【论点摘编】 乔晓楠、冯天异、王奕在《经济纵横》2025年第12期撰文指出，人工智能作为引领新一轮科技革命和产 业变革的颠覆性技术，已成为国际竞争的新焦点和经济发展的新引擎。"人工智能+"区别于人工智能技 术本身，具有更为丰富的内涵。在理论上，"人工智能+"是人工智能与经济社会各领域、各行业深度融 合的发展模式。在实践上，"人工智能+"是我国选择了强化人工智能全领域垂直应用的发展路径。任何 技术的发展都需要在重复进行的直接生产过程以及社会再生产过程中不断迭代升级，人工智能技术的发 展也需要依托我国超强制造能力、超大规模市场以及新型举国体制等优势，充分利用丰富的数据资源， 结合具体场景的应用效果，促进形成技术研发与产业应用有效互动并推动生产力持续发展的正反馈机 制。面向未来，要坚持以服务中国式现代化建设为导向，立足社会再生产的经济循环过程，将生产、分 配、交换、消费、治理、全球合作作为重点领域，全面实施"人工智能+"行动，培育与发展新质生产 力，加快构建与之相适应的新型生产关系，使全体人民共享人工智能发展成果，为高质量发展注入持久 动能。 《光明日报》（2026年02月24日 11版） [ 责编：孙宗鹤 ] ...

当街头巷尾的店铺陆续关闭，当"全网最低价"也难以点燃消费热情，我们正共同见证一个经济周期的落幕：纯消费时代结束了。这一时代的核心逻辑 ——"在别处赚钱，在此处花钱"——已经断裂。其根源并非商品太贵，而是普通人参与社会财富分配的渠道正在萎缩。互联网平台消灭了传统中间环 节，人工智能替代了大量岗位，使得许多人"无钱可花"。消费疲软，本质是分配机制滞后于生产力发展的深刻矛盾。 国家早已洞察这一趋势，并擘画了面向未来的蓝图。以"共同富裕"和"构建与数字生产力相适应的新型生产关系"为顶层指导，一套旨在重构财富分配的 系统工程已悄然启动。其两大核心载体——绿色消费积分与数商制度，正是解开当前消费困境的关键钥匙。 这绝非简单的促销工具。绿色消费积分的本质，是对个人在数字经济中贡献值的标准化计量与权益凭证。而数商制度，则从法规层面赋予了普通消费者 一个全新身份：消费经营者。这意味着，你我的每一次日常消费、每一次真诚分享，如果为品牌创造了流通价值，就不再是无偿行为，而是可以凭借"数 商"身份，通过绿色消费积分获得合理回报的价值创造活动。 其价值源泉，是对商品传统渠道价值的再分配。一件商品从工厂到消费者手中，中间的流通溢价本应激 ...

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the vision for the Zhongguancun Science Park to become a world-leading technology hub by 2035, supported by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Science and Technology, and the Beijing municipal government [1] Group 1: Market and Government Collaboration - Zhongguancun has evolved into a testing ground for new production relationships, driven by the transformation of enterprise ownership and the introduction of a market-oriented property rights system [2][3] - The region has successfully transitioned from a planned economy to a market economy, breaking down administrative barriers between technology and other production factors, thus enabling a multi-price discovery system [2][3] Group 2: New Quality Productivity - The fourth technological revolution, centered on electronic information technology, is reshaping productivity structures, with data emerging as an independent production factor [3][4] - Zhongguancun's practices illustrate that platform organizations are not merely physical spaces but act as industry organizers that integrate various resources to drive new economic forms [3][4] Group 3: Integration of Digital and Real Economies - The integration of digital and real economies relies on digital technologies to reconstruct production relationships, making data a new catalyst for activating the real economy [4][5] - This new quality productivity is increasingly dependent on advanced information technologies rather than traditional asset-heavy approaches [4][5] Group 4: Innovative Ecosystem Characteristics - The new production structure in Zhongguancun reflects an innovative ecosystem, characterized by the collaboration of diverse stakeholders, including enterprises, intermediaries, and social organizations [5][6] - The self-organizing nature of this ecosystem allows for dynamic interactions and autonomous decision-making, distinguishing it from traditional industrial production systems [6][7] Group 5: Future Directions - The emergence of new quality productivity in Zhongguancun is attributed to both technological upgrades and changes in production factors and relationships [7] - Moving forward, Zhongguancun aims to strengthen its position in high-level technological self-reliance, continuing to lead in the development of new quality productivity in China [7]

