巴拿马政府代表强行进入由PPC于巴尔博亚港及克里斯托瓦尔港所营运之码头，并且强行接管码头之行 政及营运控制权。据公司理解，特许经营权已于2026年2月23日起被视为终止，而PPC已于同日终止在 两个港口之码头的一切运作。 PPC已获得意见，指该裁决、该行政法令及巴拿马政府就PPC于该两个港口之码头营运所采取的相应行 动，与相关法律框架，以及批准该特许经营合约之法律并不一致。 董事会对该裁决、该行政法令及巴拿马之相应行动表示强烈反对，集团继续联同其法律顾问，保留集团 一切权利，并拟采取一切妥善可行之法律方案以保卫集团权益，包括就该事宜诉诸进一步国内及国际法 律程序。 香港长和集团在巴拿马运营的两个港口巴尔博亚港和克里斯托瓦尔港分布于巴拿马运河两端，是全球性 物流枢纽港。 巴拿马最高法院在当地时间1月29日做出裁决，以所谓"违宪"为由，无理取消了长和在巴 拿马运河附近经营两个港口的合同。 2月26日，长江和记实业有限公司（下文简称为"长和"）在港交所发布公告，针对巴拿马政府强行接管 其港口业务，表示强烈反对。 公告全文如下： 继公司于2026年2月4日刊发自愿性公告后，巴拿马政府宪报于2026年2月23日刊登了巴 ...

美国东部时间2026年2月20日，全球领先的民用无人机及智能影像制造商大疆创新（DJI），正式向美国 第九巡回上诉法院提交诉状，挑战美国联邦通信委员会（FCC）2025年12月23日将大疆及产品列入"受 管制清单"（Covered List）的不当决定。此举旨在维护企业合法权益、保护依赖大疆产品却受到禁令影 响的美国消费者及广大农业行业用户利益。 据悉，大疆创新在全球民用无人机市场长期保持在70%以上市场份额，在美国消费、商用、政府等无人 机市场占有约70%至90%的绝对份额。美国州和地方1800多个执法机构中，超过80%使用大疆产品。截 至2025年第三季度，大疆运动相机系列也以66%的全球市场份额超越美国品牌GoPro，成为全球运动相 机市场第一；在全景相机领域凭借单一产品在25年发布后迅速拿下全球43%的市场份额。 此前，大疆于2024年10月18日及2025年10月14日，就被列入美国国防部"中国军事企业清单"（CMC List）对美国国防部提起上诉。 值得注意的是，去年底FCC禁令一经公布，立即引发美国消费市场和农业行业用户的强烈反应和"囤货 潮"，二手交易平台上相关设备价格飙升200%。一家美国大 ...

中方回应安世半导体问题：将继续支持中企维护自身正当合法权益 中新网北京2月12日电 (记者 李京泽)中国外交部发言人林剑12日主持例行记者会。 有记者提问：荷兰阿姆斯特丹企业法庭下令对半导体芯片制造商安世半导体展开调查，并维持对该公司 中国籍首席执行官的停职决定。请问中方对此有何评论？ 林剑：中方主管部门已多次就安世半导体问题阐明立场，指出安世半导体问题的根源是荷方对企业经营 的不当行政干预引起的。 中方认为，荷方应为企业尽快解决内部纠纷、维护全球半导体产供链稳定畅通创造有利条件。中方将继 续支持中国企业维护自身的正当合法权益。(完) 来源：中国新闻网 编辑：熊思怡 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 ...

Group 1 - The core issue regarding ASML is attributed to improper administrative intervention by the Dutch authorities in the company's operations [1] - China emphasizes the need for the Dutch side to create favorable conditions for resolving internal disputes and maintaining stability in the global semiconductor supply chain [1] - The Chinese government will continue to support domestic companies in protecting their legitimate rights and interests [1]

专项监督中，检察机关依法纠治跨区域违法抓捕、违规异地办案等行为，加强对涉企刑事案件管辖权的 审查，促进规范行使刑事案件管辖权，共监督撤案3000余人，依法作出不起诉决定3500余人；共监督解 除、返还违法"查扣冻"26亿余元，依法变更人身强制措施820余人；共推动清理涉企刑事"挂案"4300余 件，监督纠正以刑事手段插手民事经济纠纷210余件；共起诉企业关键岗位人员实施的职务侵占、挪用 资金、非国家工作人员受贿等犯罪1.2万余人；起诉侵犯商业秘密、假冒专利等各类侵犯知识产权、妨 碍科技创新等犯罪1.6万余人。 据介绍，检察机关推进专项监督工作过程中，注重从制度机制层面剖析根源、堵塞漏洞，推动实现标本 兼治，巩固深化监督成果。研究起草依法加强刑事诉讼查封、扣押、冻结等强制措施监督工作的规范性 文件，建立健全加强跨省涉企刑事案件法律监督机制，努力从源头上推动解决违规异地执法和趋利性执 法司法问题。 记者2月2日从最高人民检察院举行的新闻发布会获悉，最高检自2025年3月起在全国检察机关部署开 展"违规异地执法和趋利性执法司法专项监督"。截至2025年底，全国检察机关共办理专项监督案件1.9 万余件。最高检和各省级 ...

