根据电池交易网官方微信公众号，安普瑞斯电芯产品大批量供应给安克创新、罗马仕、小米、OPPO、vivo、绿联、倍思、美团等。不过，目前仅罗马仕与 安克创新发布了召回公告，那么剩余品牌的充电宝是否达标？ 某头部充电宝企业内部人士曾向南都湾财社记者提供了一份安普瑞斯（无锡）有限公司给予该品牌的情况说明，安普瑞斯（无锡）有限公司称，罗马仕等方 面召回产品所涉电芯与供应给该品牌的电芯不存在重叠关系。 情况说明中，安普瑞斯（无锡）有限公司表示，公司会进一步加强管理，并会一如既往的重视产品安全以及与该品牌的良好合作关系。 国家企业信用信息公示系统显示，安普瑞斯（无锡）有限公司控股子公司芯派新能源（无锡）有限公司仅成立13天后便发布注销公告。官网显示，该公司成 立于今年6月20日，注册资本2亿元，简易注销公告期为7月2日至7月21日，经营范围包括电池制造、电池销售等等。 | 简易注销异议 | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | ■ 公告信息 | | | | | 异议企业名称： | 芯派新能源（无锡）有限公司 | 统一社会信用代码/注册号： | 91320205MAEP2MY88A | | 登记 ...

关注公众号，点击公众号主页右上角" ··· "，设置星标 "⭐" ，关注 鑫椤锂电 资讯~ -广告- 本文来源： 瑞浦兰钧 在全球储能行业安全要求不断升级的背景下，瑞浦兰钧以一场"极限生存测试"刷新产品安全包线—— 近期，在CSA、美国消防工程审核专家和国际客户的三方见证下，其Powtrix ® 5MWh储能电池舱完 成并通过大规模火烧测试。在满电状态下持续燃烧14小时，成功阻止热失控向周边设备蔓延。这一测 试深度模拟了五类复合火灾侵害，为储能系统产品的安全性能提供了实测证明。 灾（E类）的五类火焰炙烤。 与此同时，周边舱体持续暴露在触发舱的高温火焰之下。该测试设计旨 在考察储能设备在面临最恶劣复合火灾考验时的极限耐受能力 。 消防技术目击审核专家特别指出， "瑞浦兰钧的试验装置旨在最大程度模拟最恶劣的火灾场景。为 此，他们综合运用了包括最新版 CSA/ANSI C800:25、NFPA 855、UL 9540A 在内的多项核心标 准，确保采用了当前最为严苛的测试程序。" 极端测试条件，探索产品安全新包线 5MWh满电完全释放 触发持续3小时 五类火焰燃烧14小时 在储能系统测试中，采用满装、满充的电池舱是极 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the successful completion of an extreme fire test conducted by Ruipu Lanjun on its Powtrix® 5MWh energy storage battery system, demonstrating its enhanced safety performance under severe conditions [2][20]. Group 1: Testing Conditions and Methodology - The fire test was conducted under extreme conditions, simulating a worst-case scenario with a fully charged battery, which poses the highest risk of thermal runaway and fire spread [3][4]. - The test involved a combination of internal heating and external propane flame exposure, leading to a sustained burn of approximately 14 hours after a 3-hour ignition trigger [4][19]. - The test design included exposure to five types of fire (solid, liquid, gas, metal, and energized equipment), assessing the battery system's resilience against complex fire scenarios [4][10]. Group 2: Safety Performance and Results - The Powtrix® battery system successfully prevented thermal runaway from spreading to adjacent battery units, with the maximum flame temperature reaching 1380°C while maintaining the internal temperature of neighboring units below 57°C [7][20]. - The test was conducted without active fire suppression systems, relying solely on the battery's passive safety design, which proved effective in containing the fire [13][20]. - Over 600 temperature monitoring points were deployed during the test, providing comprehensive data collection and analysis of the combustion process, which received commendation from fire safety engineering experts [19][20]. Group 3: Industry Implications - This rigorous testing sets a new benchmark for safety in the energy storage industry, showcasing Ruipu Lanjun's capabilities in battery technology development and system safety design [20]. - The successful demonstration of the Powtrix® system's safety features contributes significantly to advancing the overall safety and reliability standards within the energy storage sector [20].

