Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's recent remarks regarding Taiwan have sparked significant international backlash, highlighting concerns over Japan's potential military involvement in the Taiwan Strait and its implications for regional stability [1][2][5] Group 1: Reactions to Kishi's Statements - Kishi's assertion that Japan may intervene militarily in Taiwan under the guise of "collective self-defense" is viewed as a serious provocation against China's sovereignty and a challenge to post-war international order [2][5] - The comments have raised alarms about Japan's emerging militaristic tendencies and the potential for escalating tensions in East Asia, particularly regarding Japan's view of Taiwan as a potential conflict zone [2][5][6] - Local voices from Okinawa express deep concern over the implications of Kishi's statements, fearing that they could lead to a repeat of historical tragedies experienced during World War II [4][6] Group 2: Historical Context and Public Sentiment - The historical context of Okinawa's suffering during the war is emphasized, with local residents advocating for peace and opposing militarization in the region [4][6] - There is a growing sentiment among the Japanese public against the portrayal of China as a threat, with a significant portion of the population expressing negative views towards China, largely influenced by political rhetoric and media narratives [7][8] - The need for increased cultural and economic exchanges between Japan and China is highlighted as a means to counteract negative perceptions and foster mutual understanding [10][11] Group 3: Political Implications - Kishi's remarks are seen as aligning with a broader trend of right-wing nationalism in Japan, which could exacerbate tensions with China and undermine diplomatic relations [9][15] - The potential for Kishi's statements to incite further militarization and conflict in the region is a major concern, with calls for her to reconsider her position and adhere to existing treaties that promote peace [12][14] - The dialogue emphasizes the importance of addressing historical grievances and fostering a cooperative relationship between Japan and China, rather than succumbing to adversarial posturing [12][15]

Group 1 - Japanese Prime Minister Sanna Takashi made provocative remarks regarding Taiwan in the National Diet, suggesting that a sudden situation in Taiwan could trigger Japan's collective self-defense rights [1] - The term "existential crisis situation" was introduced in Japan's 2015 security legislation, allowing Japan to assist allies even if its territory is not directly attacked [1] - Takashi's statements are seen as a significant shift, as she is the first sitting prime minister to explicitly link Taiwan's situation to Japan's security, potentially opening the door for military intervention [1] Group 2 - Former legislator Guo Zhengliang compared Japan's stance to Taiwan's DPP's "anti-China, protect Taiwan" narrative, indicating a shared aggressive posture [2] - The Chinese government has warned that any attempts by Taiwan to rely on external forces for independence will ultimately fail [2] - The Chinese Ministry of National Defense emphasized that any reckless military intervention by Japan in the Taiwan Strait would result in severe consequences [2]

高市7日在国会答辩时就"台湾有事"表示，如果伴随出动军舰和使用武力，可能会构成"存亡危机事 态"。根据日本法律，如发生被认定为威胁日本的"存亡危机事态"，即便并未直接遭受攻击，日本也将 可以行使集体自卫权。10日，高市在国会答辩时坚称，其言论遵循日本政府的一贯见解，无意撤回。 （记者：陈泽安、李子越；漫画：王靖云、郑开君） 日本共产党籍众议员志位和夫14日在社交平台X上发帖说，高市的涉台言论正演变为严重的国际问题。 要想使日中关系朝着积极方向发展，需要以两国确认的共识为基础，发挥智慧，冷静对话，而不是发表 加剧紧张局势的挑衅性言论。他再次要求高市撤回有关言论。 日本立宪民主党籍众议员大串博志10日在国会向高市质询时表示，此前日本历届内阁都谨慎发表相关言 论，高市应当撤回其言论。 日本首相高市早苗近日在日本国会答辩时发出涉台错误言论，多名日本国会议员随后要求她撤回相关言 论。 据日本《赤旗报》15日报道，日本共产党籍参议员山添拓14日在记者会上说，高市的言论加剧日中紧张 关系并导致互不信任。为避免日中关系进一步恶化，高市作为首相应撤回其言论。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's recent statements in the Diet suggest a potential military intervention in the Taiwan issue, marking a significant shift in Japan's defense posture since World War II [1][5][14]. Summary by Sections Definition of "Existential Crisis Situation" - The term "existential crisis situation" was created by former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe a decade ago, allowing Japan to exercise collective self-defense in cases where a closely related foreign country is attacked, threatening Japan's survival [4][6]. - This concept is seen as a legal loophole to bypass the restrictions imposed by Japan's pacifist constitution, particularly Article 9, which prohibits military actions [4][6]. Takaichi's Ambitions and Policy Shifts - Takaichi, identifying as a successor to Abe's policies, has linked the Taiwan issue to Japan's "existential crisis," suggesting that Taiwan's situation threatens Japan's survival [5][6]. - The Japanese government is reportedly planning a significant shift in defense policy, including increasing military spending and potentially revising the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [9][10]. Domestic Reactions and Criticism - Takaichi's remarks have sparked widespread criticism within Japan, with former Prime Ministers and political figures expressing shock and urging her to retract her statements [14][16]. - Public protests have emerged, with citizens demanding Takaichi's resignation and expressing concerns over her provocative rhetoric towards China [17]. Historical Context and Implications - Analysts warn that Japan's historical pattern of military expansion often begins with a narrative of "crisis," which has been used to justify past aggressions [5][6]. - The current political climate reflects a resurgence of right-wing sentiments in Japan, aiming to reshape the post-war pacifist narrative and challenge the established international order [17].

