美国国务院副发言人皮戈特在一份声明中称，前来出席联大的伊朗官员仅被允许在下榻酒店和联合国总部之间进行必要公务活动。皮戈特称，美 方此举是为了"保护美国公众的安全"，"美方不会允许伊朗官员以参加联大为借口在纽约自由出行，推动其恐怖主义议程"。此外，他还指责伊朗 官员在海外享受奢侈购物，而伊朗普通人却面临"贫困、破败的基础设施和水电短缺"。 【环球时报报道 记者 白云怡 线一凡】路透社等媒体报道称，美国国务院于22日宣布对出席纽约第80届联合国大会的伊朗代表团实施收紧出行范 围及购物权限等多项限制措施，而这一声明的发布正值联大高级别会议周拉开帷幕的关键节点。 伊通社23日报道称，事实上，美国对伊朗官员的限制并非仅局限于奢侈品，购买许多生活必需品甚至也需要提前数天申请，而这些带有强烈"恶 意"的行为被限购奢侈品的炒作所掩盖。伊通社称，这类对伊朗外事人员日常生活乃至人际交往的限制，明显违背了《联合国宪章》和外交惯例， 必将引发国际社会对美国滥用联合国总部所在地特权的批评与担忧。CNN称，除对伊朗代表团行动施加限制外，美国政府还拒绝为巴勒斯坦总统 马哈茂德·阿巴斯及约80名巴方其他官员签发签证，遭到巴勒斯坦民族权力机构 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government criticizes the U.S. for imposing sanctions on Chinese companies and urges the U.S. to correct its actions, emphasizing the need to protect the legitimate rights of Chinese enterprises [1] Group 1: U.S. Sanctions on Chinese Entities - The U.S. Department of Commerce has added multiple Chinese entities to its export control "entity list" as of September 12, 2025 [1] - The Chinese government views the U.S. actions as an abuse of export controls under the guise of national security, affecting sectors such as semiconductors, biotechnology, aerospace, and logistics [1] Group 2: Impact on Global Trade - The Chinese government argues that U.S. unilateral actions disrupt normal business exchanges between countries, distort the global market, and harm the legitimate rights of enterprises [1] - The sanctions are seen as detrimental to the stability and security of global supply chains and industrial chains [1]

Group 1: U.S. Soft Power and Global Influence - The U.S. has built its soft power post-World War II through political values, technological innovation, cultural appeal, and legitimate foreign policy, gaining significant influence in creating a new international order [1] - In the last decade, U.S. soft power has been severely impacted by the rise of unilateralism, protectionism, and cultural conservatism, leading to a decline in its international image and trust in its values and policies, particularly during Trump's presidency [1][2] - Trump's "America First" policy has led to a rejection of multilateralism, with the U.S. ranking lowest in support for multilateralism among 193 UN member states, which has resulted in a breakdown of international trade systems and supply chains [3][4] Group 2: Economic and Trade Policies - Trump's administration has adopted a confrontational approach to economic relations, exemplified by increasing tariffs, which has disrupted the multilateral free trade system and caused significant supply chain issues globally [3][4] - A Pew Research Center survey indicated that in 21 relatively affluent countries, 10 experienced a decline in favorable views of the U.S. by 6 percentage points or more, with Australia, Israel, South Africa, and Germany seeing the largest drops [4] - Trump's trade policies, including high tariffs, threaten the global trade system, which could lead to a decrease in demand for the dollar and weaken its value and credit [8][9] Group 3: Financial Stability and Dollar Credit - The U.S. has maintained financial hegemony through the dollar, which has been supported by its historical ties to gold and later oil, but this trust is now at risk due to increasing national debt and fiscal deficits [7][8] - The U.S. national debt has exceeded $36 trillion, with rising interest costs impacting the country's creditworthiness, leading to higher yields on U.S. Treasury bonds [8][9] - Trump's policies have contributed to a weakening dollar, with long-term Treasury yields rising above 4%, indicating market uncertainty and increasing risks to dollar credit [9] Group 4: Impact on Scientific Research and Education - Trump's administration has significantly cut funding for scientific research, with the National Science Foundation's new project funding dropping nearly 50% compared to the previous year, and the NIH's indirect costs being reduced from 40% to 15% [11][12] - The administration's focus on "useful research" has led to a decline in support for basic research, which is crucial for long-term innovation and competitiveness [12][17] - The reduction in federal funding has resulted in layoffs and program cuts at major universities, with institutions like Johns Hopkins and Harvard facing significant financial constraints [16][17] Group 5: Broader Implications for U.S. Soft Power - The ongoing conflict between Trump's administration and academic institutions reflects a broader ideological battle between conservative and progressive values, impacting the U.S.'s ability to attract and retain top talent in science and technology [15][17] - The erosion of support for scientific research and education under Trump's policies threatens the U.S.'s historical leadership in global science and technology, potentially diminishing its soft power [18]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses how Trump's understanding of power is limited to coercion and transactional relationships, which is undermining the United States' global influence, particularly its soft power, due to rising unilateralism, trade protectionism, and cultural conservatism [1][10]. Group 1: Impact on Scientific Research - Trump's administration has significantly reduced funding for scientific research, with the National Science Foundation's new project funding dropping nearly 50% compared to the previous year, particularly affecting engineering, education, and computer science [2][4]. - Major research institutions like the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation have had to implement large-scale layoffs due to funding cuts, with NIH terminating support for over 700 research projects in just one month [4][9]. - The Trump administration's focus on "useful research" has led to a decline in support for basic research, which is crucial for long-term scientific advancement, indicating a shift towards a more utilitarian view of science [3][5]. Group 2: Higher Education and Cultural Tensions - The Trump administration has pressured universities to reform their diversity initiatives and has threatened funding cuts, leading to significant financial repercussions for institutions like Harvard and Princeton [7][8]. - A survey indicated that approximately 75% of American researchers are considering leaving the U.S. due to the uncertain policy environment and funding cuts, highlighting a potential brain drain [4][5]. - The conflict between Trump's administration and universities reflects a broader cultural clash between conservative and progressive values, with implications for academic freedom and the future of higher education in the U.S. [6][8]. Group 3: International Relations and Soft Power - Trump's "America First" policy has led to a departure from multilateralism, with the U.S. becoming the least supportive country of multilateralism among 193 UN member states [10][12]. - The administration's aggressive trade policies and withdrawal from international agreements have strained relationships with allies and reduced the U.S.'s global standing [11][13]. - Trump's approach has resulted in a significant decline in the U.S.'s soft power, as countries reassess their relationships with the U.S. and become more cautious in their engagements [12][13].

