a "green channel" for listing on HTX exchange, but the actual requirements are much stricter, making their claims deceptive [4] - The transaction fees for users are exorbitantly high at 30%, with an additional 5% withdrawal fee, which is significantly higher than the standard rates [4][5] Group 2 - The promised static returns of 0.4%-1.2% daily translate to an unrealistic annualized return of 438%, far exceeding legitimate financial products [5][6] - Htxunion employs a pyramid scheme structure, offering commissions for recruiting new members, which has been classified as illegal by authorities [5][6] - The project is at high risk of collapse, as the model requires constant influx of new participants to sustain payouts, similar to other failed schemes [5][6] Group 3 - The project operates in violation of existing regulations that classify virtual currency-related activities as illegal financial operations, exposing participants to legal risks [6][7] - Claims of guaranteed returns or "bottom line" for coin listings are unfounded, as many meme coins fail upon listing, and no exchange can assure such outcomes [7][8] - The digital figures displayed in the Htxunion app are compared to gambling machines, indicating a lack of real value and potential for total loss [8]

Core Viewpoint - The rise of stablecoins has led to an increase in financial scams, with platforms like "Xin Kang Jia" using stablecoins as a facade for Ponzi schemes, attracting over 2 million investors and involving more than 10 billion yuan [1][2]. Group 1: Nature of the Scam - "Xin Kang Jia" presents itself as a legitimate investment platform by claiming to be a Chinese branch of the Dubai Gold and Commodities Exchange (DGCX), promising unrealistic returns of 1% daily, equating to an annualized return of 365% [2]. - The platform requires investors to convert their yuan into Tether (USDT) before depositing, creating an illusion of cross-border asset allocation and enhancing its credibility [2][3]. - The scam operates by leveraging the popularity of stablecoins, blurring the lines between payment and investment attributes, and enticing investors with high returns [2][3]. Group 2: Regulatory Challenges - Many of these scams, including "Xin Kang Jia," utilize stablecoins to bypass traditional financial regulations, making it difficult for authorities to track and recover funds [4][7]. - The lack of regulatory oversight in mainland China allows these platforms to operate illegally, with warnings issued by various local financial authorities regarding the risks associated with stablecoins [7][8]. - The scams have increasingly spread to lower-tier cities and rural areas, where residents have limited understanding of stablecoins and blockchain technology, making them more susceptible to fraud [6][7]. Group 3: Investor Behavior and Market Trends - Investors are often driven by greed and misinformation, leading them to participate in these schemes despite the risks involved [5][8]. - The narrative surrounding stablecoins is often manipulated to present them as innovative financial products, attracting a wide range of investors, including the elderly [6][8]. - The ongoing trend indicates that future scams will become more sophisticated, utilizing advanced technology and exploiting regulatory gaps globally [8].

Group 1 - The article highlights that the investment scheme related to "嘉楠科技" (Canaan Inc.) is a fraudulent Ponzi scheme, misleading investors with promises of high returns [2][4] - It emphasizes that the so-called investment opportunities, which claim to turn $200 into $50,000 with an annualized return of 300%, are unrealistic and designed to exploit those seeking quick wealth [2][3] - The article warns that the actual company, Canaan Inc., is a legitimate publicly traded company focused on mining machines and has no involvement in the alleged profit-sharing scheme [4][5] Group 2 - The article discusses the psychological factors driving individuals to participate in such schemes, primarily greed and the desire to recover losses, leading them to invest more [3][5] - It provides a method to identify fraudulent schemes, including checking the legitimacy of the company, calculating the promised returns, and monitoring the flow of funds [4][5] - The article concludes with a strong warning against multi-level marketing tactics and advises individuals to report any suspicious activities to authorities [5]