深夜回应。 深圳罗马仕科技有限公司官方微博7月3日深夜发文称："没有倒闭，感谢关心。定将努力解决所有朋友、 用户及合作伙伴的一切问题。" 作为充电宝风波的主要涉事公司，当天，"罗马仕倒闭"的消息冲上微博热搜。 有网友在罗马仕微博下方评论区留言称："辟谣倒挺快，客服是已读不回的。" 罗马仕回复："亲，近期用户咨询量较大，本次召回计划长期有效，请给我们一些时间，都会努力解决 的。" 此前据界面新闻报道，受充电宝召回事件影响，罗马仕经营陷入困境。7月3日，多名罗马仕员工证实，自 7月1日开始，罗马仕内部已经陆续通知员工全面停工停产，正式公告还没出，员工工资只发到6月份。 7月2日，证券时报记者实地探访了位于深圳市南山区西丽街道打石一路深圳国际创新谷七栋B座的深圳罗 马仕科技有限公司。 记者现场看到，办公区域内正常运营，但工作人员较少，部分区域没有开灯。"有的员工休假了。"面对记 者"为什么感觉里面人有点少"的疑问，前述熟悉罗马仕的人员含糊地回答记者。 工商信息显示，罗马仕成立于2012年3月13日，注册资本600万元人民币，2024年共有474名员工参保。 值得一提的是，7月2日，企查查APP显示，深圳罗马仕科技有 ...

充电宝新规落地，消费者权益保障须同步落实。妥善处置问题充电宝、保障消费者权益，需多方协同发 力。对厂商而言，"召回"不能止于一纸公告，必须拿出切实可行的回收方案，如在城市核心区设立便捷 的回收点，打通安全寄递通道，让问题充电宝"有路可回、有处可去"；对机场、车站等交通枢纽来说， 在严格执行新规的同时，应通过显著标识、线上公告等多渠道提前告知旅客政策变化，并在条件允许的 情况下探索提供短期暂存服务，为旅客化解"弃之可惜，带之不能"的尴尬；相关部门和企业，需要通过 官方平台发布简单易懂的回收或无害化处理指引，避免消费者因信息模糊而处置失当；监管部门需以此 为契机，引导和推动充电宝行业标准的完善与升级，同时强化动态监管，防止问题充电宝回流市场。 安全第一，消费者权益保障也应"第一"。新规如何更好落地，问题产品该何去何从，需要在生产、销 售、监管等每个环节，精准体察消费者的需求。只有产品质量可靠、回收服务便捷顺畅、监管落到实 处，消费者才能真正安心安全使用充电宝。 这一系列操作主要是出于安全考量。据统计，今年已发生15起旅客携带的充电宝在飞机上起火冒烟的事 件。召回问题产品、实施新规，是消除安全隐患、筑牢公共安全防线 ...

UL153认证意味着该台灯已经经过专业的测试和评估，符合一定的安全标准。这对于消费者而言，是一种重要的安全保障， 降低了因产品缺陷带来的风险。 2.UL153报告的重要性 （1）安全性保障 在美国市场，尤其是在亚马逊平台上，消费者对产品的安全性和质量要求越来越高。对于台灯这类电器产品，UL153报告作 为一种重要的安全认证，成为了销售和流通的必要条件。本文将为您提供一份关于美国亚马逊要求台灯UL153报告的实用指 南，帮助您深入了解这一认证的重要性及其应用场景。 1.什么是UL153报告 UL153报告是由美国保险商实验室（UnderwritersLaboratories，简称UL）颁发的一种安全认证，专门针对电气设备及其配 件。该报告旨在评估产品在正常使用和潜在故障情况下的安全性，确保产品不会对用户造成电击、火灾等安全隐患。台灯 作为一种常见的家居电器，其UL153认证能够有效提升消费者的信心，从而促进销售。 （2）市场准入 在美国市场上，许多电商平台（如亚马逊）要求销售的电器产品多元化具备UL153报告。这不仅是对消费者的保护，也使得 合规产品能顺利进入市场，提升产品的竞争力。 拥有UL153认证的产品往 ...

