特朗普的关税闹剧，终于走到了最终章，中方等待的时机终于来了？一旦美国法院驳回关税法案，特朗普政府无论吃了多少，都要乖乖吐出来。 事实上，之前美国联邦巡回上诉法院，已经针对关税法案做出裁定，在 7 比 4 的投票结果，特朗普政府以《国际紧急经济权力法》为由，所实施的大部分 加征关税措施，都被定为非法行为。 只不过，不服判决的特朗普，随即将案件上诉到最高法院，要求重新做出裁定，而这次，就是真正意义上的终审了。 如今，两个月过去，美国最高法院开始正式审理相关案件，据央视新闻报道，第一场听证会的氛围相当紧张，各方口头激辩两个多小时，争论总统行使权 力是否存在"越界"。 美国最高法院正式审理关税案 第三，特朗普政府采取如此重大的行政行动，却没有交给美国国会进行决议，这被视为是对国会权利的侵越。 所以，形势对特朗普来说，其实是极为不利的。 特朗普 毕竟关税政策的恶果已经显现，特朗普看似利用关税大棒，逼迫一些国家"破财免灾"，但美国乃至全球经济，都在这一通胡搅之下，遭到了不同程度的打 击。 更重要的是，特朗普的所作所为，进一步破坏了美国的合作信誉，反而助推了全球"去美元化"的浪潮，加剧了美国的债务危机，短短两个多月，美国的 ...

新华社华盛顿11月5日电 继今年5月指责南非出现"针对白人的种族屠杀"后，美国总统特朗普11月5 日再次对南非进行语言攻击，并重申他不会出席二十国集团领导人约翰内斯堡峰会。 特朗普当天在美国佛罗里达州迈阿密的一个会议上提及即将于11月22日至23日在约翰内斯堡举行的 二十国集团峰会。他说，南非根本就不该在二十国集团里。"因为那里的状况太糟糕了。我不会去 的。"按照此前公布计划，美国副总统万斯将出席此次会议。 5月21日，美国总统特朗普（左二）在华盛顿白宫迎接到访的南非总统拉马福萨。新华社记者胡友松摄 龃龉不断 南非白人遭"种族歧视"乃至"屠杀"的叙事在西方媒体持续传播。 长期以来，南非白人民权组织"非洲论坛"一直寻求美国右翼支持，声称"南非政府存在对白人的种 族歧视"，通过"无偿征地"强行没收白人农场主的土地。 特朗普在其第一个总统任期内曾在社交媒体平台发文，威胁要对南非政府强征白人农场主土地以 及"大规模杀害"白人农场主一事展开调查。这引起南非政府愤怒，拉马福萨说特朗普被"严重误导"，并 指责他煽动种族分裂。 5月12日，59名南非白人"难民"经美国首都华盛顿附近杜勒斯国际机场抵达美国。媒体记者当天在 白宫 ...

Core Points - The Cuban Foreign Minister, Rodriguez, strongly refuted recent U.S. diplomatic actions aimed at discrediting Cuba and interfering with the upcoming UN vote [1] - Rodriguez accused the U.S. of distributing defamatory documents that falsely claim Cuban military involvement in the Russia-Ukraine conflict and assert that Cuba threatens international peace and security [1] - He emphasized that the U.S. has maintained a decades-long economic, commercial, and financial blockade against Cuba, which he identified as the primary cause of Cuba's economic issues, including current energy crises and shortages [1][2] Group 1 - The U.S. State Department sent two diplomatic documents to multiple countries in October, filled with disrespectful and defamatory statements about Cuba [1] - Rodriguez criticized the U.S. for claiming there is no blockade against Cuba, stating that this blockade is a deliberate policy aimed at causing suffering for Cuban families [1] - The upcoming UN General Assembly will debate a resolution calling for the end of the U.S. blockade against Cuba, which Rodriguez argues is an unjust policy that has lasted for decades [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government criticizes the U.S. for imposing visa restrictions on countries involved in Cuba's overseas medical services, labeling it as an extension of its long-standing sanctions against Cuba and a misuse of the term "forced labor" [1] Group 1: U.S. Actions and Responses - The U.S. State Department announced visa restrictions on several countries and individuals involved in Cuba's overseas medical services, claiming to combat "forced labor exploitation" [1] - The U.S. warns countries cooperating with Cuba to reconsider their partnerships [1] Group 2: Cuba's Medical Contributions - According to Cuban government statistics, over the past 60 years, Cuba has sent more than 600,000 medical personnel to over 60 countries, providing medical services to over 230 million people and performing over 17 million surgeries, saving more than 12 million lives [1] - Cuba's overseas medical cooperation is recognized for its significant role in supporting healthcare systems in Latin America, the Caribbean, and Africa, receiving appreciation from governments and people in those regions [1] Group 3: China's Position - The Chinese government opposes coercive diplomacy and urges the U.S. to stop its sanctions against Cuba, advocating for actions that would improve U.S.-Cuba relations and promote regional peace and stability [1]

