又一家上市公司因严重财务造假被中国证监会查处，将被退市。 近日，中国证监会对深交所创业板上市公司北京东方通科技股份有限公司（以下简称"*ST东通 （300379）"）涉嫌定期报告等财务数据存在虚假记载作出行政处罚事先告知。经查，*ST东通连续4年 虚增收入和利润，违反证券法律法规。 在市场人士看来，今年以来，重大违法强制退市数量创新高，形成了强大的执法震慑，促使上市公司 及"关键少数"更加敬畏法律、敬畏市场，依法依规经营。 连续4年虚增收入和利润 9月12日晚，*ST东通发布公告称，收到中国证监会《行政处罚事先告知书》（以下简称《告知 书》）。根据《告知书》，*ST东通2019年、2020年、2021年、2022年年度报告信息披露存在虚假记 载、公告的证券发行文件编造重大虚假内容。 《告知书》显示，2018年12月，*ST东通收购北京泰策科技有限公司（以下简称"泰策科技"）100%股 权，泰策科技成为东方通全资子公司。2019年至2022年期间，*ST东通通过泰策科技虚构业务、提前确 认收入等方式虚增收入、利润，导致*ST东通披露的2019年至2022年年度报告存在虚假记载，4年间合 计虚增收入4.32亿元， ...

Group 1 - Regulatory authorities continue investigations into delisted companies, with recent penalties amounting to billions for financial fraud, fraudulent issuance, fund occupation, and illegal guarantees [1][3][4] - The new "National Nine Articles" and delisting regulations emphasize the principle of "delisting does not exempt from liability," reflecting a zero-tolerance approach towards capital market violations [2][8] - Companies like Yili Clean Energy and Huatie Co. have faced severe penalties, with Yili Clean Energy's total fines reaching approximately 375 million yuan and significant bans imposed on its executives [3][4] Group 2 - Regulatory bodies are actively pursuing the recovery of occupied funds from delisted companies, ensuring that responsible parties are held accountable [5][6] - The case of Delisted Longyu illustrates ongoing investigations post-delisting, with fines totaling 38.1 million yuan for inflated income and undisclosed fund occupations [6] - The regulatory focus extends to intermediary institutions, which are also being penalized for their roles in facilitating financial misconduct [7][8] Group 3 - The Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau has reinforced its commitment to stringent oversight of delisted companies, ensuring that financial fraud is thoroughly investigated and that responsible individuals face increased penalties [8] - Investor protection mechanisms have been enhanced, providing various avenues for compensation and legal recourse for investors affected by delisted companies [8]

Core Viewpoint - Recent regulatory actions against financial fraud in the stock market have intensified, with several companies facing significant penalties, indicating a stronger stance from authorities against such practices [1][3]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - On September 12, multiple listed companies received fines from regulatory authorities for financial fraud, with penalties reaching over 200 million yuan for some, and even former delisted companies being penalized [1][3]. - This year alone, more than ten companies have been punished by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) for financial fraud, a number that surpasses previous years [3]. - The penalties have escalated from previous fines of a few hundred thousand to over a billion yuan, demonstrating a serious commitment to tackling financial misconduct [3]. Group 2: Enforcement Mechanisms - Regulatory authorities are employing advanced technologies such as big data and artificial intelligence to detect financial discrepancies, making it harder for companies to conceal fraudulent activities [5][6]. - The CSRC encourages public reporting of financial fraud, which enhances the ability to uncover hidden misconduct [6]. Group 3: Implications for Companies - Companies that have been delisted are still subject to penalties for past fraudulent activities, signaling that delisting does not exempt them from accountability [7][9]. - The regulatory environment is shifting, with local governments now cooperating with regulatory bodies to ensure a clean market, recognizing that financial fraud harms ordinary investors and the overall market integrity [11]. Group 4: Investor Protection - The regulatory framework is evolving to provide better protection for investors, with efforts to facilitate collective lawsuits for compensation against fraudulent companies [11][13]. - The ongoing crackdown on financial fraud is seen as a positive development for ordinary investors, as it aims to create a more trustworthy market environment [13].

