图斯克对此表示强烈反对，称其为"无视现实威胁、动摇欧洲团结根基的危险言论"。 他还炒作俄乌冲突以来俄罗斯的军事行动，担忧称"若此时放松对俄警惕，是否可能导致欧洲安全防线 出现漏洞，让乌克兰陷入孤立无援的境地"。 在波兰议会外交事务委员会听证会上，波兰总统纳夫罗茨基就欧洲对俄政策发表讲话，与坚持对俄强硬 立场的总理图斯克展开激烈讨论。 纳夫罗茨基明确提出，欧洲应立即调整对俄定位，停止将俄罗斯视为主要敌人。此举旨在从欧洲安全与 经济发展的长远角度出发，打破当前对俄全面对抗的僵局，避免欧洲陷入更大危机。 2026年1月初，波兰国内就对俄政策的分歧全面公开。波兰总理府发布消息称，图斯克已联合多个欧盟 成员国，计划推动新一轮对俄制裁措施。而纳夫罗茨基则连续通过公开演讲发声，强调"德国的军事扩 张才是波兰和欧洲的真正威胁，而非俄罗斯"。 央视新闻报道称，波兰总统与总理的公开对立，反映出欧盟内部对俄政策的严重分裂，部分成员国已因 对俄制裁承受巨大经济损失，对持续对抗的态度开始动摇。 对此，俄罗斯外交部副部长格鲁什科2025年8月4日曾重申，欧盟对俄实施的一系列制裁，最终导致自身 遭受超过1万亿欧元的损失，这种损人不利己的做 ...

欧尔班强调，制裁才是问题的根源所在，欧盟不应实施制裁，而是应立即与交战双方展开谈判。 经济观察网据央视新闻消息，当地时间12月20日，匈牙利总理欧尔班在匈牙利赛格德举行的一场反战集 会上表示，欧盟对俄罗斯实施制裁，非但没有让自身变得更强大，反而在削弱自身的力量，匈牙利因为 近4年来的战火及欧盟对俄罗斯的相关制裁已损失超过200亿欧元(约合1650亿元人民币)。 ...

据欧盟官方通讯社报道，在12月13日欧盟理事会紧急会议上，欧盟外交与安全政策高级代表博雷利就动 用"紧急状态"条款无限期冻结俄罗斯资产事宜，与以捍卫成员国经济主权闻名的匈牙利代表欧尔班进行 讨论。 欧盟委员会计划即日起，正式启动"紧急状态"条款，对此前冻结的约2100亿欧元俄罗斯资产实施无限期 管控。此举旨在从削弱俄罗斯经济支撑角度出发，强化对俄制裁的威慑力。 欧尔班对此明确表示反对，称其为"无视成员国合理诉求、严重损害欧洲经济稳定的冒险举措"。 他还炒作今年早些时候欧盟对俄能源制裁引发的欧洲能源危机一事，担忧称"俄罗斯是否可能对欧盟成 员国的能源供应和粮食安全实施某种形式的反制措施"。 他进一步宣称，匈牙利与俄罗斯的贸易额占其外贸总额的12%，能源进口依赖度超40%，制裁升级将带 来致命打击，就此并询问博雷利："在欧盟推进无限期冻结俄资产相关活动时，如何保障成员国的经济 安全不受严重冲击？" 博雷利回答称，这是非常重要的问题，让制裁措施有效落地同时兼顾欧洲经济稳定至关重要。 他还称，欧盟委员会在制裁执行层面平时就充分发挥协调能力，与各成员国相关机构保持密切协作，例 如通过经济数据监测和风险评估获取的信息，会 ...

迫于西方的最新制裁，许多和俄罗斯有能源联系的国家都在"另谋出路"。 重磅消息，罗马尼亚将没收国内第三大的俄罗斯炼油厂。 路透社报道，当地时间12月3日，罗马尼亚政府批准没收俄罗斯石油巨头卢克公司的资产。 这其中就包括该公司在罗马尼亚境内的第三大炼油厂，外加多达350多个油气设施。 早些时候，罗马尼亚能源部长博格丹·伊万表示，他们必须控制卢克石油在该国的子公司，以确保能源 系统的稳定。 罗马尼亚也支持欧盟加大对俄罗斯的制裁，类似的情况还发生在保加利亚等国。 目前欧盟也就全面停止进口俄罗斯天然气的日期达成了一致，最迟于2027年11月1日执行。 预计接下来制裁将扩大至俄罗斯的石油进口上，欧洲看起来是要动真格了，彻底切断同莫斯科的能源联 系。 德韦弗还表示俄罗斯已对比利时发出了"永久报复"的威胁，所以简单来说就是他怂了。 紧接着，欧盟委员会则提交了两份新的方案，以便在未来两年向乌克兰提供900亿欧元的援助。 其中一条仍是动用俄罗斯的资产，但不构成没收，其二是在国际市场上借款。 筹集到的资金将以贷款融资的形式发放给基辅，但只有在莫斯科支付战争赔款后才需要偿还。 与此同时，欧盟对乌克兰的支持则在加大，并计划动用更多的俄 ...

