财政部、商务部、国家税务总局2025年12月31日对外发布通知称，为进一步激发消费需求，释放消费潜力， 三部门将支持50个左右城市开展有奖发票试 点工作，政策实施期为6个月。 三部门有关负责人表示，试点城市将按照通知要求，结合地方实际，制定有奖发票试点工作实施方案，明确有奖发票范围、参与方式、中奖规则、奖项设 置、兑奖方法、违法行为举报等要求，并向社会公布。 消费者可关注试点城市公告，根据公布的有奖发票活动具体要求，积极参与。 来源：财政部官网 关注" 新华网财经 "视频号 更多财经资讯等你来看 往期推荐 官网截图 通知称，试点城市对个人消费者以本人名义向零售、餐饮、住宿、文化艺术、娱乐、旅游、体育、居民服务业等行业的经营主体购买商品和服务，且取得 的票面金额在一定额度以上的发票组织抽奖。 财政部、商务部、国家税务总局有关负责人介绍， 此次出台的有奖发票试点政策着重从需求端发力，鼓励居民消费并取得发票后参与抽奖 。试点政策覆 盖日常消费主要场景，如购物、外出就餐、旅游住宿、文体活动、生活服务等，与居民"衣食住行"密切相关。 通知明确，试点城市申报范围为地市级及以上城市（包括直辖市，计划单列市，各省、自治区省会 ...

来源：新华社、财政部经济建设司 三部门将支持50个左右城市开展有奖发票试点 财政部、商务部、国家税务总局2025年12月31日对外发布通知称，为进一步激发消费需求，释放消费潜 力，三部门将支持50个左右城市开展有奖发票试点工作，政策实施期为6个月。 通知称，试点城市对个人消费者以本人名义向零售、餐饮、住宿、文化艺术、娱乐、旅游、体育、居民 服务业等行业的经营主体购买商品和服务，且取得的票面金额在一定额度以上的发票组织抽奖。 一、政策目标 （一）政策目标。按照党中央、国务院关于大力提振消费的决策部署，支持试点城市结合当地消费形势 及工作基础，探索开展有奖发票活动，进一步提高消费者积极性，激发零售、餐饮、住宿、文化艺术、 娱乐、旅游、体育、居民服务业等领域消费潜力，为巩固拓展经济稳中向好势头提供有力支撑。 （二）支持范围。试点城市申报范围为地市级及以上城市（包括直辖市，计划单列市，各省、自治区省 会或首府城市，地级市、州、盟）。支持50个左右城市开展试点工作，主要向人口基数大、带动作用 强、发展潜力好的城市倾斜，同时兼顾地区间政策平衡。政策实施期为6个月。 财政部、商务部、国家税务总局有关负责人介绍，此次出台的有 ...

来源：财政部 关于开展有奖发票试点工作的通知 财建〔2025〕484号 各省、自治区、直辖市、计划单列市财政厅（局）、商务主管部门、税务局： 为深入贯彻落实党中央、国务院有关决策部署，落实《提振消费专项行动方案》相关要求，进一步激发 消费需求，释放消费潜力，财政部、商务部、税务总局决定开展有奖发票试点工作。现将有关事项通知 如下： 申报材料要行文简洁、逻辑清晰、数据详实、支撑有力，不得印制豪华材料。各地不得委托商务、财 政、税务主管部门及其所属行政、企事业单位和工作人员以任何方式（署名或者不署名）参与项目的实 施方案编制等申报工作，如有违反，一经查实，取消项目申报资格，已经通过竞争性评审入围的取消入 围资格，已经获得相关资金支持的将资金予以收回。 （二）评审确定试点。省级商务、财政、税务主管部门通过竞争性评审的方式择优确定本省份试点城市 推荐名单。各省（自治区）可推荐1个城市参加试点。居民消费支出排名前12名的省、自治区可额外推 荐1个城市，居民消费支出排名前3名的可额外推荐2个城市。直辖市、计划单列市（不占所在省份名 额）单独申报。各省级商务、财政、税务主管部门应于2026年1月9日前将加盖公章的试点城市推 ...

Core Insights - The event "The 13th Annual Gathering of Guizhou People" was held to discuss cooperation and development opportunities, with nearly 200 representatives from business associations and enterprises attending [1][2] - The theme of the event was "Integrating New Opportunities, Serving a New Future," focusing on building a modern industrial system in Guiyang and Guian [1] Group 1: Industrial Development - Guiyang and Guian aim to strengthen six major industrial clusters, including a 300 billion-level digital intelligence industry cluster and a 200 billion-level quality mineral processing industry cluster [1] - The plan includes developing 1 billion-level advanced equipment, new energy materials, and specialty light industry clusters, along with a 500 billion-level emerging and future industry cluster [1] Group 2: Service Industry Focus - The region will focus on both productive and life service industries, promoting sectors such as modern logistics, financial services, and cultural tourism [2] - A platform for showcasing and connecting businesses was established during the event, highlighting the commitment to high-quality development in the modern service industry [2]

