三宝集团董事长王光文在致辞中向莅临现场的各位领导、来宾表示最热烈的欢迎和衷心的感谢！向在项目建设过程中辛勤付出的全体工作人员、合作单 位，致以诚挚的问候和崇高的敬意！他表示，项目一期生产线采用国内首台套小六辊六机架（UCMW）酸连轧全智能控制系统，项目从开工到投产仅用 时10个月，树立起单体项目建设速度最快、质量最优的新标杆。下一步，我们将始终紧跟国家战略导向，积极落实漳州市委市政府"三头六臂"主导产业， 精准发力"钢头制造"，力争在"十五五"规划中期，实现营收突破一千亿以上，打造国际一线品牌，为区域经济高质量发展贡献三宝力量！ 中冶南方总经理黄能超作为项目设计方致辞。他表示，中冶南方与三宝集团渊源深厚、合作紧密。本次冷轧硅钢项目设计对标国际领先水平，秉持"技术 引领、精益设计"核心理念，以国际最高标准精心打造，致力于树立行业标杆。该项目是三宝集团向"高精特新"转型的关键举措，将为漳州乃至全国钢铁 产业升级注入强劲动能。中冶南方期待与三宝集团持续深化合作，携手共赢高质量发展新未来。 中国二十冶集团董事长徐立作为项目总承建方致辞。他表示，冷轧硅钢项目对标国家工业建设高标准打造，是三宝集团战略转型升级的关键工程。 ...

马口铁，即镀锡薄钢板，凭借其优异的防锈性能、良好的印刷适性、出色的密封性以及高度可回收性，长期以来广泛应用于食品饮料、化工及日用品包装 领域，在华东地区需求旺盛。 （来源：本钢板材） 日前，从板材营销中心获悉，2025年本钢马口铁销量在华东区域市场实现跨越式增长，较2023年、2024年增长近三倍，其中高端产品占比高达87%，进一 步提升了产品溢价能力和品牌影响力，为本钢高端化转型提供了有力支撑。 面对这一市场机遇，板材营销中心从2024年底强化战略布局，积极组织厂矿生产技术人员、营销本部和华东区域公司相关人员，从两方面进行全力攻关。 一方面，全面强化"销研产财"一体化协同机制，研究高端产品生产开发，提质保产；另一方面加强市场开发，精准聚焦高端市场。在开发江苏某客户过程 中，相关团队仅用20天便高效完成从技术交流、方案评审、组织生产到集港发货的全流程，并顺利将1000吨实验料送达企业，赢得客户高度认可，为后续 深度合作奠定坚实基础。 在实际工作中，团队人员紧紧围绕客户需求，迎难而上，在首次供应客户高端牌号的关键节点，本钢技术人员新春佳节坚守一线，全程跟踪客户使用情 况，及时解决技术难题，最终成功打开华东高端马 ...

Core Points - China has decided to impose anti-dumping duties on 30 countries, with the highest rate reaching 103.1%, aimed at protecting its domestic industries from harm, with a duration of five years [1][3] - The countries affected include the 27 EU nations, the UK, South Korea, and Indonesia, primarily due to dumping practices related to stainless steel products [3][4] - The highest anti-dumping duty is on South Korea at 103.1%, while the EU and UK face a rate of 43%, and Indonesia has the lowest at 20.2% [3][5] Summary by Sections Anti-Dumping Duties - China will start imposing anti-dumping duties on July 1, 2025, for a period of five years against 30 countries due to dumping of stainless steel products [3] - South Korea faces the highest duty at 103.1%, with POSCO being an exception at 23.1% due to its compliance efforts [3] - The EU and UK will incur a duty of 43%, while Indonesia's duty is set at 20.2% [3] Trade Protectionism - The article highlights the hypocrisy of Western nations, particularly the EU, which have initiated trade protectionism under the guise of protecting local industries without substantial evidence [4] - China has stated that affected countries can appeal the decision, indicating a willingness to reconsider if presented with sufficient justification [4] EU and US Relations - The EU is under pressure regarding its reliance on China for rare earth materials, and despite its demands, China has not fully acquiesced [7] - The EU has shown signs of compromise with the US regarding tariffs, indicating a willingness to accept a 10% general tariff in exchange for exemptions in key sectors [9] - The article suggests that the EU's dependence on the US market makes it difficult for them to confront the US directly [9] Impact on US Market - The article discusses the unintended consequences of Trump's tariff policies, which were intended to boost US manufacturing but have led to increased costs for American consumers [11] - The rising costs have prompted US buyers to seek ways to circumvent tariffs, highlighting the challenges of finding alternatives to Chinese manufacturing [11] - The overall sentiment is that engaging with China requires sincerity from both the EU and the US, as China's retaliatory measures are seen as a response to excessive pressure [11]

