英国路透社9日报道称，特朗普政府本周早些时候以UCLA支持"反犹主义"等理由，冻结了该校5.84亿美 元的联邦科研资金。特朗普政府随后提出和解要求，即UCLA支付10亿美元以换取资金解冻。 据美国"政客新闻网"报道，纽森8日在新闻发布会上斥责特朗普"通过敲诈勒索威胁我们，除非我们服从 他的命令"。身为加州大学董事会成员的纽森表示，"我们不会成为对这个非凡公共机构学术自由攻击的 共犯，我们与那些选择另一条道路的机构不同"，他誓言将"坚决反击"，提起诉讼。当天，纽森身后还 站着数位来自得克萨斯州的民主党议员，他们因抗议该州重新划分选区一事而出逃加州，寻求支持。 【文/观察者网 王一】在关税、移民、大学政策、联邦拨款等多个事件上多次"硬刚"特朗普政府的加州 州长纽森，最近又因其向加州大学洛杉矶分校（UCLA）索要10亿美元和解金，又与特朗普添一起"世 仇"。加州州长办公室当地时间8月9日在社交媒体发帖痛斥特朗普此举为"令人作呕的政治勒索"，加州 不会向其低头。 "唐纳德·特朗普利用司法部作为武器，削弱美国排名第一的公立大学系统——冻结医学和科学资金，直 到UCLA支付他10亿美元的赎金。"贴文强调，"加州不会向特朗 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the impact of the Trump administration's actions on the academic community in the U.S., leading to a significant number of scholars seeking refuge in European institutions, particularly in France [1][3]. - Nearly 300 scholars have applied for the "scientific refuge" program initiated by Aix-Marseille University, which aims to support researchers affected by the U.S. academic environment [3][4]. - The program promises funding for about 20 scholars over three years, highlighting the growing concern over academic freedom and the state of higher education in the U.S. [3][4]. Group 2 - Scholars, including historian Sandberg, express deep concerns about the increasing restrictions on academic research, including funding applications that prohibit certain terms like "diversity" and "women" [4]. - The article notes that many top talents are leaving the U.S. for countries like China and Canada, indicating a shift in the global academic landscape [4]. - Aix-Marseille University has received over 500 inquiries from scholars at prestigious institutions such as Johns Hopkins University, NASA, Columbia University, Yale University, and Stanford University [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration aims to use its agreement with Harvard University as a "blueprint" for reforming other higher education institutions, while Harvard remains firm in its stance against compromise [1][2]. Group 1: Government Actions and Legal Proceedings - Harvard University has filed two lawsuits against the Trump administration to prevent punitive actions, including the freezing of federal funds and blocking international students from attending [2]. - A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction to stop the Trump administration from restricting Harvard's ability to accept international students, extending a temporary order previously issued [4][6]. - The Trump administration announced the cancellation of Harvard's eligibility for the Student and Exchange Visitor Program, which prohibits the university from enrolling international students [6]. Group 2: Support from Alumni - Over 12,000 Harvard alumni signed a legal statement supporting the university's challenge against the Trump administration's decision to suspend over $2.2 billion in federal funding [8]. - The alumni's statement expresses shock at the government's attempts to control Harvard and other higher education institutions without due process or legal basis [8].

Core Viewpoint - Harvard University has won a preliminary injunction allowing it to continue accepting international students during the ongoing legal proceedings against the Trump administration's actions to block such admissions [1][3]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Federal Judge Allison Burroughs issued a preliminary injunction halting the Trump administration's efforts to prevent Harvard from accepting international students, allowing the university to maintain its admissions during the case [1][3]. - Harvard filed a lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security after it revoked the university's certification to accept foreign students and process their visa applications, which affected approximately 7,000 international students [3][4]. - The judge noted that the federal government retains the right to review Harvard's eligibility to accept international students through normal legal procedures [3][4]. Group 2: Government Actions and Responses - The Trump administration attempted to block foreign students from entering the U.S. to study at Harvard through a new announcement, which Harvard challenged in court [4][6]. - Harvard's legal team argued that the Trump administration's policies violated the university's rights to due process and academic freedom, as well as the Administrative Procedure Act [6][7]. - The university expressed that the government's actions created an atmosphere of "profound fear, anxiety, and confusion" among international students [6][7]. Group 3: Future Implications - Harvard anticipates a more binding ruling from the judge in the coming days, while continuing to develop contingency plans for international students [4][5]. - If the Trump administration persists with its actions, the case may escalate to the Supreme Court, where Harvard is expected to have a strong chance of success based on constitutional grounds [7]. - Harvard is also pursuing a separate lawsuit regarding the suspension of federal funding by the Trump administration, with the first hearing scheduled for July 21 [7].

