2025 年 6 月 30 日，美国总统发布第 14312 号行政令 ——《关于撤销叙利亚制裁的 规定》（刊登于 2025 年 7 月 3 日《联邦公报》，第 90 卷第 29395 页），核心内容 包括： 2、历史背景 初始制裁紧急状态的设立（2004 年） 因美国终止叙利亚的"国家紧急状态"，OFAC 将从《联邦法规汇编》中移除《叙利亚制裁条 例》。本次是美国行政部门细化对叙利亚解除制裁的举措，预计金融机构将在叙利亚展业。 1. 制裁终止的关键行政令（2025 年） 2004 年 5 月 11 日，美国总统依据《国际紧急经济权力法》（50 U.S.C. 1701 及后续条 款）和《2003 年叙利亚责任与黎巴嫩主权恢复法》（《公法》第 108-175 号，《美国法 典》第 22 编第 2151 条注释），发布了 2004 年 5 月 11 日第 13338 号行政令 ——《冻 结特定人员财产并禁止向叙利亚出口特定商品》（刊登于 2004 年 5 月 13 日《联邦公 报》，第 69 卷第 26751 页）。 总统在该行政令中认定：叙利亚政府存在支持恐怖主义、持续占领黎巴嫩、推进大规模杀伤 性武器及导弹计划 ...

阿联酋的 Ozarka Shipping - FZCO 运营的 VICTORY ARI 号和 SONDOS 号，均将伊朗石油产品 运往中国，该公司及这两艘船均被制裁。 马绍尔群岛的长白荣耀航运有限公司旗下 LAFIT 号，自 2025 年 3 月以来向中国客户运输超 400 万桶伊朗石油，该公司及 LAFIT 号被制裁。 英属维尔京群岛的 Regal Liberty Limited 旗下 GIANT 号，2025 年初向中国运输约 200 万桶伊朗 石油，该公司及 GIANT 号被制裁。 香港的 U Beacon Shipping Co., Limited 旗下 ADELINE G 号，最近向中国运输超 100 万桶伊朗 石油，且自 2022 年 7 月以来多次运输，该公司及 ADELINE G 号被制裁。 香港的 Hong Kong Hangshun Shipping Limited 旗下 KONGM 号，自 2025 年初向中国多个地点 运输数百万桶伊朗石油，该公司及 KONGM 号被制裁。 香港的 Ares Shipping Limited 旗下 ARES 号，运输近 1000 万桶伊朗石油，该公司及 ...

