近日，因发表14篇SCI论文、获得3项国家发明专利，重庆大学化学化工学院本科生刘某乔受到广泛关 注。 5月10日，重庆大学发布情况通报称，近日，网络上对该校2021级本科学生刘某乔发表论文等情况提出质 疑。学校高度重视，立即成立专项工作组进行调查核实。 经调查， 刘某乔系该校研究生院副院长刘某华之女，刘某华安排刘某乔参与了其本人部分署名论文和专 利的研究工作 ，存在论文和专利署名不当的学术不端行为。 此外，刘某华的论文中还存在图片上传错误 等学术不严谨问题。 经研究决定， 给予刘某华党内严重警告处分，免去研究生院副院长职务；按相关程序撤销刘某乔获得的 国家奖学金等荣誉和奖励 。 学校将以此为鉴、举一反三，持续加强学术道德长效机制建设，坚决维护风清气正的育人环境。 知网刘某乔发明专利搜索结果截图。图源：红星新闻 据此前报道，刘某乔为重庆大学化学化工学院化学工程与工艺专业2021级学生，其发表SCI一区期刊论文 5篇、SCI二区期刊论文9篇，获国家发明专利授权3项。以上发明专利的最早申请时间为2016年，当时刘 某乔尚在读初中的年龄。 来源：长安街知事 责编： 刘珺宇 校对： 刘星莹 百万用户都在看 华尔街大举出 ...

（原标题：重庆大学通报：刘某乔系副院长刘某华之女，刘某华安排刘某乔参与其部分署名论文和专利 研究，被党内严重警告、免职） 来源：@重庆大学、封面新闻此前报道 5月10日，重庆大学针对"本科生发14篇SCI论文"一事发布最新情况通报： 近日，网络上对该校2021级本科学生刘某乔发表论文等情况提出质疑。学校高度重视，立即成立专项工 作组进行调查核实。经调查， 刘某乔系该校研究生院副院长刘某华之女，刘某华安排刘某乔参与了其 本人部分署名论文和专利的研究工作，存在论文和专利署名不当的学术不端行为。此外，刘某华的论文 中还存在图片上传错误等学术不严谨问题。 经研究决定，给予刘某华党内严重警告处分，免去研究生院副院长职务；按相关程序撤销刘某乔获得的 国家奖学金等荣誉和奖励。 学校将以此为鉴、举一反三，持续加强学术道德长效机制建设，坚决维护风清气正的育人环境。 此前，5月7日，《重庆这8位同学获国家奖学金》的微信公众号推文提到，来自重庆大学化学化工学院 四年级的学生刘某乔已发表十余篇SCI论文，并获得多项国家发明专利授权。有网友质疑：作为本科生 的刘某乔，是否真的取得如此惊人成就？对此，重庆大学化学化工学院相关工作人员向封 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a case of academic misconduct involving Liu Mouqiao, a student at Chongqing University, who was found to have improperly co-authored multiple research papers and patents due to her father's influence [1] Group 1: Investigation and Findings - Chongqing University established a special task force to investigate allegations against Liu Mouqiao regarding her publication record and academic integrity [1] - The investigation revealed that Liu Mouqiao is the daughter of Liu Mouhua, the vice dean of the graduate school, who arranged for her to participate in his research work, leading to improper authorship on papers and patents [1] - Liu Mouhua received a serious party warning and was removed from his position as vice dean due to the findings of academic misconduct [1] Group 2: Academic Output and Consequences - Liu Mouqiao had published 5 papers in SCI Zone 1 journals and 9 papers in SCI Zone 2 journals, along with 3 national invention patents, with the earliest patent application dating back to 2016 when she was still in middle school [1] - The university decided to revoke Liu Mouqiao's national scholarship and other honors as a consequence of the misconduct [1] - The university aims to strengthen its academic integrity mechanisms to maintain a healthy educational environment [1]

Core Viewpoint - The recent controversies in the medical field, particularly regarding academic integrity and the prevalence of male patients in gynecological studies, highlight systemic issues in research practices and publication standards [1][5][13]. Group 1: Academic Integrity Issues - A paper titled "Clinical Application Effects of Targeted Nursing Interventions on Emotional and Quality of Life in Patients with Uterine Fibroids" mistakenly included male patients, raising questions about the validity of research in gynecology [2][3]. - The journal that published the controversial paper acknowledged flaws in its review process, leading to the dismissal of involved editors and the implementation of corrective measures [4]. - The frequent occurrence of such basic errors in published papers suggests deeper problems within the academic publication chain, indicating a potential crisis in research quality [5][10]. Group 2: Publication Pressures - The pressure to publish is exacerbated by rigid evaluation systems in hospitals, where medical professionals must publish in designated journals to advance their careers, often leading to compromised research integrity [15][16][17]. - The increasing demand for published papers has resulted in a shortage of available publication slots, causing delays and forcing researchers to seek alternative, sometimes unethical, publication routes [18][19]. - The rise of "paper factories" and underground publication intermediaries is a direct consequence of the high demand for academic publications, further complicating the integrity of research [21][24]. Group 3: Proposed Solutions - Calls for legislative action to criminalize academic misconduct and to dismantle the "black and gray" market of academic publishing have been made, emphasizing the need for a more robust framework to ensure research integrity [27][28]. - Suggestions include establishing a diversified evaluation system for research that moves away from the singular focus on publication quantity, thereby reducing the incentives for academic fraud [29].

