以物抵债

Search documents
以物抵债,皇庭广场易主
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-08 23:07
上述借款由融发投资以晶岛国商购物中心及其占有范围内的土地使用权提供抵押保证,皇庭国际以持有 的融发投资60%股权为质押担保,皇庭国际之子公司POWERLAND HOLDINGS LIMITED以持有的融发 投资40%股权为质押担保,融发投资和深圳市皇庭物业发展有限公司皇庭广场分公司以应收账款提供质 押担保。 本报8月11日就"皇庭广场起拍"所做的相关报道。 【深圳商报讯】(记者 程茹欣)法拍流拍后,晶岛国商购物中心(即深圳皇庭广场)的所有权有了新 消息。 10月8日晚间,皇庭国际(深市代码:000056)公告称,公司收到广东省深圳市中级人民法院《执行裁 定书》,公司全资子公司深圳融发投资有限公司(以下简称"融发投资")名下位于深圳市福田区中心区 的晶岛国商购物中心被司法裁定以第一次网络拍卖起拍价30.53亿元抵偿相关债务,申请执行人为光曜 夏岚(深圳)投资有限公司。 皇庭国际表示,深圳皇庭广场作为公司主要资产,本次以物抵债后公司将失去标的资产的所有权,对公 司的资产、负债及日常经营活动将产生重大影响。 回溯前情,2016年,皇庭国际子公司融发投资与中信信托签订了信托贷款合同,借款金额为30亿元,借 款期限为2 ...
皇庭国际:深圳皇庭广场被司法裁定以第一次网络拍卖起拍价30.53亿元抵偿相关债务
Ge Long Hui A P P· 2025-10-08 10:34
格隆汇10月8日丨皇庭国际(000056.SZ)公布,公司收到广东省深圳市中级人民法院《执行裁定书》〔(2024) 粤03执627号之三〕,公司全资子公司深圳融发投资有限公司名下位于深圳市福田区中心区的晶岛国商购物 中心(即深圳皇庭广场)及相关附属设施、设备被司法裁定以第一次网络拍卖起拍价30.53亿元抵偿相关债 务。 | 不动产权证号 | | 深房地字第3000627642号 | | --- | --- | --- | | 权利人 | | 深圳融发投资有限公司 | | 共有情况 | | 单独所有 | | रर | 落 | 深圳市福田区 | | 用 | 途 | 商业 | | 面 | 积 | 共有宗地面积为42,348.37平方米,证载建筑面积为80,608.64 | | | | 平方米,测绘报告总建筑面积为136,895.89平方米。 G 商屋C | 深圳皇庭广场作为公司主要资产,本次以物抵债后公司将失去标的资产的所有权,对公司的资产、负债及 日常经营活动将产生重大影响。2024年深圳皇庭广场项目收入36,860.28万元,占公司全年营业收入的 56.03%。本次以物抵债后,公司将失去该部分业务收入。截止20 ...
释放体育消费20条发布,港股IPO火爆券商收入激增 | 财经日日评
吴晓波频道· 2025-09-06 00:30
Group 1: Service Trade Growth - In the first seven months of 2025, China's service trade exports grew significantly, with total service trade reaching 45,781.6 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 8.2%. Exports alone reached 19,983 billion yuan, growing by 15.3% [2] - Travel service exports saw the fastest growth, with a total of 12,594.6 billion yuan in travel service trade, increasing by 10.4%. Exports in this sector surged by 62.9% [2] - The share of service trade in China's overall foreign trade remains low, accounting for only 14.6% in 2024, indicating potential for future growth [2] Group 2: Sports Industry Development - The State Council recently issued 20 measures to enhance the sports industry, aiming to cultivate world-class sports enterprises and events by 2030, with the industry expected to exceed 7 trillion yuan in total scale [4] - The focus is on expanding sports product supply, stimulating consumer demand, and strengthening industry support, highlighting the potential for experiential consumption in the sports sector [4] Group 3: AI Adoption in Employment - A survey by the New York Fed revealed that about 40% of service sector firms are using AI, up from 25% last year, with expectations for further growth in AI deployment [5] - Despite the rise in AI usage, only 13% of firms anticipate layoffs due to AI, indicating that job reductions have not yet materialized significantly [5] - The impact of AI on the job market is expected to evolve gradually, with many white-collar jobs potentially at risk of being replaced by AI in the future [6] Group 4: Semiconductor Tariffs - Former President Trump announced tariffs on semiconductor companies that do not establish production in the U.S., with exemptions for those investing in U.S. manufacturing [7] - The tariffs are seen as having limited impact, as many semiconductor firms have already planned expansions in the U.S. due to previous pressures [7] - Recent court rulings suggest that many of Trump's tariff measures may be illegal, potentially leading to changes in tariff policies [8] Group 5: Real Estate Debt Settlement - Yunnan Chengtou announced a debt settlement plan involving property as collateral, with a total of 92 residential units valued at approximately 81.05 million yuan being used to offset debts [9] - The property market conditions indicate challenges in liquidating these assets, as the valuation