1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the given content. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - Last week, the bond market strengthened with fluctuations. Credit bonds experienced a recovery after a sharp decline, with most major - term varieties rising more than interest - rate bonds. However, some weakly - qualified urban investment bonds had a "catch - up decline" [2][9]. - The ultra - long - term credit bonds also warmed up, with the second - tier perpetual (Er Yong) ultra - long bonds rising more, while the ultra - long urban investment bonds rising relatively less [2][10]. - The Er Yong bonds continued to show the characteristic of a "volatility amplifier", and the 3 - year and above terms had higher increases than general credit and ultra - long - term credit bonds of the same terms [3][15]. - The recovery last week was mainly led by allocation - oriented institutions such as wealth management and insurance funds. Public funds and other trading desks participated less actively [4][23]. - The growth rate of the scale of credit bond ETF - like products, the main driving factor of the previous "independent bull" market of credit bonds, slowed down last week [4][26]. - Currently, the strategy should focus on liquidity. There are still some opportunities in 3 - 5 - year bank secondary capital bonds, and there are also good opportunities in 1 - 3 - year low - quality urban investment bond sinking + riding [4][28]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Credit Repair Rhythm - **Bond Market Trend**: Last week, the bond market was affected by the "anti - involution" policy expectation and the "see - saw" effect of the equity and commodity markets in the first half of the week, and then stabilized in the second half. However, the sudden rumor of tax policy changes on Friday caused fluctuations at the end of the session. Interest - rate bonds showed a "V - shaped" trend with yields oscillating downward. Credit bonds strengthened in tandem with interest - rate bonds, and most of them recovered more, but some weakly - qualified urban investment bonds had a "catch - up decline" [2][9]. - **Yield Changes**: From July 28 to August 1, 2025, the yields of 1Y, 2Y, 3Y, 4Y, and 5Y treasury bonds decreased by 1.01BP, 0.97BP, 3.26BP, 3.87BP, and 3.62BP respectively. The yields of the same - term AAA medium - term notes decreased by 4.14BP, 4.96BP, 2.98BP, 5.69BP, and 3.44BP respectively. The yields of AA+ medium - term notes decreased by 4.03BP, 4.96BP, 2.98BP, 5.69BP, and 2.44BP respectively. The yields of 2Y - 5Y AA - urban investment bonds increased by 3.56BP, 1.99BP, 3.80BP, and 3.09BP respectively [9][11]. - **Ultra - long - term Credit Bonds**: The ultra - long - term credit bonds warmed up, with most of their increases exceeding those of the same - term interest - rate bonds. The yields of AAA/AA+ 10Y medium - term notes decreased by 4.00BP and 6.00BP respectively. The yields of AAA/AA+ 10Y urban investment bonds decreased by 2.06BP and 0.06BP respectively. The yield of AAA - 10Y bank secondary capital bonds decreased by 5.49BP, while the 10Y treasury bond yield only decreased by 2.65BP [10]. - **Curve Shape**: The steepness of all - grade 1 - 2 years and low - grade 2 - 3 years was the highest, basically the same as at the end of May. Taking the yield term structure diagrams of AA+ medium - term notes and AA urban investment bonds as examples, the slopes of the 1 - 2 - year, 2 - 3 - year, and 3 - 5 - year intervals of AA+ medium - term notes were 0.0965, 0.0679, and 0.0705 respectively; those of AA urban investment bonds were 0.1265, 0.0969, and 0.0677 respectively [12]. - **Historical Quantiles**: After the sharp decline, the credit repair rhythm was moderate. The short - duration repair amplitude was large, and the high - grade 3Y - 5Y still had some cost - effectiveness. From July 28 to August 1, 2025, the valuation maturity yields of 1Y - AAA, 3Y - AAA, 5Y - AAA, 1Y - AA+, 3Y - AA+, 5Y - AA+, 1Y - AA, and 3Y - AA ChinaBond medium - and short - term notes were at the 9.06%, 22.41%, 20.90%, 5.79%, 8.81%, 13.60%, 4.03%, and 12.59% levels since 2024 respectively. The historical quantiles of credit spreads were 8.22%, 27.58%, 26.79%, 5.83%, 15.64%, 24.66%, 5.03%, and 29.97% respectively, and the protection cushion for 3Y - 5Y was strengthened [13]. 3.2 Er Yong Bonds - **Market Performance**: The Er Yong bonds strengthened and continued to show the characteristic of a "volatility amplifier". The increases of 3 - year and above terms exceeded those of general credit and ultra - long - term credit bonds of the same terms. The 1 - year - within and 7 - year - and - above parts of the curve were relatively flat, and the 2 - 6 - year curve was the steepest. The yields of 1 - 5 - year, 7 - year, and 10 - year AAA - bank secondary capital bonds decreased by 5.48BP, 7.26BP, 7.78BP, 6.03BP, 6.43BP, 4.39BP, and 5.49BP respectively [3][15]. - **Active Trading**: The trading sentiment was enthusiastic throughout the week, and the Er Yong bonds were the most active variety. From July 28 to August 1, the low - valuation trading ratios of Er Yong bonds were 100.00%, 0.00%, 100.00%, 100.00%, and 100.00% respectively; the average trading durations were 6.84 years, 0.53 years, 7.03 years, 7.25 years, and 4.39 years respectively. The discount trading amplitudes of Er Yong bonds were small, with only one discount trading amplitude exceeding 3BP. The low - valuation trading amplitudes were generally high, with 52.5% of the low - valuation trading amplitudes between 3BP - 5BP [3][17]. 