Core Insights - Zhongke Electric has seen a stock price increase of 5.08% on October 29, reaching 26.68 CNY per share, with a trading volume of 1.663 billion CNY and a turnover rate of 11.01%, resulting in a total market capitalization of 18.287 billion CNY. The stock has risen for three consecutive days, with a cumulative increase of 12.54% during this period [1] Company Overview - Hunan Zhongke Electric Co., Ltd. was established on April 6, 2004, and listed on December 25, 2009. The company primarily focuses on the research, development, production, sales, and service of industrial magnetic application technologies and products. The revenue composition is as follows: 92.50% from lithium battery anode materials, 8.53% from electromagnetic equipment, and 2.71% from other sources [1] Shareholder Information - Among the top ten circulating shareholders of Zhongke Electric, one fund from Jiashi Fund holds 4.0354 million shares of Jiashi Intelligent Automotive Stock (002168), unchanged from the previous period, representing 0.69% of the circulating shares. The estimated floating profit today is approximately 5.2056 million CNY, with a total floating profit of 11.4201 million CNY during the three-day increase [2] Fund Manager Profile - The fund manager of Jiashi Intelligent Automotive Stock (002168) is Yao Zhipeng, who has been in the position for 9 years and 185 days. The total asset size of the fund is 20.359 billion CNY, with the best fund return during his tenure being 172.05% and the worst being -10.05% [3]

Core Insights - In September, the A-share market continued to rise, particularly driven by technology stocks, with the ChiNext Index increasing by over 12% [1] - Among 1,038 ordinary equity funds, 815 funds achieved positive performance in September, representing 78% of the total [1] - The top five funds with gains exceeding 30% were all managed by Harvest Fund, highlighting strong performance in the new energy and clean energy sectors [1] Fund Performance - The top-performing funds included Harvest New Energy New Materials Stock A and C, Harvest Intelligent Automotive Stock, and Harvest Clean Energy Stock, with gains ranging from 30.20% to 31.28% [1] - The management team for Harvest New Energy New Materials Stock consists of experienced managers Yao Zhipeng and Xiong Yuzhou, who have been with Harvest Fund for several years [1] Top Holdings - The top ten holdings of Harvest New Energy New Materials Stock include major companies such as CATL, Putailai, and Yiwei Lithium Energy, most of which saw significant increases in September [2] - Harvest Intelligent Automotive Stock has a similar portfolio to Harvest New Energy New Materials Stock, indicating a focused investment strategy in lithium battery materials [3] - Other funds like Manulife New Energy Stock and Eimi Low Carbon Economy Stock also reported gains of over 25%, with a focus on new energy and semiconductor sectors [3] Sector Analysis - The clean energy sector, particularly companies involved in lithium battery materials, has shown strong performance, with funds like Harvest Clean Energy Stock and others heavily invested in this area [4] - The overall performance of ordinary equity funds was positive, with only 22 funds experiencing a decline of more than 5% in September [4] - Funds focused on the healthcare sector, such as Red Soil Innovation Medical Health Stock and Golden Eagle Medical Health Stock, faced declines, indicating sector-specific challenges [5]

Core Insights - The article provides a ranking of open-end funds based on their net asset value growth as of September 29, 2025, highlighting the top and bottom performers in the market [2][5][7]. Group 1: Top Performing Funds - The top 10 funds with the highest net value growth include: 1. E Fund CSI Hong Kong Securities Investment Theme ETF with a unit net value of 2.3164, up from 2.1379, showing an increase of 0.17 [2]. 2. Tongtai Financial Select Stock A with a unit net value of 1.2474, up from 1.1705, an increase of 0.07 [2]. 3. Tongtai Financial Select Stock C with a unit net value of 1.2281, up from 1.1524, also an increase of 0.07 [2]. 4. Invesco Great Wall Jing Tai Stable Open Bond A with a unit net value of 1.1135, up from 1.0501, an increase of 0.06 [2]. 5. Harvest Clean Energy Stock Initiation A with a unit net value of 1.0851, up from 1.0247, an increase of 0.06 [2]. 6. Harvest Clean Energy Stock Initiation C with a unit net value of 1.0665, up from 1.0072, an increase of 0.05 [2]. 7. Harvest Intelligent Vehicle Stock with a unit net value of 3.1520, up from 2.9820, an increase of 0.17 [2]. 8. Orient New Energy Vehicle Theme Mixed with a unit net value of 3.0037, up from 2.8504, an increase of 0.15 [2]. 9. Orient Regional Development Mixed with a unit net value of 1.5072, up from 1.4304, an increase of 0.07 [2]. 10. Orient Internet Jia Mixed with a unit net value of 1.4300, up from 1.3577, an increase of 0.07 [2]. Group 2: Bottom Performing Funds - The bottom 10 funds with the lowest net value growth include: 1. ICBC聚福混合C with a unit net value of 1.3532, down from 1.3723, a decrease of 0.01 [5]. 2. ICBC聚福混合A with a unit net value of 1.3931, down from 1.4111, a decrease of 0.01 [5]. 3. Shenwan Sixin Consumer Growth Mixed C with a unit net value of 1.3900, down from 1.4070, a decrease of 0.01 [5]. 4. Shenwan Lingxin Consumer Growth Mixed A with a unit net value of 1.4890, down from 1.5060, a decrease of 0.01 [5]. 5. Penghua Consumer Preferred Mixed with a unit net value of 3.2620, down from 3.2990, a decrease of 0.03 [5]. 6. Dachen Health Industry Mixed C with a unit net value of 1.3900, down from 1.4050, a decrease of 0.01 [5]. 7. Dachen Health Industry Mixed A with a unit net value of 1.4160, down from 1.4310, a decrease of 0.01 [5]. 8. Nord New Prosperity with a unit net value of 1.2933, down from 1.3063, a decrease of 0.01 [5]. 9. Guotai Zhongzheng Coal ETF with a unit net value of 1.0712, down from 1.0816, a decrease of 0.01 [5]. 10. Guolian Coal A with a unit net value of 1.7510, down from 1.7680, a decrease of 0.01 [5]. Group 3: Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index showed a slight rebound, while the ChiNext Index opened higher, with a total trading volume of 2.17 trillion. The number of advancing stocks was 3,576 compared to 1,568 declining stocks [7]. - Leading sectors included securities and non-ferrous metals, both rising over 3%, while the coal sector lagged behind [7].