is lower than market prices, suggesting potential difficulties in future sales [10] Group 6: Xiaohongshu's Profit Growth - Xiaohongshu is projected to triple its annual profit to 3 billion USD, surpassing competitors like Pinterest and Snap [11] - The company's valuation has surged to 31 billion USD, driven by successful monetization strategies and a growing e-commerce segment [11] - There are ongoing speculations about Xiaohongshu's potential IPO, supported by its profitability and favorable market conditions [12] Group 7: Hong Kong IPO Market - The Hong Kong IPO market saw a significant increase in financing, with a 714% year-on-year growth, reaching 14 billion USD in the first half of the year [13] - The surge in IPOs has led to increased revenues for brokerage firms, with a notable rise in underwriting and investment banking fees [13] - The favorable regulatory environment and improved listing processes have encouraged mainland companies to pursue listings in Hong Kong [14]
8000多万元债权长期无法收回,云南城投接受“以物抵债”:昆明92套房产,每平米均价不到6000元
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-09-04 00:59
Core Viewpoint - Yunnan Chenggong Investment (Yunnan Chenggong) announced a debt settlement plan involving asset-for-debt exchange with three companies due to their inability to repay debts owed to Yunnan Chenggong [1][2]. Group 1: Debt and Settlement Details - The debt originated from a 2018 equity transfer involving a 59.5% stake in Qicai Company, leading to a lawsuit and counter-lawsuit among the involved parties [2]. - The total debt amount owed by Fengyu Company and Qingfeng Company to Yunnan Chenggong is approximately 81.06 million yuan, which includes principal and penalties [2][3]. - The settlement involves Qicai Company transferring 92 residential properties located in Kunming, with a total area of approximately 13,600 square meters, to Yunnan Chenggong as repayment [2][3]. Group 2: Asset Valuation and Transaction Details - The market value of the assets was assessed at approximately 81.05 million yuan, closely aligning with the total debt amount [3]. - The transaction is structured to ensure clear property rights, with no existing liens or legal disputes affecting the transfer [3][4]. - The average price per square meter for the assessed properties is approximately 5,974 yuan, which is significantly lower than the market price of around 9,500 yuan per square meter for similar properties in the area [6].
云南城投拟接受“以物抵债”方案 偿还方将用昆明92套房产抵债,评估值达8105万元
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-09-03 15:01
Core Viewpoint - Yunnan Chengtou announced a debt settlement through asset transfer due to the inability of three companies to repay their debts, aiming to expedite debt recovery and protect company interests [2][6]. Group 1: Debt and Settlement Details - The debt originated from a 2018 equity transfer involving a 59.5% stake in Qicai Company, leading to legal disputes and a total debt of 81.06 million yuan owed by Fengyu Company and Qingfeng Company [3]. - The settlement involves 92 properties in Kunming, totaling approximately 13,600 square meters, to be used for debt repayment [3][4]. - The assessed market value of the properties is approximately 81.05 million yuan, closely matching the total debt amount [4]. Group 2: Asset Valuation and Market Context - The average price per square meter for the properties is calculated to be around 5,974 yuan, which is significantly lower than the market price of approximately 9,500 yuan per square meter for similar properties in the area [5][8]. - The properties are confirmed to have clear ownership without any encumbrances or legal disputes, ensuring a smooth transfer process [4][6].
