破解维修难题，还需健全人才培养体系。职业院校应紧跟行业发展趋势，调整专业设置，增设相关课 程，培养兼具理论知识和实操能力的复合型技师；相关部门也应完善职业资格认证体系，提高从业人员 待遇，吸引更多人才投身新能源汽车维修行业。 此外，车企需主动承担责任，在产品设计阶段兼顾维修便利性，减少设计缺陷，降低零部件更换成本。 保险行业也需优化产品供给，应综合考量车辆零整比、出险率等多方面因素，探索推出针对新能源汽车 的专属保险产品，将核心零部件维修、电池衰减等纳入保障范围，减轻车主负担。 新能源汽车售后维修体系的完善，是产业发展不可或缺的一环。唯有多方协同发力、打破技术壁垒、降 低维修成本、提升服务质量，才能让消费者放心购车、安心用车。 轻微剐蹭维修费用动辄上千元，核心部件受损维修成本能买半辆车……随着新能源汽车保有量持续攀 升，新能源汽车的维修难题正逐渐凸显，成为制约行业发展的瓶颈和影响消费体验的痛点。 维修难的背后，是技术特性、市场格局与产业配套多重因素叠加的结果。三电系统等核心零部件成本 高，精密元器件、智能化配置单价昂贵；车辆集成化程度高，一体化底盘等设计导致小伤大修、换而不 修成为常态；维修渠道存在垄断现象， ...

轻微剐蹭维修费用动辄上千元，核心部件受损维修成本能买半辆车……随着新能源汽车保有量持续攀 升，维修难题正逐渐凸显，成为制约行业发展的瓶颈和影响消费体验的痛点。 维修难的背后，是技术特性、市场格局与产业配套多重因素叠加的结果。三电系统等核心零部件成本 高，精密元器件、智能化配置单价昂贵；车辆集成化程度高，一体化底盘等设计导致小伤大修、换而不 修成为常态；维修渠道存在垄断现象，主机厂掌控核心配件流通和技术信息，第三方机构难以获得授 权；专业人才缺口大，新技术对维修人员要求更高，传统技师难以转型，复合型人才培养滞后。 种种情况不仅加重了消费者的用车负担，还可能延缓新能源汽车的普及进程。长远来看，若售后维修体 系无法跟上产业发展步伐，将制约新能源汽车行业高质量发展。 此外，车企需主动承担责任，在产品设计阶段兼顾维修便利性，减少设计缺陷，降低零部件更换成本； 保险行业也需优化产品供给，应综合考量车辆零整比、出险率等多方面因素，探索推出针对新能源汽车 的专属保险产品，将核心零部件维修、电池衰减等纳入保障范围，减轻车主负担。 新能源汽车售后维修体系的完善，是产业发展不可或缺的一环。唯有多方协同发力、打破技术壁垒、降 低维修 ...

破解新能源汽车维修难题，需完善市场竞争机制。相关部门应加快制定新能源汽车维修服务标准和配件 流通规则，推动信息公开，打破配件垄断，保障第三方机构的合法经营权。可建立全国性数据平台，在 保障数据安全的前提下，实现车机数据有条件共享，为维修行业提供统一、透明的技术支撑。 轻微剐蹭维修费用动辄上千元，核心部件受损维修成本能买半辆车……随着新能源汽车保有量持续攀 升，维修难题正逐渐凸显，成为制约行业发展的瓶颈和影响消费体验的痛点。 维修难的背后，是技术特性、市场格局与产业配套多重因素叠加的结果。三电系统等核心零部件成本 高，精密元器件、智能化配置单价昂贵；车辆集成化程度高，一体化底盘等设计导致小伤大修、换而不 修成为常态；维修渠道存在垄断现象，主机厂掌控核心配件流通和技术信息，第三方机构难以获得授 权；专业人才缺口大，新技术对维修人员要求更高，传统技师难以转型，复合型人才培养滞后。 破解维修难题，还需健全人才培养体系。职业院校应紧跟行业发展趋势，调整专业设置，增设相关课 程，培养兼具理论知识和实操能力的复合型技师；相关部门也应完善职业资格认证体系，提高从业人员 待遇，吸引更多人才投身新能源汽车维修行业。 种种情况不仅 ...

