Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission has released an action plan to promote high-quality development of public funds, emphasizing the importance of performance benchmarks and their impact on fund managers' evaluations and compensation [2][8]. Group 1: Fund Performance and Benchmarking - The action plan requires fund performance deviations from benchmarks to be included in the evaluation and reward systems for fund companies and managers [2]. - Three funds, namely the Jiashi Intelligent Automotive Stock Fund, Jinying Multi-Strategy Mixed A Fund, and Tianzhi New Consumption Mixed Fund, have underperformed their benchmarks by over 60 percentage points in the past three years, highlighting significant deviations [2][6][7]. - Jiashi Intelligent Automotive Stock Fund has underperformed its benchmark by 81.83 percentage points, primarily due to a misalignment in investment strategy focusing heavily on upstream lithium battery materials while neglecting downstream automotive sectors [3][4]. Group 2: Fund Manager Strategies and Changes - The Jiashi Intelligent Automotive Fund's manager has maintained a concentrated position in lithium battery stocks despite market shifts towards vehicle intelligence and optimization, resulting in significant losses [3][4]. - The Jinying Multi-Strategy Mixed A Fund has changed managers six times in nine years, leading to inconsistent investment strategies and a 71.14 percentage point underperformance against its benchmark [6]. - The Tianzhi New Consumption Mixed Fund has struggled with a heavy allocation in the pig farming sector amid a slow consumer recovery, resulting in a 61.45 percentage point underperformance [7]. Group 3: Regulatory Impact and Industry Trends - The new regulatory framework aims to enhance the stability and consistency of fund investment strategies by linking fund manager compensation to performance benchmarks [8]. - The emphasis on performance benchmarks is expected to lead to a more transparent investment environment, reducing the difficulty for investors in selecting funds and increasing trust in public funds [8]. - The industry may see a shift towards more conservative investment styles as fund managers align their strategies with mainstream broad-based indices [8].

Core Viewpoint - The newly released public fund reform plan emphasizes performance assessment for fund managers, linking their compensation to fund performance, which aims to improve long-term returns for investors [2][3][4]. Summary by Sections Fund Performance Issues - Over the past three years, more than 30% of mixed funds have underperformed their benchmarks by over 10%, and approximately 6.6% of equity funds have also lagged by the same margin [2][8]. - Notable underperformers include 52 mixed funds and 8 equity funds that have underperformed their benchmarks by over 50%, including products managed by renowned fund managers [2][8]. Reform Measures - The reform plan includes 25 measures, with a significant focus on linking fund manager compensation to performance metrics, where performance indicators must account for at least 80% of the assessment [3][4]. - Fund managers whose products underperform their benchmarks by over 10% for three years will see a significant reduction in their performance-based compensation, while those who exceed benchmarks may receive increased compensation [3][4]. Long-term Focus - The reform aims to shift the focus from scale to performance, encouraging fund managers and companies to prioritize long-term returns for investors [4][5]. - The introduction of metrics such as net asset growth rate and fund profit rate is expected to mitigate the industry's short-sighted focus on scale [5]. Performance Data - As of May 8, among 4,693 equity funds, 308 funds (approximately 6.6%) have underperformed their benchmarks by over 10%, while 418 funds (about 8.9%) have outperformed by the same margin [6]. - The worst-performing fund, Jia Shi Intelligent Automotive, has a return of -35.39%, significantly underperforming its benchmark by 81.88% over three years [7][8]. Mixed Fund Performance - In the mixed fund category, 2,660 out of 8,634 funds (30.8%) have underperformed their benchmarks by over 10%, with only 686 funds (7.9%) outperforming [8][9]. - The worst-performing mixed fund, Jin Ying Multi-Strategy, has a return of -60.58%, underperforming its benchmark by 69.26% [9][10].