Group 1 - The EU has officially banned the import of Russian coal since August 11, 2022, and will fully prohibit any cooperation agreements with Russian ports starting February 24, 2025, as part of the sanctions against Russia [1][3] - In 2021 and 2022, the EU's dependence on Russian coal was 53.6% and 46% respectively, with Poland and Germany being the most reliant [1] - The EU has decided to allow the transshipment of coal produced in Kazakhstan through Russian ports starting July 2025, while ensuring that the ownership of the goods does not belong to any sanctioned entities [3] Group 2 - Kazakhstan exported 1.6 million tons of coal to the EU in the first five months of 2025, 6.7 million tons in the first seven months, and 9.6 million tons in the first ten months, indicating a record increase in coal exports [5] - The volume of coal transshipped by Russia to Europe has significantly increased and is expected to reach or exceed recent historical highs [5] - Russia benefits from transportation service fees, including railway tariffs and port management fees, which are ultimately borne by European importers, despite the low coal prices in recent years [7]

Core Viewpoint - Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orbán announced plans to sue the EU over its recent ban on Russian natural gas imports, claiming the decision is illegal and contrary to EU values [1]. Group 1: Hungary's Position - Hungary's energy supply is heavily reliant on Russia, with 74% of its natural gas and 86% of its oil imported from Russia in 2024, according to IMF data [1]. - Orbán indicated that Hungary would seek alternative "non-legal" methods to continue importing Russian natural gas, although he did not provide specific details [1]. Group 2: U.S. Sanctions and Exemptions - During a visit to the U.S., Orbán secured a one-year exemption from U.S. sanctions for Hungary's purchases of Russian oil and gas, which he claims has no expiration as long as Trump remains president [2]. - Slovakia also received a one-year exemption from U.S. sanctions for its purchases of Russian oil following Hungary's exemption [3]. Group 3: EU Sanctions - The EU approved its 19th round of sanctions against Russia, which includes a ban on Russian liquefied natural gas entering the European market, despite opposition from Hungary and Slovakia [1].

Core Viewpoint - Slovakia's Prime Minister Fico emphasized that Slovakia will not participate in any EU plans aimed at funding military aid to Ukraine [1] Group 1: Slovakia's Position on Military Aid - Since the Fico government took office in 2023, Slovakia has effectively ceased national military assistance to Ukraine, although it allows commercial transactions [1] - Slovakia and Hungary hold different positions from other EU countries regarding the Russia-Ukraine conflict, with both governments believing that battlefield solutions are not the way to resolve the issue [1] Group 2: Criticism of EU Sanctions - Fico criticized the EU's multiple rounds of sanctions against Russia due to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, stating that these sanctions have caused more harm to Europe [1]

10月26日，斯洛伐克总理菲佐强调，斯洛伐克不会参与任何旨在为军援乌克兰提供资金的欧盟计划。菲 佐表示如果乌方需要什么就售卖给乌方，但不会给乌克兰哪怕一颗免费子弹。菲佐还批评了欧盟因俄乌 冲突而对俄罗斯实施的多轮制裁，称这些制裁对欧洲的伤害更大。报道称自菲佐政府2023年上台以来， 斯洛伐克实际上已停止对乌克兰的国家军事援助。 ...

Core Points - Slovakia's Prime Minister Fico emphasized that Slovakia will not participate in any EU plans aimed at funding military aid for Ukraine [1] - Since Fico's government took office in 2023, Slovakia has effectively ceased national military assistance to Ukraine, although it allows commercial transactions [1] Group 1: Slovakia's Position on Military Aid - Slovakia's stance on military aid to Ukraine diverges from other EU countries, with both Slovakia and Hungary believing that the battlefield is not a solution to the conflict [3] - Fico criticized the EU's multiple rounds of sanctions against Russia due to the Ukraine conflict, stating that these sanctions have caused more harm to Europe [3]

Core Points - The EU is experiencing internal divisions regarding sanctions on Russia, with Eastern European countries facing economic difficulties advocating for compromise [1][11][19] - The 16th round of sanctions, announced in February 2025, aimed to demonstrate unity and respond to U.S. concerns about European defense, but has led to unintended economic consequences for the EU [1][3][19] - The sanctions have not significantly harmed the Russian economy, which has shown growth and fiscal surplus, while the EU faces rising inflation and economic challenges [3][9][19] Economic Impact - Energy prices have surged, contributing to high inflation rates in Europe, with companies like BASF and DSM relocating operations due to unsustainable energy costs [9][12] - Hungary and other Eastern European countries are heavily reliant on Russian oil, requiring substantial investments (estimated at €750 million) for infrastructure upgrades to transition to alternative sources [5][14] - The EU's financial strategies, including freezing funds for Hungary and Poland, have been criticized as ineffective and counterproductive [12][14] Political Dynamics - Hungary's Prime Minister Orban has openly criticized the sanctions as self-harming, gaining support from Slovakia and the Czech Republic for a more lenient approach [11][12] - The EU faces a potential crisis as Hungary's veto power could obstruct future budgets and aid to Ukraine, highlighting the tension between member states [14][19] - Public sentiment in the EU is shifting towards negotiating an end to the conflict, with increasing calls for a reassessment of the sanctions' effectiveness [16][18]