省发展改革委相关负责人表示，将按照全省深化营商环境突破年活动部署要求，持续推进服务升级 与特色标杆创建，推动典型经验落细落实，力争培育一批在全省立得住、全国有影响的标杆案例，助推 新产业、新业态、新模式培育壮大，同时加快推进营商环境一品牌、一机制、一平台、一热线"四个 一"工作体系落地见效，打造"落地快、发展好"陕西营商环境特色品牌，推动营商环境优化与民营经济 发展深度融合、双向赋能。（记者：杨晓梅） 这40项典型经验做法从项目落地快、企业发展好、品牌效应显3个维度梳理总结而来。其中，12项 典型经验做法主要聚焦优化审批流程、规范行政执法、保障全周期服务，以提速项目落地建设，如西安 推行"全程代办+容缺受理+提前介入+并联审批"模式压减审批时间，咸阳建立"解难"机制破解项目建设 堵点，延安推出重大项目税费提级服务等举措，助力项目早落地、早开工；17项典型经验做法聚焦帮扶 企业发展，强化融资服务、人才保障、政策兑现、保护知识产权等，如铜川以普惠金融破解中小企业融 资难题，商洛探索"科技副总"机制促进产学研融合，杨凌示范区金融系统以信用体系构建与应用为核 心、依托信用价值为金融资源精准画像，破解"不敢贷、不愿贷" ...

（原标题：美国政府"关门"危机陷入持久战，影响有多大？） 南方财经 21世纪经济报道记者吴斌 美国政府停摆乱局几无好转迹象。据央视报道，当地时间10月9日，美国民主党提出的临时拨款法案在 国会参议院的投票中再次未获通过。同日，美国共和党提出的结束美国政府停摆的法案未能在参议院获 得足够票数，法案未获通过。市场预测显示，美国政府可能停摆15天以上。 美国总统特朗普9日表示，鉴于美国国会在重启政府问题上似乎仍陷于僵局，他计划削减一些受民主党 欢迎的联邦项目。"将进行永久性的削减，而且只会削减民主党的项目"。特朗普没有具体说明他计划削 减哪些项目，但特朗普几天来一直威胁称，如果民主党继续坚持要求以让步换取通过联邦拨款法案，他 将开始大规模裁员。 美国联邦政府因两党政治博弈而关门在历史上并不少见。20世纪70年代以来，美国联邦政府因共和、民 主两党政策分歧导致拨款中断而"停摆"已有二十多次。 上一次也是最长的一次"停摆"发生在2018年年底至2019年年初，特朗普第一任期内，民主党反对特朗普 提出的美墨边境墙项目拨款，两党在移民问题上争斗不休，导致政府关门五周。当时大约四分之一的联 邦政府机构"关门"持续五周，殃及8 ...

股市现在还在高位，仿佛什么都没发生，但我总觉得这里面埋着雷。原因很简单，这次美国可能遇上的政府关门，跟以往不一样。 过去的关门，总归是闹腾几天、最多几周，联邦雇员休个假、游客受点影响、企业耽误点事，然后政府一开门，该上班的上班，该发的钱全补上，经济就像 重启电脑一样恢复运行。1976年以来，标准普尔500在关门期平均还能稳住，2018年底那次35天的史上最长关门，美股甚至在关门前涨了10%。 但2025年的情况不太妙。 特朗普政府放话，不排除在关门期间 直接裁掉数十万联邦雇员 。这就不是请你暂时回家休息，而是告诉你，工作没了、工资没了、别等了。这种做法在历史上是没出现过的，一旦动真格，美国经济会被打个措手不及。 斯蒂芬妮·罗斯，沃尔夫研究的首席经济学家，说得很直白， 裁员会引发严重经济问题，而且中期内很难修复 。联邦雇员不只是政府里的螺丝钉，他们的收入和消费信心撑着很多地方的经济。一旦不稳，就会传导到各个行业，拖着本就脆弱的经济基本面继续下滑。 更糟的是，这种关门还可能让经济变成瞎子摸路。因为很多关键数据没人收集、没人发布，市场就会陷入信息真空。比如劳工统计局原定10月3日发布的9月 就业报告，如果关门持续， ...

当地时间9月30日，韩国总统李在明下令检查所有政府数据系统的潜在安全缺陷。 9月26日晚，韩国设在中部城市大田的国家信息资源管理院因电池爆炸引发火灾，致使647项线上政府服 务中断，网络系统也无法使用。据韩国行政安全部介绍，受火灾影响的机构包括韩国海关、韩国国家警 察厅和国家消防厅等。截至29日上午，仅有46项服务恢复正常。 李在明29日就此次服务中断事件道歉。他还指出，2023年曾发生过类似的政府服务宕机事件，"令人惊 讶的是，政府至今仍未建立更好的备份机制"。 ...

Government-solutions company CoreCivic (NYSE:CXW) said on Monday that it has been awarded two new contracts with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to utilize 3,593 beds. Shares were +4.08% pre-market to $22.43. The company expects to generate annual revenue at ...

