2月26日，广州市天河区一套估价4400万元的豪宅，在阿里法拍平台上拍卖，被一买家以5016万元价格拍下。据极目新闻，记者查询到，该 房产持有人为许火健，系恒大集团董事长许家印侄子。 法拍平台公告显示，该房产位于天河区侨鑫·汇悦台小区，建筑面积317.5平方米，评估价4400万元，起拍价也是4400万元，有3人报名参与竞 拍。26日上午，经数十轮竞价，最后该豪宅被一名苏姓买家以5016万元的价格拍下。 该房产由湛江市坡头区人民法院春节前挂拍。根据法院公告，该房产坐落于广州市天河区临江大道421号902房，是第一次拍卖，权属人为许 火健。 据扬子晚报此前报道，该套房产为小区稀缺户型，配有5个洗手间及多套间布局，2025年3月曾以6800万元总价挂牌出售。 豪宅内部 侨鑫·汇悦台小区 该房产此前已被法院查封并且设有抵押。法拍公告提示，因拍卖标的物现状及存在瑕疵等原因不能或者延迟办理过户手续及办理二次过户造 成的费用及风险自行承担，拍卖人不作过户的任何承诺，不承担过户涉及的一切费用。未办理房地产权证的房地产，拍卖人不作可出证的任 每日经济新闻此前报道，上述房产拍卖方湛江市坡头区人民法院曾审理一起涉及雅旭装饰案件，许 ...

2月26日，广州市天河区一套估价4400万元的豪宅，在阿里法拍平台上拍卖，被一买家以5016万元价格拍下。据极目新闻，记者查询到，该房产持有人为 许火健，系恒大集团董事长许家印侄子。 每经编辑｜陈柯名 法拍平台公告显示，该房产位于天河区侨鑫·汇悦台小区，建筑面积317.5平方米，评估价4400万元，起拍价也是4400万元，有3人报名参与竞拍。26日上 午，经数十轮竞价，最后该豪宅被一名苏姓买家以5016万元的价格拍下。 该房产由湛江市坡头区人民法院春节前挂拍。根据法院公告，该房产坐落于广州市天河区临江大道421号902房，是第一次拍卖，权属人为许火健。 据扬子晚报此前报道，该套房产为小区稀缺户型，配有5个洗手间及多套间布局，2025年3月曾以6800万元总价挂牌出售。 豪宅内部 侨鑫·汇悦台小区 该房产此前已被法院查封并且设有抵押。法拍公告提示，因拍卖标的物现状及存在瑕疵等原因不能或者延迟办理过户手续及办理二次过户造成的费用及风 险自行承担，拍卖人不作过户的任何承诺，不承担过户涉及的一切费用。未办理房地产权证的房地产，拍卖人不作可出证的任何承诺。涉及违法、违章部 分，由买受人自行接受行政主管部门依照有关行政法 ...

以下文章来源于销售与管理Plus ，作者子成 销售与管理Plus . 解决销售难题，传播管理智慧，深度关注企业销售、营销、管理的趋势与创新。还提供各专业大咖课程 及精品图书。每天有福利哦，有机会免费领到1本经管类精品图书。 不值得同情。 作者：子成 来源：销售与管理Plus 如今 的许家印 已失去自由 超过 860 天。 这两年，关于许家印的传闻不绝于耳：有人说他被监视居住在大别墅，仍能遥控恒大；有人说 他被刑拘写交代材料；还有传言说他不堪压力自我了断。以上这些传言均无实锤。 直到近日，许家印代理律师在香港法院的发言，才终于撕开了他真实处境的一角。 没有别墅，没有自由，更没有遥控权，有的只是上诉被驳回、资产被接管、连 120 万诉讼费 都拿不出来的狼狈。 这里插播一条课程资讯： 报名 「 黑马·欧洲游学 」， 7天6晚， 我们将带您 回到品牌的"第一现场"， 从 巴黎到米兰 ，直击 LV、欧莱雅、Prada 等顶流品牌的诞生地与核心工厂。 我们还将潜入IFM学院解密奢侈品管理逻辑，在蓝带学院领悟生活方式定义权，更能探访Loro Piana面料实验室，解锁产业链密码。 30席限量抢位， 带你用欧洲思维重构品牌壁 ...

