Core Viewpoint - The government is actively addressing prominent issues reported by enterprises through a special action aimed at regulating administrative law enforcement related to businesses, resulting in a general decline in administrative fines and a reduction in arbitrary inspections [1][2]. Group 1: Objectives and Focus Areas - The special action targets four major issues: arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and closures; illegal cross-regional law enforcement; inconsistent enforcement standards; and abuse of power or misconduct by law enforcement officials [2][3]. - Key focus areas for the action include food and drug safety, natural resources, ecological environment, safety production, urban management, and transportation, which are closely related to enterprises and the public [3]. Group 2: Progress and Impact - As of May 21, a total of 6,232 problem leads have been collected, with 5,246 cases addressed, recovering 98.81 million yuan for enterprises from a total of 335 million yuan in involved amounts [3]. - The action aims to optimize the business environment and stimulate market vitality by addressing issues such as unauthorized fees and excessive charges in various sectors, including logistics and utilities [3]. Group 3: Regulatory Measures and Future Directions - The action emphasizes strict adherence to laws and regulations, particularly in sectors affecting public health, with a focus on rigorous standards and accountability [6]. - Future efforts will include increased supervision of problem rectification, targeted handling of prominent issues, and measures to ensure compliance and accountability among local authorities [7].

Core Points - The article discusses the implementation and progress of a nationwide special action to standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, aiming to protect their legal rights and improve the business environment [2][4][6] Group 1: Special Action Overview - The special action was launched in March this year, focusing on addressing issues such as arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and seizures [2][4] - As of May 21, the action has gathered 6,232 problem clues and urged the handling of 5,246 cases, involving a total amount of 335 million yuan, recovering losses of approximately 98.81 million yuan for enterprises [6] Group 2: Key Issues Addressed - The action targets four main issues: arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and seizures; illegal cross-regional enforcement; inconsistent enforcement standards; and abuse of power or misconduct by enforcement personnel [4][6] - These issues are widespread and have significant negative impacts, with strong feedback from enterprises [4] Group 3: Implementation and Results - The Ministry of Justice has established a working platform to streamline the collection and processing of problem clues, enhancing efficiency and reducing the burden on local authorities [5] - Initial results show a downward trend in administrative fines and effective curtailment of arbitrary inspections, although there is still a gap between outcomes and enterprise expectations [6] Group 4: Future Plans and Mechanisms - Future efforts will focus on strengthening supervision of problem rectification, addressing prominent enforcement issues, and conducting research to evaluate the effectiveness of the action [6][9] - The establishment of a long-term mechanism for standardized enforcement is emphasized to prevent issues from recurring and to foster a conducive business environment [7][9]

行政执法是行政机关履行政府职能、管理经济社会事务的重要方式。在行政执法当中，要体现对各类主 体的平等保护，严格依法平等适用，不能违背"法律面前人人平等"的原则，不能仅仅为了让执法有温度 而突破法律底线，所以要坚持辩证地看这个问题。 规范执法不是执法越宽越好，更不是不执法，而是依法该严则严、当宽则宽，特别是对食品药品安全等 涉及群众切身利益的领域，要坚决落实"四个最严"的要求，以"最严谨的标准、最严格的监管、最严厉 的处罚、最严肃的问责"，切实保护人民群众的生命健康安全。要让行政执法"既有力度又有温度"，做 到既不缺位也不越位。 据中国网，5月22日，国新办就规范涉企行政执法专项行动开展情况举行新闻发布会，司法部行政执法 协调监督局局长刘波在国新办发布会上表示，目前很多地方在积极探索柔性的执法方式，优化执法理 念，坚持执法和服务相结合。实践中我们也看到，一些地方出台了免罚或者不罚的清单，比如上海出台 了《市场监管领域不予行政处罚和减轻行政处罚实施办法》，细化了轻微违法不予立案的程序。深圳龙 华区建立了"柔性执法"机制，对主动自查自纠的轻微违法企业，开通了免罚清单绿色通道。实践中的这 些探索，为企业营造了良好的营 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the implementation of a two-month "Spring Thunder Action" by the Zhenyuan County Market Supervision Administration to enhance market safety and protect public interests [1] - The action focuses on six key areas related to people's livelihoods, including food, pharmaceuticals, and special equipment, aiming to create a safe and orderly market consumption environment [1] - The "1+19" smart supervision system has been fully implemented in 235 school canteens, with 211 food quick tests conducted and six illegal cases addressed [1] Group 2 - A "Protect Farmers and Ensure Cultivation" special action has been launched during the critical spring farming period, focusing on major agricultural products like fertilizers and agricultural films [2] - A comprehensive regulatory model has been established, including source control, circulation traceability, and terminal sampling, resulting in 40 batches of inspections and the seizure of 1,973 bags of substandard fertilizers [2] - A knowledge property protection initiative has led to the investigation of two trademark infringement cases and the establishment of a 24-hour complaint handling network, recovering economic losses of 72,800 yuan [2] Group 3 - The county's market supervision authority emphasizes that the action is both a defense of safety and an upgrade of the business environment, with plans to establish a task list of 55 key issues for rectification [3] - Training for all enforcement personnel will be conducted to shift the regulatory model towards a preventive approach, fostering a standardized market environment for county economic development [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that standardizing enterprise-related law enforcement inspections is crucial for optimizing the business environment and stimulating market vitality [1] - The Ministry of Ecology and Environment has introduced the "law enforcement + service" concept, highlighting the need for innovative regulatory methods to achieve a balance between strictness and leniency [1][2] - The transition from a "one-size-fits-all" approach to "precision enforcement" requires law enforcement personnel to possess stronger legal knowledge and technical skills [1][2] Group 2 - The distinction between "minor violations" and "malicious violations" is critical in flexible law enforcement, necessitating a deep understanding of legal boundaries by enforcement personnel [2] - The implementation of a "comprehensive inspection once" mechanism aims to break down departmental barriers and enhance the effectiveness of cross-sector collaboration [2] - Law enforcement personnel are expected to evolve from mere executors to "guardians of the rule of law" and "service providers for development," ensuring ecological protection while facilitating green enterprise growth [3]