黄金预定价交易

Search documents
高杠杆、假收益、“托儿”全上场,水贝黄金预定价交易是这样的危险赌局
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-10-10 06:00
"几分钟,八千多块就没了,账户里只剩下一百多块……"回想起不久前的爆仓经历,深圳投资者王华感觉有些恍惚。 今年国庆节期间,王华通过深圳水贝黄金市场的交易平台,参与了一种预定价交易的黄金投资。用40倍的杠杆"看空"黄金,原以为能大赚一 笔,不料却迎面撞上了始料未及的金价暴涨。 王华的经历,并非个案。那一夜,她所在的多个黄金期货交流群里,不断有"看空"的投资者发出亏损截图,有人沉默退群,有人不甘地追 问"还会不会回调"。 他们的爆仓经历,掀开了黄金预定价交易"局中局"的隐秘角落。第一财经调查发现,当前,市场上存在多个面向散客的预定价交易平台,以 低至1克起订、仅付20元定金即可撬动近千元黄金的高杠杆模式,吸引散客进行黄金投资。 为了吸引客户,一些平台的业务人员,利用社交平台引流、群内安插好的"托",来晒单营造火热氛围,甚至以交易提成与回扣激励的层层推 动下,大量风险认知不足的散客被卷入其中。然而,看似低成本、高回报、交易便捷的模式,实则是参与者与平台对赌,而这种赌局又隐藏 着巨大风险:一方面,投资者在缺乏有效风控的情况下,极易因金价波动而瞬间巨亏;另一方面,部分未做充分风险对冲的平台,在金价单 边行情中,可能面临 ...
40倍杠杆的“对赌”玩不转了,水贝黄金料商倒在金价新高时
Di Yi Cai Jing Zi Xun· 2025-09-17 13:41
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the emerging risks associated with a high-leverage gold trading model in the Shenzhen Shui Bei market, particularly focusing on the sudden closure of a gold trading company, Shenzhen Yue Baoxin Precious Metals Co., Ltd, which has left many merchants and customers unable to retrieve their funds and gold materials [2][5][9]. Group 1: Trading Model and Risks - The prevalent trading method allows buyers to lock in the price of gold by paying a deposit of approximately 2.4% to 3% of the actual gold price, significantly lower than the typical 10% margin required for gold futures trading [2][10]. - This model has led some traders to engage in speculative practices, such as short-selling, where they do not purchase the gold immediately but wait for prices to drop before fulfilling orders, exposing them to substantial risks if prices rise instead [3][16][17]. - The leverage involved in these transactions can reach 30 to 50 times, creating a scenario where small price fluctuations can lead to significant financial losses or gains for traders [12][15]. Group 2: Company Closure and Impact - On September 13, 2023, Yue Baoxin announced its closure due to the freezing of its bank accounts and the disappearance of its legal representative, leaving many clients unable to access their funds or gold [5][9]. - Reports indicate that affected merchants have suffered significant losses, with one gold shop in Henan losing over 900,000 yuan worth of gold due to the company's abrupt exit [8][9]. - The Shenzhen Gold and Jewelry Association has stated that while some companies are facing issues, the situation has been exaggerated on social media, and many businesses continue to operate normally [9]. Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Concerns - The trading model may be classified as illegal due to its resemblance to futures trading, which is subject to strict regulations. The low deposit requirement and the speculative nature of the transactions raise concerns about potential fraud and illegal operations [20][21][22]. - Legal experts suggest that the practices of these traders could lead to accusations of contract fraud or illegal business operations, especially if they fail to deliver on their agreements [21][23]. - Historical cases have shown that similar trading practices have been deemed illegal by courts, reinforcing the need for regulatory scrutiny in the gold trading sector [22][23].
40倍杠杆的“对赌”玩不转了,水贝黄金料商倒在金价新高时
第一财经· 2025-09-17 12:29
2025.09. 17 本文字数:5369,阅读时长大约10分钟 作者 | 第一财经 王方然 封图 | AI生成 买方仅需20元,就能锁定1克黄金的价格,到期即便金价上涨,卖方也能按照原价交付。在深圳水贝黄金市场,这已经成为不少黄金商户,乃至公众买 金时,普遍流行的交易手法。 然而,这种高杠杆的交易模式,正悄然积累巨大风险。水贝市场的多名商家,近期向第一财经爆料,一家名为深圳市粤宝鑫贵金属有限公司(下称"粤 宝鑫")的黄金"料商",突然在深夜通知"法人失联"、门店关闭,多名涉及的商户货款与黄金原料无法提取。料商是指 从上游供货方采购黄金原料,向 下游小商户供货的黄金原料交易商。 目前,事件进展、门店关闭原因尚待有关部门进一步调查。记者调查了解到,粤鑫宝突然跑路、闭店,可能与黄金交易"料商"的预定价交易模式有关。 所谓预定价交易,是水贝市场的部分下游黄金制造销售商,仅需向"料商"支付相当于黄金实际价格约2.4%~3%的定金,就能锁定金价。理想状态下, 金价上涨后,销售商可按锁定的价格补足尾款提货,或直接结算差价获利。与正常黄金期货交易高达10%以上的保证金相比,这一模式门槛更低。 这种交易模式下, 部分料商可能 ...
