"张叔已经64岁了，姜婶都已经65岁了，姜婶还得过脑血栓，老两口开着车，路又那么远。开车捎 着他俩是我主动提出来的，本来是为了他们的安全考虑，可是没想到竟然出了事故……" 王倩进一步审查案卷发现，杨某无犯罪前科，案发后主动拨打救援电话，留在现场等候处理，到案 后如实供述自己的犯罪事实，具有自首情节；其犯罪情节轻微且真诚悔罪、积极赔偿，死者近亲属以及 其他被害人亦对其表示谅解。 "出入相友，守望相助"是我国的传统文化理念。然而，在现实生活中，陌生人之间、亲友邻里之间 的善意互助行为，也可能引发意外甚至是刑事案件。如何在查清事实、明晰责任的基础上，让友善互助 者不因一次过失而被全盘否定？ 山东省临沂市兰山区检察院在办理一起因善意助人引发的交通肇事案时，弘扬了"友善"的社会主义 核心价值观。近日，这起案件入选最高人民检察院发布的第二批检察机关依法履职推动社会主义核心价 值观融入法治建设典型案例。 搭载同村村民发生交通事故 2024年5月31日一早，杨某驾驶二轮电动车从自家出发，前去参加葬礼。行至村口时，杨某遇到了 同路的村民姜某和张某。当时，姜某正驾驶着电动三轮车搭载张某。因为知道姜某曾患脑血栓，开电动 三轮车载人 ...

Group 1 - The case involves a labor dispute where the worker, Chen, suffered an injury and faced difficulties in obtaining compensation after signing a settlement agreement without a proper assessment of her disability level [1][2] - The initial agreement stipulated a one-time compensation of 110,000 yuan, which was significantly lower than the legal standards after her disability was assessed as level nine [2][3] - The prosecutor identified issues in the legal application regarding the fairness of the settlement, emphasizing that the worker was not fully aware of her rights when she signed the agreement [2][3] Group 2 - The case highlights the challenges faced by laborers in securing adequate compensation for work-related injuries, particularly when settlements are reached without proper legal guidance [2][3] - The labor company involved expressed concerns about its financial stability, indicating that forced execution of the settlement could exacerbate its operational difficulties [3] - The resolution of the case through mediation reflects a broader strategy by the prosecutor's office to promote conflict resolution and social stability, aligning with the "Fengqiao Experience" in modern judicial practices [3]

日前，经检察机关监督，不如实报告民事赔偿义务企图蒙混过关获得减刑的罪犯王某，被法院裁定 不予减刑。 查询到民事判决书后，检察官再次认真听了王某入狱以来20余次会见、10余次亲情通话共计600多 分钟的录音。经一一甄别，最终确定王某在会见其近亲属时，同意聘请诉讼代理人代为诉讼，且在2023 年11月会见其妻子时，已被告知判决结果及需要赔偿的数额。 鉴于王某在核查、开庭阶段不如实报告且未履行民事赔偿义务，狱内存在消费较高等情况，检察官 审查后认为，王某的行为违背悔改表现的实质要求，建议法院裁定不予减刑。2025年11月29日，法院裁 定不予减刑。 针对监狱对财产性判项履行核查不到位等问题，2025年11月27日，鹤壁市检察院制发检察建议，建 议监狱提升实质化审查能力，常态化开展民事赔偿义务履行核查工作。同时，针对减刑联动审查财产性 判项执行信息不到位等情况，该院与法院、监狱建立罪犯财产性判项执行信息共享核查机制，实现了罪 犯民事赔偿执行情况动态同步共享。 来源：检察日报 "被害人遭受如此严重的伤害，怎么没主张民事赔偿呢？"检察官对此感到疑惑。于是，检察官先向 狱警询问，得知前期监狱也曾对民事赔偿情况进行核查，但并 ...

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the balance between trading efficiency and personal information protection in the carbon market, emphasizing the need for clear regulations and practices to safeguard individual rights while facilitating carbon trading [1][4]. Group 1: Case Background - A dispute arose when an individual member of a carbon trading center, referred to as Li, received unsolicited contact from multiple companies regarding carbon quota transactions, leading to claims of unauthorized personal information disclosure by the trading platform [1]. - Li alleged that the carbon trading center disclosed his name and phone number without consent, violating his personal information rights, and sought legal redress [1]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The carbon trading center defended its actions by citing legal grounds for information disclosure, arguing that it was necessary for fulfilling contractual obligations related to transaction invoicing [2]. - Both the first and second instance courts ruled in favor of the carbon trading center, determining that the information disclosure was legally justified and did not constitute an infringement of Li's rights [3]. Group 3: Judicial Recommendations - Following the case, the court provided judicial suggestions to the carbon trading center aimed at enhancing the regulatory framework, optimizing platform functions, and improving oversight [4]. - Recommendations included developing a dedicated information disclosure policy, implementing selective disclosure features, and strengthening consent and monitoring mechanisms to mitigate information exposure risks [4]. Group 4: Industry Implications - The case sets a precedent for the reasonable use of personal information in specific trading scenarios, promoting smooth carbon market transactions while encouraging platforms to enhance personal information protection measures [4]. - This outcome serves as a reference for similar disputes in the national carbon market, contributing to the integration of green economic development and personal information rights protection [4].