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the debt crisis of Evergrande Group, with founder Xu Jiayin facing legal challenges due to failure to pay a lawsuit fee of 1.2 million HKD, risking his defense rights in court [2][9] - The Hong Kong High Court has ordered Xu Jiayin to pay the lawsuit fee by November 4, 2025, or face restrictions on his ability to defend himself in related legal matters [8][9] - Evergrande's total debt has exceeded 2.6 trillion HKD, significantly impacting the company's operations and financial stability [2] Group 2 - On January 29, 2024, the Hong Kong High Court officially announced the liquidation of Evergrande Group and appointed joint liquidators to safeguard company assets and investigate the causes of debt [4] - The liquidation process has led to scrutiny of Xu Jiayin's personal assets, as he may need to use them to cover part of the company's debts [4] Group 3 - In June 2024, a Mareva injunction was issued against Xu Jiayin, preventing him from disposing of assets valued at up to 7.7 billion USD globally [6] - Xu Jiayin failed to disclose his assets as required by the court, which led to further legal complications [6][11] Group 4 - The court has indicated that Xu Jiayin's refusal to pay the lawsuit fee is seen as a deliberate act of non-compliance, as he has been able to afford high legal fees [11] - The court emphasized that Xu Jiayin has repeatedly disobeyed court orders, which could result in him being held responsible for approximately 43.318 billion RMB [11] Group 5 - The legal troubles extend beyond Xu Jiayin, affecting family members and associates, with asset freezing and enforcement actions taken against them [13] - Xu Jiayin's nephew, Xu Huo Jian, has also faced asset liquidation, with a luxury property auctioned to repay debts [16] Group 6 - The court has maintained a firm stance against attempts to delay asset recovery, indicating that creditors are awaiting repayment and will not tolerate further postponements [13] - Legal avenues for associates attempting to contest the court's decisions have been largely unsuccessful, as seen in the case of Xia Haijun [18]

作者：子成 来源：销售与管理Plus 如今 的许家印 已失去自由 超过 860 天。 这两年，关于许家印的传闻不绝于耳：有人说他被监视居住在大别墅，仍能遥控恒大；有人说他被 刑拘写交代材料；还有传言说他不堪压力自我了断。以上这些传言均无实锤。 直到近日，许家印代理律师在香港法院的发言，才终于撕开了他真实处境的一角。 没有别墅，没有自由，更没有遥控权，有的只是上诉被驳回、资产被接管、连 120 万诉讼费都拿 不出来的狼狈。 01 上诉被驳回， 终局已定 -------------------------- 许家印如今已是泥菩萨过江，却仍不死心挣扎，拼尽全力想保住最后一点资产，可到头来，还是被 法院狠狠打脸，连挣扎的资格都没了。 近日， 香港 高等法院原诉法庭先后驳回了许家印及其相关公司就接管人任命决定提出的上诉许可 申请，并针对许家印未在指定期限内支付诉讼费用一事下达命令，要求其在 2 月 20 日前支付约 120 万港元费用，否则将被禁止在相关诉讼中提出抗辩。 每日经济新闻 窗口》 置顶 26-2-4 11:46 每日经济新闻. #许家印上诉申请被驳回# 【香港高院驳回许家印 针对接管人任命上诉申请,并令其2 ...

Core Insights - The key development in the China Evergrande Group liquidation case is the interest expressed by PAG and Guangdong Tourism Holdings in acquiring a controlling stake of 51.016% in Evergrande Property Group, which would grant them actual control over the company [2][14][19]. Group 1: Acquisition Details - The sale of Evergrande Property's shares began in September 2025, with the liquidation administrators actively seeking buyers for the 51.016% stake [15][17]. - The timeline indicates a sense of urgency from the liquidators, as they aim to finalize the sale process to repay creditors following the court-ordered liquidation on January 29, 2024 [3][18]. Group 2: Financial Overview - As of February 5, 2026, Evergrande Property's market capitalization is approximately HKD 12.216 billion, a decline of over 90% from its peak of HKD 206.471 billion [21]. - Despite the parent company's debt crisis, Evergrande Property reported a revenue of approximately HKD 12.757 billion for 2024, reflecting a year-on-year growth of about 2.2% [26]. Group 3: Potential Buyers - PAG, a prominent private equity firm managing over USD 55 billion, is seen as a leading contender for the acquisition, with a history of investing in distressed assets [22]. - Guangdong Tourism Holdings, a state-owned enterprise with total assets of HKD 14.1 billion and a focus on tourism, is also a potential buyer, which may bring social responsibility considerations into the acquisition [23]. Group 4: Operational Performance - Evergrande Property maintains a relatively independent operational capacity, with a managed area of approximately 579 million square meters, indicating its ability to generate stable cash flow despite challenges [26][27]. - The company has shown growth in its third-party project signings, with over 47 million square meters contracted in 2024, highlighting its market expansion capabilities [26]. Group 5: Valuation Challenges - Evergrande Property faces valuation pressures due to the spillover effects of its parent company's credit risks and governance issues stemming from a significant deposit incident [27]. - The primary post-acquisition focus for PAG or Guangdong Tourism Holdings will be to sever ties with China Evergrande to restore market confidence and enhance operational efficiency through digital transformation and service upgrades [27].

