Core Viewpoint - Wentech Technology has appealed to the Dutch Supreme Court against the Amsterdam Enterprise Court's decision to strip its subsidiary, Nexperia, of control, claiming the ruling was made without proper consideration of its arguments and under government influence [1][3]. Group 1: Legal and Corporate Actions - The Amsterdam Enterprise Court made a unilateral decision to suspend Nexperia's former CEO and place the company's shares under the control of a Dutch lawyer, citing concerns over potential IP and business transfer to China [3][4]. - Nexperia China accused Nexperia Netherlands of misleading the public and obstructing business operations by deleting employee emails and restricting IT access [5][6]. - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce issued an export control announcement prohibiting Nexperia's subsidiaries in China from exporting certain components [3]. Group 2: Supply Chain and Operational Impact - Nexperia China reported that it has shipped 7.4 billion chips since mid-October to supply 515 global customers, despite ongoing disruptions caused by Nexperia Netherlands [5][6]. - Nexperia Netherlands has halted the supply of wafers to Nexperia China and has failed to fulfill over 1 billion RMB in service fees, further complicating the supply chain [6]. - Nexperia Netherlands plans to invest over $300 million in capacity expansion in Malaysia, indicating a strategic shift away from Nexperia China, which could have long-term negative effects on the global semiconductor supply chain [6].

Group 1 - The core issue discussed is the responsibility of the Netherlands regarding the ASML semiconductor situation, which has caused disruptions in the global semiconductor supply chain [1] - China's Ministry of Commerce has taken a responsible approach by exempting compliant civilian exports, which has somewhat alleviated the global semiconductor supply chain crisis [1] - The Netherlands has recently suspended its administrative order, which is seen as a positive step towards resolving the issue and restoring stability in the semiconductor supply chain [1] Group 2 - The UK is willing to communicate with the Netherlands to collaboratively work towards restoring the safety and stability of the global semiconductor supply chain [1] - Both parties agree that the long-term solution lies in companies resolving internal disputes through negotiation [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce emphasizes that the responsibility for the ASML semiconductor issue lies with the Netherlands, urging them to take practical actions to resolve the situation and stabilize the global semiconductor supply chain [1] Group 1: Key Points from the Meeting - Wang Wentao, the Chinese Minister of Commerce, held a video conference with UK Trade Secretary Peter Kyle to discuss the ASML semiconductor issue [1] - Wang stated that the Dutch government's administrative order and the court's erroneous decision are the root causes of the turmoil in the global semiconductor supply chain [1] - The Chinese side has taken a responsible approach by exempting exports for compliant civilian uses, which has somewhat alleviated the global semiconductor supply chain crisis [1] Group 2: Actions and Responses - The Netherlands has recently suspended the administrative order, which is seen as a positive step towards resolving the issue [1] - Wang expressed hope that the Netherlands would take responsibility and facilitate negotiations among companies to resolve internal disputes, thereby creating favorable conditions for restoring the fragile global semiconductor supply chain [1] - Kyle acknowledged the efforts made by China to restore the global semiconductor supply chain and agreed that a long-term solution lies in companies resolving their internal disputes through negotiation [1]

11月20日，商务部部长王文涛应约与英国商贸大臣彼得·凯尔举行视频会谈，就安世半导体问题深入交 换意见。 （文章来源：商务部网站） 凯尔表示，感谢中方通报安世半导体问题有关情况，以及为恢复全球半导体产供链所做努力。英方也认 为，解决问题的长期方案在于企业通过协商解决内部纠纷。英方愿就此与荷方沟通，共同推动尽快恢复 全球半导体产供链安全与稳定。 王文涛表示，安世半导体问题的责任在荷方。荷经济大臣行政令及荷经济部推动企业法庭作出错误裁 决，是导致全球半导体产供链陷入动荡和混乱的根源。中方本着负责任的态度，对符合规定的民用用途 出口予以豁免，全球半导体产供链危机得到一定程度缓解。荷方近期主动暂停行政令，是向妥善解决问 题的正确方向迈出的第一步。希望荷方真正负起责任，尽快采取实际行动，推动企业通过协商依法解决 内部纠纷，为恢复仍然脆弱的全球半导体产供链安全与稳定创造更有利条件。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing "Nexperia semiconductor incident" has seen significant developments, with the Dutch Minister of Economic Affairs announcing a suspension of the ministerial order affecting Nexperia, although the court ruling limiting control remains in effect [1][3][5]. Group 1: Developments in the Nexperia Incident - On November 19, the Dutch Minister Vincent Karremans stated that it is an appropriate time to take constructive measures and announced the suspension of the ministerial order against Nexperia [1]. - Despite the suspension of the ministerial order, the court ruling from October 7, 2025, remains valid, and the control over Nexperia by the company is still restricted [3][5]. - The ministerial order, issued on September 30, 2025, prohibits Nexperia and its global subsidiaries from making any adjustments to their assets, intellectual property, business, and personnel for one year [5]. Group 2: Responses from the Company and