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Viewpoints of the Report - Trump's governing philosophy and policy proposals echo those of William McKinley and Ronald Reagan, but he faces more severe structural constraints, and his policy logic may evolve to use tariffs as a tactical deterrent, technology breakthrough as a long - term strategic fulcrum, and debt restructuring/monetization to relieve debt pressure, with the continuous collapse of the US dollar's credit seemingly inevitable [4][9][70] - Trade protectionism cannot subvert the fundamental logic of industrial evolution. McKinley and Reagan's successes were due to specific historical conditions, while Trump faces "triple hard constraints" [4][70] Summary According to Relevant Catalogs 1. Historical Repetition? —— Policy Review of McKinley and Reagan 1.1. Trade Barriers in the McKinley Era: High - Tariff Protectionism - After the Civil War, the US pursued trade protectionism. In 1890, the "McKinley Tariff" raised the average import tariff from 38% to 49.5%, which stimulated the rise of the US steel industry but led to retaliatory tariffs on US agricultural products from other countries, causing severe losses to US farmers [10][13][17] 1.2. Reaganomics: Trade Protection and Manufacturing Revitalization - In the 1980s, the US economy was in a "stagflation" quagmire. Reagan's government took a series of trade protection measures to protect relevant industries in the short - term, but failed to reverse the overall trend of manufacturing outflow. The US also implemented tax cuts and deregulation, but the trade deficit increased from $19.4 billion in 1980 to $151.7 billion in 1987 [20][24][36] 2. Can Old Remedies Cure New Ills? —— Challenges and Variations in the Trump Era 2.1. Historical Echo? "Manufacturing Anxiety" Continues for a Century - From McKinley to Trump, the US has faced challenges of declining manufacturing competitiveness and expanding trade deficits, with tariffs and trade restrictions being core policy tools [40] 2.2. Era Variation? Deep Globalization and High Debt - Trump faces more severe challenges. Globalization is more deeply embedded, making trade protection policies more counter - effective. The world is more multi - polar, weakening the effectiveness of unilateral actions. High federal debt compresses the operational space of fiscal policies [42] 3. Is Global Taxation a Poisonous Remedy? —— What Other Cards Does Trump Have in the Future? 3.1. Taxing Externally and Cutting Taxes Internally to Promote Manufacturing Reshoring - Trump's "equivalent tariff" policy has multiple dilemmas. Tariff contributions are limited, and there is a serious shortage of industrial workers. The government may take a combination of strategies such as precise tariff regulation, labor supply supplementation, and technological application promotion [55][57][60] 3.2. Multiple Approaches to Promote Debt Resolution - The Trump government aims to resolve the high - debt problem. There are four main paths: economic growth, debt restructuring, inflation, and debt monetization. However, each path has its own difficulties and potential negative impacts [61][62][66] 4. Historical Cycle or Era Break? —— Possible End - Game of Trump's Policies - Trump may shift to "precise deterrence" in trade policies and has a more complex path for debt resolution. Trade protectionism cannot change the fundamental logic of industrial evolution, and the continuous collapse of the US dollar's credit may be inevitable [69][70]

本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者 重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 根据上海证券交易所《上市公司行业信息披露指引第十八号——化工》的相关要 求，上海紫江企业集团股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）现将 2024 年第四季度主要 经营数据披露如下： 证券代码：600210 证券简称：紫江企业 公告编号：临 2025-010 上海紫江企业集团股份有限公司 2024年第四季度主要经营数据公告 | 主要产品 | 2024 年 1-12 月销售收入（不含税） | | --- | --- | | 饮料包装 | 4,660,031,914.41 | | 纸塑包装 | 2,712,692,613.69 | | 铝塑膜 | 617,908,248.97 | | 房地产开发 | 1,425,545,493.36 | | 其他 | 889,778,918.85 | | 合计 | 10,305,957,189.28 | 二、主要产品和原材料价格变动情况 （一）主要原材料的价格变动情况（不含税） 公司的主要原材料有 PET 切片、PP 料、PVC 热收缩膜、马口铁、进口 PE ...