制度分割与利益交织所形成的地方市场多重壁垒，抑制要素自由流动和商品高效畅通，不利于企业跨区 域公平竞争与消费场景、模式创新，从而不能很好地为当地消费者提供更广泛丰富的产品与服务。与此 同时，地方壁垒造成的市场垄断提升消费者获取商品的价格、减少消费者剩余，成为阻碍提振消费 的"堵点"与"痛点"，其问题集中表现在以下四重维度。 消费是生产的最终目的和根本动力，也关系着人民群众对美好生活的向往。当前，中国消费市场的总体 规模稳居全球市场前茅，消费也已成为我国经济增长的"主引擎"，2025年上半年，消费对我国经济增长 的贡献率达到了52%。然而，我国居民消费率与发达国家相比仍存在较大差距。2015-2024年中国居民 消费支出占GDP比重（居民消费率）在37%-40%区间波动，低于经合组织国家平均水平近20个百分点。 这说明当前我国居民的消费意愿与潜力释放仍受诸多现实壁垒制约，居民消费提振仍有较大的提升空 间。加快建设全国统一大市场，不仅是我国提振居民消费、扩大内需、构建新发展格局的内在要求，更 是推动经济高质量发展、增进民生福祉的必然选择。 市场分割是抑制消费潜力释放的重要障碍 一是制度规则割裂推高消费成本，抑制居 ...

采访了解各地地方保护主义成因，常听到这样的解释：由于早期市场空间小，很多地区招商引资吸引不 了优质企业进入，只能以"名录库"等形式，变相为部分企业垄断开绿灯。 然而，小算盘打得再响，只是解决了一时困境。以行政手段干涉市场正常运行，其中的利弊得失，心里 要有本明白账。 前不久，全国首个跨省市、跨关区的航空前置货站"上海机场—苏州前置货站"在江苏苏州启用，货物安 检、收运、海关查验等繁琐环节均可在企业园区内完成。苏州企业自此能在"家门口"便捷地享受到上海 丰富的国际航线资源，地面物流成本最多可降低近三成；对上海而言，前置货站将上海机场服务范围拓 展至苏州乃至长三角地区，有力推动了"上海枢纽+区域节点"航空物流网络构建，还分流了机场地面查 验压力，让上海海关能够将更多资源投入到高风险货物监管中。 毋庸置疑，这是一项打破地域限制、提升行政效率的多赢之举。 类似的积极变化不断让市场感受到暖意。国家税务总局数据显示，今年上半年，全国省际间销售额占全 国企业销售收入比重为40.7%，较上年同期提高0.6个百分点，印证了区域壁垒的逐步消除；在要素市 场，劳动力跨省流动因在就业地参保户籍限制的全面取消而更加顺畅；在监管层面，多 ...

Group 1 - Local protectionism has led to market segmentation, increased transaction costs, and reduced resource allocation efficiency, hindering the construction of a unified national market [1] - Local protectionism undermines fair competition, giving local enterprises an unfair advantage and harming the interests of external companies, which diminishes market vitality and innovation [1] - Consumers are deprived of the opportunity to choose better and cheaper goods and services, negatively impacting their rights and consumption enthusiasm [1] Group 2 - The establishment of the "Shanghai Airport - Suzhou Front Cargo Station" represents a significant step in breaking regional barriers and enhancing administrative efficiency, allowing local enterprises to access international logistics resources conveniently [2] - The new cargo station can reduce ground logistics costs by up to 30%, benefiting both Suzhou and Shanghai by expanding service areas and alleviating pressure on airport customs [2] - Data from the National Taxation Administration indicates that inter-provincial sales accounted for 40.7% of national enterprise sales revenue in the first half of the year, reflecting a gradual elimination of regional barriers [3]