Government - The company emphasized its commitment to working with international legal teams to seek legal remedies and protect the rights of shareholders [5]. - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce welcomed the Dutch government's decision to suspend the administrative order but noted that further steps are needed to resolve the underlying issues affecting the global semiconductor supply chain [6]. - The Chinese side urged the Dutch government to take practical actions to resolve the Nexperia issue and restore stability to the semiconductor supply chain [6]. Group 3: Financial Impact on the Company - Recently, the company has faced significant shareholder reductions, with major shareholders planning to sell up to 37.34 million shares, representing 3% of the total share capital [8][9]. - The company's financial performance has been adversely affected, with a reported revenue of 4.427 billion yuan for Q3 2025, a decline of 77.38% year-on-year, while net profit increased by 279.29% [10]. - The semiconductor business has become the main focus for the company, with Q3 revenue from this segment reaching 4.3 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 12.20% [10].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing dispute involving Nexperia, a semiconductor company, has escalated into a global chip shortage affecting the automotive industry, with multiple international car manufacturers signaling production cuts [3][4]. Group 1: Impact on Automotive Industry - The Dutch government's interference in Nexperia's internal affairs has led to disruptions in the global semiconductor supply chain, causing significant turmoil in the automotive sector [4]. - As of October, 16 European car manufacturers have issued warnings about imminent production halts due to the Nexperia situation, relying on dwindling inventory to keep operations running [5]. - Major automotive suppliers like Bosch and ZF are also seeking solutions, with Bosch preparing for temporary layoffs and ZF considering short-time work arrangements [5]. Group 2: Responses from Car Manufacturers - Stellantis is actively monitoring the situation and developing strategies to mitigate potential disruptions to its operations [4]. - Nissan has indicated that its chip supply inventory can last until the first week of November, but acknowledges the chip supply shortage as a significant issue [6]. - Honda has begun adjusting production plans in North America and Mexico due to the Nexperia supply interruption, with some factories already ceasing operations [7]. - Toyota claims limited impact from the Nexperia export restrictions but recognizes it as a potential risk, while General Motors has also expressed concerns about production being affected by chip supply limitations [7].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government emphasizes that the Netherlands' interference in ASML's internal affairs has led to turmoil in the global semiconductor supply chain, and calls for constructive solutions to stabilize the situation [1]. Group 1: Government Response - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has reiterated its stance on the issue of ASML, stating that the Netherlands has not shown a constructive attitude despite China's reasonable requests during negotiations [1]. - The Chinese government holds the Netherlands fully responsible for escalating the global supply chain crisis [1]. - China has approved export license applications from Chinese exporters related to ASML and is working to facilitate the resumption of supply from ASML (China) [1]. Group 2: Call for Cooperation - China urges the Netherlands to adopt a responsible attitude and cease interference in corporate internal affairs to find constructive solutions for the ASML issue [1]. - The Chinese government highlights the importance of maintaining stable and secure global semiconductor supply chains and the broader economic relations between China and the Netherlands [1].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government emphasizes that the Netherlands' interference in ASML's internal affairs has led to turmoil and chaos in the global semiconductor supply chain, and holds the Dutch government responsible for escalating the global supply chain crisis [1]. Group 1 - The Chinese government has previously responded to inquiries regarding ASML and reiterates its stance on the issue during a press conference [1]. - The Dutch government's lack of constructive attitude and actions, despite China's repeated reasonable requests during negotiations, has contributed to the instability of the global semiconductor supply chain [1]. - China has approved relevant export license applications from Chinese exporters and granted exemptions for eligible exports to facilitate the recovery of ASML (China) supply [1]. Group 2 - China urges the Netherlands to adopt a responsible attitude and cease interference in corporate internal affairs to find constructive solutions to the ASML issue [1]. - The Chinese government highlights the importance of maintaining the overall stability and security of Sino-Dutch and Sino-European economic and trade relations, as well as the global supply chain [1].