告别"坦途"：从医疗到金融的跨界求索 李潘蔓就曾是这条路上的行者。然而，现实与理想的距离，往往只有亲历者才能丈量。2008年入职后，她很快发现，"白衣天使"的光环之下，是旁人难以 想象的高压。急诊室的彻夜灯火、病房里的瞬息万变、日复一日的超负荷运转，以及那条几乎透明的、论资排辈的晋升窄梯……这一切，让她感到窒息。 她曾目睹过无数家庭在疾病面前的脆弱，也深刻理解一份保障的意义。但体制内的按部就班，让她感到个人的价值被稀释。她内心的声音日益清晰："太 过确定的未来，反而让人感受不到眼中有光的憧憬。我不想在20多岁时，就清晰地看到50岁的自己。" 在许多人眼中，从知名医学院毕业，进入理想的医院，成为一名"白衣天使"，无疑是踏上了一条令人羡慕的"坦途"。 她不愿被"专业围城"所困。医生转行，几乎等同于从零开始。但怀着"趁年轻去创造更多可能"的决心，李潘蔓毅然脱下了白袍，令人意外地投身于一个全 新领域——财务。 这是一次彻底的"归零"。凭借学医时练就的严谨、细致与超强抗压能力，她在一家大型连锁餐饮机构的财务岗上迅速成长。短短几年，她便从一个对借贷 记账法一无所知的新人，晋升为备受认可的主管。2013年，一个升任华南区区 ...

证券日报网讯 12月29日，嘉事堂在互动平台回答投资者提问时表示，公司始终坚守央企的责任与担 当，聚焦主责主业，加强核心业务的拓展和提升，继续加强药品、医疗器械及康养产品的销售和配送业 务，提高服务能力，巩固市场地位，扩大业务覆盖率，强化厂家合作，多措并举推动公司持续稳定发 展。 （编辑 丛可心） ...

Core Viewpoint - Qualcomm emphasizes sustainable development as a key strategy and has initiated over 30 corporate responsibility projects in China, benefiting more than 1.7 million people by 2024 [1][3]. Group 1: Corporate Responsibility Initiatives - Since its launch in 2006, Qualcomm's "Wireless Reach" program has implemented over 150 projects globally, impacting more than 27 million people [3]. - In China, Qualcomm has been active for 30 years and has launched over 30 corporate responsibility projects, with a focus on smart agriculture in collaboration with the China Rural Development Foundation [3]. - The smart agriculture project encourages the adoption of smart farming equipment, showcasing technology's role in modernizing agricultural practices [3]. Group 2: Technology in Public Services - Qualcomm has extended its innovative technologies to healthcare and education, launching the "Colorful Vision" VR program for children with amblyopia, utilizing VR technology for engaging rehabilitation [5]. - The company is committed to promoting STEM education, focusing on the development of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics talent [5]. Group 3: Collaboration and Future Goals - Qualcomm aims to collaborate with more partners to leverage intellectual property for innovation and green development, contributing to rural revitalization and sustainable growth [7].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal challenges faced by Johnson & Johnson (J&J) following a significant court ruling that ordered the company to pay $966 million in damages related to asbestos exposure from its talcum powder products, highlighting the ongoing litigation and public trust issues surrounding the brand [1][4][6]. Group 1: Legal Challenges - The jury ruled that J&J must pay $16 million in compensatory damages and up to $950 million in punitive damages to the family of May Moore, who died from mesothelioma, a cancer linked to asbestos exposure [1][4]. - J&J is currently facing over 67,000 lawsuits from plaintiffs claiming that their use of talcum powder products has led to cancer diagnoses [7]. - In previous cases, J&J has been ordered to pay substantial amounts, including $72 million in 2016 and nearly $4.7 billion in 2018 for similar claims [8]. Group 2: Company Response and Strategy - J&J has consistently maintained that its products are safe and do not contain asbestos, with company officials stating that their talcum powder meets U.S. Pharmacopeia standards [5][9]. - In response to the ongoing litigation, J&J announced plans to stop selling talcum powder globally by 2023, transitioning to a corn starch-based formula instead [9][10]. - Despite the legal issues, J&J reported a revenue of $45.6 billion in the first half of 2025, reflecting a 4.1% year-over-year growth, with significant contributions from its innovative pharmaceuticals and medical technology segments [10][11]. Group 3: Market Presence and Consumer Trust - J&J has a long-standing presence in China, having established its first joint venture in 1985 and expanding its operations significantly since then [13][18]. - The brand has historically been associated with safety in maternal and infant care, but recent controversies have led to consumer skepticism regarding its products [17][18]. - Despite attempts to distance itself from the talcum powder controversy by labeling some products as "0 talc," consumer concerns persist, as evidenced by complaints about product quality and safety [21][22].

Group 1 - A federal judge in Texas will hold a hearing on August 28 regarding a criminal settlement agreement between the Department of Justice and Boeing, which could prevent the company from being prosecuted for two 737 MAX crashes, despite strong opposition from victims' families [1][2] - Boeing has already pleaded guilty to a criminal fraud charge, admitting to misleading U.S. regulators about critical flight control system issues in the 737 MAX, in exchange for a three-year suspension of independent oversight by the DOJ [1][2] - The judge emphasized that he will hear arguments on whether dismissing the charges is reasonable, having previously labeled Boeing's actions as "the deadliest corporate crime in U.S. history" [1] Group 2 - Boeing will pay a total of $1.1 billion in settlement, which includes $243.6 million in new fines, $444.5 million to a victims' fund, and the remaining funds allocated for enhancing compliance and safety systems [2] - The DOJ noted that most families have received "billions of dollars" in compensation through civil lawsuits, although specific amounts for each victim's family have not been disclosed [2] - The legal battle reflects a complex balance between corporate responsibility, judicial oversight, and victims' rights, with the outcome of the hearing potentially serving as a significant indicator for global aviation safety regulation [2]