Core Viewpoint - Harvard University has modified its existing lawsuit against the Trump administration's ban on recruiting international students, requesting the court to immediately rule to stop the enforcement of the announcement [1][2] Group 1: Legal Actions - Harvard University has filed a modified court document to block the Trump administration's announcement that imposes visa restrictions on international students [1] - The lawsuit argues that the announcement is unconstitutional and infringes on academic freedom, stating that international students contribute significantly to Harvard and the U.S. [1] - A federal judge in Massachusetts approved Harvard's request to halt the Trump administration's policy that cancels the university's eligibility to recruit foreign students [2] Group 2: Government Actions - The Trump administration has taken multiple actions against Harvard, including freezing billions of dollars in funding and threatening to revoke its tax-exempt status [2] - The administration's announcement on visa restrictions is framed as a measure to "protect national security," but Harvard contends it is an escalation of government retaliation [1]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government's recent ban on Harvard University from enrolling international students has sparked significant controversy, with implications for the university's reputation and the broader academic landscape in the U.S. [1][2] Group 1: Government Actions and Legal Responses - The U.S. Department of Homeland Security revoked Harvard's SEVP certification, prohibiting the university from enrolling international students, effective from the 2025-2026 academic year [1] - Harvard University has filed a lawsuit against the federal government, claiming the decision infringes on constitutional rights and federal laws [2] - A federal judge has temporarily extended a ban on the government's policy, allowing Harvard to continue accepting international students with valid visas [2] Group 2: Impact on International Students - International students make up over 27% of Harvard's total student body, with approximately 20% of them being from China [3] - Harvard currently hosts nearly 6,800 international students from over 140 countries, primarily in graduate programs [3] Group 3: Broader Implications for U.S. Higher Education - The U.S. government's actions are part of a broader trend of threatening funding to universities that do not comply with certain policies, leading to significant cuts in federal funding for institutions like Columbia University [3] - The Trump administration's policies have reportedly diminished the attractiveness of U.S. higher education, with a 40% year-over-year decline in searches for U.S. doctoral programs from European students [5] - Other global universities are actively reaching out to Harvard students affected by the ban, with around 100 French universities considering measures to assist them [6] Group 4: Academic Freedom and Research Funding - The government's intervention in university admissions is seen as politicizing education and undermining academic freedom, which could damage the U.S.'s reputation as a global academic center [6] - Proposed budget cuts for the 2026 fiscal year threaten significant reductions in research funding, including a 37% cut to the National Institutes of Health and over 50% to the National Science Foundation [6]

Core Viewpoint - The policies of the Trump administration have led to a significant decline in the U.S. scientific community, characterized by research stagnation and talent outflow, threatening the country's long-standing leadership in global scientific innovation [1][2][4]. Group 1: Impact on Research Institutions - The Trump administration has taken aggressive actions against top universities, including freezing billions in funding and threatening tax-exempt status, which has resulted in the halt of critical health-related research [2][3]. - Federal research institutions have seen substantial staff reductions, with thousands of positions cut from agencies such as the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [2][3]. - The proposed budget for fiscal year 2026 includes drastic cuts to research funding, with a 37% reduction for the National Institutes of Health and over 50% for the National Science Foundation, alongside significant cuts to climate and ecological research [2][3]. Group 2: Long-term Consequences - The systematic impact of the Trump administration's policies on U.S. scientific innovation is expected to take decades to repair, as rebuilding trust in academic freedom and international collaboration is crucial [3][4]. - The reduction in research funding and withdrawal from international climate research collaborations are likely to hinder global scientific cooperation, particularly in public health and environmental research [3][4]. - The prioritization of "utility science" that directly translates to economic and geopolitical advantages has led to a neglect of basic research, which is now facing scrutiny and funding cuts [3][4]. Group 3: Global Research Landscape - The U.S. is experiencing a shift towards a more decentralized global research landscape, as other countries increase investments to attract talent, with a reported 32% rise in overseas job applications from U.S. researchers [4][5]. - Initiatives in Europe and Australia aim to draw top research talent away from the U.S., indicating a potential reconfiguration of the global scientific community [4][5]. - This trend may lead to multiple regional centers of research excellence, fostering new opportunities for collaboration across different fields [5].