近日，福布斯2025全球最佳雇主榜出炉，榜单来源于对全球受访者的调研，京东连续9年登上榜单，成 为全球零售业唯一上榜中国企业。截至二季度末，京东体系人员总数约90万，京东始终坚持"先人后 企"，员工发展先于商业成功，让每一位京东员工把日子过得更好，对未来充满信心。 薪酬福利方面，京东不断加大投入。在过去一年多的时间里，京东连续7次多范围提高员工薪酬激励。 生活福利上，仅在北京就投入70亿为青年人才打造了近5000套可拎包入住、配套齐全的舒适公寓，其中 专门为实习生打造的免费公寓今年9月已投入使用。2023年，"住房保障基金"加码投入100亿，其中一线 员工申请占比高达77%，10年间已有上万名一线员工在住房保障基金政策的支持下买房。2010年建立 的"员工救助基金"为员工突遭意外或疾病兜底，十几年间这个温暖的福利项目不断发展完善，近10年该 基金累计投入超1.66亿元，帮助数千名京东一线员工度过困难。 京东始终相信，员工是最宝贵的财富，是京东事业发展的基石。京东努力让员工在实现老有所养、病有 所医、伤有所赔、住有所居的同时，也让员工能够发挥所长，收获尊严感、幸福感和成就感，为社会创 造更多的价值。 编辑：王菁 ...

智通财经APP获悉，近日，福布斯2025全球最佳雇主榜出炉，榜单来源于对全球受访者的调研，京东(09618)连续9年登上榜 单，成为全球零售业唯一上榜中国企业。截至二季度末，京东体系人员总数约90万，京东始终坚持"先人后企"，员工发展 先于商业成功，让每一位京东员工把日子过得更好，对未来充满信心。 多年来，京东积极推动稳定的、更大规模的高质量就业。一方面持续为大学生提供更多岗位和广阔舞台，2026校园招聘开 放3.5万个岗位，其中面向应届毕业生的校招岗位2万个，面向在校生的实习生岗位1.5万个，所有校招项目均匹配专业、系 统的培养方案，还专门为校招生量身打造"五年成长计划"，支持青年人才在重点业务突破上"挑大梁"、"当主角"，积极推 动青年人才实现更快成长、发挥更大作用，在为企业长期发展筑实根基的同时，也为社会培育更多具备使命担当、实践能 力和创新精神的高素质人才。 同时持续探索新业态，创造更多就业增量。2025年，京东家政启动了"百县十万人招募计划"，在全国百县千镇招募 10 万名 保洁师，业务范围覆盖日常保洁、家电清洗等;京东健康持续探索互联网医疗创新，打通"医检诊药"闭环，带动了包括互联 网医生、到家护 ...

来源：滚动播报 （来源：新消费日报） 文|徐赐豪 京东私有化达达后的业务整合迈出关键一步。 京东物流今日（9日）在港交所公告，于10月8日与京东集团（JD.com）订立业务转让协议，拟以2.70亿 美元收购原达达集团的本地即时配送业务，具体通过受让达疆、达盛两家全资子公司100%股权实现。 根据公告，此次收购的核心标的为京东集团旗下从事本地即时配送服务的全资子公司 —— 达疆与达 盛。其中，达疆为中国境内注册企业，注册资本达7亿美元；达盛则为2025年1月在香港新成立的公。二 者在收购前均由京东集团100%持股。 新消费日报记者从京东处获悉，此次拟收购的本地即时配送业务为原达达集团的即时配送业务。 值得注意的是，此次收购是京东私有化达达进程的关键收尾。回溯整个流程，京东于今年1月25日向达 达提交初步非约束性私有化提案，拟以每股ADS2.0美元（或每股普通股0.5美元）收购全部已发行股 份；4月，达达集团宣布达成私有化交易；6月10日，私有化协议经达达临时股东大会通过；到如今10 月，核心业务资产转让便已完成。 从达达业绩来看，其2024年营收为96.6亿元，较2023年的105亿元同比下滑8%；净亏损为20 ...