3.3 Ultra - long - term Credit Bonds - **Selling Willingness**: Institutions' willingness to sell ultra - long - term credit bonds was average. Although there was a recovery last week, the selling pressure was not weak in terms of the discount trading amplitude. From July 28 to August 1, the discount trading ratios of ultra - long - term credit bonds were 20.00%, 100.00%, 47.50%, 7.50%, and 10.00% respectively. The discount amplitudes were not small, and there were also transactions with a discount of more than 4BP. About 44% of the discount trading amplitudes exceeded 3BP [3][18]. - **Buying Willingness**: The market's willingness to buy ultra - long - term credit bonds was also strong. Other highly - active trades were mainly some short - term real - estate and financial flawed individual bonds. From July 28 to August 1, the low - valuation trading ratios of ultra - long - term credit bonds were 97.50%, 0.00%, 57.50%, 90.00%, and 60.00% respectively. During the market recovery last week, institutions' buying willingness was strong, and about 55% of the low - valuation trading amplitudes were above 3BP [20][23]. 3.4 Institutional Behavior - **Dominant Institutions**: The recovery last week was mainly led by allocation - oriented institutions such as wealth management and insurance funds. Public funds and other trading desks participated less actively. Funds and other trading desks reduced their holdings of credit bonds during the sharp decline in the bond market the week before last. With the bond market recovery last week, they turned from net sellers to net buyers of general credit bonds, but the overall increase in positions was small [4][23]. - **Wealth Management and Insurance**: Banks' wealth management and insurance institutions bought on dips after the sharp decline in the bond market. Banks' wealth management's buying intensity of general credit bonds and ultra - long - term credit bonds has increased for three consecutive weeks. In terms of market scale, the month - on - month increase in June and July was in the order of hundreds of billions of yuan [4][23]. - **Credit Bond ETFs**: The growth rate of the scale of credit bond ETF - like products, the main driving factor of the previous "independent bull" market of credit bonds, slowed down last week. Specifically, the week - on - week scale of credit benchmark - making ETF products has slowed down since the second week of July, and the week - on - week change has turned negative in the last two weeks. The week - on - week scale of science and technology innovation ETF products has also slowed down significantly in the last two weeks. In addition, the trading activity of the underlying bonds of ETF products has also decreased significantly, especially for the underlying bonds of science and technology innovation bonds, with about 60% of the underlying bonds falling more than non - underlying bonds [26].

记者5日从辽宁省市场监管局获悉：辽宁省推出信用修复网上办、跨省份办、跨部门互认。今年以来， 全省市场监管系统已帮助2.8万余户经营主体通过网上申办完成市场监管部门信用修复，重塑良好信 用。 （文章来源：人民日报） 辽宁省市场监管部门在给企业送达行政处罚决定书的同时，还同步送上行政处罚信息信用修复告知书和 守法诚信经营劝诫书，主动告知当事人关于行政处罚信息公示的期限及申请信用修复的政策和途径，并 指导企业提前准备信用修复材料，在半年处罚公示期结束后第一时间完成信用修复，防止企业遭受处罚 后因不了解信用修复流程而陷入困境。辽宁省市场监管部门与相关部门建立信用修复协同联动工作机 制，共享各部门行政处罚公示信息信用修复结果，并分别同步至国家企业信用信息公示系统和"信用中 国"网站，实现了信用修复结果互认。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Urumqi Market Supervision Administration has implemented a "three documents" delivery mechanism to enhance credit repair and compliance guidance for enterprises receiving administrative penalties, aiming to optimize the business environment and strengthen credit supervision [2][3]. Group 1: Administrative Penalty and Compliance - A local energy company was fined 13,700 yuan for selling compressed natural gas that did not meet the GB18047-2017 standard [1]. - Along with the penalty notice, the company received a credit repair notification and compliance advice, which are intended to help the company understand the issues and find a path for development [2]. Group 2: Credit Repair Mechanism - The "three documents" mechanism includes the administrative penalty notice, credit repair notification, and compliance advice, providing a comprehensive approach to guide enterprises in correcting their misconduct and reducing the risk of future violations [2]. - The Urumqi Market Supervision Administration has handled 18 cases under this mechanism from June 1 to the end of July [2]. Group 3: Follow-up and Support - The administration has established a case follow-up system to ensure comprehensive coverage of enforcement actions, promoting legal compliance and providing guidance to businesses facing operational challenges [3]. - This approach aims to unify political, legal, and social benefits of administrative enforcement, moving beyond mere punishment to support enterprise recovery and compliance [3].