Core Viewpoint - The Hong Kong High Court has rejected Xu Jiayin's appeal regarding the appointment of receivers for his assets and businesses, mandating him to pay approximately HKD 1.2 million in litigation costs by February 20, 2026, or face restrictions on his ability to defend in related lawsuits [1][2][3]. Group 1 - The High Court ruled on September 16, 2025, appointing Edward Simon Middleton and Huang Yongshi as joint receivers for Xu Jiayin's assets and businesses, with the costs to be borne by Xu [2]. - Xu Jiayin's appeal was based on three main arguments, all of which were dismissed by the court as lacking reasonable grounds for dispute [2]. - The court has ordered Xu Jiayin to pay the assessed litigation costs of HKD 1.2 million by November 4, 2025, which he failed to do, leading to further legal consequences [3]. Group 2 - Xu Jiayin's defense claimed he was detained by mainland authorities, limiting his communication and ability to manage his legal affairs [3]. - The court did not accept Xu's defense, stating that he had been represented by legal counsel since October 8, 2024, and could have used undisclosed funds to pay the litigation costs [4]. - The court emphasized that if Xu could pay his legal team, he should also be able to pay the assessed litigation fees, reinforcing the requirement to comply with the court's order [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Hong Kong High Court has rejected Xu Jiayin's appeal regarding the appointment of receivers for his assets and businesses, mandating him to pay approximately HKD 1.2 million in litigation costs by February 20, 2026, or face restrictions on his ability to contest the case [1][2][3]. Group 1: Court Rulings - The High Court appointed Edward Simon Middleton and Huang Yongshi as joint receivers for Xu Jiayin's assets and businesses on September 16, 2025, with the costs to be borne by Xu [2]. - Xu Jiayin's application for appeal permission and a stay of execution was dismissed by the High Court, which found no reasonable grounds for the appeal [2][3]. - The court ruled that Xu Jiayin must pay the assessed litigation costs of HKD 1.2 million by November 4, 2025, but he failed to do so [3]. Group 2: Xu Jiayin's Defense - Xu Jiayin's defense claimed he was detained by mainland authorities, limiting his communication and ability to manage his legal affairs [3]. - His legal team argued that a HKD 20 million retainer held by a previous law firm was intended to cover litigation costs, but they could not confirm its availability due to procedural issues [3][4]. - The court rejected these defenses, stating that Xu Jiayin had been able to pay his legal team from undisclosed funds, implying he could also pay the assessed litigation costs [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Hong Kong High Court has rejected Xu Jiayin's appeal regarding the appointment of receivers for his assets and businesses, mandating him to pay approximately HKD 1.2 million in litigation costs by February 20, 2026, or face restrictions on his ability to defend in related lawsuits [1][4]. Group 1: Court Rulings and Appeals - The High Court appointed Edward Simon Middleton and Huang Yongshi as joint receivers for Xu Jiayin's assets and businesses on September 16, 2025, with the costs to be borne by Xu [2]. - Xu Jiayin filed two motions on October 17, 2025, seeking permission to appeal the court's decision and to stay the execution of the order pending the appeal [2]. - The court found no reasonable grounds for Xu's appeal, dismissing all arguments presented, including claims of misapplication of legal standards and jurisdictional overreach [2][5]. Group 2: Financial Obligations and Defenses - The court ordered Xu Jiayin to pay HKD 1.2 million in litigation costs by November 4, 2025, but he failed to do so, citing his detention by mainland authorities as a reason for the delay [5]. - Xu's defense included claims of having HKD 20 million in a lawyer's retainer with a previous law firm, which he argued should be used to cover the litigation costs [5][6]. - The court rejected Xu's explanations, stating that he had been able to pay his legal team with undisclosed funds, thus he should also be able to pay the assessed litigation costs [6].

Core Viewpoint - The Hong Kong High Court has rejected Xu Jiayin's appeal regarding the appointment of receivers for his assets and businesses, mandating him to pay approximately HKD 1.2 million in litigation costs by February 20, 2026, or face restrictions on his ability to defend in related lawsuits [1][2][3]. Group 1: Court Rulings - The High Court appointed Edward Simon Middleton and Huang Yongshi as joint receivers for Xu Jiayin's assets and businesses on September 16, 2025, with the costs to be borne by Xu [2]. - Xu Jiayin's appeal for a stay of execution and the appeal permission was denied, as the court found no reasonable grounds for his arguments against the appointment of receivers [2][3]. Group 2: Litigation Costs - The court assessed the litigation costs at HKD 1.2 million, which Xu was required to pay by November 4, 2025, but he failed to do so [3]. - Xu's defense claimed he was detained by mainland authorities, limiting his communication and ability to manage his legal affairs [3][4]. Group 3: Court's Response to Defense - The High Court dismissed Xu's defense, stating that he had been represented by legal counsel since October 8, 2024, and could have used undisclosed funds to pay the assessed litigation costs [4]. - The court emphasized that if Xu could pay his legal team, he should also be able to pay the litigation fees as ordered [4].