云南城投: 云南城投置业股份有限公司关于公司拟接受以物抵债的公告
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-09-03 11:17
Core Viewpoint - Yunnan Chengtou Real Estate Co., Ltd. plans to accept debt repayment in the form of asset transfer due to the inability of related companies to repay their debts, aiming to expedite debt recovery and protect company interests [1][5]. Transaction Background - A dispute arose involving Fengyu Company, Qingfeng Company, and Qicai Company, leading to a lawsuit filed by the company. The court ruled in favor of the company, and a mediation agreement was reached in August 2025 [1][2]. - The mediation confirmed various financial obligations, including a total debt of approximately 81.06 million yuan, with specific costs allocated to the involved parties [2][6]. Transaction Overview - Fengyu Company made a partial cash payment of 456,600 yuan but could not fully settle the remaining debt. The company plans to accept assets from Qicai Company as repayment, totaling 92 units with a combined area of 13,568.38 square meters [3][4]. - The assessed value of the assets is approximately 81.05 million yuan, based on an evaluation conducted by Beijing Zhongtonghua Asset Appraisal Co., Ltd. [4][5]. Board Approval - The company's board of directors approved the asset transfer agreement on September 3, 2025, without requiring shareholder approval, as it falls within the board's authority [5][6]. Debt Repayment Agreement - The agreement stipulates that Qicai Company will repay the debt using the specified assets, with the value recognized by all parties involved. Any changes in asset value will not affect the agreed repayment terms [7][8]. - The company will apply for the release of the pledge on Fengyu Company's shares once the debt is fully repaid [8]. Purpose and Impact - The asset transfer is a strategic move to ensure timely recovery of receivables and resolve outstanding debt issues, adhering to principles of transparency and fairness [9].
这家房企“掏家底”艰难化债,实物资产抵偿10亿应付款
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-06-19 15:01
Core Viewpoint - Real estate companies are increasingly using asset-backed debt repayment strategies to manage their financial obligations, with a notable example being Rongwanjia's recent agreement to convert receivables into physical assets worth approximately 1.07 billion yuan [1][2]. Group 1: Debt Restructuring Strategies - Rongwanjia announced a debt repayment framework agreement with Rongsheng Development, involving the acquisition of assets valued at 1.07 billion yuan to offset receivables [2][3]. - The total amount of debt resolved through asset-backed transactions by Rongsheng Development has reached 3.383 billion yuan, including previous agreements with suppliers [1][4]. - The real estate sector is witnessing an acceleration in debt restructuring efforts, with many companies exploring various strategies, including asset-backed debt repayment [1][3]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Challenges - Rongwanjia's accounts receivable stood at 2.116 billion yuan in 2024, exceeding its revenue of 1.959 billion yuan for the same period, indicating significant financial pressure [2][3]. - The company has recorded a decline in revenue and net profit over the past few years, with revenues dropping from 2.563 billion yuan in 2021 to 1.957 billion yuan in 2024 [3]. - Rongsheng Development has faced substantial financial challenges, reporting a net loss of 8.4 billion yuan in 2024 and a cash decline to 1.648 billion yuan by the end of the first quarter of 2024 [6]. Group 3: Asset Types and Transactions - The assets involved in the recent debt repayment include 12,700 parking spaces, 5,479 storage units, and 112 residential and commercial units across various provinces [2][3]. - Previous asset-backed debt repayment transactions by Rongsheng Development included the use of land and property assets to settle approximately 810 million yuan in debts [4][5]. - The company has also explored equity-based debt repayment strategies, proposing to use shares from its subsidiaries to address a total of 16 billion yuan in debts [6].