围绕提升服务新效能，《通知》提出4条举措，包括方便企业办事，增设线上渠道；减少申请材料，强 化内部协同；压缩办理时限，精简核查流程；引导企业合规，精准提醒服务。经营主体可通过国家企业 信用信息公示系统(山西)、全国个体工商户发展网、山西省市场监管局门户网站、山西政务服务平台网 站的"信用修复"专区提交修复申请，最大限度便捷经营主体修复信用。市场监管部门内部可查询或确认 的信息，不再要求提供相关证明材料，整改报告书、培训记录等不再作为必须提供的材料。移出经营异 常名录压缩至4个工作日办结，停止公示行政处罚信息和移出严重违法失信名单压缩至7个工作日办结。 在违法失信主体满足信用修复时限时，市场监管部门通过国家企业信用信息公示系统发布公告、发送短 信等方式，精准推送修复提醒信息。 围绕构建修复新生态，《通知》提出3条举措，包括企业"一键申请"，实现跨省修复；推动结果互认， 建立共享机制；探索修复试点，释放改革红利。依托市场监管信用修复全国统一平台与跨省数据传输通 道，经营主体可"一键获取"自身行政处罚、经营异常名录及严重违法失信名单等违法失信信息，并"一 键申请"信用修复，实现异地提交申请、异地办结修复。市场监管部 ...

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation is supporting e-commerce platforms to provide credit repair services for merchants, aiming to enhance credit levels and restore business vitality, thereby promoting the sustainable and healthy development of the platform economy [1] Group 1 - The State Administration for Market Regulation has initiated a data-sharing pilot program, allowing selected e-commerce platforms to access credit repair data for comparison, resulting in a total of 4.501 billion data comparisons and the examination of nearly 10 million merchants [1] - The initiative has helped identify 1.67 million merchants listed in the abnormal business operation directory [1] - E-commerce platforms are being guided to send targeted notifications via internal messages and emails to remind untrustworthy merchants to repair their damaged credit [1] Group 2 - The State Administration for Market Regulation encourages e-commerce platforms to add credit repair channels on their homepage and provide credit repair guidelines to assist merchants in the credit repair process [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implementation of a pre-sanction mechanism by courts to provide breathing space for companies facing financial difficulties, allowing them to recover and fulfill their obligations without immediate punitive measures [3][4][5]. Group 1: Pre-sanction Mechanism - The pre-sanction notice serves as a warning for untrustworthy enterprises while providing them with a grace period to restore their creditworthiness [3]. - Courts are adopting a strategy of "tightening with leniency," allowing eligible untrustworthy enterprises to recover under pressure rather than facing immediate punitive actions [3][4]. - The grace period for the pre-sanction mechanism ranges from 1 to 3 months and is applicable only to those with genuine intentions to resolve their debts [5]. Group 2: Impact on Enterprises - Untrustworthy enterprises that demonstrate a willingness to fulfill their obligations can avoid severe consequences such as financing disruptions and market reputation collapse [3][4]. - The mechanism aims to provide a recovery space for companies, allowing them to secure necessary resources for development and avoid negative repercussions from credit sanctions [5]. - Successful compliance during the grace period can lead to credit restoration, benefiting both the enterprises and their creditors, while also improving court execution rates [5]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The pre-sanction mechanism is seen as an innovative execution measure that addresses the challenges of enforcement and aligns with the Supreme Court's promotion of a grace period for credit sanctions [5]. - This approach injects positive energy into credit construction and has shown initial effectiveness, suggesting potential for broader implementation [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a case involving the enforcement of a civil loan dispute, emphasizing the consequences of evading execution and the legal measures taken against the debtor, who misused the temporary lifting of restrictions to engage in gambling activities abroad [1][2]. Group 1 - The case involves a loan of 125,000 yuan that the debtor, Di, failed to repay, leading to his inclusion in the list of dishonest debtors after failing to report any assets [1]. - Di claimed health issues as a reason for his inability to repay and had his restrictions temporarily lifted, but he subsequently engaged in gambling in Hong Kong and Macau [1]. - Upon being apprehended, authorities found significant cash and evidence of Di's gambling activities, leading to his acknowledgment of evading execution and a settlement with the creditor [2]. Group 2 - The court's actions included a thorough investigation and collaboration with law enforcement to apprehend the debtor, demonstrating the judicial system's commitment to enforcing financial obligations [2]. - The case illustrates the legal repercussions for individuals who attempt to evade financial responsibilities, including potential criminal charges for refusal to comply with court orders [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court is actively promoting the