Core Viewpoint - The increase of tariffs on steel and aluminum imports by the U.S. from 25% to 50% is seen as a unilateral and protectionist action that could disrupt global supply chains and trade, with potential indirect impacts on China's steel exports [2][5]. Group 1: U.S. Tariff Policy - The U.S. has raised tariffs on imported steel and aluminum, with the new rates effective from June 4, 2025, following a history of tariff increases initiated by former President Trump [3]. - The White House's executive order maintains a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum imports from the UK, with potential adjustments based on compliance with environmental policies [3]. Group 2: Impact on China - In 2024, China exported 110.716 million tons of steel, a 22.7% increase year-on-year, but only about 890,000 tons were exported to the U.S., representing 0.8% of China's total steel exports, indicating limited direct impact from the tariff increase [4][5]. - Concerns exist that the U.S. tariff policy may indirectly affect China's steel exports through its impact on downstream industries and the global trade system [5]. Group 3: International Reactions - The tariff increase has faced criticism from Canada, the EU, and Japan, with officials expressing concerns about its legality and potential negative effects on ongoing trade negotiations [5]. - Japan's exports of steel and aluminum to the U.S. are expected to decrease significantly, potentially impacting Japan's GDP growth [5]. Group 4: Domestic Concerns in the U.S. - There are worries among U.S. domestic stakeholders that rising costs of steel and aluminum imports will ultimately be passed on to American consumers [6]. - The OECD has revised down the U.S. economic growth forecast for 2025 and raised inflation expectations, indicating potential economic challenges ahead [6].

Core Viewpoint - In the first four months of the year, China's total goods trade import and export value increased by 2.4% year-on-year, indicating sustained economic vitality and resilience in foreign trade despite external challenges [1] Group 1 - The growth rate of imports and exports in April accelerated by 4.3 percentage points compared to the first quarter, reflecting a positive trend in trade performance [1] - The statement emphasizes that "Chinese manufacturing" remains a global necessity, and the Chinese market continues to be a hotbed for investment [1] - The spokesperson highlighted that unilateralism and protectionism are unsustainable, and barriers cannot hinder China's commitment to open cooperation and shared development with countries around the world [1]

就接下来在扩大中国与南亚国家经贸合作方面有哪些考虑，商务部副部长鄢东在国新办新闻发布会上表 示，要发挥企业主体作用。在中国—南亚国家经贸合作蓬勃发展中，工商界是重要的参与者、推动者、 实践者。中方愿加强与南亚各国重要商协会、贸易投资促进机构的广泛联系，开展贸易投资促进活动， 不断扩大南亚国家朋友圈，为企业家朋友搭建交流信息、创新合作的平台，继续鼓励和支持中国企业赴 南亚国家考察对接，挖掘双方经贸合作潜力，共同将合作愿景转换为具体行动。要共同坚持多边主义。 要践行真正的多边主义，共同反对单边主义、保护主义，维护以世贸组织为核心的多边贸易体制。共同 倡导平等有序的世界多极化和普惠包容的经济全球化，为世界发展注入更多的稳定性和确定性。(人民 财讯) ...

Group 1: U.S. Tariff Policy on Steel and Aluminum - The U.S. has raised tariffs on imported steel and aluminum from 25% to 50%, effective from April 4, which China criticizes as unilateralism and protectionism [2] - China emphasizes that the U.S. tariff measures violate WTO rules and disrupt global supply chains, urging the U.S. to respect economic laws and engage in dialogue to maintain a rules-based multilateral trade system [2] Group 2: Automotive Industry Competition - The automotive industry is identified as a pillar of the national economy, crucial for growth and consumption expansion, with ongoing initiatives to boost automotive consumption [4] - The Ministry of Commerce plans to enhance tracking and policy guidance for the automotive market, aiming to address barriers in automotive circulation and meet diverse consumer needs [5] - In response to "involution" competition in the automotive sector, the Ministry will strengthen compliance guidance and market order maintenance to promote healthy industry development [6] Group 3: U.S.-China Trade Relations - Following the Geneva trade talks, the U.S. has implemented new restrictions against China, which China strongly opposes, demanding an immediate halt to these measures [8] - The U.S. Trade Representative extended the exemption period for the Section 301 investigation into China's practices until August 31, 2025, which China views as a continuation of unilateral trade protectionism [10]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that there are no winners in a trade war, as both exporting and importing countries, producers, and consumers will suffer losses. Cooperation is the only way forward, and the rules supporting global trade need to be jointly maintained by all parties [1][2] - The U.S. government's tariff policies are causing severe impacts on both the U.S. and global markets, affecting global producers exporting to the U.S. and leading to increased costs for U.S. consumers [1] - Small and medium-sized economies participating in international trade find themselves in a dilemma, lacking the leverage to influence U.S. trade policies, which highlights their preference for a multilateral trade system to protect their interests [1] Group 2 - The stability of trade rules depends on the recognition and support from all parties, and selective enforcement of these rules can lead to deep impacts on the international trade system [2] - Strengthening and perfecting regional supply chains is proposed as a solution to the current tariff crisis, with a significant portion of products being consumed within the region, leading to a more balanced international trade structure [2]