一楼业主未经二楼业主同意私自搭建玻璃雨棚，产生噪音并影响二楼安全，二楼业主诉至法院要求 拆除。近日，江苏省南通市崇川区人民法院审理了这起相邻损害防免关系纠纷案，认为一楼业主的行为 侵害了二楼业主的相邻安全，应当排除妨害，遂判决一楼业主拆除该玻璃雨棚。 老赵与老李系某小区上下楼邻居，老赵住102室，老李住202室。在老李外出期间，老赵未提前与其 协商便在一楼天井处搭建了不锈钢结构的玻璃雨棚。老李回家发现后，多次要求老赵拆除该玻璃雨棚， 并寻求居委会调解，但均未能劝阻和制止老赵继续搭建。老李遂将老赵诉至法院。 老李认为，下雨天雨水滴落至雨棚会产生噪音，影响休息；雨棚足够支撑成年人攀爬，距二楼阳 台、卧室过近，存在安全隐患。 老赵辩称，雨棚建在自家天井，无需经老李同意。不存在噪音、攀爬等风险。雨棚未被城管部门认 定为违建，老李无权要求拆除。 《中华人民共和国民法典》第二百九十五条规定："不动产权利人挖掘土地、建造建筑物、铺设管 线以及安装设备等，不得危及相邻不动产的安全。"第二百九十六条规定："不动产权利人因用水、排 水、通行、铺设管线等利用相邻不动产的，应当尽量避免对相邻的不动产权利人造成损害。"该两条规 定了不 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a legal case involving a beverage company that faced reputational damage due to false information disseminated by a media company, highlighting the importance of protecting corporate reputation in the age of social media [1][2][3]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The beverage company firmly rejected mediation in a defamation case, asserting that the false news caused severe negative effects on its operations [2]. - The court found that the media company's report contained significant inaccuracies, particularly regarding the claim of a 20% workforce reduction, which contradicted the company's financial data [2][3]. - The media company ultimately agreed to apologize and compensate the beverage company for damages amounting to over 33,000 yuan [3]. Group 2: Corporate Reputation and Media Responsibility - The case underscores the critical role of corporate reputation, with the court emphasizing that media outlets must adhere to principles of truthfulness and objectivity when reporting on businesses [3]. - The incident reflects the broader challenges companies face from unverified information in the digital age, necessitating legal frameworks to protect their reputations [1][4]. - The establishment of the New World International Commercial Court in Shanghai aims to provide legal support and education for businesses regarding reputation disputes [3][4].

Core Viewpoint - The main tower "Ice Lantern Dream" of the 27th Harbin Ice and Snow World has topped out on December 10, entering the final stages of detail polishing and lighting adjustments, set to make a stunning debut [2][4][6][8] Group 1 - The total ice volume used for the main tower "Ice Lantern Dream" is 39,000 cubic meters, making it the tallest and largest single ice structure in this year's Harbin Ice and Snow World [2][4][6][8]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of establishing a payment mechanism for high-quality data as a fundamental requirement for the marketization and valuation of data, which is essential for fostering a robust data market and enhancing the digital economy's growth potential [1][2][4]. Group 1: Importance of Paying for Quality Data - Paying for quality data is essential for recognizing its intrinsic value as a new production factor and is a key measure to overcome current data circulation challenges [1][2]. - The payment mechanism serves as a cost compensation and innovation incentive for data "factorization," ensuring that the value of data is recovered and distributed effectively [2][5]. - The market demand for quality data is rapidly increasing, with over 4,500 data products listed on the Shanghai Data Exchange in 2024, leading to a transaction volume exceeding 4 billion RMB, reflecting a diverse supply and rising value [3][4]. Group 2: Mechanisms and Challenges - The payment mechanism acts as a benchmark for data "valuation," helping to reflect market demand for different types and qualities of data, thus guiding data flow to areas where it can create the most value [4][5]. - There are significant challenges in recognizing the value of quality data, including a lack of stable payment expectations and insufficient capabilities of data circulation service institutions [7][8]. - The establishment of a payment mechanism is crucial for building a fair and efficient data market system, addressing issues like information asymmetry and enhancing transaction efficiency [5][6]. Group 3: Market Awareness and Cultural Shift - Cultivating a market culture that values payment for quality data is necessary for deepening market-oriented reforms and stimulating the internal growth of the digital economy [8][9]. - Government departments are encouraged to take the lead in establishing data transaction-related systems and promoting a consensus on the value of data [8][9]. - Enterprises should recognize the strategic value of paying for quality data as a means to enhance competitiveness and innovation capabilities, viewing it as a critical investment for future growth [9][10]. Group 4: Future Directions - There is a need to accelerate the development of a data factor market and enhance the positive incentives for paying for quality data, which will help eliminate low-quality data and ensure reasonable returns for quality providers [10][11]. - Establishing a unified data quality governance system and developing third-party evaluation and certification mechanisms are essential for improving market trust and reducing risks associated with information asymmetry [10][11]. - Supporting various data transaction models and financial products, such as data asset pledge financing and data insurance, will facilitate the flexible allocation of data across different scenarios [10][11].

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) is taking action against 24 apps and SDKs for violating personal information protection laws, following a joint announcement by several government departments regarding a special campaign for personal information protection in 2025 [1] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The MIIT is conducting governance on apps and SDKs that illegally collect and use personal information, as per the regulations outlined in the Personal Information Protection Law and other related laws [1] - A recent inspection by third-party testing agencies identified 24 apps and SDKs that infringe on user rights [1] - The MIIT has mandated that the identified apps and SDKs must rectify their issues according to relevant regulations, with potential legal actions for non-compliance [1]

Group 1 - The spokesperson of the Taiwan Affairs Office emphasized that the Taiwan issue is purely an internal matter of China and does not allow any foreign interference [1] - The Japanese Prime Minister's comments regarding Taiwan were described as a blatant interference in China's internal affairs, and the spokesperson called for Japan to reflect and retract its erroneous statements [1] - The spokesperson criticized Lai Ching-te for aligning with Japan's erroneous statements, accusing him of losing national stance and engaging in behavior that is deemed disgraceful [1]