今年6月，"奇迹童颜2.0"以5999元/支的价格面世，产品采用了圣博玛旗下市场均价约1.88万元/支 的艾维岚，圣博玛公开声明，指控新氧存在"非授权渠道采购"等问题，同时列出20余家新氧青春诊所为 艾维岚非官方合作医疗机构。新氧同样强硬回应，还明确表示圣博玛"干涉定价权"。 (责任编辑：徐自立) 中国经济网记者致电新氧了解这场"定价权大战"详情。对于上游厂商的说法，新氧表示，当前，产 业链上下游围绕价格的博弈，是医美从"卖方市场"走向"买方市场"的结构性变化。随着童颜针、玻尿 酸、胶原蛋白等产品密集获批，价格更多要围绕真实成本与用户需求重新定价。 中国经济网北京12月17日讯 华夏时报15日报道《定价权大战升级！新氧2999元童颜针硬刚上游厂 商，重资产转型陷生死博弈？》显示，前不久，医美再生材料厂商普丽妍公开发布了一份包含79家机 构的"非官方合作医疗机构"名单。其中，医美平台公司新氧（股票代码：SY.O）旗下46家"青春诊所"被 点名，被质疑产品来源不明且医护人员未经官方培训。新氧随即强硬回应，坚称其产品渠道合法合规、 全流程可追溯。 新氧认为，从中长期来看，价格回归理性，对上下游其实是共赢：对上游而言 ...

另一家"童颜针"生产商普丽妍也于上个月将40余家新氧青春诊所列为"非官方合作医疗机构"；今年6 月，圣博玛发表公开声明，称新氧销售的"童颜针"产品"艾维岚"为非合规授权渠道，并指该诊所的医生 未接受厂家培训指导，难以保障消费者健康安全。 针对多家供应商"围堵"，12月12日，新氧旗下"新氧青春诊所"在公众号发布声明，直指上游厂商固化高 价体系，弱化医疗机构的自主定价权。 来源：第一财经 近日，医美公司新氧的低价策略激化了与上游厂商的矛盾，并已遭到多家供应商抵制。12月15日美股收 盘，新氧（SY.US）股价当天大跌近6%，近5个交易日股价累计下跌约10%。 引发最新矛盾的是12月11日"童颜针"生产商斐缦生物的一纸公开声明，该公司称，已自10月1日起已经 停止向新氧集团及其下属新氧青春诊所等供应"弗缦"产品（一种胶原蛋白填充剂）。声明还强调，"以 上机构若继续大量销售我公司'弗缦'产品，则涉嫌产品从不合规渠道获得，或为假冒伪劣产品。" 第一财经记者梳理公开信息发现，目前已经在国内获批上市的"童颜针"产品已有约11款，包括圣博玛生 物的"艾维岚"、爱美客的"濡白天使"、高德美的"塑颜萃"、普丽妍的同名产品以及四 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent conflicts between medical beauty company New Oxygen and its upstream suppliers due to New Oxygen's low pricing strategy, which has led to a significant drop in its stock price and supplier resistance [3][6]. Summary by Sections Supplier Conflicts - New Oxygen's low pricing strategy has intensified conflicts with suppliers, leading to several suppliers, including Faiman Bio, ceasing to supply products to New Oxygen since October 1 [3][4]. - Suppliers claim that New Oxygen's pricing disrupts the market's pricing system, resulting in a "supply cut" from multiple manufacturers [5][6]. Pricing Strategy - New Oxygen offers its own brand of "童颜针" (youthful needle) products at significantly lower prices compared to the market, with prices as low as 999 yuan for the basic version and 2999 yuan for the upgraded version [5]. - The article highlights that while major brands price their products above 10,000 yuan, New Oxygen's pricing strategy allows it to sell similar products for much lower prices, attracting a large customer base [5][6]. Business Model - New Oxygen's business model is characterized by using low prices as a customer acquisition strategy, collaborating with upstream manufacturers to eliminate middlemen and reduce costs [6][7]. - The company reportedly utilizes lower-cost OEM production methods, allowing it to maintain high profit margins despite lower retail prices [6][7]. Market Impact - The ongoing conflict between New Oxygen and its suppliers is expected to have limited long-term effects on the overall market, with the public disputes serving to clarify positions among the involved parties [8].

