Core Viewpoint - The fierce competition among Alibaba, JD, and Meituan in the food delivery market has led to significant financial losses for all three companies, with no clear winner emerging from the "battle" [2][5][19]. Financial Performance - JD's revenue for Q2 reached 356.7 billion RMB, a year-on-year increase of 22.4%, but its net profit plummeted by 50.8% to 6.2 billion RMB [6][10]. - Meituan reported Q2 revenue of 91.84 billion RMB, up 11.7% year-on-year, but its adjusted net profit fell by 89% to 1.49 billion RMB [8][10]. - Alibaba's Q2 revenue was 247.65 billion RMB, a mere 2% increase, with core operating profit declining by 3% [10][12]. Marketing Expenditure - JD's marketing expenses surged to 27 billion RMB in Q2, a 127.6% increase year-on-year [4][17]. - Meituan's marketing spending reached 22.5 billion RMB, up 51.8% from the previous year [4][18]. - Alibaba's marketing costs amounted to 53.18 billion RMB, a 62.6% increase year-on-year, leading to a total marketing expenditure exceeding 100 billion RMB for all three companies combined [5][18]. Cash Flow and Investment - JD's free cash flow dropped by 55% to approximately 22 billion RMB, with investment losses in the food delivery sector reaching 13 billion RMB [13][14]. - Meituan's core local business operating profit fell from 15.2 billion RMB to 3.7 billion RMB, a decline of 75.6% [10][14]. - Alibaba's free cash flow turned negative at 18.81 billion RMB, a significant drop from a positive cash flow of 17.37 billion RMB in the previous year [14]. Market Position and User Engagement - JD's food delivery service achieved over 25 million daily orders, covering 350 cities with more than 1.5 million merchants [20]. - Meituan's app reached over 500 million monthly active users, with peak daily orders for instant retail surpassing 15 million [20]. - Alibaba's instant retail revenue grew by 12% to 14.78 billion RMB, with significant increases in active users and order volumes [20]. Strategic Insights - The competition is characterized as a battle for high-frequency user engagement, with short-term growth driven by subsidies failing to create lasting competitive advantages [22]. - Industry leaders express concerns over unsustainable competition and the need for a more rational market approach moving forward [21][22].

Core Viewpoint - The fierce competition among Alibaba, JD, and Meituan in the food delivery market has led to significant financial losses for all three companies, with no clear winner emerging from this costly battle [2][5][24]. Financial Performance - JD's revenue for Q2 2025 reached 356.7 billion RMB, a year-on-year increase of 22.4%, but its net profit plummeted by 50.8% to 6.2 billion RMB [6][9]. - Meituan reported Q2 revenue of 91.84 billion RMB, up 11.7% year-on-year, but its adjusted net profit fell by 89% to 1.49 billion RMB [9][11]. - Alibaba's total revenue for Q2 2025 was 247.65 billion RMB, a mere 2% increase year-on-year, with a core operating profit decline of 3% [13][24]. Marketing Expenditure - JD's marketing expenses surged to 27 billion RMB in Q2, a staggering increase of 127.6% year-on-year [4][20]. - Meituan's marketing costs rose to 22.5 billion RMB, reflecting a 51.8% increase compared to the previous year [4][20]. - Alibaba's marketing expenditure reached 53.18 billion RMB, up 62.6% year-on-year, indicating a total marketing spend exceeding 100 billion RMB across the three companies for the quarter [4][21]. Strategic Insights - The competition is characterized by high cash burn rates, with the three companies collectively spending over 43 billion RMB more on marketing compared to the previous year [4][21]. - JD's new business segment, which includes food delivery, saw revenue increase from 4.6 billion RMB to 13.9 billion RMB, but operating losses ballooned from 700 million RMB to 14.8 billion RMB [15][17]. - Meituan's core local business operating profit dropped from 15.2 billion RMB to 3.7 billion RMB, a decline of 75.6% year-on-year [11][17]. Market Position and Future Outlook - Despite the financial strain, all three companies reported increases in user engagement and order volumes, indicating some success in capturing market share [24][25]. - The competition is expected to continue, with industry leaders emphasizing the need for sustainable practices rather than excessive cash burn [25][26]. - Analysts suggest that the future of this competition will hinge on the ability to convert short-term subsidies into long-term customer loyalty and ecosystem stability [26].

Core Viewpoint - The recent "subsidy war" among food delivery platforms aims to capture market share and enhance user engagement by offering significant discounts, raising concerns about long-term sustainability and competition dynamics [1][2][3]. Group 1: Subsidy War Dynamics - Since April, food delivery platforms have engaged in a "subsidy war" involving billions in discounts, significantly boosting order volumes [2]. - Platforms are reallocating funds previously spent on advertising to consumer subsidies, enhancing customer acquisition efficiency [2]. - Experts suggest that while consumers benefit in the short term, long-term implications may include price wars leading to compromised food safety and merchant rights [2][3]. Group 2: Market Competition and Strategy - The competition is not merely about food delivery but aims to dominate the "last mile" of local services, transitioning from food delivery to broader instant consumption scenarios [3]. - Platforms are leveraging subsidies to increase app usage frequency and user engagement, which is critical for future growth [3]. - The competition landscape has evolved into a multi-dimensional arena involving pricing, service quality, and data utilization [3][8]. Group 3: Transparency and Regulation - Experts advocate for greater transparency in subsidy rules to protect smaller merchants and ensure fair competition [4][6]. - The proposed regulations emphasize the need for platforms to disclose subsidy sharing ratios, duration, and merchant participation conditions [6][7]. - The draft rules also address concerns about predatory pricing and the need for fair treatment of all merchants on the platforms [7]. Group 4: Concerns Over "Involution" - There is a debate on whether the current price competition constitutes "involution," with experts urging a distinction between healthy competition and harmful price wars [8][9]. - The focus should be on ensuring that low prices do not lead to low-quality services, with existing laws on food safety and product quality being emphasized [9]. - A balanced approach is recommended to foster a vibrant yet orderly platform economy, benefiting all stakeholders involved [9].

