资料显示，悦康药业集团股份有限公司位于北京市北京经济技术开发区宏达中路6号,香港铜锣湾希慎道 33号利园1期19楼1919室，成立日期2001年8月14日，上市日期2020年12月24日，公司主营业务涉及悦康 药业定位于高端化学药的研发与生产,报告期内主营业务收入主要集中在心脑血管药物、消化系统药 物、糖尿病用药以及抗感染药物等。银杏叶提取物注射液、天麻素注射液、注射用兰索拉唑、奥美拉唑 肠溶胶囊、盐酸二甲双胍缓释片、注射用头孢呋辛钠、注射用头孢曲松钠对公司收入贡献占比较大或未 来增长潜力较大,是公司的主要产品。主营业务收入构成为：心脑血管类55.67%，抗感染20.88%，原料 药8.73%，消化系统类6.87%，降糖类4.85%，其他2.62%，其他(补充)0.36%，技术服务0.02%。 从基金十大重仓股角度 数据显示，红塔红土基金旗下1只基金重仓悦康药业。红塔红土医药精选股票发起式A（020331）三季 度持有股数2.3万股，占基金净值比例为3.82%，位居第十大重仓股。根据测算，今日浮盈赚取约3.24万 元。 红塔红土医药精选股票发起式A（020331）成立日期2024年4月2日，最新规模1254万 ...

华安中证1000指数增强A（015148）基金经理为张序。 截至发稿，张序累计任职时间5年235天，现任基金资产总规模76.61亿元，任职期间最佳基金回报 145.19%， 任职期间最差基金回报-7.01%。 风险提示：市场有风险，投资需谨慎。本文为AI大模型自动发布，任何在本文出现的信息（包括但不 限于个股、评论、预测、图表、指标、理论、任何形式的表述等）均只作为参考，不构成个人投资建 议。 责任编辑：小浪快报 1月6日，悦康药业涨5.46%，截至发稿，报26.26元/股，成交4626.92万元，换手率0.40%，总市值118.17 亿元。 资料显示，悦康药业集团股份有限公司位于北京市北京经济技术开发区宏达中路6号,香港铜锣湾希慎道 33号利园1期19楼1919室，成立日期2001年8月14日，上市日期2020年12月24日，公司主营业务涉及悦康 药业定位于高端化学药的研发与生产,报告期内主营业务收入主要集中在心脑血管药物、消化系统药 物、糖尿病用药以及抗感染药物等。银杏叶提取物注射液、天麻素注射液、注射用兰索拉唑、奥美拉唑 肠溶胶囊、盐酸二甲双胍缓释片、注射用头孢呋辛钠、注射用头孢曲松钠对公司收入贡献占比 ...

Core Viewpoint - Yuyuan Pharmaceutical experienced a stock price decline of 2.08% on December 18, with a current price of 21.68 CNY per share and a market capitalization of 9.756 billion CNY [1] Financial Performance - For the period from January to September 2025, Yuyuan Pharmaceutical reported a revenue of 1.759 billion CNY, a year-on-year decrease of 41.20%, and a net profit attributable to shareholders of -148 million CNY, a year-on-year decrease of 170.56% [3] - The company has distributed a total of 1.092 billion CNY in dividends since its A-share listing, with 584 million CNY distributed over the past three years [4] Stock Market Activity - Yuyuan Pharmaceutical's stock has increased by 50.45% year-to-date, but has seen a decline of 19.23% over the last five trading days, 3.08% over the last 20 days, and 11.98% over the last 60 days [1] - The company has appeared on the "Dragon and Tiger List" four times this year, with the most recent appearance on August 27, where it recorded a net buy of -105 million CNY [1] Shareholder Information - As of September 30, 2025, Yuyuan Pharmaceutical had 10,700 shareholders, a decrease of 8.39% from the previous period, with an average of 42,095 circulating shares per shareholder, an increase of 9.16% [3] - The top ten circulating shareholders include notable funds such as the Fortune Precision Medical Flexible Allocation Mixed A and the E Fund Healthcare Industry Mixed A, with changes in their holdings noted [4] Business Overview - Yuyuan Pharmaceutical, established on August 14, 2001, and listed on December 24, 2020, focuses on the research and production of high-end chemical drugs, with significant revenue contributions from cardiovascular, digestive, diabetes, and anti-infection medications [2] - The revenue composition includes 55.67% from cardiovascular drugs, 20.88% from anti-infection drugs, and smaller percentages from other categories [2]