近日，医美平台新氧（SY.US）与上游再生材料供应商的定价权冲突再度升级。厂商普丽妍公开发布"非官方合作机构"名单，点名新氧旗下46家"青春诊 所"，质疑其产品来源与人员培训问题。新氧则回应称其产品渠道合规、全流程可追溯。 低价策略引发供应链冲突 公开资料显示，2025年4月，新氧推出"奇迹童颜1.0"，将普丽妍的童颜针定价为4999元/支，显著低于厂商1.68万元的指导价。2025年6月，新氧"奇迹童颜 2.0"采用圣博玛旗下产品艾维岚，定价为5999元，而市场均价约为1.88万元。圣博玛随即发声，指控新氧存在"非授权渠道采购"问题。 2025年前三季度，新氧实现营收10.63亿元，同比下降3.36%；实现净利润-1.33亿元，同比由盈转亏。其中，信息及预约服务收入同比下降33.80%，医疗产品 销售及维修服务收入同比下降29.47%。 新氧重资产扩张带来的成本压力成为拖累盈利的主因。2025年前三季度，新氧营业成本占营收比重升至50.8%，整体销售毛利率同比大幅回落13.02个百分 点。尽管部分成熟门店已实现盈利，但新店培育期的亏损严重拉低了整体利润水平。 行业重构期激烈竞争的序幕 面对指责，新氧在12月 ...

"童颜针"的主要成分为"聚左旋乳酸（PLLA）填充剂"，这种产品被宣传为可以通过注射刺激皮肤胶原 蛋白再生，实现面部轮廓塑形、皱纹改善的中长效（2-3年）抗衰医美产品。 近日，医美公司新氧的低价策略激化了与上游厂商的矛盾，并已遭到多家供应商抵制。12月15日美股收 盘，新氧（SY.US）股价当天大跌近6%，近5个交易日股价累计下跌约10%。 引发最新矛盾的是12月11日"童颜针"生产商斐缦生物的一纸公开声明，该公司称，已自10月1日起已经 停止向新氧集团及其下属新氧青春诊所等供应"弗缦"产品（一种胶原蛋白填充剂）。声明还强调，"以 上机构若继续大量销售我公司'弗缦'产品，则涉嫌产品从不合规渠道获得，或为假冒伪劣产品。" 另一家"童颜针"生产商普丽妍也于上个月将40余家新氧青春诊所列为"非官方合作医疗机构"；今年6 月，圣博玛发表公开声明，称新氧销售的"童颜针"产品"艾维岚"为非合规授权渠道，并指该诊所的医生 未接受厂家培训指导，难以保障消费者健康安全。 针对多家供应商"围堵"，12月12日，新氧旗下"新氧青春诊所"在公众号发布声明，直指上游厂商固化高 价体系，弱化医疗机构的自主定价权。 不过，12月16日，第 ...

