近日，国内半导体设备龙头屹唐股份发布公告称，将以窃取公司机密为由起诉美国应用材料公司（APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.）。 屹唐股份认为，应用材料公司非法获取并使用了其等离子体源及晶圆表面处理相关的核心技术秘密，还在中国境内以申请专利的方式披露该技术秘密，并将 专利申请权据为己有，违反《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法》，对其知识产权和经济利益造成严重损害。 图源：公司公告 屹唐股份诉讼请求包括判令被告停止相关侵权行为、确认涉事专利申请权归属、赔偿经济损失及合理支出合计9999万元等。 据悉，屹唐股份专注于半导体制造领域的设备研发、生产和销售，其高浓度、稳定均匀的等离子体晶圆表面处理技术，应用于干法去胶、蚀刻等半导体加工 设备，在该领域有一定的原创性技术积累。 应用材料公司则是全球知名的半导体设备供应商，业务涵盖半导体制造所需的各类设备及相关服务，在全球半导体设备市场占据重要地位。 值得关注的是，此次纠纷涉及应用材料公司招聘的曾任职于屹唐股份全资子公司MTI的两名员工，这两名员工曾签署保密协议，而应用材料公司提交的相关 发明专利申请中，主要发明人即为这两人，该专利申请被指披露了屹唐股份的技术秘密。 ...

Core Viewpoint - KK Group is involved in a legal dispute with Miniso regarding trademark infringement and unfair competition related to its brand "THE COLORIST," which is set to be heard in court on September 1. This case is significant for intellectual property protection in the beauty retail industry [2][4]. Company Overview - KK Group, established in 2015, is a leading new retail enterprise in China, owning multiple brands including "THE COLORIST," "KKV," and X11. The company has expanded to over 1,000 stores across more than 200 cities globally, including locations in Singapore, Thailand, and Malaysia [2][3]. Legal Background - The dispute began in 2019 when KK Group's brand "THE COLORIST" was registered by "Axin Technology" in China and by "Shenzhen Falaisheng" in several overseas countries, both of which are linked to Miniso. KK Group opened its first stores in Guangzhou and Shenzhen on September 26, 2019, quickly gaining recognition as a leading beauty retail brand [3][4]. Previous Legal Actions - Since 2020, KK Group has taken legal actions to protect its trademarks. The Beijing High People's Court ruled in favor of KK Group, stating that the registration by the infringing party constituted "unfair means of registration," leading to the cancellation of the trademark. Additionally, the Nanjing Intermediate People's Court found that Miniso's "WOW COLOUR" store design was highly similar to "THE COLORIST," ordering a cessation of infringement and a compensation of 2 million yuan [4][5]. Industry Context - The beauty retail sector in China has seen explosive growth, with the market size reaching 13 billion yuan in 2021 and projected to exceed 40 billion yuan by 2025. However, the industry faces challenges of homogenization, with many brands adopting similar business models and store designs, making it difficult for consumers to distinguish between them [5][6]. Market Trends - Recent reports indicate a slowdown in growth within the beauty retail sector, with some brands closing stores due to poor management. For instance, Sasa International announced the closure of its last 18 stores in mainland China in June 2025. In the first half of 2025, at least 34 domestic and international brands announced closures or exits from the Chinese market [6].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the rapid growth of China's toy export industry, particularly with the popularity of the LABUBU dolls, which has led to a surge in exports and raised concerns about intellectual property protection [1] - In the first four months of this year, China's exports of dolls and animal toys reached 13.31 billion yuan, marking a 9.6% increase [1] - The rise in popularity has also led to a significant number of intellectual property infringement cases, with over 20 cases related to Bubble Mart being reported in June alone [1] Group 2 - To address these challenges, cultural and creative enterprises are encouraged to shift from passive rights protection to proactive defense, establishing a systematic approach to intellectual property protection [2] - Bubble Mart has implemented a strategy of preemptive trademark registration for "LABUBU" and similar trademarks to prevent counterfeiting, ensuring a robust global trademark defense [2] - The article suggests that regulatory bodies should enhance smart regulation and judicial penalties to create a comprehensive deterrent against infringement [2] Group 3 - The articles propose deepening international rule adaptation and regional cooperation to cultivate a new ecosystem for cross-border rights protection [3] - It emphasizes the need to accelerate alignment with international conventions and establish cross-border intellectual property service centers to lower protection costs and shorten the rights confirmation cycle [3] - The promotion of international exhibitions and standard outputs is suggested to enhance China's copyright protection influence and support the globalization of unique IP values [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of legal protection for private enterprises in China, highlighting the role of law in fostering a stable