Core Viewpoint - The recent controversy surrounding academic misconduct in the medical field highlights systemic issues within the healthcare academic evaluation system, particularly regarding the publication of flawed research papers that contradict basic medical knowledge [21][36]. Group 1: Key Incidents - A nurse from Shandong University Qilu Hospital published a paper in 2017 claiming that 68.75% of the 80 uterine fibroid patients were male, which contradicts the definition of uterine fibroids as a condition affecting individuals with a uterus [21][36]. - The hospital has recognized academic misconduct and has penalized the nurse with a demotion and a five-year ban on promotions [21][36]. - Similar cases have emerged from other hospitals, including a paper from Nantong Maternal and Child Health Hospital that incorrectly included male patients in a study on uterine bleeding [21][36]. Group 2: Institutional Responses - Many involved hospitals have attributed the discrepancies to "data entry errors" or claimed they were unaware of the issues until recently, with only Qilu Hospital taking definitive action against the author [28][36]. - Journals involved in these publications, such as the "Practical Journal of Gynecological Endocrinology," have been criticized for their lax review processes, with some journals admitting to "oversights" but not retracting the problematic papers [32][36]. Group 3: Underlying Issues - The academic evaluation system in the medical field is criticized for being flawed, as it pressures healthcare professionals to publish papers for career advancement, leading to a rise in academic misconduct [35][36]. - There is a lack of regulatory oversight, as many of these issues were only exposed years after publication, indicating a failure to hold authors, journals, and hospitals accountable [35][36]. Group 4: Societal Impact and Reform Calls - The integrity of medical research is at risk, as the pursuit of economic benefits by journals has led to lowered standards for peer review, which can mislead clinical decisions and endanger patient safety [36][37]. - Calls for reform include changing the evaluation criteria to focus on clinical skills rather than publication quantity, implementing better oversight mechanisms, and establishing accountability for all parties involved in the publication process [39][36].

Group 1 - A recent medical paper on uterine fibroids mistakenly included male patients as a control group, leading to significant public scrutiny and the dismissal of the involved editor [1][6] - The phenomenon of low-quality journals operating primarily on publication fees, including ghostwriting, is prevalent, particularly in the medical field [2][4] - The pressure to publish for career advancement often leads medical professionals to resort to purchasing papers, which undermines academic integrity [3][7] Group 2 - The emphasis on publication metrics over clinical skills raises concerns about the evaluation of medical professionals, as quantifiable research outputs do not necessarily correlate with practical abilities [6][8] - The current academic environment incentivizes the production of papers rather than genuine scientific inquiry, which can lead to a disconnect between research and clinical practice [8][11] - There is a growing need for a robust domestic academic journal system to facilitate genuine scholarly communication and reduce reliance on international publications [9][11] Group 3 - Addressing academic misconduct requires serious measures, but the implementation of stricter rules may inadvertently increase the burden on healthcare workers [12][13] - Young medical professionals should be given more opportunities to showcase their clinical skills without the pressure of excessive publication demands [13][14] - The healthcare system must balance the need for academic integrity with the practical realities faced by clinicians, ensuring that the focus remains on patient care [12][13]

对于此类明显的学术不端现象，当然要严厉打击，但还应该思考，这些作者为何如此热衷于发表劣 质论文。最可能的原因恐怕还是目前专业技术晋升体系中过度重视科研和论文发表。比较典型的例如护 士和中小学教师，晋升职称的通道都被论文数量牢牢卡住，但他们开展学术研究的条件和能力都很有 限，一些人不得不炮制低质论文，甚至公然抄袭或造假。有些领域职称评定还与专业脱节，导致有人不 得不花钱买论文或找人代笔，进而形成畸形的论文产业链。 其实，护士、中小学教师这类基础性技术岗位的主要价值在于服务，强调的是专业技能和实际操作 能力，需要的是接地气的工作交流，比如在工作交流会上谈谈个人经验，在行业简报或单位内部媒介上 发表一些技术改进举措等，在提升服务质量和专业水平方面，反而可能比学术论文更管用。如果基层技 术人员的小技巧或小改进也能成为晋升职称的重要参考依据，立足岗位开展实用性创新就会蔚然成风， 这对提升技术服务质量和打造一支过硬的技术人才队伍均大有好处。 相反，如果让基础性技术岗位人员花太多精力搞科研和发表论文，不仅对于水平提升毫无益处，而 且还会浪费社会资源，甚至助长论文造假等不良风气。更要看到，评职称变成造假比拼，真正的工作能 手 ...

