特朗普再次震动全球，这次他直接把贸易关税与购买格陵兰岛的野心绑在了一起。这场看似荒唐的威 胁，瞬间将欧美盟友关系推到了前所未有的紧张境地。 当地时间1月17日，特朗普在社交媒体上宣布，美国计划从2月1日起，对丹麦、德国、法国等八个欧洲 国家输美商品加征10%关税。他明确表示，若欧洲不同意美国"完全、彻底购买格陵兰岛"，关税将在6 月起提升至25%。这不是普通的贸易摩擦，而是将主权当作商品进行公开勒索。 这一威胁立即触发了欧洲的集体反弹。欧盟与相关国家在数小时内接连发声，一致谴责此举"不可接 受"。分析指出，特朗普选择在2026年初抛出这一极端策略，意在测试欧洲的团结底线，并为他的政治 议程制造话题。 此前，特朗普曾多次暗示不排除使用武力获取格陵兰岛，但遭到了丹麦和格陵兰自治政府的坚决拒绝。 欧洲多国甚至应丹麦请求，派兵加强了在格陵兰岛的防御存在。军事施压碰壁后，特朗普转而抓住了欧 洲经济依赖美国的软肋。 这些行动向美国传递了明确信号：欧洲不会在主权问题上交易。这场危机反而加强了欧洲内部在防务和 经贸上的协调，客观上加速了其战略自主的进程。 特朗普之所以不惜撕裂与欧洲的盟友关系，根本原因在于格陵兰岛无可替代的战 ...

【"说别人不敢说 做别人不敢做"介文汲讽：特朗普想当"凯撒大帝"让美国在西半球称王称霸】台湾时 事评论员介文汲在节目中分析指出，特朗普"胸怀大志"，自诩要做美国的"凯撒大帝"，试图在全球尤其 是西半球"开疆辟土"。但所谓扩张，开的是别人的江山、别人的土地。介文汲提到，鲁比奥援引最新 《美国国防安全战略报告》明确将整个美洲大陆视为美国"核心利益区"，强调不容他国染指、凡被认 定"不利"就要出手。美国霸权思维愈发赤裸，地区与世界局势面临新的不确定性。 （来源：直新闻） ...

Core Points - Trump's speech at the UN General Assembly was marked by an unprecedented outburst, lasting an hour instead of the allotted 15 minutes, where he criticized the UN and other nations, indicating a significant emotional response [1][3] - The immediate trigger for Trump's outburst was revealed to be the signing of a historic energy cooperation agreement between China and Russia, which undermined U.S. influence [4][6] - The energy cooperation agreement allows Russia to stabilize its energy exports despite international sanctions, signaling a failure of U.S. policies aimed at isolating both China and Russia [10][12] Group 1: Trump's UN Speech - Trump's speech exceeded the time limit by four times, showcasing a blatant disregard for established protocols [3] - U.S. media reactions varied, with some commentators suggesting extreme measures against the UN, while others speculated on Trump's emotional state [3][6] Group 2: China-Russia Energy Cooperation - The energy cooperation agreement, signed in early September, is described as unprecedented, although specific financial details remain undisclosed [4][10] - The agreement is seen as a strategic move by China and Russia, indicating their preparedness and long-term planning [8] Group 3: Implications for U.S. Policy - The signing of the energy agreement directly challenges two key U.S. policies: high tariffs aimed at China and sanctions against Russia, both of which have proven ineffective [10][14] - European nations, particularly Germany and France, are reconsidering their policies towards China and Russia in light of this new development [12][18] - The U.S. may attempt to regain control through stricter technology export restrictions, but the effectiveness of such measures is questionable given China's advancements in chip self-sufficiency [16][18]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. attempts to suppress Huawei have backfired, leading to increased reliance on Huawei's technology within the U.S. military supply chain, highlighting the company's resilience and the ineffectiveness of unilateral sanctions [1][2][4][12]. Group 1: Huawei's Market Position - Huawei holds over 30% of the global 5G base station market, making it indispensable for U.S. military operations abroad [4]. - In Q1 2024, Huawei's net profit surged by 564% to 19.65 billion yuan, and its smartphone business regained the top position in the Chinese market, indicating strong recovery despite U.S. sanctions [4][8]. - Huawei's revenue for 2024 is projected to reach 862.1 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 22.4%, demonstrating robust growth driven by increased R&D investment [8]. Group 2: U.S. Policy and Internal Conflicts - The U.S. Congress passed a defense authorization bill in 2024 prohibiting the Department of Defense from contracting with companies using Huawei equipment, but the Pentagon recognized the impracticality of this approach due to Huawei's critical role in communications [2][11]. - Jeffrey Sachs criticized U.S. actions against Huawei as driven by a desire to maintain global hegemony rather than genuine security concerns, suggesting that the U.S. must adapt to a multipolar world [6][9]. - The U.S. military acknowledged that a complete decoupling from Huawei could reduce its logistics capabilities by over 20%, particularly in African bases where Huawei's technology is essential [6][12]. Group 3: Global Reactions and Future Outlook - Many countries continue to choose Huawei for telecommunications to ensure security and stability, despite U.S. efforts to isolate the company [8]. - The internal contradictions within U.S. policy are evident, as Congress pushes for ideological legislation while the Pentagon acknowledges Huawei's irreplaceability [11][12]. - Looking ahead, Huawei is expected to maintain its leadership in 5G equipment shipments globally, and the Chinese technology ecosystem is progressively becoming more self-sufficient [12][14].

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around Trump's attempts to disrupt China's energy business with Russia by offering incentives to Russia, including easing sanctions on the "Arctic LNG 2" project and encouraging Russia to procure U.S. equipment instead of collaborating with China [1][3] - The "Arctic LNG 2" project, with a total investment of $21 billion, is crucial for Russia's goal to increase its global LNG market share to 20% by 2030, and it has faced significant challenges due to U.S. sanctions [3] - China has stepped in to support the project by providing essential technology and equipment, demonstrating a strong collaborative relationship with Russia that is based on mutual respect and long-term strategic cooperation [3][5] Group 2 - Putin's silence regarding U.S. proposals indicates confidence in the stability of Sino-Russian cooperation, as he is aware of the unreliability of U.S. commitments and the potential for the U.S. to reimpose sanctions [5][6] - The energy cooperation between China and Russia has expanded beyond individual projects, with a 29.4% year-on-year increase in pipeline gas imports from Russia to China from January to May this year, indicating a deepening partnership [5][6] - The U.S. approach to cooperation is heavily influenced by geopolitical considerations, contrasting with China's non-political conditions for energy technology and equipment collaboration, making it unlikely for Russia to abandon its partnership with China [6][8]