采访了解各地地方保护主义成因，常听到这样的解释：由于早期市场空间小，很多地区招商引资吸引不 了优质企业进入，只能以"名录库"等形式，变相为部分企业垄断开绿灯。 然而，小算盘打得再响，只是解决了一时困境。以行政手段干涉市场正常运行，其中的利弊得失，心里 要有本明白账。 从市场角度看，地方保护主义造成了市场分割，各类要素难以自由流动，增加了交易成本，降低了资源 配置效率，阻碍了全国统一大市场建设。 从企业层面讲，地方保护主义破坏了公平竞争原则，本地企业在不公平的竞争环境中获得优势，损害了 外地企业利益，也削弱了市场活力和创新力。 随着全国统一大市场建设纵深推进，市场竞争秩序必将持续优化。 破除地方保护主义，要立足当下看长远，摒弃短视算大账。 前不久，全国首个跨省市、跨关区的航空前置货站"上海机场—苏州前置货站"在江苏苏州启用，货物安 检、收运、海关查验等繁琐环节均可在企业园区内完成。苏州企业自此能在"家门口"便捷地享受到上海 丰富的国际航线资源，地面物流成本最多可降低近三成；对上海而言，前置货站将上海机场服务范围拓 展至苏州乃至长三角地区，有力推动了"上海枢纽+区域节点"航空物流网络构建，还分流了机场地面查 验压 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need to deepen the construction of a national unified market to optimize market competition order and enhance resource allocation efficiency [1][2] - The construction of a national unified market is crucial for building a high-level socialist market economy, addressing issues like disorderly competition among enterprises and local protectionism [1][2] - The strategy aims to expand domestic demand, facilitate domestic circulation, and leverage the advantages of a super-large market to respond to international uncertainties [2][3] Group 2 - Local protectionism and competitive investment attraction are driven by performance assessments, necessitating reforms in incentive mechanisms to promote the national unified market [3] - The National Development and Reform Commission will play a leading role in coordinating efforts, promoting information sharing, and addressing prominent issues [3][4] - The construction of a national unified market is a complex system project requiring a clear blueprint for top-level design and coordination of various reform measures [3][4]

Group 1 - The construction industry is advocating against "involution" competition, aiming for industry transformation [2] - The central economic work conference in December highlighted the need to address "involution" competition, marking the beginning of this initiative [3] - The recent meeting of the Central Financial Committee emphasized the importance of regulating low-price competition and guiding companies to improve product quality [3] Group 2 - New industries like new energy vehicles and photovoltaic products are also experiencing "involution" competition characterized by high investment and low output [3][4] - Local government support and protectionism are significant factors contributing to the persistence of "involution" in these emerging industries [4][5] - The photovoltaic industry is facing a situation where production capacity exceeds demand, leading to significant price drops across various segments [3][5] Group 3 - The lack of large-scale mergers and acquisitions in the photovoltaic and new energy vehicle sectors is concerning, as companies continue to operate despite losses [5] - Local governments often view mergers or market exits as failures, leading to continued support for underperforming companies [5][6] - The essence of combating "involution" is to allow businesses to operate freely, with a focus on product quality and innovation [6] Group 4 - The central government recognizes the need to regulate local government and corporate behavior to foster a competitive market environment [6] - It is crucial for local governments to strengthen governance and avoid interfering with market dynamics to promote a healthy business ecosystem [6]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has issued a notification emphasizing the prevention of illegal extraterritorial law enforcement and profit-driven judicial practices, addressing local protectionism in handling enterprise-related cases [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Framework and Guidelines - The notification mandates the strict implementation of the case registration system, ensuring the protection of parties' litigation rights and prohibiting delays or selective case registrations [2][5]. - It emphasizes the principle of legal jurisdiction, prohibiting the expansion of jurisdiction for profit-driven purposes and ensuring that civil cases are not dismissed under criminal pretenses [2][4]. - The notification highlights the need to distinguish between economic disputes and criminal offenses, reinforcing legal principles such as equality before the law and the presumption of innocence [5][6]. Group 2: Addressing Local Protectionism - The issue of local protectionism in the judiciary is underscored, with calls for reforms to ensure the uniform application of national laws and to mitigate the influence of local interests [4][6]. - The notification reiterates the importance of preventing the artificial creation of extraterritorial jurisdiction and the expansion of jurisdiction based on local interests [4][5]. - Legal experts have pointed out that the misuse of jurisdiction is often linked to local protectionism, particularly in cases involving online and economic crimes [2][3]. Group 3: Enforcement Measures - The notification specifies the need for precise application of asset seizure and freezing measures, ensuring that such actions do not unduly impact normal business operations [6]. - It calls for the differentiation between illegal gains and legitimate assets, prohibiting the seizure of unrelated properties [6]. - The notification also emphasizes the need for fair judicial review of administrative cases involving enterprises, aiming to rectify issues such as arbitrary fines and inspections [6].