日本央行一边按兵不动，一边抛售ETF，这场暗藏锋芒的"鹰派突围"，正悄悄搅乱美联储的降息算盘。 2025年9月19日，日本央行在维持利率不变的同时，悄悄放出一个重磅信号——要开始减持手里的ETF。 这一招看似"按兵不动"，实则暗藏"鹰意"，直接影响到了大洋彼岸的美联储，让原本看似顺利的降息进程多了许多不确定。 2025年9月19日，日本央行宣布将基准利率维持在0.5%不变，这是市场普遍预期中的操作。 但紧接着的一则声明却让市场瞬间紧张了起来——日本央行计划每年减持约3300亿日元的ETF（交易型指数基金）和50亿日元的房地 产投资信托基金。 因为，就在日本央行宣布这一决策的前一天（2025年9月18日），美联储刚刚宣布下调联邦基金利率目标区间至4.00%-4.25%，幅度为 25个基点。 当日本央行释放鹰派信号、日元升值后，美元也会被动升值，这对美国可不是什么好消息。 美元升值会削弱美国出口竞争力，影响制造业和就业市场。偏偏当前的美国，正面临就业数据疲软、消费放缓等内部压力。 美联储原本想通过稳步降息来托住经济，现在却可能因为外部汇率压力而不得不更加谨慎。 此外，美联储内部的意见也并不一致。亚特兰大联储主席博 ...

Core Insights - Family offices are experiencing explosive growth in Australia, with at least 2,000 currently operating, representing over 150% growth in the last decade [1] - The entry threshold for establishing a family office is at least 10 million AUD in liquid assets, often significantly more [1] - Ordinary investors can mimic the investment strategies of wealthy individuals through a combination of ETFs and a target annual return of 8% [1][3] Investment Strategy - The primary appeal of family offices lies in their customized asset allocation tailored to each family's unique financial situation, risk tolerance, and spending needs [3] - The long-term goal for family offices is to achieve stable annual returns of 6% to 8% over decades [3] - An 8% annual return is considered the "golden standard" for wealth preservation and transfer, offering more flexibility than merely tracking indices [3] ETF Comparisons - Two ETF providers, Betashares and VanEck, were invited to design asset portfolios targeting an 8% annual return over 30 years, compared to Australia's Future Fund [4] - The asset allocation for VanEck and Betashares includes various categories such as Australian equities, global equities, private equity, and alternatives, with VanEck focusing on a diversified risk premium strategy [4] Risk and Liquidity - Achieving an 8% annual return corresponds to a volatility range of 12%-18%, indicating the necessity for investors to withstand asset fluctuations [5] - Betashares has excluded private assets from its portfolio to mitigate liquidity mismatch risks, opting for more liquid equity products [7] - Both ETF providers suggest allocating 1%-2% of the portfolio to Bitcoin as an alternative asset to enhance diversification and return potential [7] Cost Considerations - Family offices typically charge a management fee of 1%, which translates to 100,000 AUD annually for assets of 10 million AUD, while ETFs have significantly lower annual fees [8] - Family offices provide comprehensive services beyond investment, including legacy planning and family governance, which adds value to their offerings [8] Conclusion - While ETFs may not fully replicate the services of a family office, they can effectively simulate a family office's asset allocation strategy for investors who are clear about their goals, can tolerate volatility, and prioritize long-term returns [9]