2025.10. 21 本文字数：2360，阅读时长大约4分钟 作者 | 第一财经 高雅 今年以来，美国特朗普政府对高等教育领域发起了一场多层面的攻势，然而这一系列努力在近期遭遇 了显著挫折。 本月初，白宫向包括麻省理工学院、达特茅斯学院以及布朗大学在内的9所高校发出了一份《高等教 育学术卓越契约》，主要内容为"以联邦资金换取政策一致性"，并要求其在10月20日前回应。 截至该日，在最初受邀的9所院校中，已有7所明确拒绝了白宫的提案。范德堡大学虽未直接表态是 否支持该计划，但校方暗示对其中部分内容持保留态度。唯有得克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校表示可能较快 签署支持。 从内容上看，该协议形同一场"交易"：签署院校将有机会在联邦科研经费分配中获得优先待遇，但 作为交换，特朗普政府将在招生政策、学费设定、教师聘任乃至校园言论规范等多个关键领域获得更 大的控制权。 美国对外关系委员会高级研究员、美国西东大学外交与国际关系学院教授黄严忠告诉第一财经记者， 本届美国政府针对高校的一些措施影响已经开始显现。 "例如，本届政府对美国国立卫生研究院（NIH）等机构资助的急剧削减，已经严重影响了大学的常 规科研预算。这种压力正在迅速转化 ...

周国治先生毕生献身于冶金材料物理化学领域的科学研究与教育教学事业，主要学术贡献包括多元熔体 和合金的物理化学性质计算、氧离子迁移理论和应用、材料在微小颗粒下的物理化学行为研究，科研成 果被国内外专家学者以"周模型"和"周方法"广泛应用于合金、熔盐、炉渣、半导体材料等多种体系，先 后发表学术论文900余篇，授权70余项国内外专利，获国家自然科学奖三等奖1项、国家教育委员会科学 技术进步奖一等奖1项、冶金工业部科学技术进步奖一等奖1项、国家教育委员会科学技术进步奖二等奖 2项、上海市技术发明奖一等奖1项，获国家级教学成果奖二等奖1项、北京市教育教学成果奖等奖1项， 培养了一批活跃在冶金基础理论研究和高校教育领域的杰出人才，为高等教育事业和冶金学科建设发展 做出了卓越贡献。2017年获魏寿昆冶金奖（金奖），同年被日本铁钢协会授予名誉会员。 讣告称，周国治先生严谨治学，平易近人，甘为人梯，具有崇高的科学精神和人格魅力，深受学界敬 仰。他的逝世是冶金学界、教育界和北京科技大学的重大损失。 北京科技大学官网已变黑白 据介绍，周国治先生，生于1937年3月，广东潮阳人，1960年7月毕业于北京钢铁学院（现北京科技大 学）， ...

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of Harbin Engineering University (HEU) in 1953 during the Korean War reflects a strong commitment to national defense and technological advancement, with a legacy of innovation and dedication to serving the country [1][9]. Group 1: Historical Context - HEU was founded amidst the Korean War, symbolizing a commitment to military and national development [1]. - The university has maintained a tradition of using military bugle calls as class bells for over 70 years, emphasizing its military roots [3]. Group 2: Contributions and Achievements - HEU has achieved significant milestones, including the development of China's first wind tunnel group, the first amphibious tank, and the first shipborne electronic computer [9]. - The university's research has directly contributed to national defense projects, such as the "Jiaolong" manned submersible's positioning system [13]. Group 3: Educational Philosophy and Spirit - The ethos of HEU is encapsulated in the belief of serving the nation, with a focus on addressing national strategic needs [15]. - Students and faculty are encouraged to embody the spirit of perseverance and dedication, with a strong emphasis on connecting personal aspirations with national goals [20].

Core Points - The Trump administration's proposal for a "Higher Education Academic Excellence Pact" has faced significant rejection from top universities, with seven out of nine invited institutions declining to participate [1][4][5] - The agreement aims to exchange federal funding for greater control over university policies, including admissions and faculty hiring [2][3] Group 1: Proposal Details - The pact offers priority access to federal research funding for universities that align with the Trump administration's policies, while granting the government increased control over various academic areas [2][3] - Key conditions of the agreement include eliminating gender and racial factors in admissions, assessing faculty diversity, and implementing a five-year tuition freeze [3] Group 2: University Responses - MIT was the first to publicly reject the proposal, stating that it contradicts their core belief that research funding should be based solely on academic merit [4] - Following MIT, other universities such as Brown, Penn, and USC also issued statements declining the proposal [4][5] - Arizona University became the seventh institution to refuse the pact, emphasizing the importance of academic freedom and independent research funding [4] Group 3: Government's Misjudgment - The Trump administration previously exerted pressure on universities by freezing federal research grants, leading some institutions to reach temporary agreements [5] - The recent collective rejection of the new proposal indicates a miscalculation by the White House regarding its influence over academic institutions [5][6] Group 4: State-Level Reactions - California's Governor Newsom warned that any state university signing the pact would face immediate funding cuts, labeling the agreement as radical [6]

