特朗普失控的背后 按理说，联合国大会的发言时间是有严格规定的，特朗普这次超时四倍，显然违反了规则。整个演讲过 程中，他一会儿抱怨这个，一会儿指责那个，好像全世界只有他没问题。 美国媒体的反应也很有意思。福克斯新闻的一个主持人竟然放话，说特朗普要么退出联合国，要么派美 军炸掉联合国，这种言论真是让人咋舌。相比之下，其他媒体则较为理性，纷纷分析特朗普可能是情绪 失控，猜测他肯定是受到了什么刺激。 然而，第二天，克里姆林宫的一条消息曝光，让大家恍然大悟：原来特朗普的怒火，正是因为中俄签署 了一份"史无前例"的能源合作协议。 2025年9月23日，特朗普在联合国大会上引发了不小的风波。原定15分钟的演讲，他硬是讲了一个小 时。全程都在指责联合国及其他国家，语气激烈到让人怀疑他是吃了"枪药"。尽管大多数国家碍于他美 国总统的身份没敢反驳，还是有少数国家公开批评了他，气得他下台时恼羞成怒。 许多国家现在都陷入两难境地，既希望保护本国产业，又不敢与中国断绝经济联系，因为没有哪个国家 能够完全与中国脱钩。再看美国对俄罗斯的制裁，尽管2024年俄罗斯的石油出口曾减少了8%，但由于 中俄合作协议的签订，俄罗斯的天然气供应量可能突 ...

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. attempts to suppress Huawei have backfired, leading to increased reliance on Huawei's technology within the U.S. military supply chain, highlighting the company's resilience and the ineffectiveness of unilateral sanctions [1][2][4][12]. Group 1: Huawei's Market Position - Huawei holds over 30% of the global 5G base station market, making it indispensable for U.S. military operations abroad [4]. - In Q1 2024, Huawei's net profit surged by 564% to 19.65 billion yuan, and its smartphone business regained the top position in the Chinese market, indicating strong recovery despite U.S. sanctions [4][8]. - Huawei's revenue for 2024 is projected to reach 862.1 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 22.4%, demonstrating robust growth driven by increased R&D investment [8]. Group 2: U.S. Policy and Internal Conflicts - The U.S. Congress passed a defense authorization bill in 2024 prohibiting the Department of Defense from contracting with companies using Huawei equipment, but the Pentagon recognized the impracticality of this approach due to Huawei's critical role in communications [2][11]. - Jeffrey Sachs criticized U.S. actions against Huawei as driven by a desire to maintain global hegemony rather than genuine security concerns, suggesting that the U.S. must adapt to a multipolar world [6][9]. - The U.S. military acknowledged that a complete decoupling from Huawei could reduce its logistics capabilities by over 20%, particularly in African bases where Huawei's technology is essential [6][12]. Group 3: Global Reactions and Future Outlook - Many countries continue to choose Huawei for telecommunications to ensure security and stability, despite U.S. efforts to isolate the company [8]. - The internal contradictions within U.S. policy are evident, as Congress pushes for ideological legislation while the Pentagon acknowledges Huawei's irreplaceability [11][12]. - Looking ahead, Huawei is expected to maintain its leadership in 5G equipment shipments globally, and the Chinese technology ecosystem is progressively becoming more self-sufficient [12][14].

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around Trump's attempts to disrupt China's energy business with Russia by offering incentives to Russia, including easing sanctions on the "Arctic LNG 2" project and encouraging Russia to procure U.S. equipment instead of collaborating with China [1][3] - The "Arctic LNG 2" project, with a total investment of $21 billion, is crucial for Russia's goal to increase its global LNG market share to 20% by 2030, and it has faced significant challenges due to U.S. sanctions [3] - China has stepped in to support the project by providing essential technology and equipment, demonstrating a strong collaborative relationship with Russia that is based on mutual respect and long-term strategic cooperation [3][5] Group 2 - Putin's silence regarding U.S. proposals indicates confidence in the stability of Sino-Russian cooperation, as he is aware of the unreliability of U.S. commitments and the potential for the U.S. to reimpose sanctions [5][6] - The energy cooperation between China and Russia has expanded beyond individual projects, with a 29.4% year-on-year increase in pipeline gas imports from Russia to China from January to May this year, indicating a deepening partnership [5][6] - The U.S. approach to cooperation is heavily influenced by geopolitical considerations, contrasting with China's non-political conditions for energy technology and equipment collaboration, making it unlikely for Russia to abandon its partnership with China [6][8]