（来源：深圳商报） "一边是创始人股权被司法拍卖，一边是紧急启动H股上市募资"，正陷入业绩滑坡困境的科创板上市公司悦康药业近期的一系列操作，让市场充满疑虑。 近日，悦康药业发布公告称，为进一步提高公司综合竞争力，提升公司国际品牌形象，同时更好地利用国际资本市场，多元化融资渠道，公司拟在境外发 行股份（H股）并在港交所主板上市。 根据公告，本次发行上市方案尚需提交公司股东大会审议，并需获得中国证监会、香港联交所等相关监管机构的备案、批准或核准。公司表示将在股东会 决议有效期内（即自公司股东会审议通过之日起24个月或同意延长的其他期限）选择适当的时机和发行窗口完成本次发行H股并上市。 资料显示，悦康药业集团股份有限公司成立于2001年，总部位于北京，是一家集新药研发、药品生产、流通销售及国际贸易于一体的医药集团企业。目前 已形成核酸药物靶点发现平台、多肽药物开发平台、缓控释制剂技术平台等九大核心研发平台，涵盖核酸药、多肽药、中药创新药以及高端化药等领域。 2020年12月24日，悦康药业在上海证券交易所科创板上市。然而，公司募投项目进展并不顺利。 2024年12月19日，悦康药业公告将研发中心建设、固体制剂生产线 ...

11月20日，悦康药业涨5.34%，截至发稿，报21.89元/股，成交1.18亿元，换手率1.21%，总市值98.50亿 元。 资料显示，悦康药业集团股份有限公司位于北京市北京经济技术开发区宏达中路6号，成立日期2001年8 月14日，上市日期2020年12月24日，公司主营业务涉及悦康药业定位于高端化学药的研发与生产,报告 期内主营业务收入主要集中在心脑血管药物、消化系统药物、糖尿病用药以及抗感染药物等。银杏叶提 取物注射液、天麻素注射液、注射用兰索拉唑、奥美拉唑肠溶胶囊、盐酸二甲双胍缓释片、注射用头孢 呋辛钠、注射用头孢曲松钠对公司收入贡献占比较大或未来增长潜力较大,是公司的主要产品。主营业 务收入构成为：心脑血管类55.67%，抗感染20.88%，原料药8.73%，消化系统类6.87%，降糖类4.85%， 其他2.62%，其他(补充)0.36%，技术服务0.02%。 从基金十大重仓股角度 责任编辑：小浪快报 华安中证1000指数增强A（015148）成立日期2022年7月12日，最新规模4593.8万。今年以来收益 24.74%，同类排名2011/4208；近一年收益23.09%，同类排名1859/39 ...

Core Insights - The Chinese medicine sector showed a positive performance with an increase of 0.81% last week, while the overall pharmaceutical sector declined by 2.4% [2] - The valuation metrics for the Chinese medicine sector are as follows: PE (ttm) at 28.11X and PB (lf) at 2.37X, indicating a slight increase from the previous week [3][5] - The recent price index for traditional Chinese medicine materials has risen by 0.2%, with 9 categories increasing in price and 3 categories decreasing [6] Industry Analysis - The fourth batch of national procurement for traditional Chinese medicine includes 90 varieties, which presents both challenges and opportunities for production companies [7] - The investment recommendation maintains an "overweight" rating for the industry, focusing on three main lines: price governance, consumption recovery, and state-owned enterprise reform [8][9] Investment Recommendations - The first investment line emphasizes price governance, suggesting to monitor price reductions and market share in the context of procurement and medical insurance negotiations [8] - The second line focuses on consumption recovery, driven by macroeconomic improvement and an aging population, favoring companies with strong brand and product advantages [9] - The third line highlights opportunities arising from state-owned enterprise reforms, particularly in companies with strong R&D capabilities and unique products [9] Company Performance - Among the companies in the Chinese medicine sector, notable performers include ST Huhuluwa, Darentang, and Zhongsheng Pharmaceutical, while underperformers include Wanbangde and Qidi Pharmaceutical [2]