Group 1 - The recent U.S.-China trade discussions have seen both sides maintaining communication on economic concerns, particularly regarding U.S. export control measures in the semiconductor sector [1] - The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued a directive to halt supplies to Chinese clients from several EDA software companies, which are crucial for chip design, indicating a significant escalation in trade tensions [1] - The U.S. International Trade Court ruled that Trump's tariffs imposed through executive orders were overreaching, highlighting the ongoing legal and economic ramifications of the trade war [3] Group 2 - The upcoming G20 summit in November may serve as a critical juncture for U.S.-China relations, with potential discussions aimed at resolving trade issues [3] - There is a growing sentiment among U.S. business leaders that the current tariff policies are unpopular, with calls for a return to cooperative and mutually beneficial trade practices [5] - China's proactive diplomatic efforts with various global regions, including Latin America and the EU, suggest a strategic shift in response to U.S. trade policies, enhancing its international economic relationships [7]

韩国总统李在明：全球环境的快速变化，例如日益增长的保护主义，正对韩国构成风险。 ...

商务部新闻发言人就欧盟拟限制中企参与医疗器械公共采购答记者问 问：有媒体报道，欧盟成员国依据《国际采购工具》投票决定，禁止中国医疗器械制造商未来5年内参与价值 超过500万欧元的欧盟公共采购项目招标。请问商务部对此有何评论？ 违法和不良信息举报电话：0755-83514034 邮箱：bwb@stcn.com 责编：汪云鹏 校对：刘星莹 百万用户都在看 利空突袭！这家A股突发：实控人被刑事立案！ 重大转变！特朗普，决定撤回！ 俄罗斯，突发！已有数十人伤亡 刚刚，首次承认！印度：战机被击落！ 深夜！中国资产，全线爆发！ 答：中方注意到有关情况。欧方有关决定和歧视性的措施不仅损害中方企业利益，而且利用单边工具破坏公平 竞争，构筑新的贸易壁垒，对这一保护主义做法，中方坚决反对。 当前，全球经济秩序正遭受单边主义、保护主义的严重冲击。作为负责任的主要经济体，中欧应恪守世贸组织 规则，坚持公平、透明和非歧视性原则，以相互开放应对挑战，以合作对话妥处分歧，共同维护中欧经贸关系 健康发展。希望欧方纠正错误做法，中方将密切关注欧方后续行动，并将采取措施，坚定维护中国企业的合法 权益。 来源：商务部新闻办公室 ...

Group 1 - The OECD has revised down its global economic growth forecasts for 2025 and 2026 to 2.9%, a decrease of 0.2 and 0.1 percentage points respectively from earlier predictions made in March [1] - The report highlights that increased trade barriers and uncertainty in economic and trade policies have negatively impacted business and consumer confidence, hindering trade and investment [1][2] - The United States, Canada, and Mexico are expected to experience significant growth slowdowns, with the U.S. projected to grow at 1.6% and 1.5% in 2025 and 2026, down by 0.6 and 0.1 percentage points from previous forecasts [1] Group 2 - The OECD anticipates that the overall inflation rate for G20 countries will decrease from 6.2% in 2024 to 3.6% in 2025 and 3.2% in 2026, although the U.S. is an exception with higher inflation rates projected [1] - The report emphasizes the need for countries to work together to address uncertainties, particularly by avoiding further trade fragmentation and barriers, which could help restore growth and investment [2] - The OECD's earlier mid-term economic outlook in March had projected higher growth rates of 3.1% and 3.0% for 2025 and 2026, indicating a significant downward revision in the latest report [2]

Core Points - The U.S. Trade Representative's Office announced an extension of the tariff exemption period for certain products related to China's technology transfer, intellectual property, and innovation practices from May 31, 2025, to August 31, 2025 [1][3] Group 1: Tariff Exemption Extension - The extension of the tariff exemption is based on public feedback received by December 29, 2023, and ongoing evaluations during the four-year review process [3] - A total of 164 items from Attachment A and 14 items from Attachment B will have their exemptions extended for an additional three months [3] - The exemption applies to products listed in Attachments A and B, including chemical materials, electronic components, medical supplies, solar manufacturing equipment, and wafer handling equipment [4] Group 2: Historical Context and Economic Impact - Historical data indicates that during the Trump administration, four rounds of "301 tariffs" were imposed on China, with the first three rounds having a 25% increase and the fourth round at 7.5% [3] - The average weighted tariff rate on Chinese imports was 19.3% at the beginning of 2020, but is projected to decrease to 10.7% by the end of 2024 due to changes in export proportions and product categories [3] - The U.S. has faced criticism for its unilateral and protectionist measures, which have been deemed to disrupt international trade order and supply chain stability [4] Group 3: New Investigations and Responses - On April 17, the U.S. Trade Representative's Office initiated a 301 investigation into China's maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding industries, which has been met with strong opposition from China [5] - China's Ministry of Commerce criticized the U.S. for misrepresenting normal trade activities as threats to national security and for blaming its own industrial issues on China [5] - The Chinese government has urged the U.S. to respect facts and multilateral rules, calling for a return to a rules-based multilateral trading system [5]