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission has released an action plan to promote high-quality development of public funds, emphasizing the importance of performance benchmarks and their impact on fund managers' evaluations and compensation [2][8]. Group 1: Fund Performance and Benchmarking - The action plan requires fund performance deviations from benchmarks to be included in the evaluation and reward systems for fund companies and managers [2]. - Three funds, namely the Jiashi Intelligent Automotive Stock Fund, Jinying Multi-Strategy Mixed A Fund, and Tianzhi New Consumption Mixed Fund, have underperformed their benchmarks by over 60 percentage points in the past three years, highlighting significant deviations [2][6][7]. - Jiashi Intelligent Automotive Stock Fund has underperformed its benchmark by 81.83 percentage points, primarily due to a misalignment in investment strategy focusing heavily on upstream lithium battery materials while neglecting downstream automotive sectors [3][4]. Group 2: Fund Manager Strategies and Changes - The Jiashi Intelligent Automotive Fund's manager has maintained a concentrated position in lithium battery stocks despite market shifts towards vehicle intelligence and optimization, resulting in significant losses [3][4]. - The Jinying Multi-Strategy Mixed A Fund has changed managers six times in nine years, leading to inconsistent investment strategies and a 71.14 percentage point underperformance against its benchmark [6]. - The Tianzhi New Consumption Mixed Fund has struggled with a heavy allocation in the pig farming sector amid a slow consumer recovery, resulting in a 61.45 percentage point underperformance [7]. Group 3: Regulatory Impact and Industry Trends - The new regulatory framework aims to enhance the stability and consistency of fund investment strategies by linking fund manager compensation to performance benchmarks [8]. - The emphasis on performance benchmarks is expected to lead to a more transparent investment environment, reducing the difficulty for investors in selecting funds and increasing trust in public funds [8]. - The industry may see a shift towards more conservative investment styles as fund managers align their strategies with mainstream broad-based indices [8].

Core Viewpoint - The newly released public fund reform plan emphasizes performance assessment for fund managers, linking their compensation to fund performance, which aims to improve long-term returns for investors [2][3][4]. Summary by Sections Fund Performance Issues - Over the past three years, more than 30% of mixed funds have underperformed their benchmarks by over 10%, and approximately 6.6% of equity funds have also lagged by the same margin [2][8]. - Notable underperformers include 52 mixed funds and 8 equity funds that have underperformed their benchmarks by over 50%, including products managed by renowned fund managers [2][8]. Reform Measures - The reform plan includes 25 measures, with a significant focus on linking fund manager compensation to performance metrics, where performance indicators must account for at least 80% of the assessment [3][4]. - Fund managers whose products underperform their benchmarks by over 10% for three years will see a significant reduction in their performance-based compensation, while those who exceed benchmarks may receive increased compensation [3][4]. Long-term Focus - The reform aims to shift the focus from scale to performance, encouraging fund managers and companies to prioritize long-term returns for investors [4][5]. - The introduction of metrics such as net asset growth rate and fund profit rate is expected to mitigate the industry's short-sighted focus on scale [5]. Performance Data - As of May 8, among 4,693 equity funds, 308 funds (approximately 6.6%) have underperformed their benchmarks by over 10%, while 418 funds (about 8.9%) have outperformed by the same margin [6]. - The worst-performing fund, Jia Shi Intelligent Automotive, has a return of -35.39%, significantly underperforming its benchmark by 81.88% over three years [7][8]. Mixed Fund Performance - In the mixed fund category, 2,660 out of 8,634 funds (30.8%) have underperformed their benchmarks by over 10%, with only 686 funds (7.9%) outperforming [8][9]. - The worst-performing mixed fund, Jin Ying Multi-Strategy, has a return of -60.58%, underperforming its benchmark by 69.26% [9][10].