中国电信庆阳智能算力中心建设稳步推进 每日甘肃网12月22日讯 据陇东报报道（庆阳融媒记者路世玲）"中国电信庆阳智能算力中心一期基站目 前的上架率近97%，数据中心12个智能机房基本已经满载，新的数据园区也在加紧开展工程建 设……"日前，中国电信东数西算庆阳园区副主任杨志文告诉记者。 中国电信庆阳分公司是庆阳东数西算产业园区建设以来入驻最早的企业之一，从最初的土建到现在算力 建设规模达到2.3万PFlops，链接了全国近20家云上企业，见证了黄土高原上的数字生态崛起之路。 中国电信庆阳分公司积极投身"东数西算"庆阳节点建设，共建设两个园区。其中，云创园区占地14亩， 建设数据机楼一栋，可安装15兆瓦的机架6500个，目前，机架上架率99%以上。 另外一个园区规划用地500亩，一期征地174亩，规划建设11栋单体建筑。"目前正在进行园区的1期建 设，包括一个移动数据中心、一座110千伏变电站、一个生产调度中心及一个油机平台。"杨志文介绍， 该工程采用业界通用标准即"24模型"，旨在降低机架密度。具体而言，就是在2.34万平方米建筑面积基 础上，建设4层楼，其中1层是基础设施层，2、3、4层是智算设备机房，规划的 ...

日常生活中，个别用户感知到的网速下降，在技术问题、环境问题、建筑物等多重作用下，并不一定意 味着运营商会主动使宽带"缩水"。然而，对于罗永浩这样的科技行业从业者，硬件问题基本可以排除， 问题更可能出在网络服务端，这就不难解释罗永浩"愤怒"的理由了。 近年来，随着"千兆宽带"的普及，罗永浩痛批电信宽带"缩水"问题再次成为公众关注的焦点。 12月18日，罗永浩在朋友圈公开吐槽上海电信网速问题。罗永浩表示，其搬至上海后开通电信独享千兆 宽带服务，然而自办理以来的半年多时间里，宽带实际速率绝大多数时候仅有不到一百兆。 罗永浩说："每次找来客服，不管是官方的还是非官方的，还是疑似在官方吃里扒外的，都是管用三五 天，然后又回到九十多兆。"罗永浩吐槽"千兆宽带缩水"问题，迅速在网上引发了广泛讨论。让人不禁 思考：运营商在"宽带缩水"问题上是否真的没有动机？ 随着事件在网络上的发酵，许多上海电信用户也纷纷在网上评论区留言，反映自己也遇到了宽带实际速 率远未达标的情况。黑猫投诉平台上，就有上海电信用户反映，签约的100M上行宽带被限制至5M，严 重影响使用。 一位用户反映，在抖音商城中国电信（601728）上海旗舰店下单的20 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implementation of "Smart Nanjing" by Nanjing Telecom, which aims to enhance urban safety through a digital transformation that integrates AI monitoring systems for proactive safety measures and efficient governance [1][3]. Group 1: Smart Safety Systems - "Smart Nanjing" acts as a "safety nervous system" for the city, connecting various safety needs and transitioning from passive responses to proactive prevention [1][3]. - The collaboration between the "Big Sky Net" and "Small Sky Net" creates a comprehensive safety network that covers urban and rural areas, addressing safety issues such as frequent electric bike thefts and helmet usage among rural residents [1][4]. Group 2: AI Monitoring and Data Integration - The launch of "Small Sky Net" in October 2025 has significantly reduced electric bike thefts through AI monitoring and voice reminders, enhancing residents' awareness of traffic safety [3][5]. - The integration of AI technology into traditional monitoring systems allows for real-time alerts and a shift from human patrols to data-driven governance, improving efficiency and response times [5][7]. Group 3: Community Engagement and Feedback - The system enables residents to report safety hazards via mobile phones, creating a feedback loop for prompt action and resolution of issues, thus enhancing community safety [10][12]. - The initiative promotes a collaborative approach to safety governance, transforming it from a police-centric model to a community-involved effort, thereby fostering a sense of shared responsibility [12]. Group 4: Future Prospects - The digital safety network is expected to evolve, incorporating more public service functions and becoming a foundational element for urban governance, emphasizing the importance of safety in enhancing quality of life [12].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the dissatisfaction of users, including a notable figure, with the actual internet speeds provided by telecom companies, particularly Shanghai Telecom's claimed "gigabit" broadband service, which often delivers significantly lower speeds than advertised [1][2][8]. Group 1: User Complaints - Users have reported that despite subscribing to "gigabit" broadband, their actual speeds are often below 100 Mbps, leading to frustration and calls for better service [1][2]. - A consumer expressed that many users feel similarly, indicating a widespread issue with the actual performance of high-speed broadband services [1]. - Complaints highlight that even with high-tier plans, users experience speeds that do not meet expectations, with some reporting speeds as low as 300 Mbps on a 2000 Mbps plan [1]. Group 2: Industry Insights - Experts note that the discrepancy between advertised and actual speeds is common, attributing it to the difference between theoretical maximum speeds and real-world performance [2][5]. - Factors affecting broadband speeds include network congestion, the quality of the user's equipment, and the routing of data through various networks, which can limit speed [5][6]. - The concept of "gigabit broadband" is seen as potentially misleading, as it may not clearly communicate the conditions under which such speeds can be achieved [8]. Group 3: Regulatory and Legal Considerations - Legal experts suggest that if telecom providers fail to deliver the promised speeds, they may be violating consumer protection laws and contractual obligations [8][9]. - The article mentions that if users consistently receive speeds significantly lower than what they paid for, it could be considered a breach of contract, allowing for potential claims for damages [8][9]. - There are concerns that if telecom companies intentionally limit speeds while advertising "gigabit" services, they may be engaging in misleading marketing practices [8][9].

