96吨稀金归国！中美算总账，118亿美债抛售震动全球 更讽刺的是，案发时国家刚放开部分稀土企业通用许可，想在可控范围内让资源参与国际分工，结果有人就趁机钻空子。这波操作相当于国家在前面布局下 棋，有人在后面偷偷拆棋盘。好在警方历时18个月侦查，抓了27个主犯，端了12个黑仓库，缴获1000多份伪造单据，剩余70吨锑锭也通过国际协作锁定去向 ——这波"扫毒式"打击，直接斩断了境外势力的"递刀之手"。 这边走私案刚尘埃落定，那边美国就迫不及待搞事情。12月17日，五角大楼官宣111亿美元对台军售，创下1979年以来最高纪录。清单里全是硬货：82套海 马斯火箭炮、420枚陆军战术导弹、60门自走榴弹炮，清一色能直接实战的装备。明眼人看得出，以前台军购还想着争夺海空权，现在直接换成陆战装备， 摆明了知道海空力量扛不住72小时，想搞"刺猬战术"拖延时间。 但美国显然没懂"出来混迟早要还"的道理。军售公告刚发，美国农业部就发现：一笔13.2万吨的对华小麦订单凭空消失了。别小看这13.2万吨，相当于美国 小麦对华月出口量的35%，能装满26艘万吨货轮。要知道美国农业州早离不开中国市场，过去五年中国每年平均进口600万吨美国 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the dramatic impact of the U.S. tariff policy, particularly the increase to 125%, which has led to significant price hikes for basic goods, costing American households an additional $2,400 annually [3][5][6] - The U.S. isolation strategy has backfired, as attempts to decouple from global supply chains have resulted in negative consequences for the U.S. economy, while China has shown resilience and adaptability [5][6][10] - By 2025, China's foreign trade has grown by 4%, with exports to Africa increasing by 56.4%, indicating a shift in global trade dynamics and a more diversified trade network [13][15] Group 2 - Despite high tariffs, China's response has evolved from passive defense to proactive strategies, utilizing key resources like rare earths and semiconductors to counter U.S. actions [16][18] - The capital markets reflect a growing recognition of China's integral role in the global economy, with companies like Tesla and Volkswagen continuing to invest in China despite geopolitical tensions [18][19] - The article emphasizes that the international order is shifting towards a more complex interdependence, where the costs of excluding China from global supply chains are becoming increasingly untenable for the U.S. [21][24][27]

Core Viewpoint - The recent escalation in the US-China rivalry is marked by the US imposing additional port fees on Chinese vessels, prompting a swift retaliatory response from China with a new fee structure for US-operated ships [1][3]. Group 1: US-China Port Fee Dispute - The US began charging extra port fees on Chinese-built vessels starting October 14, 2023, which has led to China's immediate implementation of a special port fee for US ships docking in Chinese ports, effective from October 14, 2025, at a rate of 400 RMB per net ton [1]. - The criteria for the fee include ships operated by US entities or those with 25% or more US ownership, which may inadvertently affect vessels owned by other countries due to the minority US stake [3]. Group 2: Strategic Response - China is advised to adopt a strategy of countering in areas where it holds advantages, rather than passively responding to US actions, particularly in the maritime sector where China has a significant global presence in shipping and shipbuilding [5]. - The suggestion is to shift the battleground to the aviation sector, where the US has a dominant market share, by imposing additional airport usage fees on US-made passenger and cargo aircraft operating in China, thereby increasing operational costs for US airlines [7]. - This approach not only aims to create economic pressure on the US but also seeks to exploit potential divisions among US allies, particularly in the context of competition between major aircraft manufacturers like Boeing and Airbus [7].