environment for business development and innovation [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Framework and Support for Innovation - The Supreme Court has issued guidelines to implement the Private Economy Promotion Law, focusing on punitive damages and collaboration with the National Intellectual Property Administration to enhance protection for genuine innovation [2][3]. - Courts in various regions, such as Fujian and Ningde, are establishing collaborative mechanisms for judicial and administrative protection of intellectual property, particularly in key industries like ceramics and new energy vehicles [2][3]. Group 2: Addressing Business Challenges - The article discusses how judicial oversight has led to the unfreezing of over 80 million yuan in funds for a company affected by improper asset freezing due to a tax fraud investigation [4]. - As of July, national judicial authorities have supervised the return of over 12.7 billion yuan in unlawfully seized assets, indicating a proactive approach to alleviating business difficulties [4][5]. Group 3: Enhancing Communication and Reducing Administrative Burdens - The number of administrative inspections has decreased by over 30% compared to the previous year, with a significant reduction in on-site checks, reflecting efforts to ease the regulatory burden on businesses [5][6]. - Local police departments are establishing centers to streamline the reporting and management of economic crime cases, focusing on the needs of enterprises [6]. Group 4: Dispute Resolution Mechanisms - The establishment of a "court + business association" model aims to facilitate the resolution of commercial disputes efficiently and cost-effectively, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises [8]. - The judicial system is promoting arbitration as a viable alternative for dispute resolution, with over 4,373 international arbitration cases handled in 2024, contributing to a better business environment [8].

Core Viewpoint - During the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, China's intellectual property (IP) sector has made significant progress, achieving multiple core indicators ahead of schedule, thereby laying a solid foundation for building a strong IP nation and broadening its pathways [1][2]. Group 1: Institutional Foundation - Intellectual property protection serves as a "ballast" for innovation, with China completing a comprehensive revision of the Patent Law and simultaneously advancing the Trademark Law [1]. - The efficiency of patent and trademark examination has significantly improved, with the average examination period for invention patents reduced to 15.5 months and trademark registration maintained at 4 months, ranking among the fastest globally [1]. - By 2024, the social satisfaction level for IP protection is expected to reach 82.36 points, indicating a qualitative leap in protection levels from institutional provisions to practical effectiveness [1]. Group 2: Empowering Transformation - The vitality of intellectual property lies in its transformation and application, with the industrialization rate of enterprise invention patents rising to 53.3% [1]. - The value added of patent-intensive industries accounts for 13.04% of GDP, demonstrating that innovative achievements are rapidly transitioning from laboratories to production lines [1]. - Breakthroughs in key core technology patents in strategic emerging industries such as artificial intelligence and new energy vehicles are reinforcing technological self-reliance and injecting strong momentum into the development of new productive forces [1]. Group 3: Service Expansion - The national IP public service platform has been launched, providing a smart and efficient "one-stop" service network with 483 national-level public service institutions and 175 municipal-level comprehensive service institutions [2]. - The establishment of graduate-level IP programs has resulted in a talent pool exceeding 1 million, with over 40,000 practicing patent agents, contributing to a robust innovation ecosystem [2]. Group 4: Open Collaboration - China ranks 11th in the "Global Innovation Index Report," leading among middle-income economies, and has maintained the highest number of top 100 global technology clusters for two consecutive years [2]. - Chinese enterprises have won the World Intellectual Property Organization's global awards for four consecutive years, with the highest number of awards among all countries [2]. - IP cooperation relationships have been established with over 80 countries and regions, with the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) covering 84 countries, expanding China's international IP cooperation network [2].