如果获得批准，中国的稳定币使用计划将标志着其加密货币方法的重大转变，此前中国于 2021 年 9 月禁止了加密货币交易和挖矿。 中国是全球对加密货币限制最严格的司法管辖区之一，目前正考虑允许人民币支持的稳定币，这将是一项重大的政策逆转。 消息人士向路透社透露，中国将审查包括与人民币挂钩的稳定币在内的路线图，以加强人民币国际化。 美元稳定币占据市场98%份额 预计该问题将在8月31日至9月1日在天津举行的上海合作组织峰会上进行讨论。 人民币在全球支付领域排名第六 中国可能进入稳定币市场，将有助于人民币与美元和欧元等主要全球储备货币竞争。 根据Swift 的人民币追踪数据，截至 6 月份，人民币是全球支付领域第六大活跃货币，占全球支付总额的 2.9% 左右。 此前有多份报道称，在美国 2025 年大力推行稳定币的背景下，中国大陆对稳定币的态度已逐渐升温。 跨境实施 据消息人士透露，中国国务院将于8月下旬审议并可能批准一份扩大人民币全球使用的路线图。据报道，该计划包括应对美国稳定币发展步伐的措施 以及风险防范指南。 中国大陆潜在的人民币稳定币的一个用例是与一些国家实施稳定币以进行跨境贸易和支付。 尽管美元占全球支付 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article announces a specialized training program on export control and cross-border anti-money laundering compliance, aimed at helping enterprises enhance their risk identification and prevention capabilities in a complex global regulatory environment [2][3]. Training Content - **Export Control and Economic Sanctions** - Review of global export control and economic sanctions hotspots, analysis of the current situation, and future trends [2] - Overview of China's Export Control Law, including its jurisdiction, measures, and legal responsibilities [2] - Introduction to international export control mechanisms such as the Wassenaar Arrangement and Nuclear Suppliers Group [3] - Study of export control policies from the US and EU, including EAR, ITAR, and OFAC sanctions, and their impact on China [3] - Analysis of secondary sanctions case studies and response strategies [3] - Practical construction of export control compliance systems, including risk assessment, internal controls, training, and auditing mechanisms [3] - **Cross-Border Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing** - Analysis of the new Anti-Money Laundering Law and FATF's fifth round of international evaluation standards, focusing on the obligations of financial institutions and enterprises [3] - Practical operations for customer due diligence and transaction monitoring, including identity verification and reporting of large and suspicious transactions [3] - Screening for sanction risks and list management through compliance tools, establishing monitoring and updating mechanisms [3] - Case studies on cross-border transaction risks related to anti-money laundering and sanctions [3] - **Coordinated Compliance for Export Control and Anti-Money Laundering** - Building collaborative mechanisms and policy linkages, including regulatory agency cooperation models and dual-track compliance frameworks for enterprises [4] - Information sharing and technological integration for tracking cross-border funds and logistics, and upgrading list management systems [4] - Practical collaborative models and experiences, such as cooperation modes at the China-Vietnam border and high-risk country management in the EU [4] Target Audience - The training is aimed at personnel from local commerce bureaus, economic cooperation bureaus, financial regulatory bureaus, the People's Bank, foreign exchange administration, and related staff from free trade zones and border cooperation zones [5] - It also targets compliance, legal, risk management, international business, and card center staff from financial institutions, as well as relevant personnel from manufacturing and trading enterprises, trade associations, law firms, accounting firms, and consulting companies [5] Fees and Other Information - The training fee is set at 5,980 yuan per person, which includes teaching, materials, and venue costs [5] - Accommodation is arranged according to the Ministry of Finance's standards, with costs borne by participants [5] - Registration details and payment instructions are provided, with a deadline for registration [6]

Group 1 - The U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has imposed sanctions on five entities and one individual located in Iran, Hong Kong, and Taiwan for procuring technical equipment for the Iranian aircraft manufacturing company HESA, which is under sanctions [1][2] - HESA is a state-owned subsidiary of Iran's Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics (MODAFL), responsible for producing military aircraft and the Ababil series of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) used by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) [1][2] Group 2 - The sanctions were enacted under Executive Order 13382, which targets proliferators of weapons of mass destruction and their delivery systems [2] - HESA was designated in September 2008 for being owned or controlled by MODAFL and for supporting the IRGC [2] Group 3 - Control Afzar Tabriz, under CEO Javad Alizadeh Hoshyar, procured CNC machines and equipment for HESA, which are used in high-end aerospace and defense manufacturing [3] - Control Afzar utilized Clifton Trading in Hong Kong as a procurement intermediary to conceal its involvement [3] - Other entities involved include Mecatron from Taiwan and Joemars Machinery, which facilitated the shipment of CNC machines to Iran while knowingly evading sanctions [3]

Group 1 - The UK government has sanctioned Weihai Yamar Outdoors Product Co., Ltd. for allegedly facilitating illegal immigration activities across the English Channel through the sale of rigid inflatable boats (RIBs) [1] - The company is located in Weihai, Shandong Province, established in 2005, and specializes in outdoor products such as inflatable boats and surfboards, with an export ratio of 71%-80% [2] - The sanctions include asset freezing within the UK and a ban on UK citizens and businesses from trading with the company, as well as entry restrictions on company executives [3] Group 2 - This sanction marks the UK's first global action targeting the illegal immigration supply chain, involving 25 entities and individuals, including Middle Eastern funding intermediaries and Balkan smuggling groups [3]

Core Viewpoint - The European Union has agreed on a new round of sanctions against Russia, focusing on significantly lowering the price cap on Russian oil and implementing a series of new financial and trade measures [1][2] Group 1: Oil Price Cap Mechanism - The new dynamic oil price cap mechanism will set the price for Russian oil exports to third countries at 15% below the average market price, reducing the price from $60 per barrel to approximately $47.60 [1] - This price cap will be reviewed every six months to adapt to market price changes [1] - The G7 initially established the price cap agreement in December 2022 to prevent Russia from funding its invasion of Ukraine [1] Group 2: Sanctions on Shipping and Financial Institutions - The 18th round of sanctions includes measures against 105 vessels in Russia's "shadow fleet," which are used to circumvent the price cap, bringing the total number of sanctioned vessels to over 400 [2] - The sanctions further prohibit transactions with 22 Russian banks [2] - A new trading ban related to the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines has been introduced, aimed at preventing maintenance, operation, or future use of these pipelines, which have not been operational since 2022 [2] Group 3: Military Supply Restrictions - The sanctions also target 26 entities that supply the Russian military-industrial complex, further restricting Moscow's access to dual-use technologies [2]