新华社北京12月15日电 12月15日,《新华每日电讯》发表题为《新能源汽车维修,要走出"小修花大钱"现 状》的评论。 据《新京报》报道，发生轻微剐蹭时，新能源汽车的维修成本是燃油车的2倍至2.5倍。类似轻微剐蹭、 换零部件等小故障，动辄花费成百上千元，成为不少新能源汽车车主的烦心事。 应用新材料、新技术是新能源汽车的优势，也是新能源汽车维修难度较大、价格较高的原因之一。除此 之外，还有多重因素推高了新能源汽车"小修"的价格： 其次，零部件标准化程度有待提高，不同车企、同一车企不同车型间零部件互不通用，推高了维修价 格。最近几年，新能源汽车创新不断，但厂家各有各的"高招"，也在一定程度上带来了新能源汽车零部 件通用率不高、标准化程度低等问题。这不仅让维修变成了"各自为政"，还增加了物流、仓储等周边成 本。此外，新能源汽车一体化程度高，有的车型出现小问题就要更换整组模块，必然要花大价钱。这也 是经常被消费者诟病的问题。 此外，维修人员总量不足，也拉高了新能源汽车维修费用。相关报道显示，新能源汽车售后服务人才缺 口大约为84.2万人，全国获证维修技师不足10万人。传统修车师傅在高压电控、软件诊断等方面存在能 力短 ...

Core Viewpoint - The maintenance costs for electric vehicles (EVs) are 2 to 2.5 times higher than those for traditional fuel vehicles, particularly for minor damages and component replacements, causing concern among EV owners [1][2]. Group 1: Maintenance Cost Factors - The high maintenance costs for EVs are attributed to the use of new materials and technologies, which increase repair difficulty and prices [1]. - Repairs are primarily conducted at authorized 4S shops, limiting market competition and keeping prices high, unlike the diversified repair market for fuel vehicles [1]. - The lack of standardization in EV components leads to higher repair costs, as parts are not interchangeable across different manufacturers and models [1][2]. Group 2: Workforce and Market Development - There is a significant shortage of qualified maintenance personnel for EVs, with a reported gap of approximately 842,000 technicians needed, while fewer than 100,000 certified technicians are available [2]. - The development of a robust after-sales service system is essential for the growth of the EV market, as maintenance is a critical aspect of the vehicle lifecycle [2]. - Regulatory bodies are implementing policies to reduce maintenance costs and enhance the supply chain for EV parts, encouraging collaboration between manufacturers and service providers [2].

（来源：贝壳财经） 花12万多元买了一辆新能源车不到2个月，陈先生就遇到烦心事：他的车不小心剐蹭到树干，左前轮胎上方有一点小伤变形，结果维修要换好 几个零件，定损近6000元。他不理解为什么费用会这么高？ "买得起、修不起""小故障动辄上千，大维修堪比半辆车价""充电省的钱都用来维修了"，遇到类似烦心事的新能源车主不在少数。 新京报贝壳财经记者走访多家汽修店，并对车主、车企、维修技师等多方采访发现，一方面，新能源汽车维修贵、维修难，成了车主们普遍的 焦虑。有专业公司向记者提供的调查数据显示，轻微剐蹭时新能源车的维修成本是燃油车的2-2.5倍。涉及电池、电机维修，成本还会高出更 多。另一方面，目前全国获证新能源维修技师不足10万人，新能源汽车售后服务人才的缺口约84.2万人。维修技术门槛高、维修渠道垄断、维 修师傅缺口大等一系列现实而尖锐的问题摆在面前。 修不起、不敢修、缺人修的尴尬处境，成为横亘在新能源汽车行业快速增长与用户体验之间的"隐形门槛"。 正在维修的新能源汽车。 受访者供图 01 价格高：动辄数千元甚至万元 维修成本比燃油车高不少 从个案上看，在成都从事新能源汽车维修的王师傅还证实，相同剐蹭情况下， ...

炒股就看金麒麟分析师研报，权威，专业，及时，全面，助您挖掘潜力主题机会！ 特斯拉Model 3车主徐先生被追尾，后备箱盖出现一条约10厘米的轻伤裂纹，返厂维修后被告知需要换后备箱盖，费用将近2万元。同为特斯拉车主的董先 生也吐槽，车尾右侧被三轮车剐蹭但并不严重，维修费也将近1万元。 新京报贝壳财经记者采访了数十位新能源汽车车主，他们普遍反映新能源汽车维修比传统燃油车高出很多。 新京报贝壳财经记者 王琳琳 编辑 岳彩周 校对 杨利 花12万多元买了一辆新能源车不到2个月，陈先生就遇到烦心事：他的车不小心剐蹭到树干，左前轮胎上方有一点小伤变形，结果维修要换好几个零件， 定损近6000元。他不理解为什么费用会这么高？ "买得起、修不起""小故障动辄上千，大维修堪比半辆车价""充电省的钱都用来维修了"，遇到类似烦心事的新能源车主不在少数。 新京报贝壳财经记者走访多家汽修店，并对车主、车企、维修技师等多方采访发现，一方面，新能源汽车维修贵、维修难，成了车主们普遍的焦虑。有专 业公司向记者提供的调查数据显示，轻微剐蹭时新能源车的维修成本是燃油车的2-2.5倍。涉及电池、电机维修，成本还会高出更多。另一方面，目前全 国获证 ...

