Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the concept of "deep value" investment style, emphasizing its focus on understanding the logic behind competitive advantages and long-term trends of companies, rather than merely chasing short-term market trends [1][14]. Group 1: Investment Framework - The "deep value" framework proposed by Cai Zhiwen is based on a "three-dimensional resonance" approach, which includes pursuing "low valuation + high quality + high dividend" at the individual stock level, leveraging industry leader advantages and mispricing opportunities at the market level, and designing products that match investor needs [1][2]. - Cai Zhiwen's stock selection system is summarized as "the east is not bright, the west is bright," focusing on three main lines: controllable upstream resource industries, export chain enterprises undergoing structural optimization, and traditional industries in a clearing cycle [2][3]. Group 2: Stock Selection and Portfolio Management - Cai Zhiwen categorizes his stock pool into two types: large-cap leaders with clear moats and extremely low valuations, and small to mid-cap hidden champions with strong fundamentals but lower market attention [2][3]. - The investment strategy emphasizes a combination of low valuation and growth potential, aiming for assets that provide both valuation protection and profit elasticity through industry cycles [3][14]. Group 3: Risk Control Mechanisms - The risk control framework consists of three stages: pre-investment, during investment, and post-investment monitoring, ensuring a comprehensive risk management approach [6][7][10]. - The pre-investment phase focuses on avoiding "value destruction" companies with low free cash flow and high valuations, while the during-investment phase emphasizes balanced diversification across industries with low correlation [5][6]. Group 4: Performance Metrics - Cai Zhiwen's managed products exhibit controlled drawdowns and long-term stability, with metrics showing superior performance compared to peers, such as a maximum drawdown of -18.08% versus -32.87% for the average peer [4][5]. - The products managed by Cai Zhiwen have achieved significant returns, with the "Huitianfu Brand Power" product returning 58.29% over three years, significantly outperforming its benchmark [13]. Group 5: Product Types and Structures - The products managed by Cai Zhiwen are categorized into equity products, focusing on deep value stocks, and fixed income plus products, which combine equity and fixed income strategies for lower volatility [11][12]. - The design of holding periods for products varies, with options for open-ended, one-year, and three-year holding periods to cater to different liquidity and investment needs [12][13].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance of deep value fund managers during different market conditions, highlighting their underperformance in the current bull market compared to growth-style fund managers, particularly in sectors like technology and innovation [4][20]. Group 1: Performance Comparison - In the past three years of bear markets, deep value fund managers performed relatively well, with many managing over 10 billion in assets [5]. - As of September 24, 2023, mainstream deep value fund managers like Xu Yan and Jiang Cheng had annual returns below 20%, while the average return of the CSI Active Equity Fund Index reached 34.11% [6][12]. - The article notes that deep value fund managers typically focus on low-valuation, stable companies, which leads to lower returns in bull markets but better performance in bear markets [14][19]. Group 2: Investment Philosophy - Deep value fund managers invest from an owner's perspective, focusing on long-term intrinsic value rather than short-term market fluctuations [16]. - They emphasize "quality and price," seeking high-quality companies that are undervalued due to market sentiment [17]. - Safety margins are crucial in their investment decisions, as they aim to protect against errors and downside risks [17][18]. Group 3: Market Trends and Strategies - The current bull market has favored growth-style funds, particularly those heavily invested in technology, with some achieving over 200% annual returns [7]. - Deep value fund managers often hold significant positions in traditional sectors like finance and real estate, which have underperformed in the current market [14][19]. - The article suggests that deep value funds should be considered for core portfolio allocations, especially for conservative investors [23][24]. Group 4: Selection Criteria - Not all low-valuation stocks represent deep value; some may belong to contrarian or cyclical strategies [29]. - Investors should focus on the stability of deep value fund managers' styles, as many have shifted towards growth or other strategies over time [36][38]. - The article advises that deep value funds can serve as a bottom-layer allocation in a diversified portfolio, balancing risk and return [24][26].

