Core Viewpoint - The global venture capital (VC) market is undergoing a reshuffle influenced by technology and geopolitical factors, with a projected increase in total VC investment to $126.3 billion by Q1 2025, and a growing focus on artificial intelligence (AI) investments. However, compliance risks are also rising, necessitating careful navigation of investment structures and antitrust reviews [1]. Group 1: Differences Between CVC and IVC - Independent Venture Capital (IVC) focuses on financial returns, while Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) aims for business integration and early competitive advantages [2]. - IVC typically has a limited partnership structure and lacks industry resource advantages, whereas CVC can leverage industry experience and resources to provide business collaboration opportunities [2]. - CVC has a higher post-investment engagement level with portfolio companies compared to IVC, which has limited post-investment support [2]. Group 2: CVC Investment Structure - CVC investment structures can involve external fundraising, with companies having the capacity to provide funds and potentially attract external capital [4]. - CVCs often focus on specific sectors such as integrated circuits and new-generation information technology, while also engaging in consumer sectors like dining and retail [4]. Group 3: Compliance Considerations - Key compliance points include transaction document focus areas, such as potential conflicts of interest, antitrust risks, and the need for tax considerations [6][8]. - The importance of understanding the implications of antitrust and national security reviews (CFIUS) is emphasized for CVC investments [9]. - Investors must be aware of special rights and obligations post-transaction, including the need for regular updates on key operational and financial information from portfolio companies [15]. Group 4: Special Rights and IPO Considerations - Special rights of investors must be cleared before an IPO, with specific guidelines on when these rights should be terminated [17][18]. - The necessity for clarity on the ownership structure and the absence of significant disputes over share ownership is a rigid requirement for A-share IPOs [18]. - CVCs must ensure that any agreements do not conflict with the principles of equal treatment among shareholders, particularly during the IPO process [18]. Group 5: Course Overview - A course titled "Legal Compliance Points in Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) Operations" will cover the entire process from fundraising to exit, focusing on compliance techniques and transaction document design [19][20]. - The course will also address the historical development of CVC in the U.S. and China, along with notable case studies [21].

2025年5月12日23时47分，日内瓦国际会议中心灯光通明，中美经贸谈判代表握手合影的瞬间，全球金融市场屏息等待的时刻，香港长江中心的办公室突 然亮起紧急会议的红灯。三小时后，长和集团官网挂出声明，字字暗藏机锋："交易必须符合中国法律法规，需监管部门审查批准" 。此时距离国家市场 监管总局4月27日的警示已过去384小时，距离美国贝莱德集团约定的签约日仅剩10天。 资本市场的反应印证了交易背后的政治风险。在长和发布声明后的24小时内，其港股股价剧烈震荡，振幅达14.7%，成交额创下近三年新高。彭博终端数 据显示，中资机构在当天净卖出18.7亿港元，而来自新加坡的主权基金却大举扫货。更耐人寻味的是，工商银行(亚洲)突然宣布暂停对长和系企业的授信 历史总在重演中书写新章。1993年"银河号事件"中，美国凭借海运情报拦截中国商船；32年后，相似的危机以资本交易的形式重现。当李嘉诚在声明中写 下"合法合规"四个字时，或许想起了霍英东抗美援朝时期突破封锁运输物资的往事。毕竟在民族利益的天平上，任何商业算计都轻如鸿毛。正如《人民日 报》发的评论："资本无国界，但商人有祖国" 。这场还未落幕的港口争夺战，终将在中华民族伟 ...

5月12日深夜，长和（0001.HK）发布公告称，原本计划在5月22日股东周年大会上讲述港口交易的情况，但鉴 于近日不断有股东及传媒查询，集团现作出以下回应： 长江和记实业有限公司特此声明，此交易绝不可能在任何不合法或不合规的情况下进行。有关条文已于2025年 3月4日的公告中说明："交易之完成取决于一系列条件的达成，包括法律和监管部门之同意及批准、不存在违 法或法律禁止的情况、获得公司股东的必要批准以及最终文件中约定的其他适当及常规条件。" 市场监管总局新闻发言人回应表示，我们高度关注有关交易，将依法进行审查。交易各方不得采取任何方式规 避审查，未获批准前，不得实施集中，否则将承担法律责任。 综合自：长和公告、国家市场监督管理总局 责编：罗晓霞 4月27日，国家市场监督管理总局发布消息称，长和港口交易各方不得采取任何方式规避反垄断审查。 日前，市场监管总局新闻发言人就长和港口交易事回答了记者提问。有记者问：据《华尔街日报》4月16日报 道，长和出售海外港口将分拆为两个交易继续进行，国家市场监督管理总局对此有何评论？ 邮箱：bwb@stcn.com 校对：祝甜婷 百万用户都在看 巴基斯坦， 重大突发！ 刚刚！ ...

