由北京君和创新公益基金会、中国科学院大学校友会联合主办，主题为"和而不同，思想无界"的CC讲 坛第69期演讲2025年12月20日在中国科学院大学（北京玉泉路校区）礼堂举行。丑小鸭中学校长詹大年 出席，并以《厌学不是讨厌学习 而是恐惧不舒服的关系》为题发表演讲。 演讲实录： 大家好，我们先看一些有问题的孩子，2022年，这些孩子都是初二的孩子，现在他们是高二的孩子了。 其中一个孩子，他小学都没有上过，2024年参加中考，考上了我们当地的县第一中学，他在县第一中学 的高一年级，名列班级第一，年级第二。 所有的孩子在以前的学校都是不能上学的，他们都被称为厌学的、拒学的、休学的孩子。他们在昆明丑 小鸭中学上学，丑小鸭中学从2011年到现在帮助了近3000名问题孩子，他们从厌学、拒学、休学到成功 复学。这些孩子大部分来自于全国的大城市，或者教育经济文化最发达的地方，这些孩子的父母亲绝大 部分是高学历高收入高素质的人。 当这些孩子厌学到休学，从复学到好学，有很多家长很感动，说詹校长感谢您办的丑小鸭中学，否则我 的孩子今天不知道怎么样。我说不是丑小鸭的功劳，因为这些孩子他们本身就是白天鹅，他们不是丑小 鸭，他们的翅膀是拿 ...

（来源：南京晨报） 转自：南京晨报 数学组李影老师以《"读懂"是最好的教育》为题，分享阅读《读懂学生》的体会。她结合对本校青春期 学生的专项调研数据，剖析这一群体在生理与心理变化阶段的典型特点，提出教师需主动关注学生心理 需求，以"陪伴者"姿态介入情绪与动力失衡问题。 当教育者将目光从"教"转向"学"，就必须理解学习本身是如何发生的。物理老师张苗苗和英语老师刘思 琪联袂带来题为《学习问题的溯源：当脑科学遇见教育心理学》的分享，依托《大脑说明书》《教育中 的心理效应》核心观点，为学生的学习困境提供科学解释与策略。 化学老师时立勇以《"知道"走向"解释"》为题，聚焦《费曼学习法》中"以教促学"的核心观点，分享初 三化学教学实践。 晨报讯（通讯员 糜梦逸 南京晨报/爱南京记者 周卉卉 徐海兵 图文）12月19日下午，金陵河西学校第七 届读书报告会在学术报告厅举行，六位初中教师围绕"从教走向学"主题，分享了阅读感悟与教学实践。 教育集团近千名教师齐聚，共同探寻课堂变革的核心路径。 语文老师兼班主任吴子芸结合《给班主任的59条心理学建议》，分享了《涵育班级生态》的实践，推 行"项目式班级管理"与"1+1互助小组"，由学 ...

记者丨王峰 编辑丨李博 当AI已经深刻重塑教育和就业，应试教育、分数竞争将何去何从？ 在近日举行的中国教育三十人论坛第十二届年会上，中国教育学会名誉会长顾明远提出，教育改革的核 心是不能让80%学生为20%精英"陪跑"，教育不能过于"育分"而非"育人"。 顾明远认为，要改变这一状况，必须实现三大转变：从以"教"为本转向以"学"为本，从"育分"转向"育 人"，从被动学习转向主动学习。这一切的起点是激发学生兴趣，因为"没有兴趣就没有学习"。 这引起了参会专家的热烈讨论。除了理论和观点的碰撞，诸多创新实践也显示了蓬勃的生命力。 从追求"优秀"到勇闯"无人区" "在AI时代，能力远比分数重要，但这一观点却与东亚地区看重学历的传统观念相悖。"美国斯坦福大学 人工智能、机器人与未来教育中心主任蒋里说。 他表示，传统刷题体系下成长起来的孩子，面临的问题不是简单的技能过时，而是底层思维的根本性冲 突。 蒋里谈到，在计算机这类实践性极强的领域，有些学生成绩斐然，考试和作业近乎完美，但因缺乏真实 项目的动手经验，求职时反而屡屡碰壁。相比之下，另一些或许成绩平平，却热衷于实践挑战，比如那 些能轻易"攻破"学校服务器的学生，反而因其 ...