Investment Rating - The industry maintains an "Overweight" rating, suggesting a positive outlook for investment opportunities in the traditional Chinese medicine sector [6]. Core Insights - The traditional Chinese medicine sector showed resilience with a 0.81% increase in the index, while the broader pharmaceutical sector declined by 2.4% [2]. - The price-to-earnings (PE) ratio for the traditional Chinese medicine sector is 28.11X, reflecting a slight increase, while the price-to-book (PB) ratio stands at 2.37X, also showing a minor rise [3]. - The recent price index for traditional Chinese medicinal materials has increased by 0.2%, indicating a slight upward trend in the market [4]. - The fourth batch of national procurement for traditional Chinese medicine has been announced, including 90 varieties, which presents both challenges and opportunities for production companies [5]. Summary by Sections Market Performance - The traditional Chinese medicine index closed at 6593.95 points, with a weekly increase of 0.81%, contrasting with declines in other pharmaceutical sectors [2][11]. - Notable performers in the sector include ST HuLuWa, DaRenTang, and ZhongSheng Pharmaceutical, while companies like WanBangDe and QiDi Pharmaceutical lagged [2]. Valuation - The PE ratio for the traditional Chinese medicine sector is currently at 28.11X, with a year-to-date maximum of 30.26X and a minimum of 24.72X [3]. - The PB ratio is at 2.37X, with a maximum of 2.59X and a minimum of 2.17X over the past year [3]. Raw Material Prices - The price index for traditional Chinese medicinal materials has shown a slight increase, with 9 categories rising and 3 falling in the past week [4]. Focus on National Procurement - The fourth batch of national procurement includes 90 varieties, with a focus on products that have significant demand and established clinical applications [5]. Investment Recommendations - The report suggests focusing on three main investment themes: price governance, consumption recovery, and state-owned enterprise reform [6][9]. - Specific recommendations include companies with strong R&D capabilities, those less affected by procurement impacts, and leading brand enterprises in traditional Chinese medicine [9].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of "dual pricing" in designated pharmacies, where the same medication is sold at different prices to insured and uninsured patients, raising concerns about fairness and regulatory compliance [1][2][3]. Group 1: Instances of Dual Pricing - In Fuzhou, a medication costs 22 yuan when purchased with insurance but only 12.8 yuan when paid in cash [2]. - In Anyang, a certain injection costs 2980 yuan for insured patients and between 1350 to 1790 yuan for uninsured patients, showing a price difference of nearly 100% [2]. - In Chongqing, a cold medicine is priced at 31 yuan for insured patients and 17 yuan for uninsured patients [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Framework and Violations - The pricing discrepancies violate regulations that prohibit unfair pricing practices against insured patients [3]. - Experts assert that pharmacies should maintain uniform pricing for the same medication under identical transaction conditions, regardless of the patient's insurance status [3]. - Violations can lead to severe penalties, including the cancellation of a pharmacy's qualification for insurance billing [3]. Group 3: Reasons for Pricing Discrepancies - Designated pharmacies are expected to adhere to agreements that prevent discriminatory pricing against insured patients [4]. - Factors contributing to dual pricing include high operational costs and increased competition from online pharmacies, leading some pharmacies to exploit insurance to attract customers [4]. - The lack of effective regulatory oversight allows pharmacies to engage in dual pricing practices without detection [5]. Group 4: Solutions and Recommendations - The National Medical Insurance Administration is taking steps to enhance price management and monitor dual pricing practices more closely [6]. - Measures include potential penalties for pharmacies found engaging in dual pricing, such as suspending insurance billing and revoking service agreements [6]. - A call for improved collaboration among regulatory bodies to establish a robust monitoring mechanism and enforce penalties for pricing fraud is emphasized [6]. Group 5: Consumer Awareness - Consumers are encouraged to be vigilant and informed about insurance policies and pricing when purchasing medications [7]. - Tools such as price comparison apps are being developed to help consumers find reasonably priced medications [6].

