Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a bullish trend in both equity and bond markets in Q2 2025, driven by increased market liquidity and favorable government policies encouraging long-term investments. The performance of various fund categories, particularly technology and QDII equity funds, has been notably strong, with significant returns over the past three years. Fund Performance Section 1.1 Fund Classification Rankings - The top-performing ordinary equity funds over the past three years include: - Jin Ying Technology Innovation A with a return of 75.05% and a maximum drawdown of -38.68% [3] - Jia Shi Hu Rong Selected A with a return of 64.08% and a maximum drawdown of -38.79% [3] - Jing Shun Chang Cheng Hu Gang Shen Selected A with a return of 57.71% and a maximum drawdown of -14.73% [3] 1.2 Mixed Equity Fund Rankings - The leading mixed equity funds include: - Hua Xia North Exchange Innovation with a return of 175.64% and a maximum drawdown of -30.93% [5] - Hui Tian Fu North Exchange Innovation with a return of 111.39% and a maximum drawdown of -27.37% [5] - Wan Jia North Exchange Wisdom Selection with a return of 94.03% and a maximum drawdown of -28.03% [5] 1.3 QDII Equity Fund Rankings - The top QDII equity funds are: - Yi Fang Da Biao Pu Information Technology A with a return of 119.55% and a maximum drawdown of -25.54% [19] - Hua Xia Nasdaq 100 ETF with a return of 108.00% and a maximum drawdown of -22.41% [19] - Hua An Germany (DAX) ETF with a return of 106.74% and a maximum drawdown of -14.76% [19] 1.4 Performance of Bond Funds - The performance of bond funds shows: - The Wan De Short-term Pure Bond Fund Index and the Wan De Medium-term Pure Bond Fund Index increased by 0.64% and 0.95%, respectively, reaching new highs [1] - The top-performing mixed bond funds include Hua Xia Pan Tai A with a return of 30.18% and a maximum drawdown of -7.64% [7] 1.5 Investment Trends - The article notes that the ETF has become a preferred tool for asset allocation, with many products frequently appearing on performance lists, indicating their investment value [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the introduction of a new policy by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) aimed at enhancing the long-term performance of public fund managers by linking their compensation to the performance of their funds relative to benchmarks [2][3] - The policy targets fund managers whose products have underperformed their benchmarks by more than 10 percentage points over three years, leading to a significant reduction in their performance-based compensation [2][3] - The initiative is expected to align the interests of fund managers with those of investors, encouraging a shift away from short-term speculation towards a focus on long-term investment capabilities [2][3] Group 2 - As of May 21, 2023, there are 5,898 public funds managed by fund managers with over three years of experience, with 1,341 funds underperforming their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points [3][4] - Among these, 31 funds have underperformed their benchmarks by more than 50 percentage points, including notable funds managed by well-known managers such as Zheng Chengran from GF Fund and Yao Zhipeng from Harvest Fund [3][4][5] - The worst-performing fund, Morgan Small Cap A, managed by Guo Chen, has a cumulative return of -23.03% over three years, underperforming its benchmark by 127.69 percentage points [4][5] Group 3 - Conversely, there are 543 funds that have outperformed their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points, with 33 funds exceeding their benchmarks by more than 50 percentage points [7][9] - The top-performing fund, Huaxia North Exchange Innovation Small and Medium Enterprises Selected Fund, managed by Gu Xin Feng, achieved a cumulative return of 194.13%, surpassing its benchmark by 175.89 percentage points [9][10] - The North Exchange theme funds have emerged as a significant area for excess returns, with several funds exceeding their benchmarks by over 60 percentage points [10] Group 4 - In response to the new policy, many fund companies are adjusting their performance benchmarks to better reflect the risk-return characteristics of their funds [11][12] - Recent adjustments include changes to benchmarks for various funds, such as the adjustment of the performance benchmark for the浦银安盛稳健增利债券 from "CSI All Bond Index" to a more complex composite benchmark [11][12] - The trend of benchmark adjustments is expected to continue as fund companies seek to align their performance metrics with regulatory expectations and improve their competitive positioning [13][14]