记者丨王峰 编辑丨李博 他表示，传统刷题体系下成长起来的孩子，面临的问题不是简单的技能过时，而是底层思维的 根本性冲突。 蒋里谈到，在计算机这类实践性极强的领域，有些学生成绩斐然，考试和作业近乎完美，但因 缺乏真实项目的动手经验，求职时反而屡屡碰壁。相比之下，另一些或许成绩平平，却热衷于 实践挑战，比如那些能轻易"攻破"学校服务器的学生，反而因其强大的解决实际问题的能力而 在就业市场上备受青睐。 "在真正的职场竞争中，动手能力和创新精神往往比一纸漂亮的成绩单更具说服力。"他说。 当AI已经深刻重塑教育和就业，应试教育、分数竞争将何去何从？ 在近日举行的中国教育三十人论坛第十二届年会上，中国教育学会名誉会长顾明远提出， 教 育改革的核心是不能让80%学生为20%精英"陪跑" ，教育不能过于"育分"而非"育人"。 顾明远认为，要改变这一状况，必须实现三大转变：从以"教"为本转向以"学"为本，从"育 分"转向"育人"，从被动学习转向主动学习。这一切的起点是激发学生兴趣，因为"没有兴趣就 没有学习"。 这引起了参会专家的热烈讨论。除了理论和观点的碰撞，诸多创新实践也显示了蓬勃的生命 力。 从追求"优秀"到勇闯"无人区 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on education, particularly concerning minors, highlighting the need for a balanced approach to AI usage in learning environments [2][3][10]. Group 1: AI Usage Among Minors - A survey conducted by the Youth Research Center found that over 60% of minors have used AI, yet only about 30% of families have established management rules for AI usage [22]. - Concerns are raised about the potential negative effects of AI on children's learning, including a decrease in critical thinking and creativity due to reliance on AI for completing assignments [7][8]. Group 2: Parental Perspectives - Parental opinions on AI in education are categorized into three groups: the "complaining group," the "cautious group," and the "dilemma group" [6][10]. - The "cautious group" expresses worries that excessive AI use may hinder children's ability to think independently and critically, fearing that AI could mislead them with inaccurate information [7][8]. - The "dilemma group" acknowledges the necessity of AI in modern education while fearing its potential drawbacks, advocating for educational reforms to adapt to AI's presence [10][11]. Group 3: Global Regulatory Trends - Many countries are moving towards stricter regulations on AI usage among minors, with Italy being the first EU country to implement comprehensive AI regulations requiring parental consent for children under 14 [15][19]. - The article notes that the increasing time minors spend on smartphones and the internet raises concerns about their emotional dependency on AI tools [19][20]. Group 4: Recommendations for Parents and Educators - The article suggests that parents and educators should act as "AI navigators," guiding children in understanding AI's principles and limitations [25][26]. - Recommendations include teaching children to critically evaluate AI-generated content, using AI for repetitive tasks while reserving complex thinking for human engagement, and fostering creativity through collaborative projects with AI [29][30][32]. - Emphasizing the importance of human interaction, the article argues that AI cannot replace the emotional and social skills developed through direct human relationships [32].

Core Insights - The discussion focused on the theme "What kind of education do we need in the AI era?" highlighting the transformative impact of AI on education and the need for a balanced approach that combines technology with educational values [2][5][13] Group 1: AI's Role in Education - AI is transitioning from a peripheral role to a core component in education, showcasing potential in enhancing teacher productivity, personalized learning, and promoting educational equity [4][5] - The introduction of AI tools in classrooms, such as digital personas teaching various subjects, illustrates the innovative applications of AI in enhancing student engagement and learning experiences [5][7] Group 2: Challenges and Considerations - The integration of AI in education presents challenges, including the need for students to develop critical thinking and judgment skills, as well as the necessity for teachers to possess a deeper knowledge base [7][9] - There are misconceptions regarding AI's role in education, such as viewing it solely as a tool for rote learning, which necessitates a shift in educational philosophy and governance [10][12] Group 3: Policy Recommendations - Participants emphasized the importance of establishing a collaborative framework between government, schools, and AI companies to develop tailored educational models and resources [10][12][13] - Suggestions included creating dedicated funding for AI in education, promoting partnerships between educational institutions and AI industries, and ensuring equitable access to AI resources across different educational settings [12][13]