Core Insights - Deep value fund managers, who performed well during the bear market, are underperforming in the current bull market, primarily due to the significant rise in technology stocks and growth-oriented funds [1][2][10] - The average annual return of deep value fund managers is below the industry average, with many products yielding less than 20% year-to-date, while the CSI Active Equity Fund Index has achieved a return of 34.11% [3][9] - The investment philosophy of deep value managers focuses on long-term intrinsic value, safety margins, and stable business models, which contrasts sharply with the growth-oriented approach that prioritizes high growth potential and current market trends [10][11][12] Performance Comparison - As of September 24, 2023, prominent deep value fund managers like Xu Yan and Jiang Cheng have seen their flagship products yield less than 20%, with only a few exceeding 30% [3][9] - The performance of deep value funds is generally in line with the CSI 300 Index, which has a year-to-date return of 15.63% [10] - In contrast, growth-oriented funds have seen returns exceeding 200% in some cases, highlighting the stark difference in performance between the two styles [5][10] Market Trends - The current market environment favors growth-oriented strategies, particularly in sectors like technology and innovation, while deep value strategies are struggling due to their focus on low-valuation sectors such as finance and real estate [10][12][26] - The number of deep value fund managers is relatively small compared to growth-oriented managers, and many notable deep value figures have left the industry, further limiting the available options for investors [25][29] Investment Strategy - Deep value funds are recommended for conservative investors as a core holding, while growth funds may be allocated for those seeking higher returns [16][17] - A balanced approach that includes both deep value and growth strategies may provide better risk management and potential returns [18][19] - Investors should be cautious of deep value funds that show unusually high performance in a bull market, as this may indicate a shift in investment style [16]

Core Viewpoint - In a volatile capital market, "stability" has become a core demand for investors, with Cai Zhiwen of Huatai Fund adhering to deep value investment principles and achieving a cumulative return of 17.81% since the establishment of the fund in February 2023, outperforming the benchmark of 13.14% [1][2] Investment Philosophy - The investment philosophy of Huatai Fund emphasizes deep fundamental analysis, selecting high-quality securities for medium to long-term investment to achieve stable growth and high long-term returns [3] - Cai Zhiwen's investment framework is rooted in selecting undervalued companies with strong competitive advantages and governance, focusing on "industry, company competitiveness, and corporate governance" [3][4] Investment Strategy - Cai Zhiwen actively seeks sectors with upward fundamentals, valuing long-term industry trends over short-term market fads, and prioritizes companies with strong competitive moats [4][5] - The investment strategy includes a focus on companies that return value to shareholders, emphasizing governance and transparency, with many holdings offering high dividend yields [5][6] Research Methodology - The investment approach combines "deep value" with "fixed income+" through a structured research methodology, avoiding market fads and relying on data-driven analysis [6][7] - Two independent stock selection systems are established: one focusing on value growth (PEG-ROIC) and the other on absolute value (high cash flow, high dividends, low valuation) [6][7] Risk Management - A three-tier risk control system is implemented to manage drawdowns, emphasizing strict selection criteria at the buying stage to minimize risks [9][10] - The investment process includes a mechanism for tracking fundamentals, allowing for informed decisions during market fluctuations [10] Platform Support - The success of Cai Zhiwen's "fixed income+" practice is supported by Huatai Fund's integrated research platform, fostering collaboration among fund managers and researchers [11][12] - The company promotes a culture of openness and sharing, enabling efficient coverage of various sectors and enhancing investment decision-making [11][12] Product Strategy - Huatai Fund's multi-strategy product system aims to address the challenges faced by retail investors, matching products to different risk-return profiles [12][13] - The "fixed income+" products are designed to meet investor demands for stability while providing opportunities for enhanced returns through equity components [12][13]

Core Viewpoint - In a volatile capital market, "stability" has become a core demand for investors, with a focus on deep value investment and strict adherence to investment discipline, as demonstrated by the performance of the fund managed by Cai Zhiwen, which achieved a cumulative return of 17.81% since its inception in February 2023, outperforming the benchmark of 13.14% [2][3]. Investment Philosophy - The investment philosophy of the company emphasizes deep value, focusing on selecting high-quality securities through in-depth fundamental analysis, aiming for sustainable long-term growth and stable returns [5][6]. - Cai Zhiwen's investment framework is rooted in the belief that deep value investment involves buying quality companies at reasonable prices and holding them long-term, utilizing a three-dimensional screening process based on industry, company competitiveness, and governance [5][7]. Investment Strategy - The company actively seeks sectors with upward fundamental trends, prioritizing industries in a growth phase, regardless of whether they are traditional sectors [6][7]. - The focus is on companies with "non-replicable" competitive advantages, ensuring long-term profitability through strong competitive barriers [7][8]. - Governance is a key consideration, with a preference for companies that reward shareholders and maintain transparent information disclosure [7]. Risk Management - A three-tier risk control system is established to manage drawdowns, integrating risk control into the entire investment process, with a strong emphasis on pre-investment screening [15][16]. - The selection of stocks for the "Fixed Income+" product is more stringent, favoring large-cap, low-volatility leaders to mitigate risks associated with smaller, more volatile stocks [16]. Research Methodology - The company employs a rule-based research methodology, focusing on data-driven analysis and avoiding speculative trends, aligning with the risk-averse nature of "Fixed Income+" investors [10][12]. - Two independent stock selection systems are utilized: one focusing on value growth and the other on absolute value, ensuring a stable value base while capturing growth opportunities [11]. Platform Support - The company's investment strategy is supported by a vertically integrated research platform that fosters collaboration among fund managers and researchers, enhancing the depth and breadth of research [20][21]. - A data science team monitors investment strategies and fund manager styles to ensure sustainable performance and mitigate style drift [20][21].