Core Viewpoint - The article compares AT&T and Verizon Communications as high-yield dividend stocks, highlighting that while both are value stocks with solid dividends, Verizon is positioned as the better long-term investment due to its growth potential and stability [1]. Company Performance - AT&T's stock has increased by nearly 7% year-to-date as of December 17, 2025, while Verizon's stock has only risen by 2.23% in the same period [4]. - Over the past five years, AT&T's stock has appreciated by almost 9%, contrasting with Verizon's decline of more than 31% [4]. Financial Metrics - Verizon's current market capitalization is $168 billion, with a dividend yield of 6.84% and a gross margin of 46.08% [5][6]. - AT&T's market capitalization stands at $171 billion, with a dividend yield of 4.60% and a gross margin of 42.70% [7][6]. Dividend Stability - Verizon has a more reliable dividend, currently at $0.69 per quarter, and has increased its dividend for 19 consecutive years [6]. - In contrast, AT&T cut its dividend in 2022 and has not raised it since [6]. Competitive Position - Verizon is recognized for its superior balance sheet and higher revenue, along with being a leader in 5G network reliability [6][8]. - Verizon's focus on subscriber growth and fewer distractions positions it favorably against intense competition [9].

更气人的是另一种"耍流氓"：告诉你流量随便用，不限量，但速度给你卡得死死的，于是，看个标清视 频都要经历漫长的缓冲。这种商业模式，本质上是一种精心计算的体验克扣，它没有违反字面承诺，却 彻底扭曲了服务的实质。 总结起来，上海电信的回应，大概是这么个意思："我们保证送到你家门口的光猫是千兆的，至于你手 机为啥慢，那可能是你家墙太厚、路由器太老或者你平板电脑自己不行……"说起来，这也并非某一家 运营商特有的做法，而近乎是一种行业惯例——千兆宽带指的是从消费者家里光猫到运营商接入点之间 的速率。只要这段"最后一公里"的理论速率达标，运营商的义务就算履行完毕。 这话听着，是不是觉得跟买房子挺像。开发商说："我们这房子建筑面积136平方米！"等拿到手你才发 现，里头楼梯、电梯、管道井全算进去了，你能真正摆家具睡觉的，可能就100平方米。合着这网速， 也玩"公摊面积"这一套？ 近日，知名博主罗永浩吐槽网速一事引发热议。他在朋友圈称，自己搬到上海开了电信的独享千兆宽带 半年多来，绝大多数时候只有不到一百兆的网速。每次找来客服，不管是官方的还是非官方的，都是管 用三五天，然后又回到九十多兆。无可奈何之下，罗永浩通过朋友圈表示 ...