Core Insights - The article discusses the rising popularity of the Ask Me Anything (AMA) format on Xiaohongshu during the National Day holiday, highlighting its interactive nature compared to other platforms like Zhihu and Weibo [2][5] Group 1: AMA Format and Participants - The AMA format allows for a relaxed online dialogue where tech experts engage with curious users, covering a wide range of topics from futuristic concepts to personal growth challenges [5][6] - Notable participants include Liu Zhiyuan, a professor at Tsinghua University, Thomas Wolf, co-founder of Hugging Face, and the SOMA Robotics team, who discuss various aspects of technology, education, and research [6][7] Group 2: Educational Insights - Liu Zhiyuan emphasizes the importance of passion in research, advising students to seek guidance from mentors and to maintain a strong interest in their fields to overcome challenges [6][7] - Thomas Wolf shares a succinct yet impactful message about the significance of building meaningful projects, suggesting that education should empower learners to create rather than just acquire knowledge [9] Group 3: Future of Education - SOMA Robotics envisions an integrated platform combining low-barrier hardware, open-source tools, and community engagement, aiming to enable students and developers to transition from learning to creation [10][11] - The concept of Embodied AI is introduced, suggesting that AI should have physical presence and interaction capabilities, enhancing the educational experience by allowing students to engage with robots in real-world scenarios [11][12] - The article concludes with a vision of a collaborative educational environment where learning becomes a shared experience, encouraging active participation and co-creation among students and educators [12]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that for students from non-top-tier universities, personal abilities and enthusiasm are more important than academic credentials, and practical skills should be prioritized over merely pursuing higher degrees [1][2][3]. Group 1: Employment Market and Education - The current job market is challenging, and blindly competing for civil service exams or graduate studies is not cost-effective for students from second-tier universities due to limited competitive advantages [1][2]. - There is a significant disconnect between university curricula and societal needs, leading to a lack of practical skills among graduates [1][2]. - The focus should be on finding personal strengths that align with market demands rather than pursuing academic upgrades for their own sake [1][2][3]. Group 2: Skills Development - Students should abandon the "degree-centric" mindset and focus on enhancing problem-solving skills and self-directed learning abilities [2][3]. - The advent of AI tools has transformed the learning landscape, allowing individuals to acquire skills like data analysis and video production in a fraction of the time previously required [2][3]. - Emphasizing practical skills over academic performance can lead to better job opportunities in small and medium enterprises, which value cost-effective and proactive talent [2][3]. Group 3: Career Strategies for Ordinary Students - Ordinary students should prioritize skill development over academic performance, as competing for grades in ordinary universities offers limited benefits in the job market [3]. - Emerging skills such as no-code development and new media operations have lower barriers to entry, and platforms like Bilibili and YouTube provide abundant free resources for skill acquisition [3]. - Students should focus on real-world applications of their skills to enhance their employability [3]. Group 4: The Role of Higher Education - The article discusses the changing perception of the college entrance examination (Gaokao) and its diminishing role in determining life outcomes [8][12]. - The traditional notion of "knowledge changes destiny" is being challenged as many students find that their efforts do not yield expected results [8][12]. - The article suggests that students should not idolize degrees but instead focus on developing interests and skills that align with market needs [12][13]. Group 5: The Importance of Location and Industry - When choosing universities, students should prioritize cities with rich social and economic environments, as these can significantly influence their career prospects [46][47]. - Local industries and the specific characteristics of regional universities can provide unique opportunities for students to thrive [27][58]. - The article highlights the importance of understanding market demands and aligning personal skills with emerging industries to find better job opportunities [58][60].

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the shift in education policy from exam-oriented to comprehensive development-oriented education, highlighting the growing consensus on the importance of quality education that focuses on the cultivation of comprehensive abilities in children [1][2][10]. Policy Insights - The Chinese government has consistently issued policies to promote the development of quality education, transitioning from an exam-oriented approach to one that emphasizes comprehensive development [2][3]. - Key policies include the 2014 curriculum reform, the 2021 "double reduction" policy, and the 2022 regulations on non-subject training, all aimed at fostering quality education and meeting the demand for non-subject education [2][3]. Financial Insights - National education funding has been increasing, with total education expenditure exceeding 645.95 billion yuan in 2023, marking a 5.3% increase from the previous year [5][6]. - Per-student funding for kindergartens and primary schools has also seen growth, with kindergarten funding increasing by 7.2% year-on-year [5][6]. Market Trends - The non-subject education market is entering an upgrade phase, driven by policy support and new curriculum reforms, with a focus on comprehensive ability cultivation for children [7][71]. - The market for non-subject education is projected to reach 646.3 billion yuan by 2024, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 20.44% from 2023 to 2027 [71]. Educational Model Transformation - The educational model is evolving from passive learning to active exploration, emphasizing the need for students to build cross-disciplinary knowledge networks and develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills [73][74]. - The new curriculum standards aim to foster a comprehensive ability cultivation system, focusing on critical thinking, communication, and innovation [10][20]. Parental Insights - Parents are increasingly prioritizing the comprehensive ability development of their children, with a significant focus on skills such as multi-language expression, critical thinking, and practical abilities [22][32][39]. - A majority of parents believe that current school and family education systems are insufficient to meet their children's comprehensive ability development needs, indicating a demand for external educational support [36][40]. Assessment and Evaluation - There is a growing need for a more diverse and comprehensive assessment system that evaluates children's physical, cognitive, psychological, and social development [76][77]. - The article suggests that future assessments should move away from traditional standardized testing towards a more dynamic and multi-dimensional evaluation of children's abilities [76][77].