干预主义
Search documents
想抄中国剧本?“美国都放弃40年了,抄都不会抄”
Guan Cha Zhe Wang· 2025-09-26 03:41
Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government is increasingly adopting industrial policies similar to China's in response to concerns over supply chain vulnerabilities, particularly in critical sectors like rare earths and lithium [1][2][6]. Group 1: U.S. Industrial Policy Shift - The U.S. government is considering acquiring up to 10% of Lithium Americas, which is developing the world's largest known lithium resource at the Thacker Pass mine in Nevada, aiming to bolster domestic battery supply chains [4]. - A recent deal with MP Materials, a U.S. rare earth producer, involved a multi-billion dollar transaction, making the U.S. Department of Defense the largest shareholder [5]. - The U.S. also acquired a 10% stake in Intel, the only company capable of manufacturing advanced chips domestically, with a total investment of $8.9 billion, partly funded by the CHIPS and Science Act [6]. Group 2: Concerns Over Supply Chain Vulnerabilities - Analysts highlight that the U.S. recognizes that relying solely on market forces may not ensure sufficient domestic supply for strategic industries, particularly in defense technology and advanced electronics [2]. - Geopolitical tensions are driving U.S. concerns about potential disruptions in semiconductor and critical mineral supply chains [2]. Group 3: Challenges in Implementing Industrial Policy - The U.S. has not engaged in industrial policy for over 40 years, leading to questions about its ability to effectively implement such strategies [6][7]. - Despite recognizing the risks of dependency on Chinese rare earth supplies since 2010, the U.S. has made slow progress in policy formulation and industry development, facing environmental and market-related challenges [7][8]. - The lengthy process of establishing a rare earth mine in the U.S. can take up to 29 years, highlighting the difficulties in reviving the domestic rare earth industry [7].
大外交丨3天拿下数万亿美元投资,特朗普在中东做经济“加法”和政治“减法”
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-05-17 02:25
Group 1: Key Agreements and Economic Impact - The United States and the UAE have reached agreements worth over $200 billion, covering sectors such as aviation, aluminum, oil, and gas [1][3] - A significant part of the agreement includes a $14.5 billion aircraft procurement deal between Boeing, General Electric Aviation, and Etihad Airways for 28 Boeing 787 and 777X aircraft [3] - The total investment commitments from Trump's Middle East trip exceed $2 trillion, with notable agreements from Saudi Arabia and Qatar as well [5][6] Group 2: Focus on High-Tech and AI Collaboration - The U.S. and UAE have agreed to establish a "U.S.-UAE AI Accelerated Partnership" to enhance cooperation in key technologies, including the launch of a 1GW AI data center [6][7] - The AI data center will be part of a larger 5GW AI park in Abu Dhabi, marking it as the largest of its kind outside the U.S. [7] - The partnership aims to facilitate the purchase of advanced AI chips from companies like NVIDIA and AMD, with Gulf countries looking to integrate into the U.S.-led technology supply chain [7][8] Group 3: Geopolitical Context and Strategic Shifts - Trump's visit signifies a shift in U.S. foreign policy towards the Middle East, focusing on economic benefits rather than traditional diplomatic engagements [10][14] - The U.S. is reducing its military and political involvement in the region, aiming to transform Middle Eastern countries into economic partners rather than burdens [12][14] - The discussions with Syria and Iran during the visit indicate a potential recalibration of U.S. relations in the region, with an emphasis on resource acquisition and investment [12][14]