Core Insights - The recent collapse of the "Xinkangjia" platform has raised concerns in the market, with many investors attempting to withdraw funds, indicating potential further issues with similar platforms [1] - The existence of funding schemes is primarily driven by greed, necessitating both regulatory action and investor awareness to combat high-yield temptations [1] Group 1: Recent Developments - Multiple funding schemes, including "Yifeng Financial" (also known as "Xinlizhong" and "Xinbaili"), have been flagged as high-risk, with promises of monthly returns between 20% to 50% and a 45-day capital return guarantee [2] - The "Yifeng Financial" platform has been accused of using misleading tactics, including impersonating a legitimate company to gain credibility [2][4] - The "Aixinghe" platform has also been warned, with participants reporting difficulties in withdrawing funds, highlighting a pattern of operational issues across various platforms [7] Group 2: Characteristics of Funding Schemes - Funding schemes typically exhibit a "return on investment" model, characterized by static and dynamic returns, with higher returns often correlating with lower credibility [9] - Participants in these schemes can be categorized into three groups: "operators," "smart investors," and "naive investors," with the latter often suffering the most significant losses [9][11] - Common signs of impending collapse in funding schemes include withdrawal issues, sudden high-reward promotions, and frequent changes to operational rules [7][9] Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Context - Legal risks associated with funding schemes include charges of fundraising fraud, illegal public fundraising, and leading pyramid schemes, with severe penalties for those involved [13] - The evolution of funding schemes has seen a shift towards virtual operations, complicating law enforcement efforts due to the use of overseas accounts and cryptocurrencies [12] - The trend indicates a rapid increase in the number of victims and a decrease in the lifespan of these schemes, with some collapsing within as little as ten days [12]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversial situation surrounding the "DGCX Xin Kang Jia Data" trading platform, highlighting the alleged fraudulent activities and the mysterious figure known as "Mr. Huang" who is believed to be the founder, Huang Xin [2][4][5]. Group 1: Company Background - Xin Kang Jia was established on March 1, 2021, with Huang Xin, Shao Xin Kang, and Wang Yan Jia as shareholders, holding 35%, 35%, and 30% respectively [4]. - Huang Xin has never held a specific management position in Guizhou Xin Kang Jia, raising questions about his role and identity as "Mr. Huang" [5][6]. - The company has been linked to a series of operational irregularities, including being listed in the business anomaly directory due to uncontactable registered addresses [4][17]. Group 2: Operational Model - Xin Kang Jia employed a strategy of leveraging a "state-owned enterprise identity" and utilized digital currency for transactions, which attracted a large number of members quickly [7][10]. - The platform operated on a pyramid scheme model, categorizing members into nine levels with increasing rewards based on the number of recruits [9][10]. - Members were encouraged to recruit others, with the organization divided into "four major battle zones" for promotional activities [8][9]. Group 3: Current Situation - As of June 26, 2023, the platform faced severe operational issues, including withdrawal suspensions, leading to widespread panic among its 1.8 million members and potential financial losses exceeding 10 billion yuan [2][11][17]. - Huang Xin's alleged departure with funds has led to a split among members, with some still believing in the platform's recovery while others seek legal recourse [13][14]. - Regulatory bodies have issued warnings about Xin Kang Jia, labeling it a typical pyramid scheme and indicating that it lacks legal operational status in China [18][19].

Core Viewpoint - The "DGCX Xin Kang Jia Data" trading platform, known as "Xin Kang Jia," is facing severe allegations of financial misconduct, including withdrawal suspensions and platform crashes, leading to a significant loss of trust among its 1.8 million members and over 10 billion yuan involved [1][10]. Company Structure and Operations - Xin Kang Jia operates under the entity "Guizhou Xin Kang Jia Data Service Co., Ltd.," which was established in March 2021 by three individuals, including Huang Xin, who later transferred their shares to Liu Hailiang in April 2024 [2][3]. - The platform's rapid growth is attributed to its promotion of a "state-owned enterprise" identity and the use of digital currency for transactions, employing a "pyramid scheme" model to attract investments through member recruitment [4][5]. Allegations and Legal Issues - The platform has been linked to illegal fundraising activities, with regulatory bodies in various provinces issuing warnings about its operations, labeling it as a typical pyramid scheme [10][11]. - The name "DGCX" in the platform's title falsely implies a connection to the Dubai Gold and Commodities Exchange, which has not authorized any operations in China [9][10]. Current Status and Future Prospects - Following the withdrawal of key shareholders and the announcement of a company dissolution, the platform has been unable to facilitate withdrawals since June 26, 2023, leading to a crisis among its members [10][11]. - Despite the turmoil, some members remain hopeful for a recovery, with plans to potentially shift operations to Hong Kong, where a new company has been registered [7][8].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the collapse of the digital financial platform "DGCX Xin Kang Jia," which promised a daily return of 1% but ultimately left investors unable to withdraw their funds, highlighting the deceptive practices and risks associated with such platforms [1][3][12]. Summary by Sections Platform Operations and Collapse - "DGCX Xin Kang Jia" operated under the guise of a virtual currency investment platform, claiming to connect with the Dubai Gold and Commodity Exchange (DGCX) and promising an annualized return of 365%, significantly higher than traditional bank products [12][14]. - Despite multiple warnings from regulatory bodies starting in January 2025, the platform continued to attract investments until its collapse in June 2025 [3][17]. Investor Experiences - Many investors, like a mother from Shanxi, were lured into investing without understanding the risks, often influenced by friends or family [4][21]. - Some early investors managed to withdraw their funds before the collapse, indicating a predatory structure where later investors were essentially funding the returns of earlier ones [5][15]. Deceptive Practices - The platform employed a multi-level marketing structure, incentivizing users to recruit new members, which is characteristic of Ponzi schemes [15][23]. - The platform's operations included misleading claims about the legitimacy of its USDT transactions, which were used to obscure the true nature of the investment and evade regulatory scrutiny [14][15]. Regulatory Warnings and Public Response - Regulatory agencies issued multiple warnings about the platform's illegal activities, but these did not deter the influx of investments, reflecting a general lack of due diligence among investors [17][20]. - The article emphasizes the importance of recognizing the signs of fraudulent investment schemes, such as promises of high returns and reliance on recruitment for returns [21].