近日，山东大学齐鲁医院一名护士论文中被曝出现"男性患子宫肌瘤"，一篇严肃的医学论文竟出现如此 荒谬的错误，引发各界关注。 让一个身处一线的医护工作者，在没有科研基础、没有充足时间、没有实验室的情况下，去发表专业论 文并不现实。 就论文本身，国家层面应通过技术升级尽快更新核查系统，以引导医疗单位及工作者对论文质量的重 视，尽快将防控造假的端口前移，以此震慑造假的动机，从而减少学术不端的批量发生。 论文之外，更要修补制度不合理之处。对于医疗领域的科研人员，要考虑行业的特殊性和实效性。减少 对基层专业技术人员的论文、科研等硬性要求。 目前，医院已给予护士霍某某记过处分、降级处理。涉事期刊在其官网发布致歉声明。 公众的疑点颇多。比如，如此低级错误，为什么能出现又何以一路顺利"通关"？基层的护理人员为何在 临床之外也需要发表论文？医院在评定职称、评先树优方面，是否存在重论文轻临床的现象？ 简单把医护人员或科研人员论文造假归咎于学风浮躁、学术失范、诚信失守，并不能完全解释这荒诞。 离谱论文背后，除了学术品格等个人因素外，学术机制本身惩罚力度不足、对第三方机构查处乏力、医 疗论文代写灰产蔓延、行业鱼龙混杂监管缺位都是"漏洞 ...

新京报讯（记者秦冰 熊丽欣 实习生武亮亮）近期有媒体报道称，多篇妇产科领域论文内出现男性患者的数据，包 括"子宫肌瘤""难产性产后出血"等疾病，涉事期刊包括《中国医药指南》《中国农村卫生》等。5月6日，《中国 农村卫生》的主办单位中国农村卫生协会称，"我们已经成立专班调查这一事件，正在查阅相关档案了解情况。" 同日，《中国医药指南》杂志发布声明称："经调查，该学术不端问题的发生是因为我社当时的审稿流程存在漏 洞，审核人员未能对文章内容进行严谨细致的审查，未能及时发现其中的错误；部分编辑和审核人员责任意识不 足，对学术规范的重要性认识不够深刻，在工作中未能严格遵循学术出版的标准和要求。对于涉事编辑我社已作 出辞退处理。" 《中国医药指南》杂志官方通报。 图源：官方公号截图 新京报记者于当日致电辽宁省海城市中心医院医务科，工作人员回应称，发布论文的医生已知晓此事，医院也正 在着手解决。 此次引发争议的论文还包括《介入超声对于治疗卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿的效果和应用价值研究》、《高强度聚焦 超声治疗子宫肌瘤的护理要点分析》等，刊发期刊涉及《临床医药文献电子杂志》《大家健康》《中国医药指 南》《中国农村卫生》《中外医疗》 ...

近日，一篇题为《针对性护理干预在子宫肌瘤围手术期的情绪和生活质量临床应用效果》的论文被网友热议。 论文称选取的子宫肌瘤患者中含男 性，引发质疑。 5月5日，山东大学齐鲁医院发布情况说明称，网传论文存在学术不端问题。齐鲁医院依规依纪给予护士霍某某记过处分、降级处理，取消其五年内各 类晋级晋升等资格。 声明称，经调查，该学术不端问题的发生是因为当时的审稿流程存在漏洞，审核人员未能对文章内容进行严谨细致的审查，未能及时发现其中的错 误；部分编辑和审核人员责任意识不足，对学术规范的重要性认识不够深刻，在工作中未能严格遵循学术出版的标准和要求。对于涉事编辑已作出辞 退处理。 5月6日，《中国医药指南》杂志社在其官网发布《关于学术不端的声明》，称对涉事编辑已作出辞退处理，并制定了整改措施。 声明还称，此次学术不端事件，严重损害了《中国医药指南》杂志社的声誉和公信力，也对学术环境造成了不良影响。《中国医药指南》杂志社对此 深表歉意，向广大读者、作者以及学术界郑重致歉。 据杂志社官网介绍，《中国医药指南》杂志是由中国保健协会主管主办的国家级、全国性学术类综合医学期刊，创刊于2003年1月，国内外公开发 行。据悉，2024版复 ...