Group 1 - The U.S. Congress is facing a government shutdown threat as the Senate did not vote on a temporary budget passed by the House, with the fiscal year ending on September 30 [1][4] - The House, controlled by Republicans, passed a short-term funding bill to maintain current funding levels until November 21, including an additional $8.8 million for security for government officials [4] - Senate Democrats are resistant to the House's funding bill, citing the lack of provisions for critical healthcare needs and seeking to include restrictions on the Trump administration's fiscal powers [4][5] Group 2 - Both parties are reluctant to take responsibility for a government shutdown, with Republicans aiming to blame Democrats while Democrats accuse Republicans of excluding them from the legislative process [5] - Analysts suggest that a "tweaked" short-term funding bill is likely to pass at the last moment to avoid a complete government shutdown, but if both parties maintain their positions, market volatility may increase [5][6] Group 3 - Historical government shutdowns have caused significant economic losses, with the 2018-2019 shutdown resulting in an estimated $11 billion loss, including $3 billion considered permanent [7] - A potential shutdown could lower GDP growth, with estimates suggesting a weekly shutdown could reduce growth by approximately 0.13 percentage points [8]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles indicates a significant slowdown in U.S. job growth, with the unemployment rate rising to its highest level since 2021, raising concerns about a potential worsening labor market [1][2][3] - In August, non-farm payrolls increased by only 22,000, far below the expected 75,000, while the unemployment rate rose to 4.3% [2][3] - Job growth has been concentrated in healthcare, leisure, and hospitality, while sectors such as information, finance, manufacturing, federal government, and business services saw substantial job losses [2][3] Group 2 - The average job growth over the past three months is only 29,000, marking the weakest employment growth phase since the pandemic began, with job additions consistently below 100,000 for four consecutive months [3] - The disappointing employment report has increased expectations for a Federal Reserve interest rate cut in September, with a 98% probability of a 25 basis point cut anticipated [4] - The yield on the two-year U.S. Treasury note fell to 3.5%, and the ten-year note yield dropped to 4.1%, both reaching five-month lows, indicating a market reaction to the employment data [3]

Group 1 - The core point of the article is that Shenzhou Taiyue announced its financial performance for the first half of 2025, highlighting the revenue composition from various business segments [1] - In the first half of 2025, the company's revenue breakdown is as follows: mobile gaming business accounted for 75.53%, energy sector 17.92%, telecommunications sector 3.65%, financial sector 2.77%, and government sector 0.14% [1] Group 2 - The article mentions the significant growth potential in the pet industry, which is projected to reach a market size of 300 billion yuan, indicating a booming market for related companies [1] - The news highlights that companies in the pet industry are experiencing a surge in stock prices, reflecting positive investor sentiment and market dynamics [1]

Core Viewpoint - The recent revisions of U.S. non-farm employment data have raised questions about the reliability of these statistics, suggesting potential political influences and methodological inadequacies in the data collection process [1][3][19]. Group 1: Employment Data Revisions - The U.S. non-farm employment data for May was revised down from 144,000 to 19,000, a reduction of 88% [1]. - The June data was also significantly adjusted, dropping from 147,000 to 14,000 [1]. - The Labor Statistics Bureau conducts monthly surveys of over 100,000 businesses and government agencies, but response rates have declined, leading to larger discrepancies in reported data [3][4]. Group 2: Statistical Methodology Issues - The statistical models used for employment data may no longer reflect the complexities of the current U.S. economy, which is characterized by rapid changes in business dynamics [9][12][14]. - The "business birth-death model" assumes a stable economic environment, which is not applicable in the current context [10][11]. Group 3: Political Influences - Historical patterns show that extreme overestimations of employment data often occur during election years, while significant underestimations are common in the first year of a new presidency [15][16]. - The recent firing of the Labor Statistics Bureau director by Trump is seen as a politically motivated action, reflecting the intertwining of economic data and political agendas [19][20]. Group 4: Implications for Monetary Policy - Weak employment data has increased expectations for interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve, which could provide more room for policy adjustments in other economies, such as China [21].

Group 1 - The U.S. GDP contracted by 0.3% on a seasonally adjusted annual rate in Q1 2025, which was worse than market expectations, highlighting rising uncertainties due to government tariff policies [1] - In Q4 2024, the U.S. GDP grew by 2.4%, indicating a significant slowdown in economic momentum [1] - The contraction in Q1 2025 was primarily driven by a substantial increase in imports and a decrease in government spending, with net exports negatively impacting GDP by 4.83 percentage points [1] Group 2 - Personal consumption expenditures, which account for about 70% of the U.S. economy, grew by 1.8% in Q1 2025, down from 4.0% in Q4 2024, contributing 1.21 percentage points to economic growth [1] - Federal government spending decreased by 5.1%, which detracted 0.33 percentage points from economic growth [1] - Non-residential fixed investment increased by 9.8%, contributing 1.29 percentage points to economic growth, reflecting a positive investment trend despite overall economic concerns [1] Group 3 - The broad imposition of tariffs by the U.S. government has led to widespread concerns among economists and business leaders regarding the economic outlook [2] - The uncertainty created by tariff policies is causing businesses to delay investment decisions and contributing to a sharp decline in consumer confidence [2] - There are predictions that the U.S. economy may enter a recession in the second half of the year due to these factors [2]