Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the importance of digital sovereignty for Global South countries in the context of U.S. dominance over digital infrastructure and technology, emphasizing the need for local capacity building and multilateral cooperation to enhance autonomous development capabilities. Group 1: Digital Sovereignty Definition and Importance - Digital sovereignty is linked to technological sovereignty and international digital relations, viewed as crucial for national development and security in the 21st century [2][3] - Internal sovereignty involves control over territory, airspace, and now digital space, with data being as vital as natural resources [3][5] - The concept of digital sovereignty is essential for resisting foreign digital regulations and establishing a consensus on what constitutes digital sovereignty [4] Group 2: Geopolitical Context and Challenges - The current geopolitical landscape is characterized by a post-globalization era, where a multipolar world order is emerging, necessitating technological self-sufficiency [5][6] - The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the critical role of digital technology, reinforcing the need for self-reliance in the digital domain, especially in light of Western technology sanctions [6][11] Group 3: Domestic Digital Sovereignty Framework - Russia's approach to digital sovereignty includes data localization, infrastructure control, and the development of domestic technology to reduce reliance on foreign systems [15][16] - Key legislative measures include the Personal Data Localization Law and the Sovereign Internet Law, aimed at ensuring data is stored within Russia and creating a national internet infrastructure [16][17] Group 4: International Cooperation and External Digital Sovereignty - Russia advocates for international norms and legislation regarding digital sovereignty, emphasizing the need for cooperation among Global South countries to address shared challenges [19][24] - The concept of responsible state behavior in cyberspace has been introduced, aiming to establish a framework for international cooperation in digital security [22][25] Group 5: Artificial Intelligence and Future Prospects - Artificial intelligence is identified as a pivotal technology, with Russia focusing on developing national AI strategies and fostering international collaboration in AI governance [26][27] - The anticipated growth of the AI market by 2030 underscores the importance of building technological expertise and capabilities within the country [27]

(吉隆坡19日讯)通讯部副部长张念群指出，我国已正式推介策略人工智能(AI)基础设施，是我国在AI方面迈出的重要 一步，通过DeepSeek等大型语言模型本地化及将服务器设在国内，确保数据在本地处理，从而增强国家的AI主权，并 保障用户隐私与数据安全。 她说，这项计划的特别之处在于，数据将储存在大马、由大马人管理，并由大马人使用，这正是我们维护AI主权的方 式。 "现在不同于以往云端或数据中心设在海外，如今一切都设在本地，服务器在大马、管理权在大马，AI代理也由大马 人开发。我认为，这正是我们实现AI应用本地化的方式。" 她今日在"策略人工智能基础设施：可信、主权及全球"推介礼后，在记者会上这么说。 张念群提到，这项目标志著华为的芯片和服务器，以及DeepSeek大型语言模型首次在中国以外落地，开创区域先河。 "这是中国以外首个此类项目，我们感到非常自豪。这意味著在AI采用与应用方面，大马有望引领东盟。" 这被誉为大马首个完整国家级AI基础设施平台，旨在协助政府、企业与大学利用AI提升服务、提高生产力及推动创 新。 在活动中，张念群也推介我国首个主权生成式AI环境，由AlterMatic DT250AI服务器 ...

在人工智能发展的萌芽阶段，多数国家接受弱人工智能主权作为合理选择——例如依赖英伟达芯片或中 国开源模型。但拜登政府末期，美国开始从"可靠技术栈提供者"的角色中抽离。其算力扩散政策将世界 划分为三个等级：第一梯队（含英国、法国、德国等18国）可无限制获取美国芯片；第二梯队（全球多 数国家）面临芯片数量上限；第三梯队（25个受武器禁运的敌对国家）则被全面禁止进口美国芯片。 而特朗普政府似乎准备全力迈向强人工智能主权，推行"美国优先"的人工智能战略。副总统万斯在"美 国活力峰会"上批评前任政府"将工业基础拱手让与他国"，呼吁在本土完成人工智能的制造、设计和扩 散。OpenAI在提交给科技政策办公室的文件中敦促政府提升本土芯片产能，警告中国已在该领域占据 战略优势。Anthropic公司则主张强化出口管制，将更多芯片纳入禁运范围。美国新安全中心和商业圆 桌会议等机构强调，美国必须建立自主的人工智能基础设施。 这些迹象表明，美国正从弱人工智能主权转向强人工智能主权模式，而其他国家很可能会马上竞相效 仿。 所谓的"人工智能主权"，就是对关键的人工智能投入实现完全的国内控制。中国、美国、印度、日本和 加拿大等国家的政策讨论 ...