通知明确，试点城市申报范围为地市级及以上城市（包括直辖市，计划单列市，各省、自治区省会 或首府城市，地级市、州、盟）。中央财政将对试点城市分档安排奖补资金。 三部门有关负责人表示，试点城市将按照通知要求，结合地方实际，制定有奖发票试点工作实施方 案，明确有奖发票范围、参与方式、中奖规则、奖项设置、兑奖方法、违法行为举报等要求，并向社会 公布。消费者可关注试点城市公告，根据公布的有奖发票活动具体要求，积极参与。 【纠错】 【责任编辑:刘阳】 新华社北京12月31日电（记者申铖）财政部、商务部、国家税务总局12月31日对外发布通知称，为 进一步激发消费需求，释放消费潜力，三部门将支持50个左右城市开展有奖发票试点工作，政策实施期 为6个月。 通知称，试点城市对个人消费者以本人名义向零售、餐饮、住宿、文化艺术、娱乐、旅游、体育、 居民服务业等行业的经营主体购买商品和服务，且取得的票面金额在一定额度以上的发票组织抽奖。 财政部、商务部、国家税务总局有关负责人介绍，此次出台的有奖发票试点政策着重从需求端发 力，鼓励居民消费并取得发票后参与抽奖。试点政策覆盖日常消费主要场景，如购物、外出就餐、旅游 住宿、文体活动、生活服 ...

为贯彻落实党中央、国务院决策部署，充分发挥财政资金引导带动作用，加大直达消费者的普惠政策力 度，进一步激发消费需求，释放消费活力，财政部、商务部、税务总局联合印发《关于开展有奖发票试 点工作的通知》(以下简称《通知》)。近日，财政部、商务部、税务总局有关负责人就《通知》有关情 况回答了记者提问。 一、2025年以来，国家连续出台提振消费、扩大内需政策举措，此次开展有奖发票试点工作的主要背景 是什么？ 答：消费是经济增长的重要引擎，是国内大循环的关键环节，是人民对美好生活需要的直接体现，做好 提振消费工作具有重要意义。党中央、国务院高度重视扩消费工作。 2025年以来，随着一系列扩内需、促消费政策措施落地见效，消费市场总体保持平稳发展态势，消费新 亮点新热点不断涌现。2025年1—11月，社会消费品零售总额45.6万亿元，同比增长4.0%，增速比去年 全年加快0.5个百分点；服务零售额同比增长5.4%，继续保持平稳较快增长。2025年前三季度，最终消 费支出对GDP增长的贡献率达53.5%。 为贯彻落实党中央、国务院决策部署，财政部、商务部、税务总局联合开展有奖发票试点工作，通过对 居民消费取得的发票抽奖，激发 ...

Core Insights - The internal control quality of listed companies in 2024 has improved compared to 2023, with internal environment remaining the weakest aspect that requires further enhancement [4][19] - Companies with financial shared centers, high digital transformation levels, and high-quality new productivity show better internal control levels, while those facing penalties, restatements, or receiving non-standard audit opinions exhibit lower internal control levels [20] Group 1: Overall Internal Control Status - The overall internal control level of listed companies has shown a steady increase from 52.47 in 2022 to 54.75 in 2024 [7] - The distribution of listed companies is concentrated in economically developed regions, with Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu having the highest number of listed companies [8] Group 2: Regional Analysis - Internal control index averages vary by region, with Yunnan (58.49), Beijing (56.25), and Hebei (56.60) showing higher scores, while Qinghai (50.42), Hainan (50.33), and Heilongjiang (51.64) are lower [8] - The internal control quality is more balanced in economically developed areas like Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangdong, indicating a mature governance structure [8] Group 3: Industry Analysis - The financial industry maintains a significantly higher internal control quality compared to other sectors, attributed to stringent government regulations [9] - Some service and public sectors have shown notable improvements in internal control levels from 2022 to 2024, while education, construction, and comprehensive industries remain at lower levels [9] Group 4: Financial Shared Services and Digital Transformation - Companies utilizing financial shared services have an internal control index average of 57.76, compared to 54.36 for non-financial shared companies, indicating a clear advantage [10] - Companies with high digital transformation levels have an internal control index average of 55.54, outperforming those with lower levels at 53.98, highlighting the positive impact of digital transformation on internal control quality [11] Group 5: ESG and New Productivity - Companies with high ESG levels have an internal control index that is 4.51 points higher than those with lower ESG levels, particularly in the internal environment dimension [13] - Companies with high new productivity levels demonstrate superior internal control quality across various dimensions compared to those with lower levels [14] Group 6: Penalties and Audit Opinions - Companies that have faced penalties have an internal control index average of 44.45, significantly lower than the 55.06 average of non-penalized companies, with the internal environment being the most affected area [15] - Companies receiving non-standard audit opinions have a notably lower internal control index, with a score of 34.76 in 2024, indicating serious deficiencies in internal control execution [18]