Core Insights - The article highlights the issue of "dual pricing" in designated pharmacies, where the same medication is sold at different prices to insured and uninsured patients, raising concerns about fairness and legality [1][2][3] Group 1: Occurrence of Dual Pricing - Reports indicate that in various regions, pharmacies are charging higher prices to patients using insurance compared to those paying out-of-pocket, with significant price discrepancies observed [2][3] - Specific examples include a medication priced at 22 yuan for insured patients and 12.8 yuan for cash buyers in Fuzhou, and another instance where a medication costs 2980 yuan for insured patients versus 1350-1790 yuan for uninsured patients in Henan [2] Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Framework - According to regulations, pharmacies are prohibited from charging different prices based on insurance status, and violations can lead to penalties including the loss of their insurance billing privileges [3][4] - Experts emphasize that pricing should be uniform for the same product under identical conditions, and any differentiation based on insurance status is considered a violation of laws [3][4] Group 3: Reasons Behind Pricing Discrepancies - The pricing strategies of designated pharmacies are influenced by operational costs and market competition, leading some to adopt dual pricing to attract insured patients while maximizing cash sales [4][5] - The pressure from rising operational costs and competition from online pharmacies has contributed to the prevalence of dual pricing practices [4] Group 4: Regulatory Responses and Solutions - The National Healthcare Security Administration has initiated measures to enhance price management in designated pharmacies and monitor dual pricing practices more closely [6] - Plans are in place to implement real-time settlement of insurance funds with pharmacies, aiming for nationwide coverage by 2026, which could help mitigate the issue [6] Group 5: Consumer Awareness and Action - Consumers are encouraged to be vigilant and informed about pricing when using insurance, including checking prices and retaining receipts to identify discrepancies [7]

Core Viewpoint - The emergence of "yin-yang pricing" in pharmacies, where the same medication is sold at different prices to insured and uninsured patients, raises concerns about fairness and legality in the healthcare system [1][3][4]. Group 1: Instances of "Yin-Yang Pricing" - Reports indicate that in various regions, pharmacies are charging higher prices to insured patients compared to uninsured ones, with significant price discrepancies observed [3]. - For example, in Fuzhou, a medication costs 22 yuan when purchased with insurance but only 12.8 yuan when paid in cash [3]. - In another case, a certain injection costs 2980 yuan for insured patients but ranges from 1350 to 1790 yuan for uninsured patients, highlighting a nearly 100% price difference [3]. Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Framework - The pricing practices violate regulations set forth by the Price Law and the Medical Insurance Fund Supervision Management Regulations, which mandate uniform pricing for the same medication regardless of the patient's insurance status [4]. - Experts assert that pharmacies should not differentiate prices based on whether a customer has insurance, as this undermines the rights of insured patients and leads to losses in medical insurance funds [4]. Group 3: Reasons Behind Pricing Discrepancies - The financial pressures on pharmacies, including fixed operational costs and increased competition from online sales, contribute to the prevalence of "yin-yang pricing" [5]. - Some pharmacies lure insured patients with the promise of lower cash prices, thereby avoiding the delays associated with insurance reimbursements and enhancing their cash flow [5]. Group 4: Regulatory Responses and Future Measures - The National Medical Insurance Administration has initiated measures to monitor and address "yin-yang pricing," including potential penalties for pharmacies found in violation [7]. - As of May 2023, over 20,700 pharmacies have adopted instant settlement systems for medical insurance, with plans to expand this to all regions by 2026 [7]. - A collaborative approach involving multiple regulatory bodies is deemed necessary to effectively combat unfair pricing practices and enhance transparency in drug pricing [7]. Group 5: Consumer Awareness and Rights - Consumers are encouraged to be vigilant and informed about their rights regarding medical insurance and pricing, including verifying prices at the point of sale [8]. - The introduction of price comparison tools and services aims to empower consumers to make informed purchasing decisions [7][8].