公平竞争是市场经济的基本原则。"向上取整"的做法，其本质是以格式条款将不公平、不合理的规则强 加于消费者，将粗放的计量方式作为获取额外利润的手段。长此以往，不仅会损害消费者的信任，还会 形成"劣币驱逐良币"效应，对公平竞争的市场秩序带来破坏——既然"向上取整"能挣得更多，那么又何 必精准计量和公平收费呢？ 消费者权益保护法规定，经营者不得设定不公平、不合理的交易条件，不得强制交易。价格法明确，经 营者应当明码标价，不得利用虚假或使人误解的价格手段诱骗消费者。根据民法典，格式条款违反法 律、行政法规强制性规定的无效。然而，现实中"向上取整"往往以"行业惯例"为挡箭牌，游走在法律边 缘牟利。对此，应以法治之力加以治理。 完善相关制度，厘清"向上取整"边界。目前，相关规章制度对"向上取整"缺乏足够清晰界定，导致部分 企业钻空子。应进一步明确何种情况下允许合理取整、何种情况属于变相加价，让执法更有据可依。国 家邮政局的此次整治就是很好的范例，通过优化完善快递行业计重规则，也为其他领域整治类似问题提 供借鉴。 加强市场监管，提高违法成本。相关行业主管部门应主动作为，对利用"向上取整"变相涨价的商家进行 约谈、处罚，并建 ...

完善相关制度，厘清"向上取整"边界。目前，相关规章制度对"向上取整"缺乏足够清晰界定，导致部分 企业钻空子。应进一步明确何种情况下允许合理取整、何种情况属于变相加价，让执法更有据可依。国 家邮政局的此次整治就是很好的范例，通过优化完善快递行业计重规则，也为其他领域整治类似问题提 供借鉴。 加强市场监管，提高违法成本。相关行业主管部门应主动作为，对利用"向上取整"变相涨价的商家进行 约谈、处罚，并建立黑名单制度等，让违规者付出代价。同时畅通消费者投诉渠道，激活社会监督，形 成惩戒机制。 近日，国家邮政局就部分快递企业在计重收费中存在"向上取整"行为作出回应，指导相关企业参照《快 递服务》国家标准，优化完善服务收费计重规则。目前，相关企业普遍优化了计重收费规则，计费重量 以千克为单位，保留小数点后至少1位。 推动行业自律，倡导诚信经营。行业协会应制定行业规范，引导企业合法合规计量定价，杜绝隐性收 费。企业也应认识到，短期的"小聪明"可能带来一时的利润，但长远来看，只有诚信计量公平交易，才 能赢得消费者长久支持。 所谓"向上取整"，即在计价时只要零头超过"1"的都往上加到下一个整数，如有的快递企业"即便1.1公斤 ...

近日，国家邮政局就部分快递企业在计重收费中存在"向上取整"行为作出回应，指导相关企业参照《快 递服务》国家标准，优化完善服务收费计重规则。目前，相关企业普遍优化了计重收费规则，计费重量 以千克为单位，保留小数点后至少1位。 所谓"向上取整"，即在计价时只要零头超过"1"的都往上加到下一个整数，如有的快递企业"即便1.1公斤 也需按2公斤计价收费"。"向上取整"的计价方法看似是金额不大的"失之毫厘"，但千万次交易累积起 来，就是一笔数额巨大的不合理收费。 公平竞争是市场经济的基本原则。"向上取整"的做法，其本质是以格式条款将不公平、不合理的规则强 加于消费者，将粗放的计量方式作为获取额外利润的手段。长此以往，不仅会损害消费者的信任，还会 形成"劣币驱逐良币"效应，对公平竞争的市场秩序带来破坏——既然"向上取整"能挣得更多，那么又何 必精准计量和公平收费呢？ 消费者权益保护法规定，经营者不得设定不公平、不合理的交易条件，不得强制交易。价格法明确，经 营者应当明码标价，不得利用虚假或使人误解的价格手段诱骗消费者。根据民法典，格式条款违反法 律、行政法规强制性规定的无效。然而，现实中"向上取整"往往以"行业惯例"为挡 ...

