Workflow
百货零售服务
icon
Search documents
广百股份涨停,成交额3.16亿元,主力资金净流入1.18亿元
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-29 01:52
截至9月30日,广百股份股东户数3.43万,较上期减少14.47%;人均流通股15079股,较上期增加 16.92%。2025年1月-9月,广百股份实现营业收入27.87亿元,同比减少31.60%;归母净利润-3099.74万 元,同比减少159.01%。 12月29日,广百股份盘中涨停,截至09:35,报8.97元/股,成交3.16亿元,换手率5.12%,总市值62.87亿 元。 分红方面,广百股份A股上市后累计派现13.58亿元。近三年,累计派现4928.27万元。 资金流向方面,主力资金净流入1.18亿元,特大单买入1.56亿元,占比49.56%,卖出2664.97万元,占比 8.44%;大单买入3934.10万元,占比12.46%,卖出5104.24万元,占比16.17%。 机构持仓方面,截止2025年9月30日,广百股份十大流通股东中,大成景恒混合A(090019)位居第七 大流通股东,持股489.36万股,为新进股东。 广百股份今年以来股价涨27.41%,近5个交易日涨6.41%,近20日涨16.19%,近60日涨38.85%。 今年以来广百股份已经8次登上龙虎榜,最近一次登上龙虎榜为12月16日 ...
供销大集:海南大区所辖海南供销大集控股有限公司等6家实体运营企业主体获批成为海南自贸港享惠主体
Zheng Quan Ri Bao Wang· 2025-12-24 08:48
证券日报网讯12月24日,供销大集(000564)在互动平台回答投资者提问时表示,公司已于2025年6月 宣告成立海南大区,海南大区统筹海南、广东地区成员企业管理,目前业务主要涵盖百货零售、农副产 品贸易、电商及物业管理等。公司在海南的企业主要包括海南供销大集控股有限公司、海南望海国际商 业广场有限公司、海南供销大集数字科技产业有限公司、海南供销大集供销链控股有限公司、海南大集 进出口有限公司等,注册资本可在网上公开渠道进行查询。海南大区所辖海南供销大集控股有限公司等 6家实体运营企业主体获批成为海南自贸港享惠主体,意味着该6家企业可自封关运作之日(12月18日)起 适用《关于海南自由贸易港货物进出"一线""二线"及在岛内流通税收政策的通知》等规定的相关税收政 策。 ...
广百股份涨2.55%,成交额4.29亿元,主力资金净流出1159.67万元
Xin Lang Zheng Quan· 2025-12-22 03:23
广百股份今年以来股价涨20.03%,近5个交易日涨12.52%,近20日涨31.83%,近60日涨25.93%。 今年以来广百股份已经8次登上龙虎榜,最近一次登上龙虎榜为12月16日。 资料显示,广州市广百股份有限公司位于广东省广州市越秀区西湖路12号10-12楼,成立日期1990年8月 27日,上市日期2007年11月22日,公司主营业务涉及百货零售服务。主营业务收入构成为:商业 88.10%,租赁7.34%,其他(补充)4.57%。 12月22日,广百股份盘中上涨2.55%,截至11:18,报8.45元/股,成交4.29亿元,换手率7.46%,总市值 59.23亿元。 资金流向方面,主力资金净流出1159.67万元,特大单买入1531.72万元,占比3.57%,卖出1078.96万 元,占比2.52%;大单买入5498.65万元,占比12.82%,卖出7111.07万元,占比16.58%。 分红方面,广百股份A股上市后累计派现13.58亿元。近三年,累计派现4928.27万元。 机构持仓方面,截止2025年9月30日,广百股份十大流通股东中,大成景恒混合A(090019)位居第七 大流通股东,持股489. ...
徐家汇涨2.01%,成交额2.01亿元,主力资金净流出452.99万元
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-19 03:05
12月19日,徐家汇盘中上涨2.01%,截至10:43,报9.63元/股,成交2.01亿元,换手率5.15%,总市值 40.04亿元。 截至11月30日,徐家汇股东户数4.00万,较上期增加0.00%;人均流通股10360股,较上期增加0.00%。 2025年1月-9月,徐家汇实现营业收入2.74亿元,同比减少16.92%;归母净利润-207.80万元,同比减少 5.87%。 分红方面,徐家汇A股上市后累计派现17.21亿元。近三年,累计派现1.25亿元。 责任编辑:小浪快报 徐家汇今年以来股价涨5.13%,近5个交易日涨12.50%,近20日涨13.96%,近60日涨5.25%。 资料显示,上海徐家汇商城股份有限公司位于上海市徐汇区肇嘉浜路1000号9楼,成立日期1993年1月4 日,上市日期2011年3月3日,公司主营业务涉及 百货零售。主营业务收入构成为:百货100.00%。 徐家汇所属申万行业为:商贸零售-一般零售-百货。所属概念板块包括:新零售、社区团购、小盘、融 资融券、国资改革等。 资金流向方面,主力资金净流出452.99万元,特大单买入330.92万元,占比1.64%,卖出479.53万元,占 ...
中央商场:控股子公司门店暂停营业
人民财讯12月10日电,中央商场(600280)12月10日公告,控股子公司徐州中央百货大楼股份有限公司 (简称"徐州店")位于江苏省徐州市大同街125号于2019年12月开业。自开业以来,受市场环境下行及竞 争加剧、物业租赁纠纷等多重因素影响,导致徐州店经营较为困难,经过调整后当前经营基本面仍未有 改善迹象,减亏扭亏较难实现。公司决定启动暂停营业计划,同时授权公司管理层组织实施徐州店暂停 营业计划。本次暂停营业计划不会对公司整体经营状况造成重大影响。 ...