Core Insights - The article highlights the competitive landscape of international undergraduate colleges in 2025, emphasizing the integration of global education and the importance of cross-cultural teaching models [1] Rankings Overview - The Shanghai University Sydney Institute tops the 2025 rankings, recognized for its long-standing quality standards in Sino-foreign cooperative education, achieving AACSB re-accreditation for six years [2][3] - Beijing Normal University - Hong Kong Baptist University United International College ranks second, noted for its interdisciplinary approach and strong media programs [4] - Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University ranks third, with a focus on flexible training models and high international faculty ratios [6] - The University of Nottingham Ningbo China ranks fourth, demonstrating strong student recruitment and high employment rates in tech companies [7] - The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen ranks fifth, leveraging its location in a tech hub to enhance its finance and data science programs [8] - Shanghai New York University ranks sixth, with a diverse international student body and a strong emphasis on interdisciplinary studies [9] - Duke Kunshan University ranks seventh, recognized for its small class sizes and strong employment rates in public service [10] - Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Guangzhou ranks eighth, focusing on innovation and partnerships with tech companies [11] - Guangdong Technion-Israel Institute of Technology ranks ninth, specializing in engineering and high employment rates in advanced manufacturing [12][13] - Wenzhou-Kean University ranks tenth, showcasing a practical-oriented education model with strong ties to local businesses [14] Key Observations - The rankings indicate a dominant presence of Sino-foreign cooperative institutions, highlighting the integration of local foundations with international resources [15] - The success of Shanghai University Sydney Institute reflects a shift from merely importing educational models to establishing benchmarks in global education [15] - Future trends suggest that international undergraduate colleges will play a crucial role in cultivating globally competent talent, particularly in fields like sustainable development and artificial intelligence [15]

此外，在中国顶尖学科数量上，北京高校有120个学科上榜，其中冠军学科有47个。北京拥有中国一流 学科276个，无论是学科整体情况还是优势学科情况，北京高校均展现了不凡的实力。 近年来，北京持续优化学科专业，坚持前瞻布局，优先新增国家发展重点领域、空白领域和急需领域的 一些学科和专业学位类别，大力发展基础学科、新兴学科、交叉学科，以首善标准持续打造教育强市， 教育、科技、人才协同发展格局加快构建。 据悉，排名采用国务院学位委员会、教育部颁布的《研究生教育学科专业目录（2022年）》的学科口 径。今年新增了水土保持与荒漠化防治学、法医学、智能科学与技术、区域国别学4个一级学科的排 名，首次发布了艺术学门类下音乐、舞蹈、戏剧与影视、戏曲与曲艺、美术与书法5个专业学位类别的 排名。 在597个上榜学科中，清华大学上榜学科数达58个，包括57个一级学科和1个专业学位类别；其次是北京 大学上榜学科52个，包括51个一级学科和1个专业学位类别；上榜学科数超过20的学校还有北京师范大 学（36个）、北京理工大学（31个）北京航空航天大学（30个）、中国人民大学（30个）、北京工业大 学（29个）、北京交通大学（24个）、中国 ...

Core Points - The conference focused on the high-quality development of innovation and entrepreneurship education in higher education under the context of building a strong educational nation [1][2] - The new leadership aims to enhance the capacity to serve the construction of a strong educational nation through academic focus and talent cultivation [1][2] - The event included nine academic exchange activities covering various topics related to innovation and entrepreneurship education [3] Group 1 - The conference gathered over 600 representatives from universities to discuss the mission of innovation and entrepreneurship education in the context of national educational goals [1] - The president of the China Higher Education Association emphasized the importance of integrating moral education and industry-education collaboration in higher education [1] - The Shanghai Municipal Education Commission highlighted the city's commitment to innovation and entrepreneurship education as a key support for national strategies [2] Group 2 - The Shanghai Lingang Economic Development Group is working on creating a comprehensive ecosystem for original innovation and entrepreneurship, collaborating with universities [2] - The newly elected chairman of the innovation and entrepreneurship education association plans to enhance member services and international cooperation [2] - The conference featured discussions on various aspects of innovation and entrepreneurship education, including curriculum development and social entrepreneurship [3]