Core Viewpoint - Shenzhen is actively exploring new production relationships and institutional frameworks to adapt to the development of new technologies and organizational systems, aiming to become a hub for innovative productivity [1][2]. Group 1: Innovation in Robotics and AI - The successful participation of humanoid robots in various public roles, including the recent torch relay, highlights Shenzhen's advancements in AI and robotics [2]. - The city is integrating innovation chains, industry chains, capital chains, and talent chains to establish itself as a source and incubator of new productivity [2]. Group 2: Government as an Innovation Partner - The establishment of specialized industry offices for pharmaceuticals, new energy vehicles, and artificial intelligence reflects a shift in government roles from mere management to active partnership in innovation [4]. - The newly formed Longgang District AI and Robotics Bureau aims to streamline planning, ecosystem development, and talent recruitment, showcasing a market-oriented approach to governance [5]. Group 3: Restructuring Source Innovation - Shenzhen's innovation ecosystem is being bolstered by the establishment of dedicated institutions like the Shenzhen Natural Science Fund Committee and the New Productivity Technology Promotion Center, focusing on both basic research and technology commercialization [7][8]. - The introduction of technical managers aims to bridge the gap between technology and market needs, enhancing the commercialization of research outcomes [8][9]. Group 4: Encouraging Capital Investment - The concept of "bold capital" has been introduced to encourage long-term investment in innovative enterprises, with initiatives like "Shenzhen Venture Capital Day" attracting significant participation from global investment institutions [11][12]. - The Shenzhen government has established various funds to support key industries, including a 5 billion yuan semiconductor investment fund, to strengthen the local innovation ecosystem [12]. Group 5: Embracing Failure in Innovation - Shenzhen's legal framework now supports entrepreneurs facing failure, allowing for personal bankruptcy and restructuring, which reduces the risks associated with innovation [12]. - The establishment of a comprehensive service platform for both corporate and personal bankruptcy reflects a commitment to fostering a culture that values innovation while being tolerant of failure [12].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for China to lead with innovation and accelerate the establishment of new production relations that align with new productive forces, as indicated by the recent economic data showing continued growth in new productive forces [2][16]. Group 1: New Production Relations - Constructing new production relations is a complex system project that involves multiple levels, including micro (enterprise), meso (industry), and macro (national and international) interactions [4][16]. - Traditional theories oversimplify production relations by focusing solely on ownership of production materials, while modern production methods require a more nuanced understanding of interactions among enterprises, government, and society [4][16]. Group 2: Support for Innovation - The primary task in building new production relations is to create a system that supports comprehensive innovation, which includes enhancing national strategic scientific capabilities and optimizing the layout of research institutions and universities [5][17]. - There is a need to improve the mechanisms for talent cultivation and technology transfer in educational institutions to increase the conversion rate of scientific achievements [5][17]. Group 3: Importance of Technological Innovation - Technological innovation is crucial for driving industrial innovation and fostering future and strategic emerging industries [6][23]. - A comprehensive policy framework has been established to support innovation, entrepreneurship, and the application of new products, which includes improving the core technology system and encouraging investment in data and equity markets [6][18]. Group 4: Government and Market Relations - Properly managing the relationship between government and market is essential for constructing new production relations, emphasizing the importance of talent in innovation activities [8][9]. - Companies are encouraged to focus on long-term sustainable development and social responsibility rather than merely maximizing profits, which aligns with the new productive forces [8][9]. Group 5: Challenges and Future Directions - The development of new productive forces may lead to challenges such as widening income gaps and decreased social security, necessitating proactive government measures to ensure equitable growth [10][9]. - Future efforts should focus on creating a high-level socialist market economy that respects market resource allocation while also addressing potential negative impacts of rapid industrial changes [9][10].

Group 1 - The core argument emphasizes the necessity of forming new production relations to develop new quality productivity, which is essential for high-quality development and seizing competitive advantages [1][2][4] - The development of new quality productivity is driven by technological innovations such as digitalization, networking, and intelligence, which require new production relations that align with these advancements [1][4] - The historical context shows that the ability to adapt production relations to new productivity demands varies among countries, impacting their capacity to leverage opportunities from productivity changes [2][4] Group 2 - The application of artificial intelligence as a representative of new quality productivity necessitates the establishment of compatible production relations to maximize its effectiveness across various industries [3][4] - The ongoing global technological revolution presents significant opportunities for cultivating new quality productivity, making the formation of suitable production relations crucial for future competitiveness [4][8] - The Chinese government's proactive approach in proposing the concept of new quality productivity and reforming relevant systems is foundational for enhancing the country's competitive edge in the global arena [4][8] Group 3 - Accelerating the formation of new production relations requires addressing misconceptions and identifying effective pathways for reform [5][7] - The essence of economic system reform is to adjust and optimize production relations based on the needs of productivity development, which is vital for unleashing social productivity [8][10] - Key tasks include fostering innovation among micro-entities and enhancing original innovation capabilities, which are critical for the development of new quality productivity [9][10] Group 4 - Establishing a high-standard market system and improving institutional frameworks are essential for facilitating the flow of advanced production factors towards new quality productivity [11][12] - The role of data as a key production factor is increasingly recognized, necessitating the establishment of systems for data rights, market transactions, and benefit distribution [12][13] - Reforming the technology innovation system is crucial for overcoming barriers to the development of new quality productivity, focusing on enhancing foundational research and original innovation capabilities [13][14]