Core Viewpoint - The "Xinkangjia" platform, falsely claiming to be associated with the Dubai Gold and Commodities Exchange (DGCX), has collapsed, affecting approximately 2 million investors with a total amount involved reaching 13 billion yuan [1][3]. Summary by Sections Platform Operations - "Xinkangjia" promised a daily return of 1% on investments, using USDT for transactions and requiring a minimum investment of 1,000 USDT. The platform operated under the guise of virtual currency investments, claiming to be a Chinese branch of DGCX [4][6]. - After the platform became unable to process withdrawals on June 25, 2025, it was revealed that the company was accused of tax evasion, leading to the freezing of all accounts [4][5]. Investor Experience - Many investors, despite the inability to withdraw funds, were still drawn to the platform's "tax payment" scheme, which required them to pay 10% of their holdings to access their funds. This scheme was perceived as a final attempt to extract more money from investors [5][6]. - An investor reported that their investment of over 30,000 yuan became worthless within a month, as the platform's app became inaccessible [5]. Regulatory Warnings - Multiple regulatory bodies across regions such as Sichuan, Guangdong, Jiangxi, and Hunan issued warnings about "Xinkangjia," identifying it as a Ponzi scheme with significant illegal fundraising risks [10][12]. - The DGCX officially stated that it had no partnerships or affiliations in China, warning that any claims to the contrary were unauthorized [8]. Company Background - "Xinkangjia" was operated by Guizhou Xinkangjia Big Data Service Co., Ltd., which was established in April 2024 and had been listed as operating abnormally due to communication issues [13]. - The company applied for deregistration following a resolution to dissolve on May 18, 2025 [13]. Expert Insights - Experts noted that the use of virtual currencies in such schemes exploits consumers' limited understanding of these assets, leading to significant financial losses [14]. - Legal advice emphasized the importance of understanding where funds are going, what they are being used for, and who is responsible in case of issues before investing in such platforms [14].

Core Viewpoint - The "Xinkangjia" platform, masquerading as a branch of the Dubai Gold and Commodities Exchange (DGCX), has collapsed, affecting approximately 2 million investors with a total amount involved reaching 13 billion yuan [1][3][5]. Group 1: Platform Operations and Promises - "Xinkangjia" claimed to offer high returns of 1% daily, utilizing virtual currency investments and requiring a minimum entry fee of 1,000 USDT [5][6]. - The platform operated under the guise of investing in overseas gold and oil markets, promising substantial returns, but became non-operational by late June 2025 [6][12]. - After the platform's failure to allow withdrawals, it proposed a "tax payment" scheme, demanding users pay 10% of their holdings to access their funds, which many viewed as a final attempt to extract more money from investors [5][8]. Group 2: Regulatory and Legal Issues - The DGCX issued warnings stating that it had no partnerships or affiliations in China, and any claims to the contrary were unauthorized [10]. - Multiple regulatory bodies across various provinces, including Hunan and Guangdong, issued alerts regarding the platform's operations, labeling it a Ponzi scheme with significant illegal fundraising risks [12][15]. - The operational entity, Guizhou Xinkangjia Big Data Service Co., Ltd., was established in April 2024 and faced multiple issues, including being listed for abnormal operations due to uncontactable business premises [17]. Group 3: Investor Impact and Reactions - Reports indicate that many investors, despite the risks, were drawn to the platform due to its high return promises and the allure of virtual currency investments [8][12]. - Affected investors expressed frustration, with some losing significant amounts, such as over 30,000 yuan, and being unable to withdraw their funds [6][12]. - The platform's collapse has highlighted the risks associated with virtual currency investments, particularly in schemes that lack transparency and regulatory oversight [17].