Core Viewpoint - The founder of New Oriental, Yu Minhong, addressed concerns regarding employee treatment and internal complaints, assuring that employees are safe and their issues will be investigated [1][2]. Group 1: Employee Concerns - A long message from a course consultant in Hangzhou highlighted excessive working hours, stating that the team has been trapped in a "996 single day off" cycle, working from 9:30 AM to 9:30 PM, which exceeds ten hours daily [2]. - The message also pointed out that the promised double days off in the employment contract are rarely realized, and the eight-hour workday mandated by labor laws has become unattainable [2]. - Employees expressed gratitude for Yu Minhong's previous communication, which encouraged open expression of concerns, motivating them to voice their difficulties [2]. Group 2: Company Response - A staff member from Hangzhou confirmed that the message was indeed sent by an employee but was deleted shortly after due to improper communication methods, as the company has established reporting mechanisms [3]. - Yu Minhong's recent communications, including an apology letter sent from Antarctica, emphasized the responsibility of employees to uphold the company's image and resolve issues through internal channels [3]. - The company encourages open feedback but advises caution regarding extreme statements made on social media, as the stability of the company is essential for employees' peace of mind [3].

Core Viewpoint - New Oriental's chairman, Yu Minhong, addressed recent employee complaints about excessive overtime, assuring that the employees who wrote the letter are performing their duties normally and will not face repercussions [1] Group 1: Employee Concerns - A New Oriental course consultant publicly criticized the company's work culture in an internal letter, highlighting issues such as the "996 single rest" cycle, where employees work over 10 hours daily, contradicting the labor contract's stipulation of a two-day weekend and an 8-hour workday [1] - Yu Minhong emphasized that the company will investigate the issues raised by employees and will take corrective actions if the concerns are validated [1] Group 2: Company Response - Yu Minhong reassured the public that the employees who expressed their concerns are safe in their positions and are continuing to work normally [1] - The company is taking the complaints seriously and is committed to respecting employees' basic labor rights [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the discontent among New Oriental employees regarding excessive working hours, unrealistic performance targets, and a lack of respect for labor rights, urging management to address these issues to maintain the company's educational values and employee well-being [3][5][6]. Group 1: Employee Concerns - Employees report a "996 single rest" work culture, with daily working hours extending from 9:30 AM to 9:30 PM, leading to over ten hours of work becoming the norm [4][5]. - The initial promise of a double rest day in the employment contract has rarely been fulfilled, and the legal eight-hour workday has become an unattainable luxury [4][6]. - There are complaints about performance targets that exceed reasonable limits, leading to a sense of confusion and fatigue among employees [6]. Group 2: Management Response - An internal letter from a course consultant at New Oriental was circulated, expressing these grievances but was subsequently deleted, indicating potential repercussions for the employee [8]. - The company has a clear reporting mechanism for such issues, and management has stated that they will follow up on the situation [8]. Group 3: Call for Change - Employees express a desire for basic labor rights to be respected and for a return to a focus on both educational quality and employee rights [6]. - The letter references a sentiment from the founder, suggesting that if the company continuously harms its employees, it cannot be considered a good company, emphasizing the need for management to listen to employee concerns [6].

Core Viewpoint - Amazon.com is facing a proposed class action lawsuit alleging that it imposes a "punitive" policy on warehouse employees with disabilities regarding workplace absences [1] Group 1 - The lawsuit claims that thousands of warehouse employees with disabilities are subjected to this policy [1]

Core Points - Meta's recent layoffs, initiated in February under the guise of "performance optimization," are evolving into a trust crisis within the company [1] - The company claims that 5% of its workforce, approximately 3,600 employees, were laid off due to being "low performers," but former employees report issues such as double standards in the rating system and pressure from management [1] Group 1 - A human resources employee returned from a five-month maternity leave with a mid-year performance rating of "meets expectations," but was later terminated with a year-end rating of "partially meets expectations," attributed to directives from CEO Mark Zuckerberg [3] - Employees have expressed concerns over the lack of transparency in performance feedback, with self-evaluations not being reviewed [3] - A long-term employee with 17 years at Meta, who previously received the highest rating, was laid off after disclosing family pressures, highlighting a shift in the company's culture from regret during previous layoffs to a more ruthless approach [3] Group 2 - Several employees reported targeted downgrades after taking sick leave or requesting job transfers, with one software engineer being laid off shortly after returning from a four-month sick leave [3] - Concerns have been raised about the "low performer" label being assigned unilaterally by Meta, which could negatively impact future job prospects for affected employees [3] - A Meta spokesperson stated that layoffs were based on a "high-performance target culture," but the complaints from former employees reveal deeper contradictions in the performance evaluation process [3]