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing conflict between the medical beauty platform company New Oxygen and its suppliers highlights a significant pricing power struggle in the industry, particularly regarding the pricing of the "童颜针" (youthful needle) product, which New Oxygen has drastically reduced from market prices to attract consumers [2][3][4]. Group 1: Pricing Conflict - New Oxygen has been publicly accused by suppliers, including Purity and Saint Boma, of sourcing products through unauthorized channels and has faced scrutiny over the legitimacy of its clinics [3][25]. - The core of the conflict revolves around New Oxygen's aggressive pricing strategy, which has seen the price of the "童颜针" drop from approximately 10,000 yuan to 2,999 yuan, representing a nearly 70% reduction [4][26]. - New Oxygen claims that its low pricing strategy is based on "value return," achieved through large-scale procurement and reduced marketing costs [4][26]. Group 2: Financial Performance - In the first three quarters of 2024, New Oxygen reported total revenue of 1.063 billion yuan, a year-on-year decline of 3.36%, with a net loss of 133 million yuan, a shift from a profit of 20.78 million yuan in the same period last year [14][36]. - The company's gross profit margin for the same period was 49.21%, down 13.02 percentage points year-on-year, primarily due to lower margins from offline services compared to traditional information services [16][38]. - The rapid expansion of offline beauty treatment services has led to a significant increase in revenue, with a 385.05% year-on-year growth to 427 million yuan, now accounting for 40.16% of total revenue [15][37]. Group 3: Operational Challenges - New Oxygen's shift to a heavy asset model has increased operational costs, with total operating costs reaching 540 million yuan, representing 50.8% of revenue, significantly higher than the traditional platform model [16][39]. - The company faces challenges in maintaining service quality due to a lack of a stable and experienced medical team, which is crucial for the quality of medical beauty services [39]. - Regulatory risks have increased as offline medical practices are subject to stringent oversight from multiple regulatory bodies, raising concerns about compliance and potential public relations crises [39].

Core Viewpoint - The price war surrounding "童颜针" (youthful needle) is not only challenging the pricing system of the medical beauty industry but also testing the transformation path of the company, 新氧 (Xinyang) [1] Group 1: Price War and Market Dynamics - 新氧 has significantly reduced the price of "童颜针" from tens of thousands to 2999 yuan, aiming to gain pricing autonomy through its "奇迹童颜" series and the new "塑缇妍" product [1][8] - The conflict escalated as the manufacturer, 普丽妍, publicly named 新氧's clinics as "non-official partners," questioning their product sources and doctor qualifications [3][4] - The price reduction strategy has raised concerns about the sustainability of the medical beauty industry's profit distribution and the traditional agency model [4][5] Group 2: Transformation Challenges - 新氧's transition from a platform to a direct participant in the industry has led to conflicts with previously partnered medical institutions, resulting in a significant decline in its platform service revenue [11][12] - The company's aggressive expansion into self-operated clinics has resulted in increased costs and operational challenges, with a reported net loss of 64.3 million yuan in the third quarter [12][13] - Despite the challenges, the self-operated business is seen as a key driver for future growth, with a 304.6% year-on-year increase in medical treatment service revenue [12] Group 3: Pricing Strategy and Cost Structure - The drastic price reduction of 70% for "童颜针" is not solely based on cost but is a strategic market move to disrupt the high-price perception in the industry [5][6] - 新氧's lower pricing is attributed to its ability to bypass traditional distribution layers and its strategy of low-margin, high-volume sales [6][7] - The company claims that its pricing reflects a trend towards "value return" in medical beauty consumption, with a 27.1% increase in consumer visits but a 30.9% decrease in average spending [7] Group 4: Regulatory and Compliance Issues - 新氧 has faced multiple regulatory challenges, including fines for non-compliance with national standards and advertising laws [13][14] - The company acknowledges the importance of addressing consumer complaints and emphasizes that its low-cost model does not compromise regulatory compliance [14]

一场围绕童颜针的价格战，拷打的不止是医美行业的定价体系，更是新氧的转型之路。近日，童颜针厂 商普丽妍公开点名新氧旗下数十家诊所为"非官方合作机构"，质疑其产品来源与医生资质，而新氧则强 硬回应，强调其产品渠道合规、全程可溯。这已是新氧今年第二次与上游厂商公开对峙，今年以来，新 氧以"奇迹童颜"系列将"童颜针"价格从万元级一路拉低至2999元，并进一步通过与西宏生物合作推出定 制款"塑缇妍"（奇迹童颜3.0），以差异化的规格与创行业新低的定价，试图完全掌握定价自主权。 激烈价格战的背后，是新氧转型的迫切。面对线上流量红利消退，这家曾经的医美垂直平台正试图通过 自建"青春诊所"完成转型。然而，重资产扩张带来的成本压力、与传统合作生态的冲突以及服务质量与 合规性的质疑，共同构成了其转型之路上的多重考验。胜负的关键，或许不在于价格能否更低，而在于 其能否在颠覆之后，构建一个真正健康、安全且可持续的新模式。 "厂商没办法出货了" 当一份列有79家"非官方合作医疗机构"的名单公开，持续半年的"童颜针定价权之争"再次升级。 近期，童颜针厂商普丽妍公开发布"非官方合作医疗机构"名单，直指46家新氧青春诊所在内的70余家医 疗 ...