Core Viewpoint - Despite years of promoting "speed increase and fee reduction" in mobile communication, consumers still face obstacles in obtaining satisfactory plans, including rising prices, unilateral cancellation of low-cost plans, and confusing binding sales terms [1] Group 1: Consumer Experience - Consumers find it easy to sign up for new plans but face significant challenges when trying to switch to more affordable options, often encountering penalties for early termination [2][3] - Many consumers are unaware of the binding contracts they sign, which often include hidden fees and long-term commitments that complicate their ability to change plans [4][5] Group 2: Sales Tactics - Telecom operators employ tactics such as "contract bundling" to retain high-paying customers, often misleading consumers about the true nature of promotional offers [5][6] - There are reports of deceptive practices targeting vulnerable groups, such as the elderly, where sales representatives emphasize free devices while downplaying the associated high-cost plans and long-term contracts [5][6] Group 3: Regulatory Environment - The Consumer Rights Protection Law and telecommunications regulations affirm consumers' rights to choose services freely, yet operators often prioritize high-value plans for existing customers over new user incentives [6][7] - Experts suggest that regulatory bodies should enhance oversight and create more detailed guidelines to curb misleading sales practices and ensure consumer rights are upheld [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article criticizes telecom operators for making it easy to upgrade but difficult to downgrade mobile plans, highlighting issues such as "hidden traps" in contracts and the preferential treatment of new users over existing ones [1][4][17]. Group 1: User Experience Issues - Users find it straightforward to upgrade their plans through proactive marketing from operators, but face significant hurdles when attempting to downgrade, often being redirected to physical stores or encountering unhelpful customer service [3][5][6]. - Existing users often feel disadvantaged as attractive low-cost plans are typically available only to new customers, leading to frustration and abandonment of attempts to switch [4][5][7]. Group 2: Contractual Tactics - Operators frequently use "contract bundling" as a strategy to retain high-paying customers, offering incentives like free phones while binding users to expensive plans through long-term contracts [8]. - Users may face obstacles when trying to switch back to lower-cost plans, as operators cite contract obligations or claim that the desired plans are no longer available [9][18]. Group 3: Misleading Advertising - There are numerous complaints regarding misleading advertisements for low-cost plans, where promised data allowances are often significantly lower than advertised, and many come with hidden fees or conditions [10][12][13]. - Users report discrepancies between the plans they sign up for and what they actually receive, including unexpected charges and limitations on data usage [15]. Group 4: Regulatory and Consumer Response - Despite repeated criticisms from media and regulatory bodies, the issue of difficult downgrades persists, largely due to operators' focus on maintaining revenue in a stagnant user growth environment [17][18]. - Legal experts suggest that regulatory bodies should conduct special investigations into common complaints, and consumers should be vigilant about promotional language in telecom offers [18].

投资小红书-第264期 日斗投资董事长王文用了5年多的时间，将公司打造为资金管理规模300多亿元的私募公司。但他并没 有停下奔跑的脚步，仍然不懈怠地寻求更好的潜在投资机会。 "吃着碗里的，看着锅里的，还看着别人锅里的。"这是王文与他人最大的区别。他努力奔跑，怕自己 的"所知障"会让自己留在旧时代里；他也努力修行，让自己的投资原则不会脱离价值投资的基本层面。 他说，"佛教讲的'所知障'，就是你知道的东西会形成障碍，你能想到吗，王府井和西单的商场里会人流稀 少，我们在北京念书时，这是不可能的事。投资最怕的是离开事实讲修行，时代变化太快了，投资不能陷 入自我意识的牢笼里。" 王文认为，'所知障'也可以形成了最佳的买点，那就是在一个行业被投资者长期抛弃之后，利空已基本消 化，但市场对这些行业仍然充满偏见，无论它的业绩发生了怎样的变化，也不能打动普通投资者，投资的 买点恰恰发生在业绩发生后，情绪翻转前。 煤炭在2011年左右达到上一轮顶峰后，在接近10年的时间里都在下跌盘整，普通投资者对煤炭股完全提 不起兴趣。煤炭行业头部公司的利润在2016年悄然上涨，然而市场行情直到2019年前都没有太大表现。 随着利润逐渐上涨，煤 ...

办卡关注 微 信 公 众 号 ：找卡乐园 这里是专为你打造的流量卡服务站，既能帮你揭开流量卡市场的各类真相，避开隐藏套路，也是你挑选、办理优 质正规流量卡的一站式平台。跟着我们一起，做出更明智的选卡决策，轻松享受稳定、无忧的网络使用体验！ 特别温馨提醒：在选择流量卡之前，请务必仔细查看套餐的详细说明，尤其是年龄限制、地区覆盖范围等关键条 件，避免因不符合要求导致开卡失败，耽误你的使用哦～ 广电卡19元套餐深度测评：流量自由还是营销套路？ 『广电卡19元套餐深度测评：流量自由还是营销套路？』 当你看到"广电卡"、"19元套餐"和"流量自由"这几个词组合在一起，心里是不是立刻拉响了警报？一边是"这价 格，这流量，真能实现自由？"的狂喜，另一边是"新运营商，这么便宜，该不会又是套路吧？"的深深怀疑。作为 一名实际使用过广电套餐，也见证了身边人从"真香"到"翻车"全过程的用户，我想和你进行一次最坦诚的交流。 今天，我们不谈任何办理链接，就以一个"踩过坑也尝过甜头"的过来人视角，把这张卡从华丽的广告词里拽出 广电的"19元套餐"所宣称的"流量自由"，其本质是一种 "在有限通用流量基础上，叠加了海量定向免流资源"的特 定 ...