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing conflict between Harvard University and the Trump administration over the recruitment of international students has raised significant concerns about academic freedom and the future of international education in the U.S. [1][3][4] Group 1: Impact on Harvard University - The Trump administration's decision to revoke Harvard's eligibility to enroll international students has created a crisis for thousands of students, forcing them to consider transferring or facing loss of legal status [2][4] - Harvard University has responded by filing a lawsuit against the Trump administration, claiming that the actions taken are illegal and lack necessary procedures [4][6] - The university's international student population, approximately 6,800, constitutes about 27% of the total student body, highlighting the critical role these students play in the institution's financial structure [7] Group 2: Broader Implications for U.S. Education - The Trump administration's actions are not isolated to Harvard; they reflect a growing trend affecting multiple U.S. educational institutions, leading to a chilling effect on academic freedom [3][15] - The economic contribution of international students to the U.S. is substantial, with last year's international student population generating approximately $43 billion in revenue [8] - Concerns are rising about the potential decline in international student enrollment, which could have long-term negative effects on U.S. higher education and research funding [8][10] Group 3: Global Response and Talent Migration - The political climate in the U.S. is prompting many international students, particularly from China, to reconsider their future in American academia, with some opting for opportunities in Europe or returning to their home countries [12][14] - Several universities in Hong Kong and Europe are actively recruiting students affected by U.S. policies, indicating a shift in the global academic landscape [13][14] - The potential loss of top talent from the U.S. could reshape the future of higher education, as institutions abroad seek to attract those disillusioned by the current U.S. educational environment [11][15]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a legal battle between Harvard University and the Trump administration regarding the revocation of Harvard's international student enrollment status, highlighting the implications for academic freedom and government overreach in educational policies [1][2][8]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - A federal judge in Massachusetts, Allison Burroughs, indicated that a preliminary injunction will be issued to prevent the Trump administration from revoking Harvard's international student enrollment status [1]. - The Trump administration had previously notified Harvard that its "Student and Exchange Visitor Program" (SEVP) certification would be revoked, requiring international students to leave within 72 hours [2]. - The judge emphasized the need to maintain the status quo to protect Harvard and its international students until the administrative process is completed [3]. Group 2: Government Actions and Implications - The government altered its stance before the hearing, allowing Harvard 30 days to contest the revocation, but the judge deemed it necessary to protect the university's rights [3]. - If Harvard can provide evidence that the government's actions were motivated by dissatisfaction with its liberal stance, the court may rule that the government's actions violate constitutional rights, including the First Amendment (freedom of speech and academic freedom) and the Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection) [5][21]. Group 3: Broader Context - The conflict represents a broader clash between liberal universities, exemplified by Harvard, and a conservative government, with Harvard symbolizing elite education and liberal values [9][10]. - The Trump administration's policies targeting higher education institutions aim to weaken the structural advantages of liberal universities in the U.S. discourse and knowledge systems [13][14]. - Harvard's financial dependence on federal funding for research and student loans complicates its autonomy, as federal funding constitutes approximately 11% of its total operating revenue [18][19]. Group 4: Future Legal Landscape - Harvard is also challenging the Trump administration's decision to freeze approximately $3 billion in federal research funding, with a hearing scheduled for July 2025 [17]. - The case is expected to progress through the U.S. federal court system, potentially reaching the First Circuit Court of Appeals, which is known for its liberal leanings [28][29]. - The outcome of this legal battle may have significant implications for the relationship between academic institutions and government policies, particularly regarding academic freedom and institutional autonomy [8][30].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating conflict between the Trump administration and Harvard University, focusing on the implications for international students and the broader academic landscape in the U.S. [2][15] Group 1: Trump's Actions Against Harvard - The Trump administration has initiated a series of actions against Harvard, including freezing over $2.2 billion in federal funding and threatening to revoke the university's tax-exempt status [6][7]. - On May 22, the Trump administration announced the cancellation of Harvard's eligibility for the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SVEP), effectively banning the university from enrolling international students [7][15]. - Harvard has responded by filing a lawsuit against the Trump administration, claiming that the government's actions violate the First Amendment and other federal laws, and have a "direct and devastating impact" on over 7,000 visa holders [7][8]. Group 2: Legal Implications and Harvard's Position - Legal experts suggest that Harvard has a strong chance of winning the case, as the Trump administration's actions may conflict with constitutional rights related to freedom of speech and academic freedom [9][15]. - The article highlights that the government's administrative measures must adhere to due process and proportionality principles, which may not be met in this case [8][9]. - The temporary restraining order issued by a federal judge indicates that the court may prioritize the protection of students' interests while reviewing the legality of the Trump administration's actions [8][9]. Group 3: Broader Implications for Higher Education - The conflict raises concerns about the future of international students in U.S. higher education, as they represent a significant source of tuition revenue and talent [15][16]. - The article notes that international students make up over 27% of Harvard's student body and contribute to the academic and financial vitality of U.S. universities [15]. - Experts warn that aggressive policies against international students could harm the U.S.'s global standing in higher education and its economic interests [15][16].