Core Points - The Zhongshan Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety inspection covering seven categories of food, with a total of 214 batches tested, of which 206 were qualified and 8 were unqualified [2] Group 1: Inspection Overview - The inspection included categories such as catering food, condiments, convenience foods, pastries, cocoa and baked coffee products, edible agricultural products, and beverages [2] - The inspection was carried out according to the "Implementation Rules for Food Safety Supervision and Sampling Inspection in Guangdong Province" [2] Group 2: Results Summary - Out of 214 batches tested, 206 were found to be compliant, resulting in a compliance rate of approximately 96.3% [2] - The unqualified samples included various food items, with specific details provided in the attached inspection report [2] Group 3: Consumer Engagement - Consumers are encouraged to participate in food safety supervision and report any harmful food products or illegal activities to the Zhongshan Market Supervision Administration [2]

河源市市场监督管理局2025年第14期食品安全监督抽检信息公示 近期，河源市市场监督管理局联合市食品检验所组织开展食品安全专项监督抽检，共抽检215批次，涉及16个食品大类，含粮食加工品、调味品、水果制 品、乳制品、饮料、酒类、蔬菜制品、糕点、方便食品、豆制品、薯类和膨化食品、炒货食品及坚果制品、淀粉及淀粉制品、糖果制品、餐饮食品、食用 油、油脂及其制品。根据食品安全标准检验和判定，其中抽检项目合格样品204批次、不合格样品11批次（见附件）。根据《食品安全抽样检验管理办法》 等相关规定，现公开监督抽检结果信息，具体情况如下： 一、总体情况：共计抽检215批次，其中粮食加工品40批次、调味品25批次、水果制品5批次、乳制品10批次、饮料22批次、酒类10批次、蔬菜制品4批次、 糕点1批次、方便食品3批次、豆制品3批次、薯类和膨化食品1批次、炒货食品及坚果制品5批次、淀粉及淀粉制品3批次、糖果制品1批次、餐饮食品73批 次、食用油、油脂及其制品9批次。 二、不合格产品情况 三、食品安全消费提示：消费者应当通过正规可靠渠道购买所需食品并保存相应购物凭证，要看清外包装上的相关标识，如生产日期、保质期、生产者名称 和 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent food safety supervision and sampling conducted by the Liyang Market Supervision Administration revealed that out of 765 food samples tested across 24 categories, 15 samples were found to be non-compliant with safety standards [1]. Group 1: Food Safety Monitoring Results - A total of 765 food samples were tested, covering categories such as condiments, beverages, dairy products, and more [1]. - 15 samples were identified as non-compliant, indicating a failure rate of approximately 1.96% [1]. Group 2: Non-Compliant Products Information - Specific non-compliant products included: - A soup bowl from Tianmuhu Aixiang Snack Shop, which tested positive for coliform bacteria [1]. - Multiple fruit samples from various vendors that exceeded the allowable limits for pesticide residues, such as imidacloprid and chlorpyrifos [1]. - The report includes detailed information on the non-compliant products, including the name of the product, the production date, and the specific non-compliance issues [1].

Core Viewpoint - The Huizhou Daya Bay Economic and Technological Development Zone Management Committee's Market Supervision Administration has conducted food safety supervision and sampling inspections, revealing that out of 150 batches tested, 3 batches were found to be non-compliant with safety standards [3]. Summary by Category Food Safety Inspection Results - A total of 150 batches of food were inspected as part of the 2025 food sampling plan, with 3 batches failing to meet safety standards [3]. - The results are being publicly disclosed in accordance with government information disclosure regulations [3]. Specific Findings - The inspection covered various food categories, including dining utensils, condiments, and processed meat products, among others [4][5][6]. - Specific products that failed included items such as flavored condiments and processed meat products, indicating potential issues in food safety compliance [4][5][6]. Regulatory Compliance - The public disclosure of inspection results aligns with the government's commitment to transparency and consumer safety in food products [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Weinan Market Supervision Administration announced that 15 out of 145 food samples tested were found to be non-compliant with national food safety standards, highlighting issues such as pesticide residue, excessive use of food additives, and microbial contamination [3][11]. Summary by Category Non-compliant Products - Celery sold by Fuhai Jialiyuan Self-service Supermarket in Chengcheng County had a pesticide residue (Thiacloprid) level of 0.16 mg/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 0.04 mg/kg [3]. - Ginger sold by Yangguang Life Shopping Plaza in Pucheng County had a Thiacloprid level of 3.1 mg/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 0.2 mg/kg [4]. - Mango sold by Zanduoduo Supermarket in Pucheng County had a pesticide residue (Pyraclostrobin) level of 0.082 mg/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 0.05 mg/kg [5]. - Banana sold by Zanduoduo Supermarket in Pucheng County had a pesticide residue (Thiacloprid) level of 0.037 mg/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 0.02 mg/kg [6]. - Bean sprouts sold by Yang Gaitao's vegetable shop in Fuping County had a residue of 4-Chlorophenoxyacetic acid (as 4-Chlorophenoxyacetic acid) at 53.4 μg/kg, which is not permitted [7]. - Ginger sold by Weinan Fenghui Honest Man Commercial Development Co., Ltd. had a Thiacloprid level of 0.55 mg/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 0.2 mg/kg [8]. - Plates used by Zhang Yongliang's restaurant in Tongguan County had an anionic synthetic detergent (as Sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate) level of 0.0144 mg/100 cm², which is not permitted [8]. - Vegetable buckets used by the same restaurant had both anionic synthetic detergent (as Sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate) and coliform bacteria detected, which are not permitted [8]. - Green peppers sold by Cheng Meng's dried vegetable distribution store in Tongguan County had a Thiacloprid level of 0.67 mg/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 0.05 mg/kg [9]. - Celery sold by Kangmei Vegetable Distribution Store in Tongguan County had a Thiacloprid level of 0.072 mg/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 0.04 mg/kg [10]. - Rice noodles sold by Weinan High-tech Zone South North Alley Dried Vegetable Condiment Store had aluminum residue (dry sample, as Al) at 358 mg/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 200 mg/kg [10]. - Green bean sprouts sold by Weinan High-tech Zone Runhe Family Life Supermarket had a residue of 4-Chlorophenoxyacetic acid (as 4-Chlorophenoxyacetic acid) at 17.0 μg/kg, which is not permitted [10]. - Licorice apricot meat sold by the same supermarket had a sulfur dioxide residue level of 0.538 g/kg, exceeding the standard limit of 0.35 g/kg [10]. - Green bean sprouts sold by Shaanxi Meilian Society Discount Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. had a residue of 4-Chlorophenoxyacetic acid (as 4-Chlorophenoxyacetic acid) at 25.7 μg/kg, which is not permitted [11]. - White angelica sold by Shaanxi Jinhui Shangyue Lejia Trading Co., Ltd. had a sulfur dioxide residue level of 1.04 g/kg, which is not permitted [11]. Regulatory Actions - The Weinan Market Supervision Administration has instructed local market supervision departments to conduct investigations and take risk control measures such as product recalls and removals from shelves for the non-compliant products [11].