Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need to deepen the construction of a national unified market to optimize market competition order and enhance resource allocation efficiency [1][2] - The construction of a national unified market is crucial for building a high-level socialist market economy, addressing issues like disorderly competition among enterprises and local protectionism [1][2] - The strategy aims to expand domestic demand, facilitate domestic circulation, and leverage the advantages of a super-large market to respond to international uncertainties [2][3] Group 2 - Local protectionism and competitive investment attraction are driven by performance assessments, necessitating reforms in incentive mechanisms to promote the national unified market [3] - The National Development and Reform Commission will play a leading role in coordinating efforts, promoting information sharing, and addressing prominent issues [3][4] - The construction of a national unified market is a complex system project requiring a clear blueprint for top-level design and coordination of various reform measures [3][4]

Group 1 - The construction industry is advocating against "involution" competition, aiming for industry transformation [2] - The central economic work conference in December highlighted the need to address "involution" competition, marking the beginning of this initiative [3] - The recent meeting of the Central Financial Committee emphasized the importance of regulating low-price competition and guiding companies to improve product quality [3] Group 2 - New industries like new energy vehicles and photovoltaic products are also experiencing "involution" competition characterized by high investment and low output [3][4] - Local government support and protectionism are significant factors contributing to the persistence of "involution" in these emerging industries [4][5] - The photovoltaic industry is facing a situation where production capacity exceeds demand, leading to significant price drops across various segments [3][5] Group 3 - The lack of large-scale mergers and acquisitions in the photovoltaic and new energy vehicle sectors is concerning, as companies continue to operate despite losses [5] - Local governments often view mergers or market exits as failures, leading to continued support for underperforming companies [5][6] - The essence of combating "involution" is to allow businesses to operate freely, with a focus on product quality and innovation [6] Group 4 - The central government recognizes the need to regulate local government and corporate behavior to foster a competitive market environment [6] - It is crucial for local governments to strengthen governance and avoid interfering with market dynamics to promote a healthy business ecosystem [6]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has issued a notification emphasizing the prevention of illegal extraterritorial law enforcement and profit-driven judicial practices, addressing local protectionism in handling enterprise-related cases [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Framework and Guidelines - The notification mandates the strict implementation of the case registration system, ensuring the protection of parties' litigation rights and prohibiting delays or selective case registrations [2][5]. - It emphasizes the principle of legal jurisdiction, prohibiting the expansion of jurisdiction for profit-driven purposes and ensuring that civil cases are not dismissed under criminal pretenses [2][4]. - The notification highlights the need to distinguish between economic disputes and criminal offenses, reinforcing legal principles such as equality before the law and the presumption of innocence [5][6]. Group 2: Addressing Local Protectionism - The issue of local protectionism in the judiciary is underscored, with calls for reforms to ensure the uniform application of national laws and to mitigate the influence of local interests [4][6]. - The notification reiterates the importance of preventing the artificial creation of extraterritorial jurisdiction and the expansion of jurisdiction based on local interests [4][5]. - Legal experts have pointed out that the misuse of jurisdiction is often linked to local protectionism, particularly in cases involving online and economic crimes [2][3]. Group 3: Enforcement Measures - The notification specifies the need for precise application of asset seizure and freezing measures, ensuring that such actions do not unduly impact normal business operations [6]. - It calls for the differentiation between illegal gains and legitimate assets, prohibiting the seizure of unrelated properties [6]. - The notification also emphasizes the need for fair judicial review of administrative cases involving enterprises, aiming to rectify issues such as arbitrary fines and inspections [6].