Core Viewpoint - The FCC is proposing new rules to accelerate investment in submarine cable construction while ensuring protection against threats from foreign adversaries, particularly China [1][2] Group 1: Proposed Rules and Measures - The FCC plans to adopt measures to protect submarine cables from foreign adversaries, including presumptive denial of applications from foreign-controlled entities and restrictions on capacity leasing agreements [1] - The proposed rules will also prohibit the use of equipment from entities listed on the "Covered List" and establish requirements for network and entity security [1] - The FCC aims to streamline the licensing approval process to facilitate faster deployment of submarine cables [1] Group 2: Encouragement of Domestic Resources - The FCC is encouraging the use of U.S. submarine cable repair ships and the adoption of trusted technology for overseas operations [2] - A proposal is under consideration to exempt license applications that meet high-security standards from Team Telecom review, which was established to assess national security and law enforcement risks [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the urgent call from three Republican congressmen for the Trump administration to expedite security reviews of Chinese drone manufacturers, particularly focusing on DJI and Autel, due to national security concerns. Group 1: Legislative Actions - Three Republican congressmen, Elise Stefanik, John Moolenaar, and Rick Crawford, have jointly urged the Trump administration to accelerate the security review of Chinese drone manufacturers [1] - The request is based on the provisions of the 2025 National Defense Authorization Act, which mandates the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, to complete a security assessment of DJI and Autel within 30 days [4] - The congressmen highlighted that Chinese drones hold a significant market share in the U.S., with DJI accounting for 90% of the market, necessitating urgent action to mitigate "foreign influence" [4] Group 2: Policy Background - In June 2025, Trump signed an executive order to promote the domestic drone industry, prioritizing the procurement of U.S.-made equipment and investigating supply chain security [4] - The Secretary of Defense, Hegseth, announced reforms to the Pentagon's drone procurement policy, aiming to establish U.S. dominance in the drone sector by 2027 [4] Group 3: Chinese Response - The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs criticized the U.S. for "generalizing national security concepts" and warned of potential countermeasures [3] - DJI has denied any security risks and has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense regarding its 2022 designation as a "military company" [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the inadequate enforcement of Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) policies among financial institutions in Singapore, leading to significant penalties and regulatory scrutiny [1][8]. Group 1: Penalties and Institutions - A total of 9 financial institutions, including banks and capital market service providers, were fined a combined amount of 27.45 million Singapore dollars for various AML/CFT violations [5]. - The penalties imposed on specific institutions include: - Credit Suisse Singapore Branch (CSSB): 5.8 million SGD - United Overseas Bank (UOB): 5.6 million SGD - UBS Singapore Branch (UBSS): 3 million SGD - Citibank Singapore: 2.6 million SGD - Julius Baer Singapore Branch (BJBS): 2.4 million SGD - LGT Bank Singapore (LGTS): 1 million SGD - UOB Kay Hian Securities (UOBKH): 2.85 million SGD - Blue Ocean Investment (BOIPL): 2.4 million SGD - Trident Trust Company (TTCSPL): 1.8 million SGD [2]. Group 2: Major Violations - Five institutions failed to effectively implement risk rating policies for customer risk assessments [6]. - All nine institutions did not adequately verify the legitimacy of clients' sources of wealth [6]. - Eight institutions exhibited insufficient scrutiny of suspicious transactions [6]. - Two institutions did not promptly take risk mitigation measures following suspicious transaction reports (STRs) [6]. - Four executives from Blue Ocean Investment (BOIPL) faced industry bans of 3 to 6 years for failing to ensure effective execution of AML/CFT policies [6]. Group 3: Regulatory Response - The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) emphasized the need for financial institutions to enhance their AML/CFT measures to align with industry best practices [8]. - MAS warned of severe penalties for serious violations to maintain the integrity of Singapore's financial system [8].