Group 1 - The restaurant industry is entering a new phase of "increased orders and profits," showcasing unprecedented vitality and resilience [1] - From July, the Chinese fast food brand Hehegu saw a 140% month-on-month increase in takeaway orders and nearly 80% growth in net GMV, with steady increases in total sales and profits [1] - The growth is attributed to marketing activities where platforms bear most of the promotional subsidies, leading to a rise in new customers and improved repurchase rates [1] Group 2 - Xiaotiao Pear Soup reported an 18% year-on-year increase in takeaway revenue within three months of launching on Taobao Flash Purchase, with a significant rise in order volume and profits [2] - The platform has helped 1.4 million merchants achieve significant growth in daily order numbers and actual income, with over 800,000 restaurants seeing monthly revenue increases exceeding 10,000 yuan [2] - The restaurant sector plays a crucial role in boosting service consumption, and digital platforms are essential for enhancing operational efficiency among small and micro enterprises [2]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing subsidy war among food delivery platforms has led to increased sales for some restaurants, but has also created challenges regarding profitability and service quality for restaurant operators [1][7][8]. Group 1: Impact on Sales and Profitability - South City Fragrance (南城香) reported a daily revenue increase of approximately 30% to 35% during the recent subsidy war, while total profits rose by about 15% [7][8]. - Despite the increase in total revenue, dine-in sales have not grown and some locations have even seen a decline [7][8]. - The overall online penetration rate for restaurants has noticeably increased due to the subsidy war [8]. Group 2: Challenges Faced by Restaurants - Restaurant operators face a dilemma: not participating in subsidy activities results in a lack of customer traffic, while participation often leads to losses [8][10]. - The competition has led to a decrease in average order value and profit margins for restaurants [8][9]. - Operators are urged to find a balance between order volume, profitability, and customer pricing in the face of intense competition [9][10]. Group 3: Strategic Recommendations - Restaurants should consider the relationship between profit and customer base size, making trade-offs within acceptable limits [9]. - It is essential for restaurants to adapt to a potentially long-term low-profit environment while maintaining quality and service [9]. - Operators are encouraged to seek a business model that aligns with their brand amidst the competitive landscape [9][10]. Group 4: Industry Perspectives - The China Chain Store & Franchise Association has called for a collective resistance against short-sighted competitive behaviors such as price wars and subsidy-driven traffic acquisition [10]. - Experts emphasize the need for transparency in subsidy practices and advocate for platforms to bear the costs of subsidies without compromising restaurant interests [10].

这是半佛仙人的第1788篇原创 1 这两天外卖大战可谓非常精彩，很久没这么刺激的对抗了。 几 个 月 前 我 就 写 过 京 东 不 做 外 卖 才 奇 怪 ， 这 几 天 很 多 人 后 台 问 我 应 该 怎 么 看 ， 应 该 支 持 谁。 什么都不看，什么都可能是烟雾弹。 就看【目标】【成本】【收益】【风险】，就追逐，最无可辩驳的基础逻辑。 以及，看清你自己的利益。 不管你是消费者还是商家，面对这个问题有且只有一个决策。 支持京东做外卖。 支持京东做外卖，不是为了京东，是为你自己，是为了让这个行业目前的既得利益者不得 不给消费者，骑手以及商家让出更多的利益。 你 从 来 不 需 要 站 哪 边 ， 你 应 该 ， 站 在 你 钱 包 这 边 ， 你 的 权 利 这 边 ， 站 在 你 自 己 的 生 意 这 边。 为了你的钱包，你趁着现在京东狂发券的时候不吃是不是便宜东哥了？ 都是一样的店，一样的东西，干嘛要花更多钱？ 你的钱包可没惹过你，人家这些年不容易，要花就花东哥的补贴。 而且京东外卖发展得越快，你喜欢用的别家的产品是不是就不得不爆出更多金币让你得到 实惠？那你不是也赚了？ 发现了么，只要你多点 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article revolves around the competitive dynamics in the food delivery industry, particularly between Meituan and JD.com, highlighting recent allegations of anti-competitive practices [1] - JD.com has accused competitors of enforcing a "choose one" strategy, pressuring delivery riders to avoid accepting orders from JD.com, with threats of being banned for non-compliance [1] - Meituan has denied allegations circulating online that it is blocking riders from taking orders on other platforms, labeling these claims as rumors [1]