Core Viewpoint - The transaction between Cheung Kong Holdings and BlackRock regarding port assets has faced significant regulatory scrutiny from China's State Administration for Market Regulation, indicating a strong stance on antitrust enforcement and jurisdiction over offshore transactions [1][3][5]. Group 1: Regulatory Response - The State Administration for Market Regulation has issued a clear warning that all parties involved in the transaction must not circumvent regulatory review without approval, or they will face legal consequences [3][5]. - This situation marks the first instance of China's antitrust mechanism exercising extraterritorial jurisdiction over offshore registered companies, signaling a robust regulatory environment [3][5]. Group 2: Transaction Details - Cheung Kong Holdings plans to sell 43 port assets located in 23 countries to BlackRock, with two ports in the Panama Canal being particularly significant due to their strategic importance in Sino-U.S. maritime trade [3][5]. - Chinese merchant vessels account for 21% of the cargo volume in the Panama Canal, highlighting the potential impact of this transaction on global trade dynamics [3]. Group 3: Strategic Implications - The proposed transaction has raised concerns that it could grant BlackRock control over shipping pricing from the Pacific to the Atlantic, potentially threatening the security of $2.3 trillion in maritime trade [5][10]. - The Chinese regulatory stance reflects a broader strategy to safeguard national interests and supply chain security, emphasizing a "zero tolerance" policy towards transactions that pose risks to these areas [10][12]. Group 4: Market Reactions - The ongoing regulatory scrutiny has led to delays in the approval of BlackRock's 23 investment projects in China, prompting multinational companies to reassess their compliance costs in the Chinese market [8][10]. - The situation has also attracted interest from other potential buyers, such as the Italian MSC Group, indicating a shifting landscape in the port asset market [8][10].

Core Viewpoint - The potential sale of port assets by Li Ka-shing to BlackRock has raised significant concerns regarding geopolitical implications, particularly in the context of U.S.-China relations and the control of global shipping routes [3][6][12]. Group 1: Transaction Details - Li Ka-shing plans to sell 34 ports, with 21 located in Asia and Oceania, and 13 in Europe, including critical ports like Rotterdam, which handles over 13.8 million containers annually, accounting for 42% of the European market [5]. - The transaction has not undergone a global public bidding process, leading to criticism and concerns about national interests and strategic assets [6][19]. - BlackRock's involvement is framed as enhancing infrastructure control, but this raises alarms about U.S. geopolitical strategies that could undermine China's Belt and Road Initiative [11][12]. Group 2: Regulatory and Political Reactions - The Chinese government has initiated an antitrust investigation into the transaction, emphasizing the need for regulatory approval before any sale can proceed [6][17]. - There are strict regulations in place regarding large transactions involving national security, with China requiring notification for deals exceeding 12 billion RMB [17][18]. - The Chinese authorities have made it clear that any attempts to circumvent regulatory scrutiny will not be tolerated, and legal consequences will follow for violations [18][21]. Group 3: Strategic Implications - The sale of these ports could significantly impact China's foreign trade framework, particularly its Belt and Road Initiative, by potentially constraining access to key shipping routes [12][21]. - The situation highlights a broader concern regarding the lack of national sentiment in business decisions, as Li Ka-shing's willingness to sell to U.S. interests has drawn public and governmental backlash [19][21]. - The ongoing geopolitical tensions and trade wars further complicate the landscape, with the potential for increased scrutiny on foreign investments in critical infrastructure [10][21].

这回，李嘉诚是真的栽了。 市监总局直接放狠话：交易各方不得规避审查，未经批准，集中交易一律暂停，谁敢乱来，依法办！什 么意思？很简单：李嘉诚也好，贝莱德也罢，地中海航运集团也好——一个都别想玩垄断！ 李嘉诚想一次性甩卖全球43个海外港口，换一大笔现金走人，彻底跑路？想得美！ 市监总局这个动作，直接把李嘉诚最后一点侥幸心理敲碎了。因为李嘉诚这边，还在不停地暗搓搓搞小 动作，想搞"金蝉脱壳"——把旗下的长和集团拆成小块，企图蒙混过关。 怎么个拆法？把长子李泽钜名下的电讯盈科等产业，一分为二，直接打包送去英国伦敦上市。 一边做拆分，一边转资产。拆出来的公司名字一换，股权一分，反垄断的帽子就想摘掉。反正，留在李 嘉诚名下的是"合法"的，搬到李泽钜名下的，又是"独立"的——想得太美了！ 更绝的是，李泽钜本身还不是中国国籍，弄走的大多是海外资产。尤其是欧洲的电信资产，比如英国最 大的电信公司，都被李家收割到手。一操作下来，大量财富可以偷偷转移，反垄断审查直接被架空。 但很遗憾，国家早看穿了。 北美、拉美、欧洲、中东、东南亚、澳洲……只要是重要节点，几乎都有他的码头。 李嘉诚的盘子有多大？ 一是房地产，遍地开花，从内地到香 ...