Core Viewpoint - Shenzhen Guangdao Digital Technology Co., Ltd. (*ST Guangdao*) has been found guilty of systematic financial fraud from 2018 to mid-2024, with a total inflated revenue exceeding 1.4 billion yuan, leading to severe regulatory consequences [1][4]. Group 1: Financial Fraud Details - The company engaged in financial fraud by creating false sales and purchase contracts, invoices, bank receipts, delivery notices, and warehouse receipts to inflate both revenue and costs [4]. - The inflated revenues for the years 2018 to mid-2024 were as follows: - 2018: 142.97 million yuan (87.34%) - 2019: 191.56 million yuan (95.39%) - 2020: 223.44 million yuan (98.96%) - 2021: 249.27 million yuan (85.87%) - 2022: 303.97 million yuan (99.39%) - 2023: 282.63 million yuan (98.14%) - 2024 (H1): 71.65 million yuan (88.11%) [4]. - The inflated costs for the same period were: - 2018: 64.65 million yuan (84.53%) - 2019: 85.42 million yuan (91.17%) - 2020: 117.36 million yuan (98.41%) - 2021: 133.08 million yuan (83.30%) - 2022: 162.51 million yuan (99.13%) - 2023: 151.90 million yuan (92.26%) - 2024 (H1): 38.63 million yuan (83.81%) [4]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions and Consequences - The company has been subjected to an administrative penalty by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) and is facing mandatory delisting due to serious violations of regulations [2][5]. - Starting from September 15, 2025, the company's stock will be suspended from trading due to the triggering of major illegal delisting circumstances [2]. - *ST Guangdao* will become the first company to be delisted from the Beijing Stock Exchange since its establishment, as previous delistings were due to transfers rather than direct violations [6].

Core Viewpoint - Shenzhen Guangdao Digital Technology Co., Ltd. (*ST Guangdao*) has been found guilty of systematic financial fraud from 2018 to mid-2024, inflating its revenue by over 1.4 billion yuan, with some years showing nearly 100% inflation in reported income [1][5][9]. Summary by Sections Financial Fraud Details - The company inflated its operating revenue by 142,973,927.21 yuan in 2018, 191,558,867.84 yuan in 2019, 223,444,673.66 yuan in 2020, 249,266,088.49 yuan in 2021, 303,965,284.02 yuan in 2022, 282,630,187.61 yuan in 2023, and 71,646,067.21 yuan in the first half of 2024, with respective inflation rates of 87.34%, 95.39%, 98.96%, 85.87%, 99.39%, 98.14%, and 88.11% [5][9]. - Operating costs were also inflated by 64,652,610.42 yuan in 2018, 85,416,420.45 yuan in 2019, 117,359,597.78 yuan in 2020, 133,078,197.50 yuan in 2021, 162,512,396.11 yuan in 2022, 151,900,201.80 yuan in 2023, and 38,629,991.69 yuan in the first half of 2024, with inflation rates of 84.53%, 91.17%, 98.41%, 83.30%, 99.13%, 92.26%, and 83.81% respectively [5][9]. Regulatory Actions - The company has been subjected to an administrative penalty by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) due to its violations of information disclosure laws, leading to an investigation initiated in December 2024 [1][9]. - As a result of these violations, *ST Guangdao* will face mandatory delisting from the Beijing Stock Exchange starting September 15, 2025 [2][10]. Company Background - Established in 2003, *ST Guangdao* was listed on the New Third Board in November 2016 and became one of the first companies to be listed on the Beijing Stock Exchange in 2021, focusing on software product development and sales aimed at data applications [7][8].

Core Viewpoint - *ST Dongtong, once a leading middleware company in China, faces a severe financial crisis due to systematic financial fraud over four years, leading to a significant drop in stock price and impending delisting [1][3][4]. Financial Fraud Details - The company inflated its revenue by a total of 432 million yuan and profits by 314 million yuan from 2019 to 2022, with annual inflated revenues ranging from 61.45 million yuan to 160.53 million yuan, and profits from 52.23 million yuan to 123.69 million yuan [3][4]. - The inflated figures represented 12.29% to 17.68% of reported revenues and 22.72% to 219.43% of reported profits during the respective years [3]. Regulatory Actions - On September 12, the company received a notice from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) regarding administrative penalties due to the fraudulent activities [3][4]. - The company is set to face delisting procedures as it has been flagged for major violations, marking it as the 12th company to face such actions since 2025 [4][6]. Financial Performance - The company has reported continuous revenue decline and net losses for three consecutive years, totaling nearly 1.3 billion yuan in losses [5]. - In the first half of 2025, the company reported a revenue of 240 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 48.85%, but still incurred a net loss of 55.16 million yuan [5]. Governance Issues - The company has faced significant governance challenges, with its 2024 annual report receiving an audit opinion that could not be expressed, indicating serious internal control issues [5][6]. - The CSRC has imposed a fine of 229 million yuan on the company and additional penalties on responsible individuals, including a 10-year ban on the former chairman from engaging in securities activities [6].

