系统性治理与精准施策相协调。网络生态是一个有机整体，内部各要素相互关联彼此作用。治理必须具 备系统思维，将其作为整体工程加以推进。这要求统筹国内与国际、发展与安全、活力与秩序、建设与 规范等多重关系，避免"头痛医头，脚痛医脚"。在系统布局之下，还需注重精准施策，针对不同类型的 网络行为与信息内容，采取差异化治理策略，对危害国家安全的行为严厉打击，对网络谣言和虚假信息 坚决清理，对侵犯知识产权行为依法惩处。 多元共治与主体责任相强化。网络生态治理并非政府的"独角戏"，而是党委领导、政府管理、企业履 责、社会监督、网民自律共同参与的"大合唱"，多元共治是构建良性治理格局的必然路径。其中，互联 网平台作为关键节点，需要切实履行主体责任。压实平台在内容审核、用户保护、数据安全及算法伦理 等方面的责任，推动其从被动合规转向主动作为。同时，畅通社会监督渠道，发挥行业组织自律作用， 并加强宣传教育，提升网民的法律意识、文明修养与信息辨别力，形成"人人参与、人人共享"的生动局 面。 2025年11月28日，中共中央政治局围绕加强网络生态治理开展第二十三次集体学习。习近平总书记指 出，网络生态治理是网络强国建设的重要任务，事关 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has released five typical civil cases related to online consumption, emphasizing the importance of integrity in business operations and the legal protection of consumer rights [1][6]. Group 1: Online Consumption Trends - New business models in the online consumption sector are emerging, leading to various new issues and challenges that require ongoing research [8]. - The 2023 "618" shopping festival highlighted significant changes in online consumption trends, with a shift from price wars to a focus on product quality and value for money [2][6]. - High-tech products, energy-efficient green products, and health-related outdoor products have seen sustained popularity among consumers [2]. Group 2: Legal Challenges and Consumer Rights - Online consumption disputes often involve multiple parties, including platform operators, merchants, payment service providers, and logistics companies, complicating legal relationships [3]. - The Supreme People's Court has established that operators must fulfill their commitments made during live marketing, such as compensation promises, to protect consumer rights [4][5]. - The court has also addressed issues of false advertising and excessive collection of consumer information, holding businesses accountable for misleading practices [6]. Group 3: Regulatory Developments - The State Administration for Market Regulation has proposed a draft for the "Live E-commerce Supervision Management Measures," outlining the responsibilities of platform operators in managing compliance and consumer protection [7]. - There is a call for platforms to enhance their role as gatekeepers, ensuring that marketing practices are transparent and do not mislead consumers [7]. Group 4: Future Directions - The Supreme People's Court plans to increase research efforts in the online consumption sector, aiming to unify judicial standards and improve communication with market regulatory bodies to prevent and resolve disputes [8].

Core Viewpoint - The recent regulatory talks involving major food delivery platforms like JD, Meituan, and Ele.me highlight the urgent need for compliance and consumer rights protection in the face of fierce competition and unsustainable pricing strategies [1][11]. Group 1: Industry Competition - The food delivery market has seen aggressive subsidy wars, with JD committing over 10 billion yuan in subsidies, Meituan planning to invest 100 billion yuan over three years, and Ele.me launching its own subsidy campaign [3][5]. - This intense competition has led to significant price reductions, with items being sold at astonishingly low prices, raising concerns about the sustainability of such pricing strategies and the potential for market monopolization [5][7]. - The platforms are accused of using algorithms to enforce "choose one" practices, limiting merchants' ability to operate on multiple platforms, which raises concerns about fair competition and consumer rights [5][12]. Group 2: Consumer and Merchant Rights - Reports indicate that some merchants on JD's platform have engaged in fraudulent practices, such as falsifying business licenses, which poses a serious risk to food safety [7][12]. - Consumers have reported discrepancies in food quality and quantity, particularly when using subsidies, leading to dissatisfaction and concerns over the integrity of the service [7][13]. - Merchants are also feeling the pressure, as they often have to share the burden of subsidies, leading to negative profit margins in some cases [8][13]. Group 3: Regulatory Response - The regulatory bodies have emphasized the need for platforms to adhere to laws such as the E-commerce Law and the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, aiming to establish clear responsibilities and prevent monopolistic practices [12][19]. - The talks aim to ensure that platforms improve their complaint mechanisms and provide better protections for consumers, merchants, and delivery personnel [13][16]. - The regulatory push is expected to reshape the competitive landscape, moving from price wars to a focus on service quality and compliance [17][20]. Group 4: Future Industry Direction - The regulatory discussions mark a pivotal moment for the food delivery industry, steering it towards sustainable development and compliance rather than unchecked growth [20][22]. - The industry is expected to adopt new technologies for better oversight, such as blockchain for tracking food safety and algorithm monitoring to prevent price discrimination [19][20]. - Long-term goals include establishing service standards for delivery platforms to balance market innovation with social responsibility, ensuring a fair ecosystem for all stakeholders [20][22].