Core Viewpoint - The recent "Action Plan for Promoting High-Quality Development of Public Funds" emphasizes linking fund manager compensation to performance, with significant salary adjustments based on performance relative to benchmarks [1] Group 1: Fund Manager Performance - Chen Ying, managing the Jin Ying Technology Innovation fund, achieved a remarkable 85.96% excess return over the benchmark in the past three years, focusing on AI and technology sectors [3][4] - Sun Quan from the Fu Guo fund has also excelled, with a focus on TMT sectors, achieving significant returns through investments in AI-related companies [5] - Jin Xiao Fei, managing the Peng Hua Medical Technology fund, has delivered a 41.11% return over three years, utilizing a top-down approach to navigate the pharmaceutical sector [6] Group 2: Investment Strategies - Chen Ying emphasizes a diversified portfolio with a focus on emerging technologies, while also managing risks through strategic allocation to blue-chip stocks [4] - Sun Quan's strategy involves identifying competitive companies within high-growth sectors, particularly in AI and renewable energy [5] - Jin Xiao Fei employs a top-down analysis to time market entries and exits, focusing on innovative pharmaceuticals and AI healthcare [6] Group 3: Fund Characteristics - The Jin Ying Technology Innovation fund has a total scale exceeding 72 billion, with a high concentration in technology stocks [3] - The Fu Guo fund managed by Sun Quan has a total scale of over 82 billion, with a significant portion in AI-related stocks [5] - The Peng Hua Medical Technology fund has a scale of approximately 44 billion, with a concentrated portfolio strategy [6] Group 4: Market Trends and Insights - The article highlights the importance of understanding market cycles and the specific stages of industries when making investment decisions [4][6] - Fund managers are encouraged to adapt their strategies based on market conditions, with a focus on long-term growth potential [5][6] - The performance of funds is closely tied to the ability of managers to identify and capitalize on emerging trends, particularly in technology and healthcare sectors [22]

Core Viewpoint - The equity market continued to recover in Q1 2025, with investor risk appetite rising, as evidenced by a 4.65% increase in the Wind Mixed Equity Fund Index for the quarter and an 11.77% increase over the past year [1]. Fund Performance Equity Funds - The top-performing ordinary equity funds over the past three years include: - Chuangjin Hexin Cultural Media A with a return of 61.44% and a maximum drawdown of -28.28% [3] - Jin Ying Technology Innovation A with a return of 60.58% and a maximum drawdown of -38.68% [3] - Zhaoshang Technology Power A with a return of 56.81% and a maximum drawdown of -18.47% [3]. Mixed Equity Funds - The top mixed equity funds include: - Zhaoshang Advantage Enterprise A with a return of 86.51% and a maximum drawdown of -40.83% [7]. - Huatai-PB North Exchange Innovation Selected with a return of 80.10% and a maximum drawdown of -27.37% [7]. Bond Funds - In the fixed income market, there was significant structural differentiation affecting bond fund performance: - The Wind Short-term Pure Bond Index slightly increased by 0.13% in Q1 2025, while the Wind Medium-Long Term Pure Bond Index fell by 0.29%, marking the largest quarterly decline since Q1 2023 [1]. QDII Equity Funds - The top QDII equity funds over the past three years include: - Southern China Emerging Economy A with a return of 84.84% and a maximum drawdown of -33.95% [22]. - Tianhong CSI China-US Internet A with a return of 76.74% and a maximum drawdown of -24.33% [22]. FOF Funds - The top FOF funds over the past three years include: - Xingzheng Global Anyue Stable Pension with a return of 11.83% and a maximum drawdown of -4.99% [27]. Thematic Funds - The top quantitative funds over the past three years include: - CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy with a return of 61.08% and a maximum drawdown of -40.72% [30].

Core Viewpoint - The article presents a ranking of the top 35 fund managers based on their performance over the last three years, highlighting the significance of long-term performance in evaluating fund managers [1][2]. Group 1: Performance Rankings - The top fund manager, 冷文鹏, achieved a total return of 104.70% since taking over a fund in July 2024, benefiting from favorable market conditions [4][6]. - The second-ranked fund manager, 缪玮彬, has maintained a consistent performance with a maximum drawdown of around -20% and an annualized return of 24% over the past three years [6][7]. - The third-ranked fund manager, 白冰洋, has shown solid performance since joining 富国基金, managing a fund that covers various sectors including internet and semiconductor [11]. Group 2: Fund Management Strategies - 冷文鹏's fund is closely tied to the performance of the 北交所, indicating that his success is partly due to market timing and conditions [4][5]. - 缪玮彬's strategy involves maintaining a low portfolio concentration, with no single industry exceeding 10% of holdings, which helps in controlling risk [6][7]. - 白冰洋's fund management reflects a diversified approach across multiple sectors, although her performance this year has not been exceptional [11][12]. Group 3: Fund Manager Profiles - The article notes that 闫思倩 ranks 35th, with her performance significantly boosted by investments in the AI sector [22]. - 鲍无可 is recognized for managing multiple funds with a total scale of 177.83 billion, focusing on a value investment style [19][20]. - 朱红裕, a veteran in the industry, manages two funds with a combined scale of 50 billion, showing a diversified investment strategy across various sectors [16][17].