Group 1: Mergers and Acquisitions in Semiconductor Sector - Multiple A-share listed companies are engaging in cross-industry mergers and acquisitions, particularly in the semiconductor sector, including companies like Wantong Development, Quzhou Development, Kaipu Cloud, Yongji Co., and Kanda New Materials [2][3] - Wantong Development plans to invest approximately 854.45 million yuan to acquire a 62.98% stake in Beijing Shudu Information Technology Co., which specializes in high-speed interconnect chip design and development [3] - Quzhou Development intends to purchase 95.46% of the shares of Guangdong Xiandao Rare Materials Co. and raise up to 3 billion yuan in supporting funds, with the estimated valuation of the target company not exceeding 12 billion yuan [4] - Yongji Co. is planning to acquire control of Nanjing Tena Fei Electronic Technology Co. through a combination of share issuance and cash payment [4] - Kanda New Materials aims to acquire 51% of Chengdu Zhongke Huamei Electronics Co. for 275 million yuan, making it a subsidiary [5] Group 2: Legal Disputes in Semiconductor Industry - Yitang Co., a leading domestic equipment manufacturer with a market value of 60 billion yuan, has filed a lawsuit against global semiconductor equipment leader Applied Materials for "illegally obtaining and using its core technical secrets," seeking 99.99 million yuan in damages [6][7] - The lawsuit highlights the competitive landscape between Chinese and American semiconductor equipment giants and reflects the determination of Chinese semiconductor companies to protect their innovations through legal means [6][7] Group 3: Lithium Mining and Market Reactions - Ningde Times' subsidiary, Yichun Times New Energy Mining Co., has temporarily halted operations at its lithium mine following the expiration of its mining rights, with plans to apply for an extension [8][9] - The suspension has led to a significant rise in lithium stocks, with companies like Tianqi Lithium and Jiangte Electric experiencing substantial gains, indicating a positive market reaction to the supply disruption [9]

Core Insights - The Japanese market is seen as a strategic high ground for brands looking to expand internationally, characterized by high consumer spending and strict compliance requirements [1] - A private event titled "TikTok Japan Gold Rush: Seizing the New Windfall of 'Market Increment + Brand Protection'" was held to empower Chinese enterprises in navigating the Japanese market [1] - The event featured discussions on new pathways for overseas business and global brand development strategies [3] Group 1: Market Dynamics - The dual circulation strategy emphasizes that Chinese enterprises should enhance product capabilities through domestic circulation while leveraging international circulation to capture pricing power and blue ocean markets [4] - The Japanese market is experiencing explosive growth, with GMV increasing by 150%-200%, opening doors to significant sales opportunities [6] - Companies are advised to focus on product quality, packaging design, and localized innovation to build competitive barriers and protect profit margins [6] Group 2: Knowledge and Strategy - Insights were shared on the growth paradigm in the Japanese market, including platform traffic distribution mechanisms and localized operational strategies [6] - Practical experiences were discussed regarding the challenges and opportunities in the Japanese consumer ecosystem, highlighting underappreciated niche markets [8] - A comprehensive approach to global intellectual property (IP) strategies was presented, covering trademark and patent layouts, infringement monitoring, and cross-border litigation [10] Group 3: Collaborative Efforts - A roundtable discussion focused on the transition from "product export" to "brand asset export," exploring how to leverage IP as a competitive tool for sustainable growth [12] - The collaboration between companies like 安盾网 and TikTok aims to integrate resources and capabilities to support Chinese brands in achieving both short-term breakthroughs and long-term sustainability in global markets [14]

Core Viewpoint - Corning Inc. has initiated a series of legal actions, including a "337 investigation," against several leading Chinese companies in the new display industry, indicating a significant escalation in the competition between U.S. and Chinese firms in the display supply chain [1][2][6][14]. Group 1: Overview of the Investigation and Lawsuits - The "337 investigation" by Corning is a critical phase in the legal battle, with evidence submission deadlines set by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) [1][10]. - Corning has filed a total of 13 lawsuits against Chinese companies, including Rainbow Technology, TCL Huaxing Optoelectronics, and Huike, across multiple jurisdictions such as the U.S., EU, and India [2][9]. - The investigation targets the entire display industry chain, from materials to end products, highlighting the comprehensive nature of the legal actions [9][21]. Group 2: Market Dynamics and Implications - China's display panel production accounts for approximately 50% of the global market, with over 70% of shipments originating from China [4][19]. - Corning, along with two Japanese companies, dominates about 90% of the glass substrate market, posing