7月28日，《江苏省民营经济促进条例（草案）》与《福建省民营经济促进条例（草案）》）同日提交 省人大常委会会议进行审议。河南省、山东省在此前起草公布了草案，目前《河南省民营经济促进条例 （草案征求意见稿）》与《山东省民营经济促进条例（草案征求意见稿）》正面向社会公开征求意见。 珠海经济特区则启动了对2016年起施行的《珠海经济特区民营经济促进条例》的修订工作。此外，陕西 省、安徽省、天津市等多省市都已开展相关的立法调研与研讨工作。 贯彻"公平竞争"原则 自民营经济促进法（下称"民促法"）公布实施以来，江苏省、河南省、山东省、福建省、珠海经济特区 等多地正推进配套地方性法规的立法或修法工作。 第一财经记者注意到，已公布的地方性法规基本贯彻了民促法这一上位法的主要精神原则。民促法 对"平等对待""公平竞争"原则的强调，以及为"公平竞争"设立的专章内容，包括实行全国统一的市场准 入负面清单制度、落实公平竞争审查制度、保障各类生产要素和公共服务资源依法平等使用等，被地方 性法规草案重申或强调。 山东省曾于2021年出台《山东省民营经济发展促进条例》，此次新启动《山东省民营经济促进条例》的 立法工作，为"立新废旧"。已 ...

地方性法规将贯彻上位法精神，并力图发挥地方立法的补充、细化和创新功能 考虑到地方性法规实施性、补充性、探索性的功能定位，上述条例草案中对上位法规定比较原则的内容 进行了细化补充，力图增强可实施性，这也是地方立法的一个重点。 贯彻"公平竞争"原则 第一财经记者注意到，已公布的地方性法规基本贯彻了民促法这一上位法的主要精神原则。民促法 对"平等对待""公平竞争"原则的强调，以及为"公平竞争"设立的专章内容，包括实行全国统一的市场准 入负面清单制度、落实公平竞争审查制度、保障各类生产要素和公共服务资源依法平等使用等，被地方 性法规草案重申或强调。 山东省曾于2021年出台《山东省民营经济发展促进条例》，此次新启动《山东省民营经济促进条例》的 立法工作，为"立新废旧"。已公布的草案征求意见稿为"公平竞争"设立了专章，在平等准入、公平竞争 审查、平等对待、招标投标及政府采购、融资服务平等、反垄断反不正当竞争等方面作出具体规定。 珠海经济特区在修订现行条例时，调整了章节结构，新增"公平竞争"专章，对落实公平竞争审查制度、 定期清理市场准入壁垒、禁止在招标投标和政府采购中限制或者排斥民营经济组织等作出规定。 福建条例草案也 ...

Group 1 - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) proposed to strengthen the regulation of "involution" competition in the automotive industry to maintain a fair and orderly market environment [1] - The revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law will take effect on October 15, 2025, aiming to address issues of unfair competition [1] - The Central Economic Committee emphasized the need to govern low-price and disorderly competition in enterprises [1] Group 2 - The MIIT plans to introduce a growth stabilization plan for ten key industries, including steel, non-ferrous metals, petrochemicals, and building materials, focusing on structural adjustments and eliminating outdated production capacity [2] - A meeting was held to further regulate the competitive order in the new energy vehicle industry [2] - The National Energy Administration announced a verification of coal mine production due to disruptions caused by some companies exceeding announced production capacities [2] Group 3 - The Guangdong Paper Industry Association issued an initiative to resist low-price disorderly competition and maintain market fairness [3] - A national meeting emphasized the need to strengthen governance in key industries like photovoltaics and to enhance the national standard system in the industrial and information sectors [3] - The Political Bureau of the Central Committee highlighted the importance of promoting a unified national market and optimizing market competition order [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the legislative effort in Jiangsu Province to promote the development of the private economy through the draft of the "Jiangsu Province Private Economy Promotion Regulations," which aims to create a favorable environment for growth by protecting fair competition and optimizing resource allocation [1][2] - The draft regulations respond to challenges faced by the private economy in Jiangsu, emphasizing the need for institutional guidance to stimulate market vitality and high-quality development [1] - The regulations include provisions to eliminate entry barriers in various industries, addressing local protectionism and hidden barriers to ensure a unified national market [1][2] Group 2 - The draft encourages equal treatment of private capital in participating in mixed-ownership reforms of state-owned enterprises and ensures that private economic organizations can access public services and resources on an equal basis [2] - It outlines mechanisms for optimizing resource allocation, including standardized industrial land supply, financing support from local governments, and collaboration with educational institutions for talent development [2] - The draft emphasizes the protection of the legal rights of private economic organizations, requiring local governments to enhance oversight of payment issues and prevent unlawful interference in economic disputes [3]