导语："个别监管安排、地方输血、企业造假"的结构，相比以往贪腐方式，更柔性、更隐蔽，但危害更大。 金融系统反腐已进入 " 高频时刻 " 。 上市公司方面，则借此虚增收入、制造增长假象，以维持资本市场的存续地位，或顺利过会 IPO ，或避免退市。 一纸批复的时机、一笔债券发行的承销安排、一份 PPP 合同的对接，均可能成为利益交换的方式。 与传统腐败最大的不同在于，它往往具有表面合法性。所有文件、合同和公告看上去都符合法规，却在桌面之下， 完成了权力与资本的绑定。 从监管高层到大型金融机构的高管，从地方国资平台到产业园区，密集出现的落马案例背后，一种隐秘的腐败模 式，逐渐浮出水面。 不同于传统意义上直接收受贿赂， 这类模式往往通过制度性通道实现 " 监管 资源 货币化 " ，呈现出个别监管高 层、地方国资与城投平台、上市公司三方之间的 " 软交易 " 。 所谓 " 监管 资源 货币化 " ，指的是监管权力 带来的资源 ，被转化为可交易的资源。它不是简单的贪污受贿，而 是把监管环节制度化的权力，变成企业可以购买的 " 隐性服务 " 。 这种交易在表面上保持了 " 合规外观 " ，利益交换也不再通过直接转移现金或财 ...

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has announced severe penalties for *ST Dongtong due to serious financial fraud, leading to a total fine of 273 million yuan for the company and seven related individuals [1][2] Group 1: Company Actions and Penalties - *ST Dongtong's stock was suspended from trading after a significant drop, with its current price being over 90% lower than its historical peak [1] - The auditing firms involved, including Beijing Dehao International Accounting Firm and Dahua Accounting Firm, have received warning letters from regulatory authorities [1] - The underwriter for *ST Dongtong, First Entrepreneurship, has also faced scrutiny, with its designated representative receiving a warning letter from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange for failing to conduct due diligence [1][2] Group 2: Financial Misconduct and Implications - In June 2023, *ST Dongtong disclosed a fundraising report indicating it raised approximately 2.2 billion yuan, based on fabricated financial data from 2019 to 2021 [1] - First Entrepreneurship's subsidiary, Yi Chuang Investment, served as the underwriter during the fraudulent issuance period, raising questions about potential joint liability and regulatory penalties [2] - Previous cases have shown that underwriters can face significant financial repercussions, as seen in the "first case of fraudulent issuance on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board," where involved institutions paid a total of 1.275 billion yuan in compensation to investors [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes a "zero tolerance" approach towards financial fraud and misconduct in the capital market, with strict penalties being imposed on companies like *ST Dongtong and Yili Clean Energy [1][2] - The regulatory environment is characterized by severe penalties, including billion-level fines, which serve as a deterrent against financial misconduct and enhance investor protection [1][3] - Strong regulation is seen as essential for maintaining market confidence and ensuring the quality of listed companies, which directly impacts investor safety [1][3] Group 2 - The regulatory framework is designed to hold all entities accountable, with no exceptions for companies or individuals who violate market rules, as demonstrated by the case of Yili Clean Energy facing penalties even after delisting [2] - The comprehensive accountability system under strong regulation has led to a decrease in low-cost violations, fostering a healthier market ecosystem [3] - Enhanced governance among listed companies and increased diligence from intermediaries are expected outcomes of the stringent regulatory measures, ultimately benefiting investors through reduced risks and improved company performance [3]

Core Viewpoint - *ST Dongtong, once a leading middleware company in China, faces severe consequences due to systemic financial fraud over four years, leading to a significant drop in stock price and impending delisting [1][4][5]. Financial Fraud Details - The company inflated its revenue by a total of 432 million yuan and profits by 314 million yuan from 2019 to 2022, with annual inflated revenues ranging from 61.45 million yuan to 160.53 million yuan, and profits from 52.23 million yuan to 123.69 million yuan [4][5]. - The inflated figures represented 12.29% to 17.68% of reported revenues and 22.72% to 219.43% of reported profits during the respective years [4]. Regulatory Actions - On September 12, the company received a notice from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) regarding administrative penalties due to the fraudulent activities [4]. - Following the discovery of the fraud, the company announced on September 14 that it would face delisting procedures due to significant violations, marking it as the 12th company to face such actions since 2025 [5]. Financial Performance - The company has reported continuous revenue decline and net losses for three consecutive years, accumulating losses of nearly 1.3 billion yuan [6][7]. - In the first half of 2025, the company reported a revenue of 240 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 48.85%, but still recorded a net loss of 55.16 million yuan [7]. Governance Issues - The company has faced governance challenges, including an audit report for 2024 that was unable to express an opinion, indicating serious internal control issues [7]. - The CSRC has imposed a fine of 229 million yuan on the company and a total of 44 million yuan on seven responsible individuals, including the former chairman, who received a personal fine of 26.5 million yuan and a 10-year ban from the securities market [7][8].