2025.10.09 本文字数：1239，阅读时长大约2分钟 作者 |第一财经 陆涵之 10月9日，京东物流在港交所发布公告，宣布以2.7亿美元从京东集团收购从事本地即时配送业务的全资 子公司。当天，京东物流股价上涨超4%。 据了解，京东物流拟收购的本地即时配送业务为原达达集团的即时配送业务，原达达集团主营业务分为 本地即时零售业务和本地即时配送业务。 京东物流在公告中提及，鉴于即时配送业务过去数月的表现，公司认为目标业务具备商业潜力及进一步 拓展业务的机会。京东物流表示，收购可以拓展集团的解决方案及服务组合，补充其现有产品矩阵及业 务版图。同时，收购将助力集团巩固产品竞争力、开拓新商机、推动业务增长，以及加强公司的"最后 一公里"配送能力。 此前，达达已经完成私有化并由京东全资拥有。4月1日，达达发布公告宣布已与母公司签署合并计划， 成为母公司的全资子公司，母公司由京东全资拥有。 对于本次收购，百联咨询创始人庄帅对第一财经记者表示，京东物流本次收购是为了提升其作为第三方 的物流服务能力，收购达达后可以给包括京东秒送、淘宝闪购、抖音小时达在内的多个平台提供即时配 送的物流服务。 从业绩表现看，达达的即时配送业 ...

同样推广淘宝一分购项目，有人一单赚26元，有人拿36元，这10元差价背后，隐藏着你不知道的接单秘密。 刚刚接触地推APP拉新的小李很疑惑，为什么同样推广淘宝一分购项目，朋友一单能赚36元，而他只能拿到26元？经过同行点拨他才明白，关键就在于是否 对接了"一手单"——直接来自项目源头，没有中间商抽成的地推项目。 做越多，实际"亏"得越多。推广100单下来，收入直接少了1000元！在地推网推这个行业，选择可靠的接单平台，直接关系到你的实际收益。 为此，本文精心整理了2025年公认的五大可靠地推网推平台，它们都以提供一手资源为核心，助你直接对接高佣项目。 01 五大可靠平台：对接一手项目，实现收益最大化 在地推网推行业，摸清门道的老手都知道，选对平台就等于成功了一半。那么，2025年哪些平台真正值得投入时间和精力呢？ 洽立方——资源丰富的行业领头羊 洽立方在APP拉新行业内堪称翘楚，作为商务资源对接领域的佼佼者，它拥有超过200W的用户资源，其中地推拉新板块就汇聚了100W+。 这个平台搭建了一个庞大的免费对接桥梁：一端连接着海量一手服务商，另一端则服务着数百万的职业推广员。 平台上项目类型丰富多样，像快手极速版、 ...

Core Viewpoint - JD.com is launching the "Taste of China" campaign for the National Day and Mid-Autumn Festival, offering themed reunion meals and various promotions to enhance consumer experience and satisfaction during the holiday season [1][4]. Group 1: Campaign Details - The campaign features the "New Eight Major Cuisines" themed reunion meals, categorizing dishes from Sichuan, Hunan, Fujian, Taiwan, Beijing, Tianjin, Northeast China, Guangdong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shaanxi, Gansu, Ningxia, and global cuisines [3][4]. - Consumers can enjoy a variety of flavors, from the spicy and fragrant dishes of Sichuan to the rich tastes of Northeast cuisine, ensuring there is something for everyone regardless of their location [3]. Group 2: Promotions and Incentives - Notable promotions include the "Order to Win iPhone 17" event, where the top 50 users with the highest daily order counts from October 1 will receive prizes such as the new iPhone 17, a travel voucher worth 666 yuan, and JD.com gift boxes [4]. - For group dining scenarios, JD.com is offering a "Recharge Meal Card for Discounts" promotion, where consumers can recharge 200 yuan to receive 210 yuan or 500 yuan to receive 525 yuan, effectively enjoying a 5% discount [4]. - Additional opportunities for prizes can be earned through browsing, sharing, and ordering, with rewards including iPhones, small appliances, crab vouchers, and tickets to sports events [5].

Core Insights - The takeaway from the article is that the food delivery market has shifted from a duopoly to a three-way competition involving JD, Meituan, and Taobao, significantly altering the previously stable market dynamics [1][7][20] - The competition has led to a re-evaluation of strategies, with JD leveraging its e-commerce ecosystem to enhance its food delivery service, focusing on quality rather than aggressive subsidies [13][16] Market Dynamics - JD's food delivery service achieved over 25 million daily orders within 90 days of launch, disrupting the long-standing duopoly of Meituan and Ele.me [2][4] - The market is now expected to be divided among the three major platforms, with Taobao/Ele.me holding 34.2%, JD at 33.5%, and Meituan at 28.9% [4] - JD's strategy of differentiated competition allowed it to avoid the pitfalls of excessive subsidy wars, maintaining a stable presence in the market [2][10] Consumer Behavior - Consumers are increasingly distributing their orders across the three platforms, with JD gaining recognition for its quality offerings, leading to a shift in user preferences [6][12] - The cessation of irrational subsidies has prompted consumers to return to a more rational consumption pattern, favoring platforms that provide quality service [4][6] Business Synergy - The integration of JD's food delivery with its e-commerce operations has created significant synergies, driving user engagement and increasing shopping frequency [9][10] - JD's food delivery service has contributed to a 198.8% growth in new business revenue, showcasing the effective collaboration between food delivery and core retail [10][12] Future Outlook - The future of the food delivery market will hinge on the ability of platforms to create collaborative value rather than just competing on delivery speed and service quality [15][16] - JD's focus on quality food delivery, supported by its robust supply chain, positions it well for sustained growth and consumer loyalty [16][18] - The ongoing competition among JD, Meituan, and Taobao is expected to foster a healthier market environment, encouraging innovation and improved service offerings [20][21]