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's recent statements in the Diet suggest a potential military intervention in the Taiwan issue, marking a significant shift in Japan's defense posture since World War II [1][5][12] Group 1: Concept of "Existential Crisis Situation" - The term "existential crisis situation" was introduced by former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe a decade ago, allowing Japan to exercise collective self-defense under specific conditions [1][2] - This concept defines a situation where an armed attack on a closely related foreign country poses a clear danger to Japan's survival, fundamentally threatening the rights of its citizens [1][2] Group 2: Political Implications - Takaichi's remarks link Taiwan to Japan's "existential crisis situation," which has sparked significant domestic backlash, with critics arguing that Taiwan is part of China and not a threat to Japan's survival [5][12] - Analysts warn that Japan's historical narrative of "crisis" has often been used to justify military expansion and aggression, suggesting Takaichi's rhetoric may serve similar purposes [5][12] Group 3: Defense Policy Shift - Takaichi has proposed aggressive military expansion policies, including a significant increase in defense spending and the potential development of nuclear capabilities [6][8] - The ruling Liberal Democratic Party is set to discuss amendments to key security documents, aiming to raise defense spending to 2% of GDP and reconsider the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [8][11] Group 4: Domestic Reactions - Takaichi's statements have led to widespread criticism from former prime ministers and political figures, emphasizing that Japan should not interfere in Taiwan's internal affairs [12][13] - Public protests have erupted, with citizens demanding Takaichi's resignation and a retraction of her statements, reflecting a strong opposition to her militaristic rhetoric [14][15]

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's recent statements in the Diet suggest a potential military intervention in the Taiwan issue, marking a significant shift in Japan's defense posture since World War II [1][5][10] Summary by Sections Concept of "Existential Crisis Situation" - The term "Existential Crisis Situation" was created by former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe a decade ago, allowing Japan to exercise collective self-defense under specific conditions [3] - This situation is defined as a clear and imminent danger that threatens Japan's survival due to military attacks on closely related foreign nations [3][5] Takaichi's Statements and Domestic Reactions - Takaichi linked the Taiwan issue to Japan's "Existential Crisis Situation," suggesting that Taiwan's situation threatens Japan's survival [5][10] - Her comments have sparked significant backlash within Japan, with former Prime Ministers and political leaders criticizing her statements as illogical and provocative [11][12] Defense Policy Shift - The ruling Liberal Democratic Party plans to discuss amendments to Japan's National Security Strategy and related documents, aiming to increase defense spending and potentially revise the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [7][9] - Takaichi's administration is pushing for aggressive military policies, including a substantial increase in defense spending and the possibility of acquiring nuclear capabilities [7][9] Public Protests and Political Pressure - Following Takaichi's remarks, public protests erupted in Tokyo, with citizens demanding her resignation and a retraction of her statements [12][13] - Various political figures and civil groups have expressed concerns over the implications of her comments for Japan's national security and international relations, particularly with China [10][12][13]

Core Viewpoint - The recent statements made by Japan's new Prime Minister, Sanae Takaichi, regarding Taiwan have sparked significant controversy in the international community, indicating a potential shift in Japan's political stance towards China and Taiwan [1][15][40]. Group 1: Political Context - Takaichi's comments suggest that a situation in Taiwan could be considered a "survival crisis" for Japan, implying possible military intervention [1][5]. - This marks a departure from previous Japanese leaders who refrained from linking Taiwan's situation directly to Japan's national security [7][19]. - The term "survival crisis" was originally introduced by former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, allowing Japan to exercise collective self-defense under certain conditions [5][27]. Group 2: Domestic Reactions - Takaichi's remarks have faced backlash from various political figures in Japan, including former Prime Ministers who emphasize that Taiwan is a domestic issue for China and should not involve Japan [17][19]. - Critics within Japan have labeled Takaichi's statements as reckless and dangerous, raising concerns about the implications for Japan's military posture and regional stability [9][21][25]. Group 3: International Implications - The Chinese government has expressed strong opposition to Takaichi's comments, viewing them as a violation of Japan's previous political commitments and an interference in China's internal affairs [13][41]. - Experts warn that Japan's rightward political shift, as evidenced by Takaichi's statements, could lead to increased tensions in East Asia and a potential escalation of military conflicts [27][36][39].