一周债市看点|荣盛发展拟“以物抵债”方式化债约8.1亿元,华媒控股资产被冻结涉及1.89亿元
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-06-15 09:29
Group 1 - Zhejiang Huamei Holdings Co., Ltd. announced that its assets have been frozen due to a contract dispute, involving 189 million yuan, which accounts for 10.17% of its net assets at the end of the previous year [1] - The dispute originated from a breach of contract related to a project with Nanhua University, with a total amount in question of 175 million yuan, representing 9.42% of the company's net assets [1] - In Q1 2025, the company reported a significant loss of 37.93 million yuan, compared to a loss of 10.42 million yuan in Q1 2024, marking a year-on-year decline of 263.97% [1] Group 2 - Ocean Group announced that its subsidiary, Ocean Holdings, is facing liquidity issues and has passed a resolution to extend the repayment of its bonds, with a grace period of 30 trading days [1] - The company is actively seeking funds during the grace period to address its debt issues [1] Group 3 - Rongsheng Development disclosed plans to resolve debts totaling 810 million yuan through asset swaps, involving four assets to mitigate debt risks and ensure project implementation [2] - The company currently has total guarantees amounting to 42.965 billion yuan, with overdue guarantees of 6.646 billion yuan [2] - Rongsheng Development was listed on the overdue list by the Shanghai Commercial Paper Exchange as of June 6, 2025 [2] Group 4 - Everbright Bank announced that Jinggong Group's "18 Jinggong SCP003" has defaulted since July 15, 2019, and the lead underwriter is monitoring the bankruptcy restructuring progress [3] - Jinggong Group has executed a restructuring plan, with 80% of Shanghai Yuexin Investment Co., Ltd. sold for 833,201 yuan in February 2025 [3] Group 5 - Xi'an Port Industrial Co., Ltd. and its executives received a warning from the Shaanxi Securities Regulatory Bureau for non-market-based issuance behavior [4] - The company reported a significant decline in net profit for Q1 2024, with earnings of 5.5177 million yuan compared to 81.3671 million yuan in Q1 2023, a year-on-year drop of 93.22% [4] Group 6 - Wuhan Tianying Investment Group announced it has failed to pay the interest and principal of the "H20 Tianying 1" bond, totaling 535.7 million yuan [5][6] - The company is implementing business restructuring, asset disposal, and debt collection measures to address the situation [6] - In 2024, the company reported a significant loss of 4.827 billion yuan, compared to a loss of 14.8687 million yuan in 2023, reflecting a year-on-year decline of 32,367.10% [6]
荣盛发展: 关于债务加入并以物抵债的公告
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-06-11 12:45
Transaction Overview - Rongsheng Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. plans to resolve outstanding debts with several construction companies by signing a debt settlement agreement with Langfang Bank, utilizing assets from its subsidiaries as collateral [3][4][5] - The transaction involves the transfer of four assets valued at a total of 80,000.00 thousand yuan to offset debts owed by the subsidiaries to Langfang Bank [3][4] Financial Data of Langfang Bank - As of December 31, 2024, Langfang Bank's total assets amounted to 302.84 billion yuan, with total liabilities of 276.78 billion yuan and total deposits of 231.72 billion yuan [7] - The bank's total loans stood at 169.67 billion yuan [7] Financial Status of Related Construction Companies - Nanjing Ninglu Construction Co., Ltd. reported total assets of 129.61 million yuan and total liabilities of 129.53 million yuan as of December 31, 2024, with a net asset value of 0.76 million yuan [8] - Hebei Zhongkai Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. had total assets of 106.35 million yuan and total liabilities of 89.32 million yuan, resulting in a net asset value of 17.03 million yuan as of December 31, 2024 [9] - Zhonghe Construction Co., Ltd. reported total assets of 160.61 million yuan and total liabilities of 156.22 million yuan, with a net asset value of 4.39 million yuan as of December 31, 2024 [10] - Xieyi Garden reported total assets of 307.71 million yuan and total liabilities of 308.53 million yuan, resulting in a net asset value of -0.82 million yuan as of December 31, 2024 [11] - Chaoan Garden had total assets of 155.92 million yuan and total liabilities of 156.53 million yuan, with a net asset value of -0.62 million yuan as of December 31, 2024 [12] Asset Details for Debt Settlement - The assets involved in the debt settlement include urban residential land and various properties, with specific valuations for each asset: - Asset 1 valued at 422.12 million yuan - Asset 2 valued at 78.05 million yuan - Asset 3 valued at 103.59 million yuan - Asset 4 valued at 206.40 million yuan [3][13][14][15] - The assets are subject to existing mortgage restrictions and are being utilized to offset debts owed to Langfang Bank [13][14][15] Legal and Regulatory Aspects - The transaction has been approved by the company's board and does not constitute a related party transaction or a major asset restructuring as defined by regulations [4][5] - The agreement requires further approval from the company's shareholders [5]