周国治先生,生于1937年3月,广东潮阳人,1960年7月毕业于北京钢铁学院(现 北京科技大学),并提前留校在理化系任教,1978年破格晋升为副教授、1979年赴美国麻 省理工学院进修,1982年学成回国,1984年破格晋升为教授、博士生导师,并获首批"国 家有突出贡献中青年专家"称号,1995年当选为中国科学院院士,享受国务院政府津贴, 2003 年担任第十届全国政协委员。曾在美国麻省理工学院、波士顿大学等多所海外大学 任客座教授,现为北京科技大学教授,上海大学、上海交通大学、安徽工业大学、重庆大 学、武汉科技大学等多所大学兼职教授、同时兼任中国金属学会理事、国际矿业冶金杂志 编委。 新京报讯10月21日，北京科技大学发布讣告：著名冶金材料物理化学家、教育家，中国科学院院士，北京科技大 学教授周国治先生因病医治无效，于北京时间2025年10月20日13时在美国波士顿逝世，享年88岁。 斗 告 著名冶金材料物理化学家、教育家、中国科学院院士,北京科技大学教授周国治先生, 因病医治无效,于北京时间 2025 年 10 月 20 日 13 时在美国波士顿逝世,享年 88 岁。 周国治先生毕生献身于冶金材料物理化学 ...

亚利桑那大学校长苏雷什·加里梅拉在学校官网发表的一封公开信中写道，校方认为该校的一些基础原 则必须保留，因此没有同意协议草案中概述的条款。 特朗普政府10月1日晚致函美国9所大学，要求校方研究签署一项包含特定条款的协议以获得优先使用联 邦资金的机会。这些条款包含：要求大学在招聘员工和录取学生时不得考虑种族、性别等因素；将国际 本科生入学率限制在不超过15%；要求申请学生参加美国大学入学考试（SAT）或类似学术能力考试 等。 据美媒报道，20日是特朗普政府要求这9所大学对协议作出反馈的截止日期。此前，麻省理工学院、布 朗大学、南加州大学、宾夕法尼亚大学、弗吉尼亚大学和达特茅斯学院已明确表示拒绝签署该协议。 特朗普此前曾在社交媒体上发文暗示，不排除进一步扩大该协议所适用的高校范围，"那些想要迅速回 归追求真理和成就的大学，我们邀请它们与联邦政府达成一项前瞻性协议"。 新华社华盛顿10月20日电（记者杨伶 熊茂伶）美国亚利桑那大学20日表示，不同意特朗普政府此前要 求部分大学签署的包含特定条款的协议。该大学成为首批9所大学中第7所明确拒绝签署该协议的大学。 范德堡大学校长丹尼尔·迪迈尔20日在发给学生和教职员工的公 ...

Core Insights - The 23rd China MBA Development Forum, hosted by Xi'an University of Electronic Science and Technology, focuses on the theme "Insight into the Future: AI Reshaping MBA Innovation Development and Industry-Education Integration" to explore the transformation of MBA education in the AI era and propose new paths for high-quality development in Chinese MBA education [1][6][15] Group 1: Forum Opening and Key Participants - The forum's opening ceremony featured notable attendees including academicians, university leaders, and industry experts, emphasizing the importance of collaboration between academia and industry [3][4][6] - Keynote speeches were delivered by leaders from various institutions, highlighting the integration of technology and management in MBA education [3][6][8] Group 2: Educational Innovation and AI Integration - The forum discussed the impact of AI on productivity and the restructuring of corporate logic, presenting both challenges and opportunities for MBA education [7][10] - Six academic reports were presented, addressing the integration of AI in MBA education and its implications for value reconstruction and industry practices [7][8][9] Group 3: Sub-Forums and Discussions - Four parallel sub-forums were held, focusing on topics such as AI-enabled MBA education, regional economic development, and industry-education integration, fostering in-depth discussions among experts and practitioners [10][11][13] - The discussions aimed to provide new insights and strategies for adapting MBA education to the demands of the digital economy [10][11] Group 4: Awards and Recognition - An awards ceremony recognized outstanding contributions in MBA education, innovation, and industry practice, reinforcing the importance of excellence in the field [14][15] - The forum has evolved into a significant annual event in the MBA education sector, contributing to the innovation and development of MBA programs across China [14][15]