Group 1 - The article highlights Ye Yong's unique experience and expertise in macro and industry cycles, which has led to significant investment success in sectors like energy, gold, and industrial metals [1][3][4] - Ye Yong's funds, managed under Wan Jia Fund, have shown impressive returns, with Wan Jia Trend leading at 73.07% and Wan Jia Cycle Driver at 51.75% over the past year [1] - His investment strategy is characterized by a deep understanding of macroeconomic trends and the ability to identify cyclical opportunities, particularly in the context of the current global economic shifts [1][5][16] Group 2 - Ye Yong's background as a financial journalist and his roles in equity investment have provided him with a solid foundation for understanding macroeconomic and cyclical trends [3][4] - He emphasizes the importance of recognizing the cyclical nature of various industries, advocating for a top-down investment approach rather than a narrow focus on cyclical stocks [8][9] - Ye Yong's insights into the commodity cycle indicate a shift from a decade-long downtrend to an upward cycle, particularly in resources like coal and oil [5][10] Group 3 - The article discusses Ye Yong's perspective on the "anti-involution" policy, which he believes has significant implications for macroeconomic stability and industry dynamics [16][17] - Ye Yong argues that the current economic environment necessitates a comprehensive approach to address overcapacity across various sectors, unlike previous supply-side reforms [16][18] - He predicts that the Producer Price Index (PPI) will see a turning point in the second half of the year, potentially reversing the deflationary spiral [21][30] Group 4 - Ye Yong outlines three key investment areas for the upcoming year: industrial metals, traditional cyclical leaders, and post-cyclical sectors, indicating a strategic shift towards cyclical assets [32][34][35] - He identifies copper as a core investment due to its stable demand and supply dynamics, likening its importance to that of oil in previous commodity bull markets [13][32] - The article emphasizes the need for investors to adapt their perceptions of resource stocks, as the current market conditions favor a transition from a downtrend to an uptrend in commodity prices [10][30]

Group 1 - The core investment philosophy of deep value is derived from Graham's "cigar butt" approach, focusing on stocks priced significantly below their liquidation value, which can yield good returns even in immediate liquidation scenarios [1][7] - The deep value fund pool has demonstrated stable historical returns with a high risk-reward ratio, achieving an annualized return of 11.81% from February 2, 2015, to August 7, 2025, outperforming the equity fund index by 4.26% [1][9] - The fund pool has shown strong performance stability, even during market conditions favoring growth styles, maintaining high absolute returns despite some drawdowns since mid-2024 [1][12] Group 2 - The excess returns of the deep value fund pool are primarily attributed to dynamic allocation, style configuration, and stock selection, with a preference for low momentum, low elasticity, and low volatility styles [2][15] - The current sector allocation has shifted towards consumer sectors while maintaining exposure to manufacturing and TMT sectors, indicating a strategic adjustment in response to market conditions [2][18] - The deep value fund pool is defined by absolute undervaluation characteristics, with a focus on funds that have positive exposure to the BP factor and high expected net profit [2][22] Group 3 - The newly selected deep value fund list includes various funds with significant returns, such as "中庚价值灵动灵活配置混合" with a return of 19.82% and "广发稳健策略混合" with a return of 18.64% [2][23] - The analysis of individual funds reveals a focus on maintaining a balance between absolute returns and risk management, with strategies tailored to specific market conditions [2][25][30] - The report emphasizes the importance of quality and valuation as key safety margins, utilizing DCF cash flow models to assess companies' competitive advantages and growth potential [2][25]