"如何解决台湾问题是中国人自己的事，不容任何外来干涉。"13日，外交部副部长孙卫东奉示召见日本 驻华大使金杉宪治，就日本首相高市早苗涉华错误言行提出严正交涉。孙卫东表示，日本首相高市早苗 日前在国会答辩时公然发表涉台露骨挑衅言论，暗示可能武力介入台海问题，性质影响极其恶劣。在中 方多次严正交涉后，日方仍不思悔改，拒不撤回错误言论。中方对此强烈不满、坚决反对，向日方提出 严正交涉和强烈抗议。14日，国防部发言人和国务院台办发言人分别发表评论称，日本领导人涉台错误 言论"挑战战后国际秩序，向'台独'势力发出严重错误信号，性质影响十分恶劣，极不负责、极其危 险"，"希望广大台湾同胞充分认清相关行径的危险性、危害性，同我们一道守护中华民族共同家园，维 护中华民族根本利益和自身安全福祉"。 "14亿中国人民对此绝不答应！" 11月7日，高市早苗在日本国会众议院被问及"台湾有事"是否属于安全保障相关法规定中可行使集体自 卫权的"存亡危机事态"时表示："如果涉及武力行使，我认为这可能属于'存亡危机事态'的情形。"10 日，面对有议员建议应当修正上述言论，高市辩称，"这只是针对最坏情况的假设性回答"，并坚称自己 的发言符合政 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Ma Ying-jeou's criticism of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's remarks regarding Taiwan, highlighting concerns over regional tensions and the misinterpretation of Japan's "collective self-defense" concept [1] Summary by Sections - **Criticism of Takaichi's Remarks** - Ma Ying-jeou expresses deep concern over Takaichi's comments, which he believes incorrectly invoke Japan's "collective self-defense" and exacerbate tensions in the Taiwan Strait [1] - He notes that there are differing opinions within Japan regarding Takaichi's statements, citing former Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's warning against making definitive conclusions [1] - **Concerns Over Militarism** - Ma suggests that Takaichi's proactive stance on Taiwan may evoke fears of a resurgence of Japanese right-wing militarism, especially given the historical context of Japan's invasion and the ongoing pain it caused to the Chinese people [1] - He emphasizes that this is particularly sensitive as it marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the War of Resistance and Taiwan's recovery [1] - **Misinterpretation of Collective Self-Defense** - Ma argues that Takaichi has misquoted the concept of "collective self-defense," stating that any situation regarding Japan's survival must first be discussed with the United States, which Takaichi apparently did not do [1] - He concludes that peace and stability in cross-strait relations are essential to avoid the tensions Takaichi describes, asserting that these issues should be resolved directly between the two sides without foreign intervention [1]

2015年7月，在民众的强烈抗议声浪中，日本国会强行通过了安倍晋三政府提交的旨在解禁集体自卫权 的新安保法案。 行使集体自卫权，实际上超越了日本宪法第9条划定的红线，这是1972年日本政府就"集体自卫权和宪法 关系"发表的正式立场。安倍内阁解禁集体自卫权的做法有违反宪法之嫌，也是迄今日本绝大多数宪法 学者的共识。 新安保法案规定，在"存亡危机事态"之际，日本可行使集体自卫权，而所谓"存亡危机事态"的定义是这 样的："与我国有密切关系的他国遭到武力攻击，因此威胁到我国的生存，从根本上颠覆了我国国民的 生命、自由和追求幸福的权利的明确的危险事态。"从本质上来说，解禁集体自卫权，是为了松绑日本 宪法对日本扩军和自卫队海外行动的限制。 想不到，10年后，以安倍路线继承人自诩的高市早苗悍然将台湾问题与"存亡危机事态"联系起来，在接 受国会质询中公然发表涉台露骨挑衅言论，暗示日本可能武力介入台海问题。 高市这是图穷匕见了！ 台湾是"与日本有密切关系的他国"？台湾问题"威胁到日本的生存"？"从根本上颠覆了日本国民的生 命、自由和追求幸福的权利"？简直荒谬至极。 责编：张靖雯、姚凯红 正如中方指出的，高市早苗的错误言论粗暴干 ...