补贴标准 按照社会保险个人缴费额的25%给予补贴。根据个人社会保险缴费额度的不同，符合条件的重点群体每月可享受的补贴金额在115.6元~577.9元。 日前，重庆市人力社保局印发《关于加快落实扩大社会保险补贴范围和一次性扩岗补助政策有关工作的通知》，明确按照社会保险个人缴费额的25%给予补 贴，激励企业扩岗吸纳就业。 年关将至，重庆市人力社保局发出提醒，这一政策申报截止时间为2025年12月31日。也就是说，企业提交申请最迟为2025年12月31日，尚未申报重点群体社 保补贴的企业注意，别错过时间。 政策详情 补贴对象 在重点行业领域的中小微企业就业，签订1年以上劳动合同，且2025年企业按规定为其新缴纳或继续缴纳基本养老保险费、基本医疗保险费、失业保险费的 重点群体。 重点行业 包括制造业，信息传输/软件和信息技术服务业，批发和零售业，住宿和餐饮业，租赁和商务服务业，居民服务、修理和其他服务业。 重点群体 包括2025届高校毕业生，2023届和2024届离校未就业毕业生，2025年登记失业半年以上人员，以及防止返贫监测对象。 政策主动"送上门" 多措并举助力重点群体就业 为了让更多人尽快享受政策红利，重庆依 ...

制造业 PMI 小幅回升至 49.2%，非制造业商务活动指数降至 49.5%。 国际机构上调对中国 2025 年和 2026 年经济增长预期，工业转型升级 取得进展，但内需不足和收入乐观程度下降构成挑战。 政策建议包括：生产端优化提升传统产业，培育壮大新兴产业；投资端 扩大有效投资，激发民间投资活力；消费端提升居民消费能力，推进新 消费培育。短期财政政策应兜牢基层"三保"底线，规范税收优惠及财 政补贴政策。 预计 2026 年全球经济增速与 2025 年持平，中国 GDP 增长目标可设定 为 4.5%-5.0%。宏观政策将继续实施积极财政政策和适度宽松货币政 策。应重视科技创新与产业深度融合，培育科技企业家，并通过高科技 发展带动就业和民生改善。 包括：内需动能不足拖累整体生产，但外需扩张对 11 月生产端形成主要拉动 力量；冬季供暖需求推动采矿业增速提升，当月煤炭开采和洗选业同比增速为 7.5%；装备制造业占比持续提升，工业结构不断优化，其中电子、汽车行业增 速分别为 9.2%和 11.9%；高技术制造业引领工业高质量发展，规模以上高技 术制造业增加值同比增长 8.4%。 稳中求进、行稳致远的中国宏观经济 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the phenomenon of "involution" in the Chinese economy, highlighting its causes, impacts, and policy responses, emphasizing the need for structural reforms to enhance economic quality and stability [3][5][6]. Group 1: Causes and Impacts of Involution - The current "involution" is characterized by long-term negative growth in the Producer Price Index (PPI) and low capacity utilization rates in mid- and downstream industries, which squeeze corporate profits and hinder industrial upgrades [3][5]. - The deep-rooted causes of this "involution" include the differentiation of old and new economic drivers during the economic transition period and the chaotic competition among local governments pursuing GDP and fiscal revenue [5][6]. - The "involution" phenomenon has created a spiral contraction cycle of "price-income-consumption," severely restricting healthy economic development and transformation [5][6]. Group 2: Policy Responses and Recommendations - To address the "involution," policies should focus on both supply and demand sides, combining growth stabilization with reform promotion, which benefits both the present and the long term [6][11]. - Supply-side measures include production adjustment, elimination of backward production capacity, and improving product quality to restore prices and enhance competitiveness [6][11]. - Demand-side strategies should promote resident service consumption through fiscal subsidies and social security improvements to unleash consumption potential, while guiding employment from manufacturing to services [6][11]. Group 3: Evolution of Anti-Involution Policies - Since mid-2024, high-level meetings have consistently addressed the need to combat "involutionary" competition, with significant policy decisions made to regulate local government and corporate behaviors [7][8]. - The 2025 government work report outlined specific actions to establish a unified national market and comprehensively address "involutionary" competition [8][11]. - The current anti-involution policies are characterized by a higher stance, broader coverage, and stronger synergy compared to previous supply-side reforms, with a focus on both local governments and enterprises [11][12]. Group 4: Macroeconomic Context and Industry Characteristics - The macroeconomic environment is under pressure from continuously declining prices, with the PPI experiencing negative growth for 33 consecutive months, and industrial capacity utilization rates at historical lows [14][16]. - The profitability of industrial enterprises is under significant pressure, with many industries, particularly in the mid- and downstream sectors, experiencing negative profit growth [16][19]. - The "involution" is more pronounced in mid- and downstream industries, where the competition has intensified, leading to a decline in profitability and increased cost pressures [19][21]. Group 5: Structural Issues and Future Directions - The article emphasizes the need for structural reforms to break the cycle of "price-income-consumption" contraction, advocating for a shift from an investment-driven to an innovation-driven economy [20][42]. - The service sector is identified as a key area for absorbing employment and addressing structural unemployment, with significant potential for growth in service consumption [42][43]. - Policies should focus on enhancing service sector development, improving social security systems, and optimizing service industry regulations to stimulate demand and support economic transformation [37][42].