记者2月2日从最高人民检察院举行的新闻发布会获悉，最高检自2025年3月起在全国检察机关部署开 展"违规异地执法和趋利性执法司法专项监督"。截至2025年底，全国检察机关共办理专项监督案件1.9 万余件。最高检和各省级检察院挂牌督办交办一批重大典型案件，有力维护企业合法权益。 专项监督中，检察机关共监督撤案3000余人，依法作出不起诉决定3500余人；共监督解除、返还违 法"查扣冻"26亿余元，依法变更人身强制措施820余人；共推动清理涉企刑事"挂案"4300余件，监督纠 正以刑事手段插手民事经济纠纷210余件。 专项监督开展以来，共起诉企业关键岗位人员实施的职务侵占、挪用资金、非国家工作人员受贿等犯罪 1.2万余人，维护公平公正的市场环境；起诉侵犯商业秘密、假冒专利等各类侵犯知识产权、妨碍科技 创新等犯罪1.6万余人。（刘硕、刘洪昌） ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the importance of resolving the issues surrounding Nexperia Semiconductor and restoring the legitimate control rights of Wentai Technology as a shareholder [1][3][4] - The Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs' decision to suspend the administrative order is seen as a first step towards addressing the problem, but it does not resolve the underlying issues, particularly the emergency measures imposed by the corporate court [1][2] - Wentai Technology calls for the Dutch Ministry to permanently withdraw the administrative order and ensure the restoration of the rights of Chinese shareholders and personnel, reverting Nexperia to its status before September 29, 2025 [3][4] Group 2 - The article outlines the involvement of the Dutch Ministry in the corporate court proceedings, indicating that the Ministry acted as a stakeholder and played a significant role in the process, which led to the illegal deprivation of Wentai Technology's rights as a 100% shareholder of Nexperia [2] - The Ministry's actions are characterized as systematic and illegal, with the emergency measures taken by the corporate court being described as complementary to the Ministry's administrative order, further complicating the situation for Wentai Technology [2][3] - Wentai Technology firmly states that any resolution must be based on the restoration of its complete rights as a shareholder and will not accept any attempts to legitimize the illegal outcomes of the current situation [4]

Core Viewpoint - The company expresses its strong concern regarding the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy's decision to suspend the administrative order issued on September 30, 2025, against Nexperia, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive resolution to the issues surrounding Nexperia's governance and control [1] Group 1: Response to the Dutch Ministry's Decision - The company acknowledges that the Dutch Minister's statement follows consultations between the Chinese Ministry of Commerce and the Dutch Ministry, appreciating the efforts made to resolve the Nexperia issue [1] - The suspension of the administrative order indicates the Dutch Ministry's recognition of the illegality and impropriety of its previous actions [1] - Despite the suspension, the emergency measures imposed by the Amsterdam Court of Appeal remain in effect, continuing to infringe upon the rights of Chinese shareholders and personnel [1] Group 2: Obligations of the Dutch Ministry - The administrative order issued on September 30, 2025, is viewed as the beginning of a series of actions by the Dutch government [1] - The Dutch Ministry actively participated in the court proceedings initiated by Nexperia's European management, asserting itself as a stakeholder and influencing the process [1] - The Ministry's involvement led to the court's emergency measures that deprived the company of its rights as a 100% shareholder, indicating a systematic illegal deprivation of ownership [1] Group 3: Restoration of Rights - The company insists that the suspension of the administrative order is only a preliminary step and not a comprehensive solution to the ongoing issues [1] - The company urges the Dutch Ministry to acknowledge the essence of the situation and to permanently withdraw the administrative order and its support for the court proceedings [1] - A genuine resolution must restore the company's complete rights as a shareholder and its legal control over Nexperia, rejecting any attempts to legitimize the illegal outcomes [1]

Core Viewpoint - The company emphasizes the importance of restoring its complete rights as a shareholder and its legitimate control over Nexperia, following the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs' decision to suspend the administrative order against Nexperia, which is seen as a first step towards resolving the issue [2][3]. Group 1: Company's Position on the Dutch Ministry's Decision - The company acknowledges the Dutch Minister's statement as a recognition of the current issues and appreciates the efforts of the Chinese Ministry of Commerce in addressing the Nexperia situation [2]. - The suspension of the administrative order indicates the illegality and impropriety of previous actions taken by the Dutch Ministry [2]. - Despite the suspension, the emergency measures imposed by the Dutch court remain in effect, continuing to infringe upon the rights of Chinese shareholders and personnel [2]. Group 2: Obligations of the Dutch Ministry - The administrative order issued on September 30, 2025, is viewed as the beginning of a series of actions by the Dutch government, with the Ministry actively participating in the court proceedings initiated by Nexperia's European management [3]. - The Ministry's involvement included submitting supportive documents to the court and advocating for rapid intervention to prevent potential non-compliance with the administrative order [3]. - The court's emergency measures, which included suspending the positions of Chinese directors and placing a majority of shares under custody, were executed without allowing reasonable representation from Chinese shareholders, indicating a systematic illegal deprivation of the company's rights [3]. Group 3: Restoration of Rights and Control - The company insists that the suspension of the administrative order is not a comprehensive solution and urges the Dutch Ministry to permanently withdraw the order and its involvement in the court proceedings [4]. - A true resolution must be based on restoring the company's complete rights as a shareholder and its legitimate control over Nexperia, reverting the situation to its state prior to September 29, 2025 [4]. - The company will not accept any attempts to legitimize illegal outcomes or a new governance structure created through unlawful processes, and it is prepared to take all legal measures to protect its and all shareholders' rights [4].

Group 1 - BYD has reported multiple instances of defamatory content circulating online, which has severely damaged its product reputation and brand image. The company has decided to take legal action against specific social media accounts, seeking a public apology and compensation of 3 million yuan [2] - A recent court ruling found that the social media account "Long Zhu - Ji Che" had published a significant amount of false and defamatory information about BYD, resulting in a compensation order of 2.0187 million yuan, which has been executed [4] - In July, BYD sold 344,296 new vehicles, maintaining its position as the global leader in new energy vehicle sales. The sales breakdown includes 315,136 vehicles from the Dynasty and Ocean series, 14,180 from the Fangchengbao, 11,375 from Tengshi, and 339 from Yangwang [6]