40倍杠杆锁价、场外期货“对赌” 黄金料商却在金价新高时悄悄消失了
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-09-17 10:36
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the emerging risks associated with a high-leverage gold trading model in the Shenzhen Shui Bei market, particularly focusing on the case of Shenzhen Yue Baoxin Precious Metals Co., which has reportedly ceased operations and left many clients unable to retrieve their funds or gold [1][3][7]. Group 1: Trading Model and Risks - The pre-set price trading model allows buyers to lock in gold prices by paying a deposit of approximately 2.4% to 3% of the actual gold price, significantly lower than the typical 10% margin required in standard gold futures trading [1][12][20]. - This model has led to some traders acting as "speculators," engaging in practices such as short-selling, where they do not purchase the gold immediately, hoping to buy it at a lower price later [2][15]. - The high leverage involved in this trading model can lead to substantial financial losses for traders if gold prices rise unexpectedly, as they may be forced to buy at higher prices to fulfill their obligations [16][20]. Group 2: Company Specifics - Shenzhen Yue Baoxin was established in August 2023 and primarily engaged in the sale, wholesale, recycling, and processing of jewelry [5]. - Following the company's abrupt closure, many clients reported being unable to retrieve their gold or funds, with one client citing a loss of over 900,000 yuan worth of gold [6][7]. - The company’s sudden disappearance has raised concerns about a potential wave of similar incidents in the Shui Bei market, although the Shenzhen Jewelry Association has stated that many businesses are still operating normally [7][20]. Group 3: Legal Implications - The trading practices employed by companies like Yue Baoxin may be classified as illegal operations or fraud, as they involve collecting deposits without actual gold reserves or the ability to hedge risks properly [21][22]. - Legal experts suggest that such practices could lead to criminal charges for contract fraud or illegal business operations, as they resemble characteristics of futures trading without proper regulatory oversight [20][21]. - Historical cases have shown that similar trading models have been deemed illegal by courts, leading to penalties for those involved [22].
40倍杠杆锁价、场外期货“对赌”,黄金料商却在金价新高时悄悄消失了
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-09-17 10:03
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the risks associated with a high-leverage gold trading model in the Shenzhen Shui Bei market, particularly focusing on the sudden closure of a gold trading company, Shenzhen Yue Baoxin Precious Metals Co., Ltd, which has left many merchants unable to retrieve their funds and gold materials [1][3][7]. Group 1: Trading Model and Risks - The pre-set price trading model allows buyers to lock in the price of gold by paying a deposit of approximately 2.4% to 3% of the actual gold price, significantly lower than the typical 10% margin required for gold futures trading [1][12][20]. - This model has led to a high leverage ratio, with some transactions exhibiting leverage as high as 30 to 50 times, creating substantial risk for traders [13][18]. - Some traders may engage in speculative practices, such as short selling, by not purchasing the gold immediately and instead waiting for prices to drop, which can lead to significant losses if prices rise unexpectedly [2][15][16]. Group 2: Company Closure and Impact - Shenzhen Yue Baoxin announced its closure due to the freezing of its bank accounts and the disappearance of its legal representative, affecting numerous merchants who had transactions with the company [3][5][6]. - Reports indicate that the closure has resulted in financial losses for various merchants, with one gold shop reportedly losing over 900,000 yuan worth of gold [6][7]. - The incident has raised concerns about a potential wave of similar closures among other trading companies in the Shui Bei market, although the Shenzhen Gold and Jewelry Association has stated that many businesses are still operating normally [7][20]. Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Concerns - The trading practices employed by companies like Yue Baoxin may be classified as illegal operations or fraud, as they resemble futures trading without proper regulatory oversight [21][22]. - Legal experts suggest that the collection of deposits under the guise of price locking could constitute contract fraud, especially if there is no actual gold reserve or hedging capability [21][22]. - Previous court cases have ruled similar trading practices as illegal, indicating a potential for significant legal repercussions for companies engaging in these high-risk trading models [22].