a significant challenge for Chinese firms like Rainbow Technology, which has recently achieved a 10% market share [4][15]. - The legal actions are seen as an attempt by Corning to maintain its market position and limit the production capacity of Chinese companies, which have begun to break the technological monopoly in the glass substrate market [14][16]. Group 3: Technological and Competitive Landscape - The glass substrate is a crucial material in the display supply chain, akin to silicon wafers in the semiconductor industry, making the ongoing legal battles pivotal for the future of the Chinese display industry [5][15]. - Both Corning and Rainbow Technology utilize the "overflow method" for glass substrate production, which is essential for achieving the required precision and quality [21]. - The competition is not only about market share but also revolves around intellectual property rights, with Corning leveraging its patents to create barriers for Chinese competitors [22][23]. Group 4: Future Outlook and Industry Response - The outcome of these legal battles could significantly impact the Chinese display industry's ability to secure its supply chain and maintain competitive pricing, as evidenced by the drop in glass substrate prices due to increased local production [16][17]. - Experts emphasize the need for China to develop its own intellectual property in the glass substrate sector to ensure long-term sustainability and independence in the display industry [25][29]. - The ongoing disputes reflect broader trends in global trade and technology competition, with potential implications for other sectors as well [30][31].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing legal battles initiated by Corning Inc. against several leading Chinese companies in the new display industry, highlighting the implications for the industry and the potential risks to China's market position due to patent and intellectual property disputes [2][4][20]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Investigations - As of mid-August this year, Corning has initiated a total of 13 lawsuits related to patents and intellectual property against Chinese companies such as Rainbow Technology, TCL Huaxing Optoelectronics, and HKC in various regions including the US, EU, India, and China [2][4]. - The critical date for evidence submission in the "337 investigation" by the US International Trade Commission (ITC) is set for August 8, 2025, marking a significant point in the legal proceedings [2][8]. - Corning has filed two applications for "337 investigations" against Chinese companies within a short span from late 2024 to early 2025, accusing them of infringing on its patents and trade secrets in the glass substrate sector [6][10]. Group 2: Industry Context and Market Dynamics - The display industry chain is divided into three segments: glass substrates (upstream), liquid crystal panels (midstream), and electronic displays (downstream), with downstream applications in TVs, smartphones, computers, and automotive displays [3]. - China currently accounts for approximately half of the global display panel output value and over 70% of the shipment volume, having invested over 1.5 trillion yuan to establish more than 60 production lines with an annual capacity of about 250 million square meters [4][14]. - Despite this growth, around 90% of the glass substrate market is dominated by Corning and two Japanese companies, with Rainbow Technology being the only Chinese firm to recently overcome the technical barriers of the 8.5-generation production line [4][12]. Group 3: Implications of the Legal Battles - The ongoing legal disputes are seen as a significant threat to the Chinese display industry's future, as the outcome could determine the ability of Chinese companies to maintain their market share and technological advancements [12][20]. - The legal actions initiated by Corning are perceived as efforts to restrict the production capacity of Chinese firms, which have recently begun to challenge the long-standing technological monopoly held by multinational corporations [13][21]. - The article emphasizes the importance of intellectual property rights in the glass substrate market, as both Corning and Rainbow Technology utilize similar manufacturing processes, making the protection of patents crucial for competitive advantage [16][18].

Core Viewpoint - The company, Dinggu Jichuang, has received a patent for an invention titled "Method for Selecting Value of Particleboard and Composite Board," which is expected to enhance its intellectual property protection and promote technological innovation, thereby strengthening its core competitiveness [1]. Summary by Relevant Categories Patent Acquisition - The patent was applied for on December 6, 2022, and the authorization announcement was made on August 15, 2025 [1]. - The acquisition of this patent is not expected to have a significant impact on the company's recent production and operations [1]. Impact on Company Operations - The patent will help improve the company's intellectual property protection system [1]. - It is anticipated to leverage the company's independent intellectual property advantages and promote technological innovation [1]. - The overall effect on the company's production and operations is viewed positively [1].