9月22日，中央纪委国家监委网站公布二十届中央第三轮巡视整改情况，涉及金融多个领 域。其中，中国人民银行党委、金融监管总局党委，以及10家银行、保险机构等发布通报。 对于需长期整改事项进展情况，中国人民银行党委表示，持续学习贯彻习近平总书记关于金 融工作的重要论述、党的二十大、二十届二中、三中全会和中央金融工作会议精神；持续推 动金融基础设施建设；持续推进信息科技改革；持续提升固定资产利用效能；持续推进金融 立法；持续推动构建中国特色现代金融体系。 金融监管总局在防范金融风险方面落实多项工作。金融监管总局党委提出多项举措，包括严 格规范市场准入秩序，防范化解中小金融机构风险，规范监管权力运行与制约，着力增强行 政处罚威慑力，维护金融消费者合法权益，推进金融监管法治建设等各方面。其中，依法加 大对违法违规机构和人员的"双罚"力度；联合公安部出台加强银行业保险业涉嫌犯罪案件移 送工作规定，畅通行刑衔接机制。 值得注意的是，中央纪委国家监委进一步强调对"一把手"的监督，也体现在本轮金融机构巡 视整改情况通报中。央行强调加强对下级单位"一把手"和领导班子的监督，金融监管总局提 出落实任前谈话制度，党委书记对拟任"一把 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of establishing a clear responsibility framework for new leaders, particularly focusing on the "one leader" accountability system in Yunnan's Honghe Prefecture [1][2] - The Honghe Prefecture's disciplinary inspection and supervision authorities have created two lists: one for integrity risks and another for integrity responsibilities, to assist new leaders in understanding their roles and responsibilities [1] - The "Clear Wind Accompanying the 'One Leader'" initiative has been launched to enhance supervision and accountability, with specific measures aimed at improving family values and duty performance [2] Group 2 - In 2023, the disciplinary inspection agencies in Honghe Prefecture have investigated 49 cases involving "one leader" violations, with 9 cases referred to judicial authorities, highlighting a proactive approach to governance [2] - The establishment of a "duty demand ledger" for new leaders aims to identify and address risks in project approvals, fund allocations, and team management [2] - The prefecture has implemented a regular communication mechanism between the disciplinary inspection secretary and local leaders to ensure ongoing supervision and address any misinformation or unjust accusations against leaders [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of strengthening supervision over key leaders, particularly the "first responsible person" in various organizations, to ensure integrity and compliance with regulations, thereby preventing corruption and promoting accountability [17][18]. Group 1: Supervision and Accountability - The Chongqing Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision has implemented measures to enhance the supervision of "first responsible persons" through various educational and corrective actions [3][10]. - The commission has focused on the analysis of serious violations of discipline and law by key leaders, leading to the establishment of improved management systems in procurement and government investment projects [3][4]. - A series of typical cases of corruption have been addressed, highlighting the need for strict accountability and the establishment of a robust supervisory framework [5][6][7]. Group 2: Anti-Corruption Measures - The article outlines the ongoing high-pressure stance against corruption, with significant cases being investigated and punished, such as the expulsion of former officials for serious violations [4][5]. - The commission has adopted a dual approach of punishment and prevention, targeting sectors with concentrated power and resources, including state-owned enterprises and public services [5][6]. - The integration of digital technologies, such as big data and artificial intelligence, has been emphasized to enhance the investigation and supervision processes [17]. Group 3: Systematic Governance - The article discusses the shift from individual case handling to systematic governance, aiming for comprehensive oversight mechanisms that address the root causes of corruption [13][16]. - The establishment of a digital management system for integrity records is highlighted, which aims to provide timely insights into the integrity status of leaders and facilitate effective supervision [15][16]. - Continuous improvement of the supervisory measures and the promotion of a culture of accountability among leaders are essential for fostering a clean governance environment [12][18].

Core Points - The political supervision spot check research group in Kunming has completed research in 14 counties (cities, districts) to enhance political supervision [1] - Kunming is implementing a series of measures to strengthen supervision over leading cadres, especially the "first person in charge," to create a clean political environment [1] - Starting from 2025, Kunming will conduct political supervision spot check research for three consecutive years [1] Summary by Sections - **Political Supervision Initiatives** - Kunming has initiated political supervision spot check research and "first person in charge" supervision talks to deepen the implementation of strict party governance [1][2] - The city has completed three rounds of political supervision spot check research, engaging in 2,782 individual talks to address supervision challenges [1] - **Supervision Mechanisms** - The city has established a mechanism for supervision talks between the "first person in charge" of the party and other members of the leadership team, creating a feedback loop for research, discussion, and rectification [2]

Group 1 - The core issue highlighted is the impact of individual misconduct, particularly by key leaders, on the political ecology and development of the entire organization or industry [1] - The local disciplinary committee has intensified collaboration with inspection and auditing departments to broaden the sources of problem leads, resulting in the investigation of 18 cases of misconduct involving current leaders in the past two years [1] - A total of 15 individuals received party disciplinary and administrative penalties, while 5 cases were referred to judicial authorities [1] Group 2 - The disciplinary committee has urged all levels of party organizations to conduct a comprehensive self-examination of decision-making and execution related to "three major and one large" matters, leading to the identification and rectification of 228 issues [2] - 142 units have been prompted to improve their institutional mechanisms and decision-making processes as a result of the oversight [2] - The disciplinary committee has implemented a system of reminders and recorded the outcomes in the integrity files of the leaders of units that were reported for issues [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of enhancing the supervisory effectiveness of top leaders ("one leaders") in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, through targeted supervision and accountability measures [2][3][4]. Group 1: Supervision Mechanisms - Guangzhou's Discipline Inspection and Supervision Commission focuses on the "key minority" by implementing supervision talks and accountability discussions to improve the supervisory quality of top leaders [2][4]. - A systematic approach is adopted to identify which top leaders require priority discussions, particularly those with significant issues or new appointments [5][6]. - The city has established a regular and targeted conversation system for top leaders, which includes individual and collective discussions to address specific issues [6][7]. Group 2: Accountability and Responsibility - A comprehensive responsibility checklist has been developed, detailing 5 major responsibility categories, 55 tasks, and 87 specific measures to clarify the responsibilities of top leaders [8][9]. - The checklist aims to ensure that accountability is clear and that leaders are evaluated based on their performance and adherence to responsibilities [8][9]. - The city has implemented a rigorous review process for the accountability discussions, ensuring that the materials presented by leaders are complete and truthful [9][10]. Group 3: Case Studies and Practical Applications - The article highlights a case where the Guangzhou municipal government addressed issues in a local bank, leading to significant reforms and improved risk management practices [5][10]. - The use of big data and a "cloud supervision" platform has been introduced to enhance the precision and effectiveness of supervision over top leaders [11][12]. - The article discusses the establishment of a comprehensive supervision chain that includes ongoing monitoring and corrective actions based on identified issues [10][12].