Core Viewpoint - Five Chinese automotive companies, including BYD and Zeekr, are facing potential fines in Australia for allegedly monopolizing after-sales services by not complying with local regulations regarding the disclosure of diagnostic software and repair parameters, which has made it difficult for independent repair shops to service these vehicles [5][7]. Group 1: Cost of Repair for New Energy Vehicles - The repair costs for new energy vehicles (NEVs) are significantly higher than those for traditional fuel vehicles, with minor accidents costing between 5,000 to 15,000 yuan for NEVs compared to 2,000 to 8,000 yuan for fuel vehicles [9]. - In severe collision cases, the repair costs for NEVs can exceed the cost of purchasing a new vehicle, while fuel vehicles can still be repaired for 50,000 to 150,000 yuan [9]. - The high repair costs are attributed to expensive parts, advanced technology, and the necessity of using official service centers to maintain warranty coverage [11][15]. Group 2: Challenges in After-Sales Services - Many automotive companies have strict warranty policies that require all maintenance and repairs to be conducted at authorized service centers, which can lead to high costs for consumers [15][16]. - Official service centers often prefer to replace parts rather than repair them, which increases overall repair costs [18]. - The integration of advanced technology in NEVs complicates repairs, as many independent repair shops lack access to necessary diagnostic tools and information [24][26]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Future Outlook - The number of independent repair shops for NEVs is significantly lower than for traditional vehicles, with estimates of only 20,000 to 30,000 NEV repair shops compared to around 400,000 for fuel vehicles in China [37]. - The current high repair costs for NEVs are expected to persist until more vehicles are out of warranty and independent repair shops become more knowledgeable about NEV repairs [39]. - The automotive repair industry is facing challenges due to the rapid technological advancements in NEVs, which require specialized knowledge and skills that many traditional mechanics do not possess [39].

Core Points - Australian media reported that companies like BYD and Zeekr failed to comply with local regulations regarding the disclosure of diagnostic software and repair parameters, affecting the ability of external repair shops to service these vehicles [1][3] - These companies may face fines up to 10 million AUD, approximately 47 million RMB [3] Group 1: Repair Costs - The cost of repairing electric vehicles (EVs) is significantly higher than that of traditional fuel vehicles, with minor accidents costing between 5,000 to 15,000 RMB for EVs compared to 2,000 to 8,000 RMB for fuel vehicles [6] - In severe collisions, the repair costs for EVs can exceed the cost of purchasing a new vehicle, while fuel vehicles can still be repaired for 50,000 to 150,000 RMB [6][7] - The high repair costs for EVs are attributed to expensive parts and advanced technology, with battery packs often costing as much as 50.96% of the vehicle's total price [12][8] Group 2: Repair Process and Limitations - Most car manufacturers require repairs to be conducted at official service centers to maintain warranty coverage, which limits options for vehicle owners [15][16] - Many service centers prefer to replace parts rather than repair them, leading to higher costs for consumers [18][20] - The integration of advanced technology in EVs complicates repairs, as many repair shops lack access to necessary diagnostic tools and proprietary data from manufacturers [24][30] Group 3: Market Dynamics - The number of repair shops for EVs is significantly lower than for traditional vehicles, with only 20,000 to 30,000 EV repair businesses compared to around 400,000 for fuel vehicles in China [42][47] - The repair industry for EVs remains closed and limited, with few companies able to provide adequate service due to a lack of access to repair data [42][28] - The high costs of EV repairs are expected to persist until more vehicles are out of warranty and the repair market becomes more competitive [48]

Core Viewpoint - The rapid sales growth of domestic electric vehicles is overshadowed by challenges in the after-sales service market, particularly regarding maintenance and repair options for owners [1][4]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - A recent court ruling in Shanghai highlights the legal risks associated with third-party repairs for electric vehicles, marking the first case where individuals were sentenced for unauthorized maintenance [4]. - Approximately 35.63% of electric vehicle owners opt for non-official repair channels after the warranty period, indicating a significant shift away from authorized service centers [1][5]. Group 2: Consumer Concerns - Electric vehicle owners express three main concerns regarding maintenance: 1. Ownership rights over vehicle data and the ability to manage it independently [7]. 2. High costs and long wait times associated with official service centers, leading to dissatisfaction [8]. 3. Anxiety over the future availability of services if the manufacturer ceases operations, potentially leaving vehicles unserviceable [9]. Group 3: Repair Channel Options - The repair market for electric vehicles is currently dominated by official service centers, with about 50% of owners using them, while the remaining choose third-party options [5][14]. - The legal implications of unauthorized repairs create a dilemma for consumers, as they risk legal consequences while seeking more affordable service options [10][21]. Group 4: Future Considerations - The industry faces a challenge in balancing consumer rights with manufacturers' control over repair processes, suggesting a need for clearer regulations and standards [18][21]. - Potential solutions include policy measures to ensure service continuity even if a manufacturer goes out of business, similar to insurance industry practices [19].