以下文章来源于牲产队 ，作者牲产队长 牲产队 . 挣工分，磨洋工，舒服一会儿是一会儿 作者：牲产队长 来源：牲产队（ID：gh 9adbf3261554） 这一次，李嘉诚的港口交易真要黄了。 市监总局直接要求，交易各方不得采取任何方式规避审查，未获批准前，不得实施集中，否则将 承担法律责任。啥意思呢？这就是打明牌了。李嘉诚也好，贝莱德也罢，还是新引入的地中海航 运集团，都不得垄断全球航运权。李嘉诚想一次性甩卖 43 个海外港口，套现跑路，是彻底搞不 成了。 这时候，为什么市监总局要发出这个信号？主要就在于，李嘉诚不甘心，始终还是想卖。而且， 长和集团在想办法，对抗反垄断审查，想玩一招 " 金蝉脱壳 " 之计。就在市监总局对长和集团 发起反垄断调查后，长和集团就宣布，要对旗下资产进行拆分。怎么拆分呢？把长子李泽钜旗下 的电讯盈科等产业，独立拆分，远赴英国伦敦上市。 为什么要拆分？一个是，规避反垄断调查。你说它垄断了，它马上拆分，变成一个个小公司。家 族产业一部分留在李嘉诚旗下，另一部分就转移给长子李泽钜。而李泽钜呢？既不是中国人，带 走的也不是中国资产，而是长和旗下的海外资产。尤其是电信产业，主要都位于欧洲。像 ...

昨天，当我们"调休"五一假期而周日加班"摸鱼"的时候，相关监管部门却一点都没闲着！ 近日，国家市场监督管理总局就长和集团出售海外港口交易连续发声，明确要求交易各方不得采取任何方式规避反垄断审查，否则将承 担法律责任。 上述相关部门官网于当天（4月27日）下午17时整，公布了有关"李嘉诚卖港口"的最新消息。 针对"李嘉诚卖港口"，市场监管总局第二次表态！ 下面，我们可以从全国唯一一份以"中国"冠名的资产管理行业专业媒体（中国基金报），在昨天发布的相关报道（10W+）中，援引了外 媒的上述相关报道。 记者援引外媒从知情人士称处获悉的消息：控制地中海航运的意大利阿庞特家族，考虑将与贝莱德合作，从43个港口中剥离出其中的巴 拿马港口，分别为巴尔博亚和克里斯托瓦尔2个港口。 值得一提的是，这已经是该相关部门近期第二次就此交易表态。 就在1个月之前（3月28日），上述相关部门反垄断二司负责人在回复港媒（大公文汇全媒体）记者关于"长和拟售巴拿马港口"的提问 时，就明确表示将依法审查，以"保护市场公平竞争，维护社会公共利益"。 据上述信息显示：在日前的一次答记者问环节，有记者提到了外媒（华尔街日报）于早前（4月16日）关于" ...

李嘉诚卖港口一事，有新消息。 市场监管总局：长和港口交易各方不得采取任何方式规避反垄断审查 最初的交易方案是，阿庞特家族现有的港口运营商Terminal Investment Limited（TiL）获得全球港口资产51%的股份，贝莱德旗下的一家实体获得 49%的股份。那部分占了该交易中涉及的大部分资产，包括位于荷兰、德国、马来西亚和其他地方的集装箱码头。 对于这两个巴拿马港口，所有权结构正好相反：TiL获得49%的股份，贝莱德最近收购的基础设施投资机构Global Infrastructure Partners获得51%的 股份。 3月4日深夜，李嘉诚旗下长江和记实业有限公司在港交所公告，宣布与贝莱德牵头的财团达成原则性协议，出售其全球港口业务核心资产。 标的资产覆盖亚欧美洲23个国家的43个港口，涵盖199个泊位及配套的智能码头管理系统、全球物流网络等核心资源。其中涉及巴拿马港口公司 90%股权。 如此一来，该公司运营的巴拿马巴尔博亚和克里斯托瓦尔两个港口将被美国企业控制。 4月27日消息，日前，市场监管总局新闻发言人就长和港口交易事回答了记者提问。有记者问：据《华尔街日报》4月16日报道，长和出售海外港 ...

日前，市场监管总局新闻发言人就长和港口交易事回答了记者提问。有记者问：据《华尔街日报》4月 16日报道， 长和出售海外港口将分拆为两个交易继续进行，国家市场监督管理总局对此有何评论？ 答：我们高度关注有关交易，将依法进行审查。交易各方不得采取任何方式规避审查，未获批准前，不 得实施集中，否则将承担法律责任。 ...