classification management of "dishonesty" and "inability," aiming to strictly punish severe dishonest behaviors while providing relief for those who are genuinely unable to fulfill their obligations [1][2]. Group 1: Classification of Dishonesty and Inability - The Supreme Court has released nine typical cases to clarify the distinction between "dishonesty" and "inability," enhancing the precision and convenience of the dishonesty punishment system [1]. - The court aims to combat malicious dishonest behaviors that disrupt the market economy and harm the legitimate rights of winning parties [1]. Group 2: Trends in Dishonesty Punishment - In 2024, the number of new entries into the dishonesty list was 2.457 million, a decrease of 23.4% year-on-year, while 2.821 million individuals were restored to the market through credit repair, marking a 35.4% increase [2]. - The overall trend in dishonesty punishment is showing a positive pattern of "reducing existing cases and curbing new ones," contributing to a more stable social environment [2]. Group 3: Effectiveness of Dishonesty Punishment System - The dishonesty punishment system has proven to be an important measure in combating malicious debt evasion and maintaining the rights of winning parties [3]. - Since the implementation of the dishonesty list system in October 2013, a total of 17.1 million individuals have voluntarily fulfilled their obligations due to credit punishment and consumption restrictions [3]. - Despite progress, issues of evasion and resistance to execution remain prominent, necessitating continued enforcement efforts against malicious dishonest behaviors [3].

Core Points - The Supreme People's Court has implemented a classification management system for "dishonest" and "unable" individuals, aiming to alleviate the debt burdens of those who are honest but unfortunate while cracking down on severe dishonest behaviors [1][2][3] - In 2024, the number of new entries into the dishonest debtor list decreased by 23.4% year-on-year, with 2.821 million individuals successfully rehabilitated through credit restoration measures, marking the first decline in a decade [1][2] - The court emphasizes a balanced approach, ensuring the protection of legitimate rights for winning parties while fostering an environment conducive to economic recovery for those with potential for development [1][2][3] Group 1 - The dishonest punishment system has proven effective in combating malicious debt evasion and maintaining the rights of winning parties [2] - Since the implementation of the dishonest debtor list system in October 2013, a total of 17.1 million individuals have voluntarily fulfilled their obligations due to credit punishment and consumption restrictions [2] - The courts are encouraged to continue strengthening the punishment of dishonest behaviors while ensuring the rights of winning parties are protected [2][3] Group 2 - The Supreme People's Court has released nine typical cases to illustrate the strict distinction between "dishonest" and "unable" individuals, focusing on the specific circumstances of each case [3] - Courts are required to consider the actual situations of debtors, avoiding mechanical enforcement that does not differentiate between "dishonest" and "unable" individuals [3][4] - The courts are adopting measures such as grace periods for those with potential for development, allowing them to recover while still protecting the rights of winning parties [4][5] Group 3 - Courts are intensifying efforts to punish malicious dishonest behaviors that disrupt market order and harm the rights of winning parties [5][6] - Specific cases highlight the courts' commitment to balancing enforcement with compassion, allowing for rehabilitation and resolution of disputes [6][8] - The courts are utilizing flexible enforcement strategies, such as grace periods and active communication, to facilitate debtors' recovery while ensuring compliance with legal obligations [8][9] Group 4 - The courts are exploring innovative approaches to enforcement, such as "active sealing" of assets, to support struggling businesses while ensuring creditors' rights are upheld [15][16] - Successful case resolutions demonstrate the effectiveness of tailored enforcement strategies that consider the unique circumstances of each debtor [16][17] - The courts are committed to fostering a harmonious social environment while promoting economic stability through effective enforcement practices [17][18]

近日，市场监管总局支持引导电商平台采取多种形式为平台内商家提供信用修复服务，推动平台商家提 升信用水平、恢复发展活力，促进平台经济持续健康发展。市场监管总局开展数据共享试点，向部分电 商平台试点开放信用修复数据查询比对，累计提供数据比对45.01亿条次，排查平台商家近1000万户， 协助发现平台内列入经营异常商家名录167万户。针对上述经营异常商家，市场监管总局引导相关电商 平台采取站内信、邮件等形式，点对点发送提示信息，提醒失信商家及时修复受损信用。同时，鼓励电 商平台在门户网站首页增加信用修复通道，提供信用修复指南，引导商家开展信用修复。(市场监管总 局) ...