Group 1: U.S. Soft Power and Global Influence - The U.S. has built its soft power post-World War II through political values, technological innovation, cultural appeal, and legitimate foreign policy, gaining significant influence in creating a new international order [1] - In the last decade, U.S. soft power has been severely impacted by the rise of unilateralism, protectionism, and cultural conservatism, leading to a decline in its international image and trust in its values and policies, particularly during Trump's presidency [1][2] - Trump's "America First" policy has led to a rejection of multilateralism, with the U.S. ranking lowest in support for multilateralism among 193 UN member states, which has resulted in a breakdown of international trade systems and supply chains [3][4] Group 2: Economic and Trade Policies - Trump's administration has adopted a confrontational approach to economic relations, exemplified by increasing tariffs, which has disrupted the multilateral free trade system and caused significant supply chain issues globally [3][4] - A Pew Research Center survey indicated that in 21 relatively affluent countries, 10 experienced a decline in favorable views of the U.S. by 6 percentage points or more, with Australia, Israel, South Africa, and Germany seeing the largest drops [4] - Trump's trade policies, including high tariffs, threaten the global trade system, which could lead to a decrease in demand for the dollar and weaken its value and credit [8][9] Group 3: Financial Stability and Dollar Credit - The U.S. has maintained financial hegemony through the dollar, which has been supported by its historical ties to gold and later oil, but this trust is now at risk due to increasing national debt and fiscal deficits [7][8] - The U.S. national debt has exceeded $36 trillion, with rising interest costs impacting the country's creditworthiness, leading to higher yields on U.S. Treasury bonds [8][9] - Trump's policies have contributed to a weakening dollar, with long-term Treasury yields rising above 4%, indicating market uncertainty and increasing risks to dollar credit [9] Group 4: Impact on Scientific Research and Education - Trump's administration has significantly cut funding for scientific research, with the National Science Foundation's new project funding dropping nearly 50% compared to the previous year, and the NIH's indirect costs being reduced from 40% to 15% [11][12] - The administration's focus on "useful research" has led to a decline in support for basic research, which is crucial for long-term innovation and competitiveness [12][17] - The reduction in federal funding has resulted in layoffs and program cuts at major universities, with institutions like Johns Hopkins and Harvard facing significant financial constraints [16][17] Group 5: Broader Implications for U.S. Soft Power - The ongoing conflict between Trump's administration and academic institutions reflects a broader ideological battle between conservative and progressive values, impacting the U.S.'s ability to attract and retain top talent in science and technology [15][17] - The erosion of support for scientific research and education under Trump's policies threatens the U.S.'s historical leadership in global science and technology, potentially diminishing its soft power [18]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses how Trump's understanding of power is limited to coercion and transactional relationships, which is undermining the United States' global influence, particularly its soft power, due to rising unilateralism, trade protectionism, and cultural conservatism [1][10]. Group 1: Impact on Scientific Research - Trump's administration has significantly reduced funding for scientific research, with the National Science Foundation's new project funding dropping nearly 50% compared to the previous year, particularly affecting engineering, education, and computer science [2][4]. - Major research institutions like the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation have had to implement large-scale layoffs due to funding cuts, with NIH terminating support for over 700 research projects in just one month [4][9]. - The Trump administration's focus on "useful research" has led to a decline in support for basic research, which is crucial for long-term scientific advancement, indicating a shift towards a more utilitarian view of science [3][5]. Group 2: Higher Education and Cultural Tensions - The Trump administration has pressured universities to reform their diversity initiatives and has threatened funding cuts, leading to significant financial repercussions for institutions like Harvard and Princeton [7][8]. - A survey indicated that approximately 75% of American researchers are considering leaving the U.S. due to the uncertain policy environment and funding cuts, highlighting a potential brain drain [4][5]. - The conflict between Trump's administration and universities reflects a broader cultural clash between conservative and progressive values, with implications for academic freedom and the future of higher education in the U.S. [6][8]. Group 3: International Relations and Soft Power - Trump's "America First" policy has led to a departure from multilateralism, with the U.S. becoming the least supportive country of multilateralism among 193 UN member states [10][12]. - The administration's aggressive trade policies and withdrawal from international agreements have strained relationships with allies and reduced the U.S.'s global standing [11][13]. - Trump's approach has resulted in a significant decline in the U.S.'s soft power, as countries reassess their relationships with the U.S. and become more cautious in their engagements [12][13].