Core Insights - The active management equity funds are experiencing a strong recovery in returns, with 95% achieving positive returns and an average return exceeding 15% as of August 7, 2025 [1][2] - The pharmaceutical sector has emerged as the biggest winner, with four funds doubling their returns, all focused on this industry [3] Fund Performance - As of August 7, 2025, the average return for over 4,500 active equity funds is 15.03%, while more than 93% of over 2,500 stock index funds have positive returns averaging 11.8% [2] - Active equity funds have outperformed major indices like CSI 300 (4.6%) and CSI 500 (10.6%) after three years of underperformance [2] Fund Manager Dynamics - There are 90 active equity fund managers managing over 10 billion yuan, with Zhang Kun from E Fund leading at over 50 billion yuan [5][6] - Among these managers, 86 have achieved positive returns, with the average return for those managing over 30 billion yuan being 9.8%, which is lower than the average of the top 90 managers [6] Sector Focus - The four funds that doubled their returns are primarily invested in the pharmaceutical sector, including Changcheng Pharmaceutical Industry Selection and Huashan Pharmaceutical Biotechnology [3] - The top-performing managers, Zhang Wei and Zhang Lu, have focused on themes like innovative drugs and robotics, contributing to their high returns of 65.8% and 53.4% respectively [8] Underperforming Funds - Despite the overall positive trend, 228 active equity funds reported negative returns, with the worst performer, Qianhai Kaiyuan AI A, showing a return of -18.5% [3] - Wang Mingxu from GF Fund has seen 7 out of 8 funds underperform, with a bottom return of -7.4% [8][9] Investor Sentiment - Although the A-share market has been rising, investor confidence in active equity funds remains low, with a significant reduction in total shares of active equity funds by approximately 198.24 billion shares in the first half of 2025 [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles indicates a strong recovery in the performance of actively managed equity funds in 2025, with 95% of these funds achieving positive returns and an average return exceeding 15% as of August 7 [2][3] - The pharmaceutical sector has emerged as the biggest winner, with four actively managed equity funds achieving returns that have doubled this year, all focusing on the pharmaceutical industry [4][5] - As of mid-2025, there are 90 fund managers managing over 10 billion yuan, with Zhang Kun from E Fund leading with over 50 billion yuan under management [8][9] Group 2 - The average return of actively managed equity funds has outperformed major stock indices, such as the CSI 300 and the CSI 500, which recorded returns of 4.6% and 10.6% respectively [3] - The average return of the entire market of over 4,500 actively managed equity funds is 15.03%, compared to 11.8% for over 2,500 stock index funds [3] - Despite the overall positive performance, there are still 228 actively managed equity funds with negative returns, with the worst performer, Qianhai Kaiyuan AI A, showing a return of -18.5% [4][6] Group 3 - The top-performing funds in the pharmaceutical sector include Changcheng Pharmaceutical Industry Selection, Bank of China Hong Kong Stock Connect Pharmaceutical, Yongying Pharmaceutical Innovation Selection, and Huashan Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, all achieving significant returns [4][5] - The performance of fund managers varies significantly, with some, like Zhang Wei and Zhang Lu, achieving returns of 65.8% and 53.4% respectively, while others, such as Wang Mingxu, have negative returns [12][13] - The total scale of actively managed equity funds reached 3.39 trillion yuan by mid-2025, although the total number of shares decreased by 198.24 billion compared to the end of the previous year [6][7]

Core Viewpoint - The resurgence of established private equity firms in China is highlighted, with many achieving significant performance recoveries and attracting renewed investment interest after a period of underperformance [1][2]. Group 1: Performance Recovery - Established private equity firms are experiencing a performance rebound, with some reporting year-to-date returns exceeding 40% [1]. - Notable firms like淡水泉投资 and 重阳投资 have reported year-to-date returns of 15.98% and over 15%, respectively, with近一年收益率 around 35% [1][2]. - 源乐晟 has also seen a turnaround, with year-to-date returns reaching 35.54% and over 40% in the last six months [2]. Group 2: Investment Strategies - Various strategies are being employed by established private equity firms, including deep value investing and growth-oriented investments, particularly in sectors like artificial intelligence [2]. - The adaptability of investment strategies to different market conditions is emphasized, with firms adjusting their approaches based on asset performance [2]. Group 3: Research and Organizational Reforms - Firms are actively reforming their research and investment frameworks to enhance adaptability and decision-making [3]. - For instance, 淡水泉投资 has restructured its research organization to improve its understanding of emerging industries and market dynamics [3]. - 星石投资 has implemented a multi-fund manager system to enhance decision-making and performance accountability [3]. Group 4: Market Outlook - The outlook for the market remains positive, with expectations of structural opportunities driven by policy support and active capital [4]. - Key areas of focus include the revaluation of high-quality Chinese assets, the globalization of competitive industries, and advancements in technology innovation [4]. - 源乐晟 anticipates favorable conditions in both Chinese and U.S. stock markets, driven by economic resilience and adjustments in investor sentiment [4].