Core Insights - The takeaway from the report by iResearch is that the subsidy war in the food delivery market is receding, leading to a significant shift in user preferences and consumption habits, resulting in a new competitive landscape where the market share is expected to be evenly distributed among Taobao, JD, and Meituan [1][3] Market Dynamics - The overall food delivery market is projected to see Taobao's flash purchase and Ele.me slightly leading with a 34.2% market share, followed closely by JD's quick delivery at 33.5%, and Meituan at 28.9% [1][3] - The competition among the three major players has reached a stalemate, indicating a long-term battle rather than a quick resolution [3][4] User Behavior Changes - The intense subsidy competition has reshaped consumer behavior, with a shift in focus from price to product quality and overall service experience [5][13] - iResearch found that 81.3% of users are willing to pay extra for a combination of "physical stores + high-rated merchants + timely delivery + compensation guarantees" [6] User Segmentation - The food delivery market has seen the emergence of three distinct user segments: - Price-driven users (49.3%) who are sensitive to price changes - Value-driven users (26.8%) who prioritize quality and experience - Opportunistic users (19.5%) who only order during promotions [6][7] Competitive Landscape - In the "ordinary delivery" segment, Taobao's flash purchase and Ele.me lead with 54.4%, while in the "quality delivery" segment, Taobao and Ele.me lead with 43.4%, followed by JD at 39.8% [8][10] - JD has established a reputation for "quality delivery," which has positively influenced user preferences, with 59.5% of users indicating they will increase their frequency of ordering from JD [10][11] Platform Strategies - The competition has evolved from a focus on traffic acquisition to a deeper emphasis on business synergy and comprehensive capabilities [19][22] - JD's food delivery service has quickly gained traction, contributing to overall user growth and cross-category purchasing behavior [20][21] Conclusion - The decline of the subsidy bubble has led to a more rational consumer base that values product quality and service experience, indicating a shift in the competitive dynamics of the food delivery market [13][22]

"你好，万能博士，帮我给会场的朋友点杯咖啡吧"。许冉在演讲中还演示了用"他她它"点外卖的体验： 通过语音唤醒 "万能博士"，下达点餐指令。万能博士几秒钟短暂思考后推荐京东外卖， "点餐助手" 主 动推荐了三款咖啡。在用语音和操作确认了商品品类、数量、外卖放置点、备注需求后，即可完成支 付。（闫妍） 新浪科技讯 9月25日上午消息，主题为"Enjoy AI"的JDDiscovery-2025京东全球科技探索者大会在北京举 行。京东集团SEC副主席、CEO许冉在演讲现场，用最新发布的数字人万能助手"他她它"，为到场嘉宾 们点咖啡外卖。 责任编辑：江钰涵 ...

Group 1 - The takeaway from the article is that the intense competition in the food delivery market is cooling down, with a noticeable reduction in subsidies and promotional activities from major platforms [1][5][6] - Merchants have reported a significant decline in sales, with some experiencing a drop of over one-third in daily revenue compared to the peak months of July and August [1][3] - Delivery riders have also felt the impact, with a decrease in order volume leading to lower earnings, with some reporting daily incomes dropping from over 300 to around 200 [4][5] Group 2 - The article highlights a shift in focus from food delivery to in-store services, with platforms like Alibaba and JD.com launching new initiatives to promote in-store purchases and group buying [2][12] - The introduction of local lifestyle rankings, such as the "Gaode Street Ranking," indicates a strategic move by platforms to enhance their presence in the local service market, competing directly with existing players like Meituan [8][9] - The competition in the in-store segment is still in its early stages, with platforms relying on user reviews and experiences to drive traffic, which is more complex than the food delivery model [13][14] Group 3 - The article discusses the financial implications of the food delivery battle, noting that while the competition has led to increased market share for platforms, it has also negatively impacted profitability [5][6] - The profitability of in-store services is significantly higher than that of food delivery, with operating profit margins for in-store services reaching 45.6% compared to just 6.5% for food delivery [12] - The platforms are expected to avoid large-scale subsidy wars in the in-store segment, focusing instead on sustainable growth and enhancing user experience [14][15]