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing price war surrounding "童颜针" (youthful needle) is not only challenging the pricing system of the medical beauty industry but also represents a critical transformation path for the company, 新氧 (So-Young) [2][14]. Group 1: Price War and Market Dynamics - 新氧 has significantly reduced the price of "童颜针" from over 10,000 RMB to 2,999 RMB, aiming to gain control over pricing autonomy [2][10]. - The company faces accusations from suppliers like 普丽妍, which has labeled many of 新氧's clinics as "non-official partners," questioning the legitimacy of their product sources and medical qualifications [3][4]. - The price reduction strategy is seen as a challenge to the traditional profit distribution model in the medical beauty industry, where high prices were previously justified by perceived quality [6][7]. Group 2: Transformation Challenges - 新氧 is transitioning from a platform-based model to a direct participant in the medical beauty industry by establishing its own clinics, which has led to conflicts with previously partnered medical institutions [14][15]. - The company's revenue from information and reservation services has declined significantly, with a 34.5% year-on-year drop in the third quarter [14]. - Despite the aggressive expansion into self-operated clinics, 新氧 has reported continuous losses, with a net loss of 64.8 million RMB in the third quarter of 2025 [15][16]. Group 3: Financial Performance and Cost Structure - 新氧's aesthetic treatment services revenue surged by 304.6% year-on-year to 1.84 billion RMB in the third quarter, becoming the largest revenue source [17]. - The gross profit margin for 新氧's medical aesthetic services was reported at only 24.25% in the second quarter of 2025, indicating a significant deviation from industry standards [8][9]. - The company is focusing on cost optimization through strategies like scale procurement and supply chain integration to improve profitability [17]. Group 4: Regulatory and Compliance Issues - 新氧 has faced multiple complaints regarding service quality and compliance, with 876 complaints recorded on consumer platforms, including issues related to false advertising and operational violations [17][19]. - The company has been penalized for non-compliance with national standards, highlighting the regulatory risks associated with its rapid expansion [17][18]. - 新氧 emphasizes that its low pricing strategy does not compromise regulatory compliance and is committed to addressing consumer feedback seriously [19].

一场围绕"童颜针"的价格战，拷打的不止是医美行业的定价体系，更是新氧的转型之路。近日，童颜针厂商普丽妍公开点名新氧旗下数十家诊所为"非官方 合作机构"，质疑其产品来源与医生资质，而新氧则强硬回应，强调其产品渠道合规、全程可溯。这已是新氧今年第二次与上游厂商公开对峙，今年以来， 新氧以"奇迹童颜"系列将"童颜针"价格从万元级一路拉低至2999元，并进一步通过与西宏生物合作推出定制款"塑缇妍"（奇迹童颜3.0），以差异化的规格与 创行业新低的定价，试图完全掌握定价自主权。 激烈价格战的背后，是新氧转型的迫切。面对线上流量红利消退，这家曾经的医美垂直平台正试图通过自建"青春诊所"完成转型。然而，重资产扩张带来的 成本压力、与传统合作生态的冲突以及服务质量与合规性的质疑，共同构成了其转型之路上的多重考验。胜负的关键，或许不在于价格能否更低，而在于其 能否在颠覆之后，构建一个真正健康、安全且可持续的新模式。 "厂商没办法出货了" 当一份列有79家"非官方合作医疗机构"的名单公开，一场持续半年的"童颜针定价权之争"再次升级。 近期，童颜针厂商普丽妍公开发布"非官方合作医疗机构"名单，直指46家新氧青春诊所在内的70余家医 ...