责编：叶舒筠 校对： 彭其华 版权声明 4日，商务部新闻发言人就美方宣布以芬太尼等问题为由对中国输美产品再次加征关税发表谈话。 美国东部时间3月3日，美方宣布以芬太尼等问题为由，自3月4日起对中国输美产品再次加征10%关税。 中方 对此强烈不满，坚决反对，将采取反制措施坚定维护自身权益。 中国是世界上禁毒政策最严格、执行最彻底的国家之一，中美双方开展了广泛、深入的禁毒合作并取得显著成 效。但美方"甩锅推责"、一错再错，以芬太尼问题为由再次对中国输美产品加征关税。 美方这一做法罔顾事 实，无视国际贸易规则和各方呼声，是典型的单边主义、霸凌主义行径。 中方多次阐明，美方单边关税违反世贸组织规则，破坏多边贸易体制，不仅解决不了自身问题，还会对中美经 贸合作和正常的国际贸易秩序造成破坏。中方敦促美方尊重其他国家权益，立即撤回无理无据、损人不利己的 单边关税措施。希望美方客观、理性看待和处理问题，尽快回到通过平等对话妥善解决分歧的正确轨道。 来源：央视新闻 END 点击关键字可查看 潜望系列深度报道丨 股事会专栏 丨 投资小红书 丨 e公司调查 丨 时报会客厅 丨 十大明星私募访谈 丨 今天，这些上市公司代表委员登上了 ...

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. has announced a 10% tariff on Chinese imports starting March 4, citing issues related to fentanyl, which China strongly opposes and plans to take countermeasures to protect its rights [1]. Group 1: U.S. Tariff Announcement - The U.S. imposed a 10% tariff on Chinese products, effective March 4, due to fentanyl-related issues [1]. - China expresses strong dissatisfaction and opposition to the U.S. decision, indicating it will take necessary countermeasures [1]. Group 2: China's Position on Drug Policy - China is recognized as one of the countries with the strictest and most thorough drug control policies globally [1]. - The cooperation between China and the U.S. on drug control has been extensive and has yielded significant results [1]. Group 3: Criticism of U.S. Actions - The U.S. is accused of shifting blame and acting unilaterally, disregarding facts and international trade rules [1]. - China's stance is that the U.S. tariffs violate World Trade Organization rules and undermine multilateral trade systems, which could harm U.S.-China economic cooperation and the normal international trade order [1]. - China urges the U.S. to respect the rights of other countries and to withdraw the unilateral tariff measures, advocating for a return to dialogue to resolve differences [1].