广百股份涨2.50%,成交额2.63亿元,主力资金净流入1639.24万元
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-01 02:34
Core Points - Guangbai Co., Ltd. experienced a stock price increase of 2.50% on December 1, reaching 7.80 CNY per share, with a total market capitalization of 5.467 billion CNY [1] - The company has seen a year-to-date stock price increase of 10.80%, with significant gains over the past 5 days (21.68%), 20 days (22.45%), and 60 days (17.12%) [1] - Guangbai Co., Ltd. has been listed on the stock market since November 22, 2007, and primarily operates in the retail sector, with 88.10% of its revenue coming from commercial activities [1] Financial Performance - For the period from January to September 2025, Guangbai Co., Ltd. reported a revenue of 2.787 billion CNY, a year-on-year decrease of 31.60%, and a net profit attributable to shareholders of -30.9974 million CNY, reflecting a decline of 159.01% [2] - The company has distributed a total of 1.358 billion CNY in dividends since its A-share listing, with 49.2827 million CNY distributed over the last three years [3] Shareholder Information - As of September 30, 2025, the number of shareholders for Guangbai Co., Ltd. was 34,300, a decrease of 14.47% from the previous period, while the average number of circulating shares per person increased by 16.92% to 15,079 shares [2] - Among the top ten circulating shareholders, Dazheng Jingheng Mixed A (090019) is the seventh largest, holding 4.8936 million shares as a new shareholder [3]
4连板涨停!百货零售+川超概念联动,茂业商业9:32涨停,背后逻辑揭晓
Jin Rong Jie· 2025-11-28 01:50
Core Viewpoint - Maoye Commercial has experienced a continuous four-day trading limit increase, indicating strong market interest and potential growth in the retail sector [1] Group 1: Stock Performance - The stock has achieved a four-day limit increase, with a trading halt at 9:32 AM today [1] - The trading volume reached 419 million yuan, with a turnover rate of 3.97% [1] Group 2: Market Influences - The stock's performance may be influenced by the active state of the department store retail sector and regional consumption concepts [1] - The company primarily operates in the department store retail space, owning multiple self-operated properties in key commercial districts [1] Group 3: Investment Considerations - The volatility of limit-up stocks is significant, suggesting a need for cautious investment strategies [1]
二连板茂业商业:公司目前生产经营情况正常
Core Viewpoint - Maoye Commercial (600828) has experienced a significant stock price fluctuation, with a cumulative increase of 20% over three consecutive trading days [1] Group 1: Stock Performance - The stock price of Maoye Commercial showed an abnormal fluctuation, with a daily closing price increase deviation of 20% over the trading days of November 24, 25, and 26 [1] - The company has issued an announcement regarding the abnormal trading activity, indicating that it is in compliance with regulatory requirements [1] Group 2: Company Operations - Maoye Commercial is primarily engaged in the department store retail business [1] - The company has confirmed that its current production and operational status is normal, with no undisclosed significant information [1]
广百股份涨2.03%,成交额4392.19万元,主力资金净流入60.85万元
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-11-25 05:45
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is that Guangbai Co., Ltd. has experienced a decline in stock price and financial performance, with a notable drop in revenue and net profit for the year 2025 [1][2][3] - As of November 25, Guangbai's stock price increased by 2.03% to 6.54 CNY per share, with a total market capitalization of 4.584 billion CNY [1] - The company has seen a net inflow of main funds amounting to 608,500 CNY, with significant buying and selling activities recorded [1] Group 2 - For the period from January to September 2025, Guangbai reported a revenue of 2.787 billion CNY, a year-on-year decrease of 31.60%, and a net profit attributable to shareholders of -30.9974 million CNY, a decrease of 159.01% [2] - The company has distributed a total of 1.358 billion CNY in dividends since its A-share listing, with 49.2827 million CNY distributed in the last three years [3] - As of September 30, 2025, the number of shareholders decreased by 14.47% to 34,300, while the average circulating shares per person increased by 16.92% to 15,079 shares [2][3]
“诈弹”虚惊 韩国首尔乐天百货商店紧急闭店
Xin Hua She· 2025-11-09 06:39
Core Points - South Korean police conducted emergency searches at 10 department stores in Seoul due to a bomb threat posted online, which turned out to be a false alarm [1] - The bomb threat was made on the DC Inside forum, warning people to leave the Lotte department store, claiming five explosive devices were placed inside [1] - Following the threat, the stores were closed and operations were suspended on November 9, with a cinema in one of the stores evacuating around 100 viewers [1] Investigation and Legal Context - Police are tracing the IP address of the individual who posted the bomb threat to identify the suspect [2] - A series of bomb threats occurred in South Korea from July to August, with a notable incident on August 11 involving another Lotte department store [2] - Experts suggest that the current penalties for bomb threats in South Korea are insufficient, advocating for stricter enforcement [2] - In February, the South Korean National Assembly passed an amendment to the criminal law establishing a new offense for public intimidation, with penalties of up to 5 years in prison or fines of 20 million KRW (approximately 98,000 RMB) [2] - However, data from the National Police Agency indicates that only 10% of suspects in related cases have been arrested under the new law, with 77% of those arrested being referred to prosecutors, while many cases remain unresolved [2]