Core Viewpoint - The recent public consultation by the Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants aims to establish a clear regulatory framework for sustainable information verification, marking a new phase of standardization and professionalism in ESG verification in China [1] Group 1: Challenges in Sustainable Information Verification - Current challenges in China's sustainable information verification include fragmented standards, significant differences in methods and indicators among verification institutions, and inadequate risk assessment capabilities [2] - The consultation draft aims to address these issues by proposing key measures to fill the gaps and resolve related challenges [2] Group 2: Standardization and Quality Control - The consultation draft is expected to resolve the long-standing fragmentation issue in the industry by establishing standardized procedures and requirements for verification [2] - It emphasizes the need for quality control mechanisms and clear anti-fraud requirements to provide reliable institutional guarantees for the market [1][2] Group 3: Incorporating International Experience and Local Adaptation - The draft draws on international frameworks like ISSA 5000 while considering the local context of China's nascent sustainable information disclosure and verification practices [3] - It proposes detailed requirements for dual materiality assessment and expert competency evaluation, aligning with domestic regulatory frameworks [3] Group 4: Enhancing Verification Quality - The draft sets stringent requirements for verification institutions, including the need for project partners to possess adequate competency in sustainable information [4] - It highlights the importance of maintaining independence and quality management within verification processes [5] Group 5: Addressing Fraud and Data Verification Challenges - The identification of fraud remains a significant challenge in sustainable information verification, particularly due to the lack of standardized metrics for non-financial data [7] - The draft suggests implementing technological solutions and cross-departmental collaboration to enhance data verification and fraud detection [8] Group 6: Strengthening Accountability and Regulatory Mechanisms - The establishment of a robust accountability framework is crucial, with suggestions for dual accountability for fraudulent activities involving both companies and verification institutions [9] - A two-way data reporting platform is proposed to facilitate communication between verification institutions and regulatory bodies, enhancing the identification of high-risk entities [10]

Core Points - The article outlines the anti-fraud system established by Beijing Yanjing Beer Co., Ltd. to prevent and address fraud, enhance corporate governance, and protect the rights of shareholders [1][2] - The anti-fraud work aims to regulate the behavior of senior and middle management as well as all employees, ensuring compliance with laws, regulations, and ethical standards [1][2] Summary by Sections General Principles - The purpose of the anti-fraud system is to prevent actions that could harm the company's and shareholders' interests, based on relevant laws and regulations [1] - The definition of fraud includes deceptive actions by internal or external personnel to gain improper benefits at the expense of the company's legitimate economic interests [1] Responsibilities and Internal Controls - The Board of Directors is responsible for promoting a culture of anti-fraud within the company and overseeing the establishment of a comprehensive internal control system [2] - Management is tasked with creating effective internal control mechanisms, including reporting channels for fraud detection and implementing measures to reduce fraud opportunities [2][3] Reporting and Investigation Procedures - Employees and external parties can report suspected fraud through various channels, including hotlines and emails [3][4] - The internal audit department is responsible for receiving reports, conducting initial assessments, and escalating cases involving senior management to the Board of Directors [4] Remedial Measures and Penalties - Upon confirmation of fraud, the company must take timely remedial actions and assess the internal controls of affected business units [5] - Employees found guilty of fraud will face disciplinary actions, and criminal offenses will be referred to judicial authorities [5][6] Applicability and Implementation - The anti-fraud system applies to the company and its subsidiaries, and it is subject to interpretation by the internal audit department [6] - The system becomes effective upon approval by the Board of Directors and will be modified as necessary [6]

校对： 冉燕青 通报称，2024年全年，共有39人因涉嫌违法犯罪被集团移送司法机关处理。2024年至今，抖音集团共将 23家合作方列入永不合作主体清单。2024年下半年，有17人因商业贿赂、职务侵占等舞弊行为被移送司法 处理。 抖音集团始终坚持对腐败、贿赂"零容忍"的态度。员工如涉嫌违法犯罪，一经查实，集团将作辞退处理， 并永不录用。调查过程中，如发现有合作方行贿集团员工，或伙同集团员工谋取不正当利益，相关合作方 将被列入永不合作主体清单，抖音集团不再接受其任何服务或产品。同时，集团将严格按照国家法律法 规，全力配合司法机关调 查，追究涉案人员及相关主体的法律责任。 抖音集团致力于维护良好的商业环境，鼓励合作方及时反馈任何违反国家法律法规或商业道德的行为。对于调 查过程中主动提供线索并积极配合的合作方，集团将酌情不列入永不合作主体清单；对于主动举报腐败、贿赂 行为，经查证属实，对案件有实际推动的人员，集团将综合考虑给予奖励。 责编：叶舒筠 抖音集团在其官方公众号公开发布了"2024年下半年抖音集团反舞弊通报"。 点击关键字可查看 潜望系列深度报道丨 股事会专栏 丨 投资小红书 丨 e公司调查 丨 时报会客厅 ...

中亿丰罗普斯金材料科技股份有限公司 反舞弊与举报制度 中亿丰罗普斯金材料科技股份有限公司 反舞弊与举报制度 （2025 年 2 月修订） 第一章 总则 第一条 为加强中亿丰罗普斯金材料科技股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）的公司治理和 内部控制，降低公司风险，规范经营行为，确保公司经营目标的实现和公司持续、稳定、健 康发展，保护公司、股东和债权人的合法权益，根据《深圳证券交易所上市公司自律监管指 引第 1 号——主板上市公司规范运作》、《公司章程》及公司其它内部控制制度的规定，并结 合公司实际情况，特制定本制度。 第二条 反舞弊工作的宗旨是规范公司全体员工的职业行为，特别是董事、监事、中高层管 理人员、关键岗位员工的职业行为，树立廉洁、勤勉、敬业的良好风气，遵守相关法律法规、 职业道德及公司内部管理制度，防止损害公司、股东利益的行为发生。 中亿丰罗普斯金材料科技股份有限公司 反舞弊与举报制度 （十一）其他损害公司经济利益或谋取公司不当经济利益的舞弊行为。 第三章反舞弊的组织机构及职责 第三条 本制度适用于公司及下属各控股子公司。 第二章 舞弊的概念及形式 第四条 本制度所称舞弊，是指公司内、外部人员采用隐瞒、欺 ...