Core Viewpoint - The event organized by Wuliangye focuses on intellectual property protection and fair competition in the Chinese liquor industry, responding to the new Anti-Unfair Competition Law and addressing challenges in the sector [1][3]. Group 1: Event Overview - The intellectual property protection seminar was held on July 25 at the Chengdu Taihe Tai Legal Service Center, gathering experts from the judiciary, academia, legal profession, and the liquor industry [1]. - The seminar aimed to discuss key issues related to intellectual property protection and fair competition in the context of the new Anti-Unfair Competition Law [1][3]. Group 2: Legislative Context - The revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law, effective in 2025, introduces a three-dimensional protection system comprising "mark protection + behavior regulation + ecological maintenance" [3]. - Companies are encouraged to enhance intellectual property management through identification rights, technical prevention, and compliance review, while also being aware of legal risks in new scenarios such as algorithm recommendations and cross-border competition [3]. Group 3: Industry Challenges - Experts discussed legal boundaries of "involution-style" low-price competition and paths for protecting against imitation packaging and decoration [3]. - The new law is expected to help companies more effectively combat infringement behaviors that exploit brand reputation, thereby maintaining a healthy industry development ecosystem [3]. Group 4: Future Initiatives - Wuliangye plans to continue strengthening intellectual property protection efforts and collaborate with various stakeholders to build a fair market environment [5]. - The company will hold a series of legal seminars in cities like Shanghai and Henan to demonstrate its commitment to leading the healthy development of the industry [6].

Group 1 - The revision of the Price Law is necessary and urgent to respond to the increasing demands for fairness, transparency, and justice in market activities, particularly in the context of unfair pricing behaviors like low-price dumping [2][3] - The government plays a crucial role in regulating pricing behaviors, especially in cases of market failure, such as low-price dumping, which disrupts normal business operations and harms the interests of other operators [3][4] - Strengthening the legal framework of the Price Law is essential for promoting high-quality economic development and ensuring that market prices accurately reflect supply and demand signals [4][5] Group 2 - Establishing a robust price regulation system is vital to curb unfair pricing practices, ensuring that pricing reflects market conditions and production costs [5][6] - The revision of the Price Law includes clearer definitions of unfair pricing behaviors, particularly low-price dumping, which is now explicitly categorized as an unfair pricing practice [5][6] - Promoting self-discipline and integrity among operators is crucial for maintaining fair competition, with the Price Law emphasizing the importance of honesty and trustworthiness in pricing activities [6][7]

Group 1 - The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) has conducted administrative talks with major food delivery platforms including Ele.me, Meituan, and JD.com, urging them to standardize promotional activities and engage in rational competition [2][3] - Local market regulation departments, such as Zhengzhou and Fushun, have echoed SAMR's calls, focusing on compliance in various aspects including merchant qualification audits, food safety management, and consumer rights protection [2][3] - Zhengzhou's market regulation bureau has specifically prohibited deceptive pricing practices, requiring clear labeling of product specifications and pricing, as well as transparency in platform fees [2] Group 2 - Fushun's market regulation bureau emphasized the importance of fair competition, urging platforms to cease price wars and focus on service quality and food safety [3] - The Shanghai market regulation department has also intervened, leading to the suspension of "zero-yuan purchase" promotions and a reduction in free meal marketing, while platforms have committed to enhancing monitoring and price control [4] - Platforms are required to adhere strictly to regulations during promotions to ensure transaction authenticity and commercial reasonableness [4]