责任编辑：李昂 【无锡#市监局调查罗马仕安克充电宝电芯供货商#】#市监局调查罗马仕安克电芯供货商#据罗马仕、安 克此前发布的召回公告，召回原因是充电宝的电芯存在原材料变更，导致存在极端情况下或有燃烧风 险。澎湃查询发现，此次被指安全隐患的源头供货企业——江苏无锡的安普瑞斯（无锡）有限公司（下 称"安普瑞斯"），目前多个相关电池及电芯产品3C认证证书处于"暂停"状态。针对安普瑞斯的电芯问 题，6月27日，安普瑞斯一位工作人员回复智通财经称，目前，该公司有生产电芯，都是按相关规定生 产的。至于网传的相关问题，市场监管部门正在调查中。针对安普瑞斯的电芯问题，6月30日上午，无 锡市市场监督管理局工作人员回复称，目前正在调查中，后续会统一对外发布。此前报道，罗马仕召回 491745件充电宝，安克召回71万件。据一位在充电宝生产企业工作多年的业内人士介绍，目前，充电宝 领域竞争激烈，"内卷"厉害，很多品牌都是贴牌、代工模式，生产厂家的利润被压得很低。在一个充电 宝中，最重要的零配件就是电芯，仅电芯就占整个充电宝成本的40%-50%，若想压缩成本，很可能在电 芯上做文章。而且，电芯的生产需要一定技术，不是小工厂就能生产的 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) has implemented new regulations prohibiting passengers from carrying non-3C certified power banks on domestic flights, leading to a significant number of power banks being intercepted at airports [4][7]. Group 1: Regulatory Changes - The CAAC issued an emergency notice on June 26, stating that from June 28, passengers are banned from bringing power banks without 3C certification, unclear 3C markings, or those that have been recalled [4][7]. - The CAAC emphasized the need for airport security to enhance checks on power banks carried by passengers to prevent non-compliant items from being taken on board [7]. Group 2: Market Impact - Following the new regulations, a surge of power banks labeled as "airport intercepted" has appeared on second-hand platforms, being sold at low prices ranging from 15 to 30 yuan [2]. - Major brands such as Romoss and Anker have recalled over 490,000 and 710,000 power banks respectively due to safety hazards, indicating a broader issue of safety and quality in the power bank market [4][7]. Group 3: Consumer Reactions - Many consumers have reported their power banks being denied boarding, with social media posts showing large quantities of confiscated power banks at airports [4][7]. - Some sellers on second-hand platforms have been evasive about the safety and sourcing of these intercepted power banks, raising concerns among potential buyers [2][3].

Group 1 - The Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) has issued an emergency notice prohibiting passengers from carrying power banks without 3C certification, unclear 3C markings, or recalled models on domestic flights starting June 28 [1][4] - The decision comes in response to a rise in incidents of power banks and lithium battery products catching fire or smoking on flights, indicating safety risks associated with these devices [4][5] - Major brands like ROMOSS and Anker Innovation have initiated recalls of multiple power bank models due to safety concerns related to battery cell materials and potential overheating risks [6][10] Group 2 - CAAC has mandated airlines and airports to enhance the inspection of power banks carried by passengers and to increase staff presence at security checkpoints to assist travelers [5] - Airports are required to improve charging facilities for passengers and ensure that staff are well-trained to handle inquiries regarding power bank safety risks and policies [5][10] - Anker Innovation has announced a recall of certain models and is offering compensation options, including full refunds and product exchanges, while also terminating its relationship with the supplier responsible for the safety issues [10]

Core Viewpoint - The Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) has issued an emergency notice prohibiting passengers from carrying non-compliant power banks on domestic flights due to safety risks associated with lithium battery products [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - Starting June 28, passengers are banned from bringing power banks without 3C certification, unclear 3C labels, or recalled models on domestic flights [1]. - The CAAC has decided to implement stricter control measures based on international guidelines for the safe transport of dangerous goods [1][2]. - Airlines and related entities are required to enhance awareness and communication regarding the safety risks of power banks [2]. Group 2: Safety Incidents - There have been multiple incidents of power banks overheating and causing smoke in-flight, leading to emergency interventions by flight crews [4]. - Notable incidents include a power bank smoking on a flight from Zhoushan to Jieyang on June 13, and another incident involving a camera battery and power bank on a flight from Hangzhou to Shenzhen on May 31 [4]. - The French aviation accident investigation agency linked a fire incident on a flight from Hangzhou to Hong Kong to a power bank overheating, specifically identifying a Romoss brand device [4]. Group 3: Manufacturer Responses - Major brands like Anker Innovations and Romoss have issued recalls due to safety concerns with their power banks, with Anker recalling 710,000 units in China and 1.158 million in the U.S., while Romoss recalled 490,000 units domestically [4].